2014 FA: Building 19 Opened for Bizzness

Status
Not open for further replies.

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
That's a nice move for the Pats right there.  Looks like he could be cut in camp if he doesnt bounce back to save money, but he gets paid in full if he's a starter.
 

Corsi

isn't shy about blowing his wad early
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2010
12,955
Boston, MA
I hadn't seen reports of Costa's visit, but it may give us some idea what they're thinking of doing with Wendell/Connolly.
 

Dr. Gonzo

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2010
5,417
Make a run at Alex Mack. If Cleveland matches so be it but I would love to see the center position solidified. Tackle is obviously fine, pending Vollmer's health, and Cannon can slide to guard. Draft depth.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
45,000
Here
phragle said:
 
What makes you say that?
 
Well, we know they weren't at nearly 24 million in space before Revis signed, but reports had them around 16-17 million yesterday, before the Sopoaga cut, and around 18 after. I also assume that count wouldn't be including anticipated cuts, so if they were including the Sopoaga and Revis moves, but not Wilfork, it should have been closer to 11 million or so.
 
Miguel's numbers look consistent with what's been reported to me. They're actually at around 10.8 million, after factoring in Hooman and Kelly, but Wilfork's anticipated cut put them over 18. The 16.8 wouldn't fit anywhere but before the Sopoaga and Revis moves yesterday.
 
 
Dr. Gonzo said:
Make a run at Alex Mack. If Cleveland matches so be it but I would love to see the center position solidified. Tackle is obviously fine, pending Vollmer's health, and Cannon can slide to guard. Draft depth.
 
I couldbe wrong, but it seems to me that the offensive line positions typically have the highest level of relative success in the draft, especially in the earlier rounds. I'd rather spend the money on pass rush or wide receiver than pay big money to an O lineman, even if it is a need.
 

Phragle

wild card bitches
SoSH Member
Jan 1, 2009
13,154
Carmine's closet
RedOctober3829 said:
Could they be making a play for Alex Mack?
 
I think they'd have to give Cleveland a pick either for his rights or to ensure they don't match the contract. 
 
Ed Hillel said:
Well, we know they weren't at nearly 24 million in space before Revis signed, but reports had them around 16-17 million yesterday, before the Sopoaga cut, and around 18 after. I also assume that count wouldn't be including anticipated cuts, so if they were including the Sopoaga and Revis moves, but not Wilfork, it should have been closer to 11 million or so.
 
Miguel's numbers look consistent with what's been reported to me. They're actually at around 10.8 million, after factoring in Hooman and Kelly, but Wilfork's anticipated cut put them over 18. The 16.8 wouldn't fit anywhere but before the Sopoaga and Revis moves yesterday.
 
My bad. I keep forgetting the Wilfork cut isn't official.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
91,031
Oregon
MikeWellsNFL Mike Wells
As far as Alex Mack goes, the door isn't officially shut w Colts pursuing him, but it drastically reduces it, according to league source
 
 

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,720
phragle said:
 
I think they'd have to give Cleveland a pick either for his rights or to ensure they don't match the contract. 
 
 
My bad. I keep forgetting the Wilfork cut isn't official.
No picks on transitional tags.
 

Phragle

wild card bitches
SoSH Member
Jan 1, 2009
13,154
Carmine's closet
jsinger121 said:
No picks on transitional tags.
 
I know, but Cleveland has the cap space to match any offer. I think the only way to get Mack would be to offer a pick to Cleveland for Mack's rights, or a pick so they decline the option to match the Pats offer. I'm not sure if the second one is an actual thing.
 

Corsi

isn't shy about blowing his wad early
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2010
12,955
Boston, MA
Eric Edholm ‏@Eric_Edholm  14m
Teams reaching out on WR Steve Smith: Ravens, Patriots, Chargers, Redskins, Seahawks. Smith expected to talk to Ravens' Gary Kubiak tonight.
 
 
 

lambeau

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 7, 2010
1,175
Connecticut
So Tracy Porter and D'Angelo Hall signed in washington, but tonight they visit with Walter Thurmond and Brandon Browner? Huh?
Hopefully 27.5 Mill to Jason Hatcher leaves them with less for Browner--but nice pick-up.
 

Corsi

isn't shy about blowing his wad early
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2010
12,955
Boston, MA
lambeau said:
So Tracy Porter and D'Angelo Hall signed in washington, but tonight they visit with Walter Thurmond and Brandon Browner? Huh?
 
They're cornering the market.
 
/rimshot
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,298
lambeau said:
So Tracy Porter and D'Angelo Hall signed in washington, but tonight they visit with Walter Thurmond and Brandon Browner? Huh?
2013 Washington DBs
DeAngelo Hall
Reed Doughty
Brandon Merriweather
Josh Wilson
David Amerson
EJ Biggers
Trenton Robinson
Chase Minnifield
Bacarri Rambo
 
Re-signing Hall and adding Porter doesn't make that a good secondary. They knew going in that if they re-signed Hall they still needed at least 2 more DBs.
 

( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)

T&A
SoSH Member
Feb 9, 2010
5,302
Providence, RI
DaughtersofDougMirabelli said:
 
Vikings are making some decent moves this offseason. 
Not giving into Peterson and bringing in Vick might turn out to be the best move they didn't make. Cassel is no great shakes but can at least keep the seat warm if they find a QB they like in the draft.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Ed Hillel said:
I couldbe wrong, but it seems to me that the offensive line positions typically have the highest level of relative success in the draft, especially in the earlier rounds. I'd rather spend the money on pass rush or wide receiver than pay big money to an O lineman, even if it is a need.
 
This is an interesting thought and I seem to remember a discussion about it (or success at another position(s)) a while ago. 
 
I think that it is certainly more true for first round interior offensive lineman. Super Nomario (IIRC) posted the other day about the hit rate on top 10 LT and how later first rounders were a comparable value. Until very recently, interior OL (guards and centers) were only taken in the first round when they were no-brainer, absolute-lock prospects. 
 
Every time I think about the Pats OL situation I find I have a short thought get rolling and then BOOM - No Dante. So everything we thought we knew about how the Pats did things on the OL is now no longer true. I have no idea if they will change some aspect of the scheme, how much the technical coaching will suffer, whether there is a chance they can still identify and coach up late round or UDFA prospects. It's all a big question mark. Lose Weis, lose McDaniels, lose BOB...there was always Dante to rely on. 
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,038
Mansfield MA
soxfan121 said:
Every time I think about the Pats OL situation I find I have a short thought get rolling and then BOOM - No Dante. So everything we thought we knew about how the Pats did things on the OL is now no longer true. I have no idea if they will change some aspect of the scheme, how much the technical coaching will suffer, whether there is a chance they can still identify and coach up late round or UDFA prospects. It's all a big question mark. Lose Weis, lose McDaniels, lose BOB...there was always Dante to rely on. 
I think the idea the Pats could just identify and coach up late-round or UDFA prospects is overblown. Who are the solid points on the O-line? First-rounders Solder and Mankins and second-rounder Vollmer (and Cannon, who was a 2nd-3rd-round talent who slipped to the 5th because of medical concerns). Who are the question marks? UDFAs Wendell and Connolly. Talent still matters. I'd say they did a great job having the backups prepared to fill in for spot duty, and they rarely whiffed on high picks even when they were coming in raw (as Solder and Vollmer were). How much of that is Dante and how much is Belichick is unknown - and of course, Brady's quick release and ability to dictate protections helps, too.
 
Bottom line: No doubt Dante was terrific, but in general they gave him good talent to work with. If they give Deguglielmo good talent to work with, I think they'll be fine, especially since they still have BB and Brady.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,689
deep inside Guido territory

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,689
deep inside Guido territory

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Time to make a call in the next day or two on Edelman. Vet WR is a need and they'll start to come off the board
 
Status
Not open for further replies.