Allen trade and pick was brutally bad imoBills have had a really nice night
You don’t think the Chargers believe Rivers has 3 more years?Chargers will take Jackson imo
Allen trade and pick was brutally bad imo[/QUOTED]
Depends on how you value Allen. I am a fan
Tough call, maybe he does, but QB you don’t mess with.You don’t think the Chargers believe Rivers has 3 more years?
LandryPats still have a good chance of getting a valuable defensive player at 23.
Landry
Landry
Landry
Sit tight and take RudolphWith that and the return for the Bills second trade up, I feel we're now comfortably in territory where if we don't end up with Lamar, it is because we didn't actually want him. That is a very very reasonable price to jump 9 spots.
No rush. Who is the competition for Lamar at this point? BAL at 22? PIT jumping up from 28?With that and the return for the Bills second trade up, I feel we're now comfortably in territory where if we don't end up with Lamar, it is because we didn't actually want him. That is a very very reasonable price to jump 9 spots.
Cincy.No rush. Who is the competition for Lamar at this point? BAL at 22? PIT jumping up from 28?
What if they trade down but get Earl Thomas?This crowd will melt down if Cowboys trade down.
Seahawks get: Pick 27 (R1), Pick 76 (R3), Pick 186 (R6)Seahawks get 27 and 76, with a 7th rounder going to GB.
Weak return, it seems.
I didn’t say trading down was a bad idea — just that the home crowd will lose its shit if it happens.What if they trade down but get Earl Thomas?
Ravens are in play for him.If the Pats are interested in Jackson, there seems to be a path now as all the teams ahead of us have decent QBs (Stafford, Dalton, Flacco)
I guess it all depends on what Cincy really thinks of Dalton and Baltimore really thinks of Flacco.If the Pats are interested in Jackson, there seems to be a path now as all the teams ahead of us have decent QBs (Stafford, Dalton, Flacco)
Which makes me wonder....Landry still on the board after the lions.