2023-24 Celtics

SteveF

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
2,060
I wouldn't say the looks were great, but I really only saw 4-5 terrible shooting decisions that didn't involve a shot clock situation. The process wasn't great. They didn't really do much to take advantage of Embiid in drop and challenged him a few time they probably would have been better off kicking out.

Horford is looking a bit toasty on offense. Hopefully he can get his stroke back. He has been leaving a lot of his threes short. Embiid wasn't even really guarding him and was able to clog the paint by being that weakside roamer. Celtics were +20 with Horford on the bench, single game plus-minus proviso, but my eye test says he wasn't helping much at spacing the floor. (Part of the fix here might be not sticking Horford in the corner. He's not the kind of 3 point shooter than can't shoot AB3s -- if he's toast he is toast everywhere and not just above the break. It would have been harder for Embiid to roam and rim protect if Horford were in actions/above the break.)

I've never been high on Brown. His flaws drive me nuts. I can't even imagine how hard it is to convince guys who have been successful their entire lives that they should stop trying to do things they are bad at and focus on doing the things they are good at. Jaylen is going to have to figure it out, but I'm not hopeful. The mindset required to even make it to the NBA is probably not a mindset that lends itself to realistic self evaluation.
 
Last edited:

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
14,342
View: https://twitter.com/NElGHT_/status/1722629930704642282


Sadly, every C's fan knew how that sequence was destined to end.
This made me break out in hives.

And it's really just on Jaylen - KP and PP are both making themselves available and are open for an easy pass. There's no reason to try to go 1-3 up the floor. Just ... why?

At this point, it really feels like Jaylen is listening to his critics and try to prove them wrong. That's less than ideal.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
Obv all small samples but JB's 8-13 vs that thing the Wizards call defense skews his overall shooting numbers this year. He's 10-38 aside from that night of shooting in an open gym. I don't like how he fits w Porzingis, I never really liked how he fit w Tatum but he got plenty of rhythm touches when it was only the two of them. He was my biggest concern staring the year and remains so.
I think this is a fair critique and I am interested in the type of player you would want to trade Brown for.

My biggest concern is something that @PedroKsBambino touched on in the game thread last night and that's that this team just doesn't seem to have championship discipline. I don't know if it's more Jaylen or Jayson but it seems like it's both of them. I don't think anyone has ever said "they don't beat themselves" when talking about this core.
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,901
At this point, it really feels like Jaylen is listening to his critics and try to prove them wrong. That's less than ideal.
Who really knows, tbh. He did play one of the all-time terrible games and then got the mega contract so I feel like he's definitely pressing and, IMO, the guy's shot gets wonky under pressure e.g. missing important late-game free throws. Hopefully, it's just a rut. The block on Maxey was great to see, at least. It was interesting that he didn't get the inbound pass when he flashed open on the last play. Lack of trust from Jrue, Embiid's presence, or maybe that wasn't the play call? Maybe a mixture of all those.
 

Jakarta

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2020
244
4. Bench. CJM needs to continue working in Stevens/Brissett, they can help with energy/defense which the C's could have used last night. After watching Jrue somewhat disrupt Embiid, I'm starting to change my thoughts on the 3rd Center approach.
Maybe Stevens/Brissett can provide pesky defense against BIGs in limited minutes? CJM may start experimenting with that.

Wins are better, but growth can come from losses.
I’ve wondered about this in the context of what happens when Al or KP is unavailable. Rather than forcing Kornet to play 20-25 minutes, I think they try to play small ball with Stevens/Brissett and Tatum as the other big. Should work just fine against second unit bigs and maybe even against starting bigs to save a bit of wear and tear on Jrue.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,469
Watching live I actually wanted the backcourt violation when the clock hit 17, anything better than a turnover to fast break the other way which came to fruition.
The violation would occur at :16 and it looks like the officials call this like those in the NFL call delay of game penalties at :00 one one-thousand.
 

Pablo's TB Lover

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 10, 2017
6,023
The violation would occur at :16 and it looks like the officials call this like those in the NFL call delay of game penalties at :00 one one-thousand.
Yup if you are within one stride of halfcourt you are typically clear. Unless you get a "look at me" ref which can happen often...
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,373
The violation would occur at :16 and it looks like the officials call this like those in the NFL call delay of game penalties at :00 one one-thousand.
We've been over this a ton: they don't show decimals, so the clock starts at 24.0, and when it shows 16, that's actually 16.0-16.9. The violation happens as soon as it shows 15, because that means 15.9.

You can verify this by watching the inbounds: the clock starts at 24, but changes to 23 as soon as someone touches the ball, because it's going from 24.0 to 23.9.

Nothing to do with officials giving a buffer: if they called a violation when it showed 16, they would be only giving 7.1 seconds to cross half-court.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,626
Somewhere
Also, the players have the timing of the 8 second rule down pretty pat. It's like a tennis toss or a free throw motion at this point for them.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,469
We've been over this a ton: they don't show decimals, so the clock starts at 24.0, and when it shows 16, that's actually 16.0-16.9. The violation happens as soon as it shows 15, because that means 15.9.

You can verify this by watching the inbounds: the clock starts at 24, but changes to 23 as soon as someone touches the ball, because it's going from 24.0 to 23.9.

Nothing to do with officials giving a buffer: if they called a violation when it showed 16, they would be only giving 7.1 seconds to cross half-court.
Yeah I knew it had to do with the decimal. When I saw 17 I thought the number was 16 but you're correct.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,373
Yeah I knew it had to do with the decimal. When I saw 17 I thought the number was 16 but you're correct.
Yup, this used to throw me a lot as a kid, couldn't figure out why refs were ALWAYS missing the call lol.

I haven't checked NFL clocks, but it might be a similar thing, where they give you the one one thousand because they're not showing the decimal.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,469
I think this is a fair critique and I am interested in the type of player you would want to trade Brown for.

My biggest concern is something that @PedroKsBambino touched on in the game thread last night and that's that this team just doesn't seem to have championship discipline. I don't know if it's more Jaylen or Jayson but it seems like it's both of them. I don't think anyone has ever said "they don't beat themselves" when talking about this core.
I was going to respond but was busy and I haven't put a whole lot of thought into it bc we are so top-heavy loaded and you don't want to move Jaylen for 2nd unit role players...which I really what we need by the deadline. Like if you had asked me over the past two years when I proposed moving Jaylen I would have said packages involving guys like Kristaps or Jrue!
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
I was going to respond but was busy and I haven't put a whole lot of thought into it bc we are so top-heavy loaded and you don't want to move Jaylen for 2nd unit role players...which I really what we need by the deadline. Like if you had asked me over the past two years when I proposed moving Jaylen I would have said packages involving guys like Kristaps or Jrue!
I've looked at it fairly closely and I just don't see a ton of options that make sense.

The 3 names that I've come up with are Mikal Bridges, Brandon Ingram and OG Anunoby. I think the Ingram idea would work but I believe New Orleans wants to cut payroll, not add to it...
 

SteveF

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
2,060
Brown can't be traded until July 26, 2024. Many of you probably already know that, but I thought I'd toss that out there.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,461
Santa Monica
I've looked at it fairly closely and I just don't see a ton of options that make sense.

The 3 names that I've come up with are Mikal Bridges, Brandon Ingram and OG Anunoby. I think the Ingram idea would work but I believe New Orleans wants to cut payroll, not add to it...
Good because Ingram is too soft/injured. OG or Bridges (+filler for a BIG) would be great fits here.

Jaylen, an Alpha Wing, signed for multiple years, would make sense for the Nets/Raptors.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,373
Good because Ingram is too soft/injured. OG or Bridges (+filler for a BIG) would be great fits here.

Jaylen, an Alpha Wing, signed for multiple years, would make sense for the Nets/Raptors.
Problem with OG is that he is an FA this summer, so would have to be a S&T, which probably isn't workable.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,469
Problem with OG is that he is an FA this summer, so would have to be a S&T, which probably isn't workable.
Yeah there just aren't many matches out there for what we need. Maybe to a lottery team for an OG-type, who can seemlessly play a role in our rotation plus a Top-3 pick to plug into the rotation while on his rookie deal? Options are slim.
 

Five Cent Head

64th note
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2007
778
Seattle
We've been over this a ton: they don't show decimals, so the clock starts at 24.0, and when it shows 16, that's actually 16.0-16.9. The violation happens as soon as it shows 15, because that means 15.9.

You can verify this by watching the inbounds: the clock starts at 24, but changes to 23 as soon as someone touches the ball, because it's going from 24.0 to 23.9.

Nothing to do with officials giving a buffer: if they called a violation when it showed 16, they would be only giving 7.1 seconds to cross half-court.
Right. You can also verify it by watching the shot clock when it starts showing tenths of a second: it goes 7 (pause), 6 (pause), 5 (pause), 4.9-4.8-4.7-....
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
Yeah there just aren't many matches out there for what we need. Maybe to a lottery team for an OG-type, who can seemlessly play a role in our rotation plus a Top-3 pick to plug into the rotation while on his rookie deal? Options are slim.
Jalen Williams and some Thunder 1sts? Obviously the Thunder would have to add salary but that's one option. Josh Giddey can't shoot so I don't think he's as good of a target. Same issue with Scottie Barnes.

Maybe Orlando wants to get more established star power and would give up Franz and another piece?

Pains me to even type this but Desmond Bane?

San Antonio has Vassell and Keldon Johnson but I can't imagine they want to give away picks and speed up their timeline that much.

It's seriously really fucking hard to find players that make sense before even getting into what the team is looking for. Because of the roster the Celtics currently have, the player pretty much has to be a forward. It can't be someone too ball dominant because the Celtics have Tatum/White/Holiday....has to be someone who can shoot to keep the spacing. Basically has to be a top 75 player.

Remove OG because of the S&T implications (that also removes Siakam)...

So I believe there are 5 players that fit? Mikal Bridges, Brandon Ingram, Jalen Williams and Franz Wagner. If anyone comes up with anymore, feel free to add it here
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,469
Jalen Williams and some Thunder 1sts? Obviously the Thunder would have to add salary but that's one option. Josh Giddey can't shoot so I don't think he's as good of a target. Same issue with Scottie Barnes.

Maybe Orlando wants to get more established star power and would give up Franz and another piece?

Pains me to even type this but Desmond Bane?

San Antonio has Vassell and Keldon Johnson but I can't imagine they want to give away picks and speed up their timeline that much.

It's seriously really fucking hard to find players that make sense before even getting into what the team is looking for. Because of the roster the Celtics currently have, the player pretty much has to be a forward. It can't be someone too ball dominant because the Celtics have Tatum/White/Holiday....has to be someone who can shoot to keep the spacing. Basically has to be a top 75 player.

Remove OG because of the S&T implications (that also removes Siakam)...

So I believe there are 5 players that fit? Mikal Bridges, Brandon Ingram, Jalen Williams and Franz Wagner. If anyone comes up with anymore, feel free to add it here
Barnes looks to be taking a major leap with his shooting recently. He's hit 4 and 5 threes in two of his last 4 games and made 21-27 FT's during that time. Softer shot, tighter rotation. It's clear he's out the time in working with coaching on this.

I was thinking a tougher defensive minded guy like a prime-Draymond, this years version of Dillon Brooks w/o the desire to score 20ppg, OG.....that's what this team is missing in its core rotation in the frontcourt. It's where Grant is missed the most in being that physical versatile defender who doesn't need shots. We have too many guys who require the ball to be fully engaged with Jaylen being the primary one.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,557
I think this is a fair critique and I am interested in the type of player you would want to trade Brown for.

My biggest concern is something that @PedroKsBambino touched on in the game thread last night and that's that this team just doesn't seem to have championship discipline. I don't know if it's more Jaylen or Jayson but it seems like it's both of them. I don't think anyone has ever said "they don't beat themselves" when talking about this core.
The guy I'd be looking at in a possible future Jaylen trade is Bam.

Would probably need Butler to hit the wall, and Bam to ask out of a great market to go play with Tatum.

But that's the dream target for me.
 

m0ckduck

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,788
So I believe there are 5 players that fit? Mikal Bridges, Brandon Ingram, Jalen Williams and Franz Wagner. If anyone comes up with anymore, feel free to add it here
The guy I'd be looking at in a possible future Jaylen trade is Bam.

Would probably need Butler to hit the wall, and Bam to ask out of a great market to go play with Tatum.

But that's the dream target for me.
Jaren Jackson Jr? I agree with the thinking around Bam, but I can't even visualize him outside of a Heat uniform. JJJ is like the next most similar player, so that's where my head has gone in the past. If Morant totally flames out, I could see the makings of a deal there— Memphis is really short on shot creation at the moment— although there'd have to be a ton of salary coming along with him. Would set us up for a post-Al future, in any case.

Edit: this all sounds very fanboy-ish. I was just trying to address the OP question— who would even make sense on this team, putting aside the viability of acquiring that player.
 
Last edited:

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,373
It was pretty visible too. Was basically the same guys around both Brown and Tatum (PP, Kornet, Hauser), and it all worked way better with Tatum.

I thought PP had a really good game on both ends. The Nets don't have anyone who can shoot over you in the post, and he's very good at staying up into guys on the perimeter.

Kornet is also playing with more and more force now.

Joe doesn't seem particularly afraid to give the PP/Hauser/Kornet group extended minutes this year, regardless of immediate results, which is encouraging.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,860
Melrose, MA
So much of the attention on this team will be focused on Tatum and Brown and Porzingis, while the White/Holiday backcourt is quietly awesome.

Jrue has twice come one play away from a triple double. This year, his usage and scoring are way down from his established levels, but so far he seems to be channeling the effort into defense (so far career high defensive BPM through the early games) and rebounding (career high offensive and defensive rebound rates).

White is, as the thread says, criminally underrated. His efficiency has been off the charts in the early going, in a way that I don't think is sustainable (46% from three among other things), but I don't think the team's success depends on him sustaining that.

I think they are additive. With Jaylen I think you can say that, as talented as he is, there's some inefficiency and redundancy there that isn't helpful. White and Jrue might sacrifice some shots and points but they make the team and each other better.

It was good to see PP shake off his slump. Better shooting and 4 offensive rebounds, a few of which became quality looks for Hauser. After shooting 5-10 from three, Hauser is up to 43% and is third on the team in made threes.

One thing the Celtics are doing differently this year is having their guards crash the offensive glass from the corners, PP seems to be thriving on that. He is 4th on the team in offensive rebounds with 11 through 8 games. His career offensive rebound rate is 3.6% but he is at 7.3% this year. Holiday's career rate is 3.1%, his rate in his 3 years with the Bucks was 3.8%, this year he is at 6.3%. WHite's career rate was 2.1%, his Boston rate is 2.4%, this year he is at 3.5%.
 

Montana Fan

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 18, 2000
8,931
Twin Bridges, Mt.
Not picking on any poster specifically but wouldn’t it make sense to have a “What would you trade Jaylen Brown for next July“ thread that stood on its own and allowed the people interested in reading about the 23-24 Celtics, of which Jaylen Brown is a part of, to engage in this thread?
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,396
Lynn
Barnes is untouchable untouchable.
It was pretty visible too. Was basically the same guys around both Brown and Tatum (PP, Kornet, Hauser), and it all worked way better with Tatum.

I thought PP had a really good game on both ends. The Nets don't have anyone who can shoot over you in the post, and he's very good at staying up into guys on the perimeter.

Kornet is also playing with more and more force now.

Joe doesn't seem particularly afraid to give the PP/Hauser/Kornet group extended minutes this year, regardless of immediate results, which is encouraging.
View: https://twitter.com/SeanGrandePBP/status/1723203782526238755


CTG tells the same story
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,373

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,290
Am I reading that tweet correctly that the Celtics are much better with Brown OFF the court?
Not only that, he would be the worst player on the Celtics (which is of course not true). I think there's probably some weird SSS going on, especially given how the C's have blown out some teams and had a few horrible quarters.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,396
Lynn
Am I reading that tweet correctly that the Celtics are much better with Brown OFF the court?
It’s usually the case, but when he’s out, Tatum is almost always in. So his on/off numbers will always be extreme, especially as he’s not a guy who will raise the play of other guys.

I think we need to stagger Tatum and Holiday, as they are clearly the two best creators on the team.
 
Last edited:

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,105
Am I reading that tweet correctly that the Celtics are much better with Brown OFF the court?
Sure, that's one way to look at these numbers.

Of course, they're even worse with Horford and Hauser on the floor (you need to click the link to get the top of the list).

And according to that, Tatum should just play alone, because they're technically worse with everyone on the floor, except Tatum.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
I’m not sure CJM has done Jaylen many favors with some of his substitution patterns.
I think the idea is to get Jaylen more reps as a ball handler top of the key creator, which makes a lot of sense and I appreciate that it could definitely help in the playoffs.

However, the trade off of that is that these on/off numbers (specifically for this year) are going to paint Jaylen in a pretty bad light.

I appreciate that it’s a data point and everyone is putting out the caveat that it’s a small sample size but I can’t get too worked up about anything that says that Jaylen is literally the 3rd worst player on the team
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
So far, only four guys have had positive on/off’s , so you’ll definitely see it correct somewhat.

And one of those 4 guys is Payton Pritchard who has had some abominable outings. Yeah, I really don’t think this matters at this point in the season
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,396
Lynn
And one of those 4 guys is Payton Pritchard who has had some abominable outings. Yeah, I really don’t think this matters at this point in the season
That’s just because he’s stapled to Tatum, their net with him and Tatum in is +23.3. Pritchard has been mostly horrible lol. Which leads to the next point.

People can’t use on/off as a ranking system. It’s just a part of the equation when analyzing a player.

They’ve had Jaylen doing this for years, and it just doesn’t pay off come playoff time. We have primary creators, use them to do so, and use Jaylen as an attacker. But he is on the record about wanting more on ball reps, which is understandable, and part of team management is keeping your players happy. It’s definitely a factor in why his on/off is so poor for his career though, both regular season and playoffs.

 

Montana Fan

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 18, 2000
8,931
Twin Bridges, Mt.
I think we need to stagger Tatum and Holiday, as they are clearly the two best creators on the team.
This is what really needs to be sorted out. If the starters are going to play the first and last 6 minutes of each half, how best to split up the Top 6 For the remaining 24 minutes.

Maybe JB, Jrue & Porzingis and JT, White & Horford as cores for use with the bench players during the last half of Q1, first half of Q2 and then last half of Q3 and first half of Q4. Sorting out the 3 man unit mixes that work together best seems to be job 1 with job 2 being figuring out which bench players mesh best with each 3 man core.

Using my 3 man cores, JB, Jrue, Porzingis, PP and Brissett could form one unit and JT, White, Horford, Hauser & Kornet/Stevens could form the second unit.

I’m sure Brad’s data guys are working on this as the dataset grows but the sub patterns and which groups play best together is the most interesting question to me during this early season.

Truly a good problem to have when with just a little finagling 3 of the top guys can pretty much be on the floor at almost all times.