2023-24 Celtics

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,879
It's really, really, really hard for me to imagine a ref saying that to a Lakers or Warriors assistant re LeBron or Steph.
Or throwing either of them out for talking too much. LeBron argues calls like that and more once a week… I guess the major difference is LeBron waits til the cameras are off… or at least when other things are going on.. Tatum should’ve waited til the FTs were being shot and then talked to the ref I guess.

But mainly I just think NBA refs suck.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
The NBA made a lot of changes this offseason to get the stars to play more games, but I guess they didn't tell the refs. Giannis, Jokic, Tatum and CP3 have all been ejected for nonsense.
Yeah, I will never understand why the NBA compounds their inherent problems with officiating (basketball is too quick a game to correctly officiate consistently ) by over-empowering their referees. There are far, far too many technicals and way too many players thrown out in the NBA.
I honestly don’t care what Tatum said to the ref as long as he didn’t threaten him. NBA officials should be thankful that they get paid a quarter of a million a year for a 6 month a year job, and if that means hearing some angry objections to their decisions than so be it.
After all, NFL refs seem to be comfortable enough listening to expletive filled complaints from NFL coaches, why would it be so hard to accept the same in the NBA?
Instead, the NBA, in its wisdom, has decided to expand referee power by encouraging their officials to start blowing whistles when players hang on the rim too long. I mean, Jesus, who the fuck cares?
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,839
Melrose, MA
Middleton's stats look poor because he is still working his way back from injury. I have watched the Bucks play and he doesn't look washed to my eyes but maybe he is cooked. Hasn't seemed so of late.

As for their D, they are middle of the pack in terms of team defense but that's the regular season. We all know that playoff defense is a different animal. For me, the answer to the question about whether the 76ers or Bucks worry you more in a playoff series against Boston is Milwaukee.

I am not dismissing Philly because this roster can definitely beat the Celtics in a seven game series. But Milwaukee worries me more because they have ample length/rim protection and two guys who can get buckets when they need them, even against great defense.

Maybe Middleton is totally washed and Boston handles the Bucks D easily in the playoffs but I wouldn't bet on it.
The Celtics went right at him and he looked helpless on defense, so either he is washed or working his way back.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,607
Somewhere
I’d split the baby on Milwaukee. They are still a good team but the east has several that are more dangerous matchups for the Celtics.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,879
Middleton's stats look poor because he is still working his way back from injury. I have watched the Bucks play and he doesn't look washed to my eyes but maybe he is cooked. Hasn't seemed so of late.

As for their D, they are middle of the pack in terms of team defense but that's the regular season. We all know that playoff defense is a different animal. For me, the answer to the question about whether the 76ers or Bucks worry you more in a playoff series against Boston is Milwaukee.

I am not dismissing Philly because this roster can definitely beat the Celtics in a seven game series. But Milwaukee worries me more because they have ample length/rim protection and two guys who can get buckets when they need them, even against great defense.

Maybe Middleton is totally washed and Boston handles the Bucks D easily in the playoffs but I wouldn't bet on it.
With Middleton I looked at two things.. 1. His numbers have been declining generally over the past few years. 2. His age.. he may be working his way back but injuries at that age aren’t easy to come back from..and he’s slowing down regardless.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,400
Middleton is still within his prime age window for a wing. 32 is not old in 2023....our PG is 33 and we can't wait to sign him to an extension. If not for injuries robbing him of his physicals he'd be fine.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,138
Newton
Yeah, I will never understand why the NBA compounds their inherent problems with officiating (basketball is too quick a game to correctly officiate consistently ) by over-empowering their referees. There are far, far too many technicals and way too many players thrown out in the NBA.
I honestly don’t care what Tatum said to the ref as long as he didn’t threaten him. NBA officials should be thankful that they get paid a quarter of a million a year for a 6 month a year job, and if that means hearing some angry objections to their decisions than so be it.
After all, NFL refs seem to be comfortable enough listening to expletive filled complaints from NFL coaches, why would it be so hard to accept the same in the NBA?
Instead, the NBA, in its wisdom, has decided to expand referee power by encouraging their officials to start blowing whistles when players hang on the rim too long. I mean, Jesus, who the fuck cares?
I think, if I had to guess, the league isn’t trying to empower the refs so much as cut down on the complaining, which, like the load management and flopping, they likely believe harms the on-court product. The problem of course is that players carrying on after every possession and shot is so endemic to the NBA now—and unequally enforced—that it is very hard put the toothpaste back into the tube. Compounding matters, the league also didn't really say this was going to be a point of emphasis this season so people are rightfully kind of confused as to what is going on with guys like Porzingis getting teed up seemingly once a game.

It’s tough. I agree that it makes the games less enjoyable as a fan and is out of control. It’s so pervasive that you are seeing this constant complaining in some adult leagues now. But given that the officiating is already a two-tiered system for stars and everyone else, I’m not sure how they actually do this without opening a much bigger can of worms.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,879
I think, if I had to guess, the league isn’t trying to empower the refs so much as cut down on the complaining, which, like the load management and flopping, they likely believe harms the on-court product. The problem of course is that players carrying on after every possession and shot is so endemic to the NBA now—and unequally enforced—that it is very hard put the toothpaste back into the tube. Compounding matters, the league also didn't really say this was going to be a point of emphasis this season so people are rightfully kind of confused as to what is going on with guys like Porzingis getting teed up seemingly once a game.

It’s tough. I agree that it makes the games less enjoyable as a fan and is out of control. It’s so pervasive that you are seeing this constant complaining in some adult leagues now. But given that the officiating is already a two-tiered system for stars and everyone else, I’m not sure how they actually do this without opening a much bigger can of worms.
I think the main problem is that it seems to be enforced differently for each player.. basically by comparing any behavior to how the player normally acts vs what is unacceptable behavior across the board. So players like Draymond are given one set of behaviors that are acceptable vs someone like Tatum or others who are judged entirely differently… at least that’s what I think I’ve read in explanations for the past techs being given. It also seemingly varies with each crew which also doesn’t help.

Re: leagues.. I haven’t played in a while but feels like there’s always been complaining about calls. Pickup games always seemed to have a player or two that would always call a foul and then talk about it all game etc. would be interesting to see if that’s truly changed.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,138
Newton
I think the main problem is that it seems to be enforced differently for each player.. basically by comparing any behavior to how the player normally acts vs what is unacceptable behavior across the board. So players like Draymond are given one set of behaviors that are acceptable vs someone like Tatum or others who are judged entirely differently… at least that’s what I think I’ve read in explanations for the past techs being given. It also seemingly varies with each crew which also doesn’t help.

Re: leagues.. I haven’t played in a while but feels like there’s always been complaining about calls. Pickup games always seemed to have a player or two that would always call a foul and then talk about it all game etc. would be interesting to see if that’s truly changed.
I play a regular pick up game that does not use refs. The honor system works just fine. But when I dropped in to play in a friend’s league that plays on the weekends and uses paid officials, it was appalling. It was as if these guys really wanted to get their moneys worth and rake these referees over the coals. I’m sure that’s one end of the spectrum but I had no doubt these guys were taking some inspiration from what they saw on television.

As for the NBA I’m not sure it’s as nuanced as you describe. Draymond yes, he is officiated differently, but I think that comes down to the fact that he is an important player on the dynasty of the last decade. Is there anyone else who fits that bill? Since Jordan, my sense is that it has been stars versus other players.

And that’s the real issue, which goes way beyond technical fouls and complaining. Does the NBA want to stop having the two tiered officiating system that pretty much creates all these problems? I’m sure they do but how badly? That I’m less sure of. Stern’s legacy there is so entrenched I have a hard time seeing how Silver undoes it.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,422
Santa Monica
I'd go ZERO tolerance and start the T parade, probably not a popular approach but the player whining (in all sports) is out of control (seeps into youth sports & everyday life). If the cost is Tatum for a quarter in Game #18, another few games this season, or KP getting a game of rest down the road so be it. The Celtics will live and the game will be better.

I've been a huge Tatum fan from Day 1, but if ZERO tolerance stopped his arm waving/yelling at refs when he gets stripped then maybe he'd get the hell back on defense & focus on the game. I don't see Horford, Brown, White, Jrue whine every time they get stripped.

ALSO I rarely ever discuss officiating since I think it all evens out at the end (there is no Tatum conspiracy IMO). NBA officiating will continue to improve with camera/AI/technology advancements which are happening daily.

This probably also means Draymond gets tossed every game. GOOD. The dude is screaming for professional help. Can't imagine what it's like around the Green household when internet latency is slow & his podcast isn't working.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,774
With Middleton I looked at two things.. 1. His numbers have been declining generally over the past few years. 2. His age.. he may be working his way back but injuries at that age aren’t easy to come back from..and he’s slowing down regardless.
If you are arguing that he's seen his peak, we agree there. Some people have him as washed - I don't agree. I think that if he is reasonably healthy come playoff time, he will be a problem.

Again, this forum has a long history of prematurely calling "ballgame" for opposing players careers. I've been guilty too but while its true players tend to decline over time, they often can still dial things up for a game or series. I am just not as comfortable writing off Middleton or Milwaukee for the playoffs. They are long and length bothers this Cs team.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,422
Santa Monica
It all depends on how you define washed.

Was Kemba washed his last season in Boston when he was averaging over 19ppg?

Because there were folks who thought he was one of the Celtics' better players that season. POINTZ!
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,279
I think, if I had to guess, the league isn’t trying to empower the refs so much as cut down on the complaining, which, like the load management and flopping, they likely believe harms the on-court product. The problem of course is that players carrying on after every possession and shot is so endemic to the NBA now—and unequally enforced—that it is very hard put the toothpaste back into the tube. Compounding matters, the league also didn't really say this was going to be a point of emphasis this season so people are rightfully kind of confused as to what is going on with guys like Porzingis getting teed up seemingly once a game.

It’s tough. I agree that it makes the games less enjoyable as a fan and is out of control. It’s so pervasive that you are seeing this constant complaining in some adult leagues now. But given that the officiating is already a two-tiered system for stars and everyone else, I’m not sure how they actually do this without opening a much bigger can of worms.
So, I do think think the hand waving, gesticulating, and all that physically demonstrative stuff hurts the product. I’m completely on board with that. The yapping stuff is far less noticeable as a fan and in my view, absent some magic words or threats, I’d let all of that go. It’s also much easier to enforce correctly. Whether someone says a particular word or not is objective, and the players would learn right quick what not to say. That’s one of the things that I find weird about the war on Kristaps is that from a fan perspective it hardly looks like he’s doing anything. He doesn’t look that upset he’s not jumping up and down and going full Lebron, so why the Ts unless he is saying something specific. I don’t really want to see players tossed for talking as they run up the court.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,400
I think the main problem is that it seems to be enforced differently for each player.. basically by comparing any behavior to how the player normally acts vs what is unacceptable behavior across the board. So players like Draymond are given one set of behaviors that are acceptable vs someone like Tatum or others who are judged entirely differently… at least that’s what I think I’ve read in explanations for the past techs being given. It also seemingly varies with each crew which also doesn’t help.

Re: leagues.. I haven’t played in a while but feels like there’s always been complaining about calls. Pickup games always seemed to have a player or two that would always call a foul and then talk about it all game etc. would be interesting to see if that’s truly changed.
I'd say this is true in everyone sport and in society as well. You set your individual behavior standards and people will adapt to them. Not saying it's right or wrong but it just is.

As far as pick-up games and leagues I'd imagine it is today as it was decades ago when I played....and that it depends on location and the players. If your in a Sunday morning pickup game with older guys it will be different than a Monday night prime time pick-up game with a 3-game wait.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,563
around the way
This is true in every single sport. I wouldn't try and make this an NBA only issue.
There's definitely some of that in most sports, but the caste system in the NBA is well beyond that of other sports.

Tatum has games where he's mercilessly hacked without calls. Doesn't happen all that often, but this game was one of them. Any time that happens, he bottles it up and then eventually snaps. And he thinks that he has earned the star treatment, where that nonstop hacking would never have been let go for so long. That crew was shit, and I like physical play.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,759
Saint Paul, MN
There's definitely some of that in most sports, but the caste system in the NBA is well beyond that of other sports.

Tatum has games where he's mercilessly hacked without calls. Doesn't happen all that often, but this game was one of them. Any time that happens, he bottles it up and then eventually snaps. And he thinks that he has earned the star treatment, where that nonstop hacking would never have been let go for so long. That crew was shit, and I like physical play.
Jayson Tatum is 12th in free throw attempts this year. He was 6th last year. 7th the year before that.

He gets plenty of calls. And when he doesn't he whines just like every other player.
 

amlothi

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 5, 2007
812
I'd go ZERO tolerance and start the T parade, probably not a popular approach but the player whining (in all sports) is out of control (seeps into youth sports & everyday life). If the cost is Tatum for a quarter in Game #18, another few games this season, or KP getting a game of rest down the road so be it. The Celtics will live and the game will be better.

I've been a huge Tatum fan from Day 1, but if ZERO tolerance stopped his arm waving/yelling at refs when he gets stripped then maybe he'd get the hell back on defense & focus on the game. I don't see Horford, Brown, White, Jrue whine every time they get stripped.
+1
 

GeorgeCostanza

tiger king
SoSH Member
May 16, 2009
7,286
Go f*ck yourself
As far as pick-up games and leagues I'd imagine it is today as it was decades ago when I played....and that it depends on location and the players. If your in a Sunday morning pickup game with older guys it will be different than a Monday night prime time pick-up game with a 3-game wait.
This is very true. I used to play in a 25+ league and a 40+ league. The 25+ had better competition but my lord the bitching at the refs and at teammates and at opposing players was absurd. Sucked all the fun out of it. Now I just play in the 40+ because everyone’s biggest concern is getting to the bar after the game without any injuries.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,830
This is very true. I used to play in a 25+ league and a 40+ league. The 25+ had better competition but my lord the bitching at the refs and at teammates and at opposing players was absurd. Sucked all the fun out of it. Now I just play in the 40+ because everyone’s biggest concern is getting to the bar after the game without any injuries.
If you thought the 25+ league was bad, you check out a lawyer's league. Players who are trained to argue. Refs should get combat pay in those leagues.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,563
around the way
Jayson Tatum is 12th in free throw attempts this year. He was 6th last year. 7th the year before that.

He gets plenty of calls. And when he doesn't he whines just like every other player.
I'm not saying that he doesn't get calls.

For one, counting a guy's FTA alone doesn't tell us whether they're getting the appropriate number of calls for the contact and advantages that they're creating. Second, it's not a question of whether he's getting the right number or not--when he gets hacked repeatedly for 2.5 quarters and doesn't get a corresponding number of trips, he's pissed. I think that he had a right to be pissed. I just think (perhaps you agree) that he handled it poorly that night, as he sometimes does. To have guys bodying you and hacking your arm while you're playing and then to get an offensive foul call (justified even so) would be infuriating. He needs to get past it though.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,830
Anyone else more worried about meeting Philly than Milwaukee in the postseason?

Philly is noticeably better coached this year (and better coached than Milwaukee), Maxey is an emerging star while Milwaukee's age is finally showing (Middleton, e.g.), and I think the impact of the Lillard addition to the Bucks has been overrated. Plus, Philly made a nice offseason pickup with Oubre, and it doesn't help that Beverley can really dial it up sometimes (like last night when he was auditioning for the Hall of Fame).
The correct answer is PHI - not because of how the teams are presently constituted but because PHI has the assets and contracts to make a big move.

For example, IF LAC were in the middle of the pack and they decided they aren't going to get an extension done with PG or KL, PHI could conceivably grab one of those two.

Among DET, POR, CHI, possibly LAC, UT, and a few other teams, there could some very good players available and PHI could - if they wanted to - get one. BOS could as well but I think they are limited on how much they could improve given how good their Big 6 are.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,483
According to a Timelord post on IG this morning, Tatum was upset that a ref told a Celtics assistant to come get him and said so. Apparently it was not how the ref said it, but the fact that he did, like Tatum was a child instead of a first team All NBA superstar.

Nobody paid to see that ref Friday night, and nobody except maybe his immediate family tuned into that nationally televised game. Ridiculous tech by a power tripping referee.

That said, when a player has a tech, he can’t pick up another one, regardless of the show of disrespect from a referee
curious if those defending the tech yesterday still feel good about it—note also the NBA has confirmed the initial call was crap and reversed the flagrant.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
So, I do think think the hand
I think, if I had to guess, the league isn’t trying to empower the refs so much as cut down on the complaining, which, like the load management and flopping, they likely believe harms the on-court product. The problem of course is that players carrying on after every possession and shot is so endemic to the NBA now—and unequally enforced—that it is very hard put the toothpaste back into the tube. Compounding matters, the league also didn't really say this was going to be a point of emphasis this season so people are rightfully kind of confused as to what is going on with guys like Porzingis getting teed up seemingly once a game.

It’s tough. I agree that it makes the games less enjoyable as a fan and is out of control. It’s so pervasive that you are seeing this constant complaining in some adult leagues now. But given that the officiating is already a two-tiered system for stars and everyone else, I’m not sure how they actually do this without opening a much bigger can of worms.
Maybe I’m in the minority but I honestly don’t get why people get so upset about players complaining to the refs. How does this “take away from the game” so much that it has to be dealt with with technicals and ejections which, quite literally, take away (points and players) from the game?
Honestly, many of the worst examples of complaining lead to natural consequences anyway (as it often leads to players not getting back on defense), so it’s not clear why punishing what amounts to bad play is even necessary. Over-calling technicals stops the flow of the game and can lead to the loss of key players at key moments.
Instead, when players complain the refs should try to restart the action ASAP, making it more likely that that player will be out of position for the next play.
When play has stopped, the ref should walk away while another ref makes sure the fouled player initiates free throw shooting ASAP. The focus of the refs should be on maintaining the flow of the game, something that is clearly better for the viewer regardless but has the secondary benefit of increasing the natural consequences of over-complaining.
To make these natural consequences more impactful, maybe more concrete rules could be initiated to follow all foul calls. For example, for shooting fouls maybe a free throw clock would help (requiring free throw shooting to begin within some amount of seconds from the foul). For non-shooting fouls an inbound clock could limit how much time a team has to initiate the inbound play after the call.
Edit: From this perspective, the current trend that has refs focusing particular attention on how long players hang on the rim is totally maddening. Hanging on the rim too long can naturally lead to players being behind a play defensively, and therefore already results in natural consequences. What is the justification for increased enforcement of this “issue”? To maintain flow of the game? If so, how does stopping game flow through calling a technical accomplish that?
 
Last edited:

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,435
San Francisco
Maybe I’m in the minority but I honestly don’t get why people get so upset about players complaining to the refs. How does this “take away from the game” so much that it has to be dealt with with technicals and ejections which, quite literally, take away (points and players) from the game?
Honestly, many of the worst examples of complaining lead to natural consequences anyway (as it often leads to players not getting back on defense), so it’s not clear why punishing what amounts to bad play is even necessary. Over-calling technicals stops the flow of the game and can lead to the loss of key players at key moments.
Instead, when players complain the refs should try to restart the action ASAP, making it more likely that that player will be out of position for the next play.
When play has stopped, the ref should walk away while another ref makes sure the fouled player initiates free throw shooting ASAP. The focus of the refs should be on maintaining the flow of the game, something that is clearly better for the viewer regardless but has the secondary benefit of increasing the natural consequences of over-complaining.
To make these natural consequences more impactful, maybe more concrete rules could be initiated to follow all foul calls. For example, for shooting fouls maybe a free throw clock would help (requiring free throw shooting to begin within some amount of seconds from the foul). For non-shooting fouls an inbound clock could limit how much time a team has to initiate the inbound play after the call.
Edit: From this perspective, current trend that has refs focusing particular attention on how long players hang on the rim is totally maddening. Hanging on the rim too long can naturally lead to players being behind a play defensively, and therefore already results in natural consequences. What is the justification for increased enforcement of this “issue”? To maintain flow of the game? If so, how does stopping game flow through calling a technical accomplish that?
it takes away from the game because it's annoying and a distraction. at a certain point it's like asking someone why they don't like cilantro. idk man I just get pissed off watching it I dont really need to justify my distaste.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,279
Because I like watching basketball players play basketball and I don’t like watching people complain. I don’t find that behavior entertaining, and basketball is for entertainment. They aren’t curing cancer or anything.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,266
Imaginationland
The act of complaining doesn't bother me too much, but the consequences of said complaining bother me. I don't like when guys on my team complain if it keeps them from getting back on defense (or if it results in a tech), and I don't like it when guys on the other team complain if it ends up influencing future calls.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,400
Maybe I’m in the minority but I honestly don’t get why people get so upset about players complaining to the refs. How does this “take away from the game” so much that it has to be dealt with with technicals and ejections which, quite literally, take away (points and players) from the game?
I'm with you. I understand that working refs for future calls are a part of the games dynamic. The refs understand it which is why they have ongoing dialogue with players throughout the game that rarely results in players crossing the line.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,234
Here
For everyone who has posted the JT on/off numbers over the year, Sean Grande sent this out last night:
In the last 9 games, Jayson Tatum is last on the Celtics in +/-.
+58 with Tatum off the court -17 with Tatum on.
A reversal of every trend in his 7 NBA years. And the Celtics have still won 7 of those 9.

View: https://twitter.com/SeanGrandePBP/status/1730803983654981693
It started right after he got sick. I'm not sure this is what's happened, but there is some garbage virus going around New England that is affecting people for like 3-4 weeks. He's looked noticeably more drained and is leaving a lot of shots short, especially long distance. Speculation, obviously, but worth considering.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,525
It started right after he got sick. I'm not sure this is what's happened, but there is some garbage virus going around New England that is affecting people for like 3-4 weeks. He's looked noticeably more drained and is leaving a lot of shots short, especially long distance. Speculation, obviously, but worth considering.
RSV is rampant. Dangerous for infants and the elderly and presents as a bad cold for everyone else. If he's been suffering they should have given him a few days/games off.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
The act of complaining doesn't bother me too much, but the consequences of said complaining bother me. I don't like when guys on my team complain if it keeps them from getting back on defense (or if it results in a tech), and I don't like it when guys on the other team complain if it ends up influencing future calls.
But that’s why it should be something coaches not just referees manage. Which is why I think the best solution is to change game conditions so that these type of natural consequences are more omnipresent. If you have say, eight seconds (I have no idea what number would actually be appropriate), to get in position to rebound a first free-throw attempt (you could even have non-rebounding players required to be on the bench by that time) there wouldn’t be much time for yapping. An indisputable technical could be called if players weren’t in proper position by the designated time. This would take away most of the subjectivity that makes current technicals so frustrating.
Obviously if players became threatening or physically aggressive they’d still need to be given a tech, but it would make it a lot easier to deal with the persistent yapping that seems far more common (and leads to the more more subjective tech that seems to be given for complaining “too much”).
In such a system, refs would also be encouraged to ignore a lot more, but since players will be more busy getting into position because of the enforcement of time clocks, it should be less of an issue. Yes, it would remain annoying if players continued to complain (for those that are bothered by this) but any technical that would come out of it would be far less subjective, and since there would be far less time to complain it’s unlikely to be as persistent a problem.
Whatever the solution, I think it’s clear that the NBA’s current approach doesn’t seem to be working. Both complaining and technicals for complaining seem to be higher than ever and the NBA’s response appears to be to get even more nitpicky. The league needs to get more creative, not - as their current focus on hanging on the rim suggests- more punitive. It just hasn’t worked and it’s led to the increasing influence of subjective factors on game outcomes while decreasing the flow of the game.
 
Last edited:

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,784
I’m not a baseball expert, and I know this comment could result in a bunch of comments about baseball on this particular site, but if the NBA wanted to end players and coaches complaining to refs, they could implement a “no arguing calls” policy akin to MLB’s “no arguing balls and strikes” policy. Automatic tech on initial complaining, regardless whether it’s demonstrative or polite, and second tech if it doesn’t stop immediately.

Basically, a don’t talk to the refs policy.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,293
Pittsburgh, PA
I’m not a baseball expert, and I know this comment could result in a bunch of comments about baseball on this particular site, but if the NBA wanted to end players and coaches complaining to refs, they could implement a “no arguing calls” policy akin to MLB’s “no arguing balls and strikes” policy. Automatic tech on initial complaining, regardless whether it’s demonstrative or polite, and second tech if it doesn’t stop immediately.

Basically, a don’t talk to the refs policy.
I would be fine with a "don't complain while the ball is in play" policy. Demonstrative "WTF!" arm gestures? T. Bitching while running back up the court? T unless it's really under your breath and you're not staring at 'em. Falling over after taking a jumper and splashing yourself down on the floor because you didn't get a call? T, unless you immediately pick yourself up and keep going (i.e. only a T if you sit there trying to show up the refs)

But players wanna chat. So during dead ball moments, during timeouts (or just after them as we're returning), in the couple seconds before free throws, all of that - go ahead and talk, without making a show of it. I think most players already do this, so it's a matter of saying X is no longer allowed but you can still do Y.

While the ball is in play, you're marring "the product". That's the main reason to put a stop to it. If the ball's not in play, feel free to say what you gotta say, as long as you don't cross the line.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,879
I would be fine with a "don't complain while the ball is in play" policy. Demonstrative "WTF!" arm gestures? T. Bitching while running back up the court? T unless it's really under your breath and you're not staring at 'em. Falling over after taking a jumper and splashing yourself down on the floor because you didn't get a call? T, unless you immediately pick yourself up and keep going (i.e. only a T if you sit there trying to show up the refs)

But players wanna chat. So during dead ball moments, during timeouts (or just after them as we're returning), in the couple seconds before free throws, all of that - go ahead and talk, without making a show of it. I think most players already do this, so it's a matter of saying X is no longer allowed but you can still do Y.

While the ball is in play, you're marring "the product". That's the main reason to put a stop to it. If the ball's not in play, feel free to say what you gotta say, as long as you don't cross the line.
And a thousand random Ts at the discretion of already poor officiating will improve the product? How about instead of focusing on the players we work on the officials and officiating and try to fix the actual problem?

Fans being annoyed by players making any kind of complaint or whining.. this isn’t chess or golf or tennis at Wimbledon where we need to keep some sort of decorum… maybe the fans just need to get over themselves.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,366
Lynn
The reason people always give the SSS warning with on/off is for reasons like the last two weeks with Tatum. The offense has been the same whether he’s been on or off the court, which shows he’s not playing to his capabilities on that end IMO, but it’s almost hard to describe how extreme the other teams shooting variance has been with Tatum on and off the court.

The screenshot below is the teams defense rating from the last ten games, with the players OFF the court. Hell, for the season, opponents shoot 37% from three when Tatum is in, and 29% when he’s out. Which is funny because his individual defensive numbers are really good.

74682
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
And a thousand random Ts at the discretion of already poor officiating will improve the product? How about instead of focusing on the players we work on the officials and officiating and try to fix the actual problem?
The biggest issue for me is that in at least a majority of cases, the complaining player is wrong. (He did commit a foul / was not fouled).
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,293
Pittsburgh, PA
And a thousand random Ts at the discretion of already poor officiating will improve the product? How about instead of focusing on the players we work on the officials and officiating and try to fix the actual problem?

Fans being annoyed by players making any kind of complaint or whining.. this isn’t chess or golf or tennis at Wimbledon where we need to keep some sort of decorum… maybe the fans just need to get over themselves.
Calling fouls on contested drives to the basket - accurately and consistently - is incredibly hard. And it's a necessary, structural part of the game, so we will struggle with it for the rest of time.

Spotting a whiny gesture directed at you, the ref, is not hard. And it's not an essential and necessary part of the game, it's a problem we can solve.

Impose a penalty, make it clear it will continue, explain it to the players before the season starts, and you will stamp out the problem. We've seen it done before, in all leagues. You make it clear that this is the new normal, not some passing fad that will change in a week, you train the referees and then make it part of how they're evaluated, and it will stop. Because it's an unnecessary part of the game.

NFL players don't routinely disrespect the refs, at length. You'll see a WR throw their hands up asking for a flag on occasion... and then hustle back to the huddle because doing more than that can get them in big trouble in a hurry. Are defensive linemen whining for a holding call every play? Is every CB yelling "pick play!" when they think it's an illegal motion? No, they get on with doing their jobs, because with rare exceptions, whining-for-calls isn't part of the sport's culture. And that culture can be changed if it's desired from on top. Much like how we no longer have furious, vein-bulging arguments between baseball managers and umpires.

(and needless to say, these Ts should be assessed at the next stoppage of play, like the flopping calls - they need not interrupt ongoing flow)
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,879
Calling fouls on contested drives to the basket - accurately and consistently - is incredibly hard. And it's a necessary, structural part of the game, so we will struggle with it for the rest of time.

Spotting a whiny gesture directed at you, the ref, is not hard. And it's not an essential and necessary part of the game, it's a problem we can solve.


Impose a penalty, make it clear it will continue, explain it to the players before the season starts, and you will stamp out the problem. We've seen it done before, in all leagues. You make it clear that this is the new normal, not some passing fad that will change in a week, you train the referees and then make it part of how they're evaluated, and it will stop. Because it's an unnecessary part of the game.

NFL players don't routinely disrespect the refs, at length. You'll see a WR throw their hands up asking for a flag on occasion... and then hustle back to the huddle because doing more than that can get them in big trouble in a hurry. Are defensive linemen whining for a holding call every play? Is every CB yelling "pick play!" when they think it's an illegal motion? No, they get on with doing their jobs, because with rare exceptions, whining-for-calls isn't part of the sport's culture. And that culture can be changed if it's desired from on top. Much like how we no longer have furious, vein-bulging arguments between baseball managers and umpires.

(and needless to say, these Ts should be assessed at the next stoppage of play, like the flopping calls - they need not interrupt ongoing flow)
This would be a nightmare for game flow.. a parade of free throws at every stoppage of play.. many times at the other end of the court?

And “Spotting a whiny gesture directed at you, the ref, is not hard. And it's not an essential and necessary part of the game, it's a problem we can solve.”

There’s zero evidence that this is true… nba refs already can’t officiate flipping democratically.. and they also have the same problem already with techs. We’re going to pretend that they’ll be able to spot when a player is being whiny enough or when it’s being directed at them vs a player being frustrated at themselves? They already mess this one up enough.

Edit: nfl vs nba.. how many more fouls are called in an nba game vs nfl? How is a sport where physicality/tackling required really helpful to compare to one that doesn’t.. plus nfl coaches yell at the refs all game long and there are a ton of stoppages in the nfl.. also nfl refs don’t give out techs or have the ability to throw players out for words.. at least I don’t think they do? When was the last time a head coach was thrown out in the nfl for talking? It already happens all the time in the nba.. it doesn’t improve the product.
 
Last edited:

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,293
Pittsburgh, PA
Lars, that sounds identical to an argument of "it's hard so let's not even try". And in this case it's not even hard.

I think they should actually try to call Ts on flopping, as well. They clearly don't. But they also don't have to solve every problem with officiating an NBA game first before trying to tackle something that's interfering with how enjoyable it is to watch a game.

"We’re going to pretend that they’ll be able to spot when a player is being whiny enough or when it’s being directed at them vs a player being frustrated at themselves?"

Yeah, I think we can all recognize the difference between when a player claps his hands together hard and looks down, being frustrated with themselves, and when they give the universal "what the hell?" gesture and look at the nearest ref. There are 10-20 times per game when it happens blatantly, and there's no question whether it's directed at the ref or not. We can cut some slack on the edge cases, as long as it's made well known that for anything clear-cut, it'll be a call at the next stoppage.

Maybe players will develop some under-their-breath way to complain without making eye contact or big gestures or lingering around the backcourt to act shocked and surprised. They'll game the system so they can still complain without being visually obvious about complaining. If so, great. Victory.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,784
I don’t think we can ask referees how to interpret gestures. The best way to get a free flowing game is to not have the players or coaches talk to the referees at all during the game.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,422
Santa Monica
I would be fine with a "don't complain while the ball is in play" policy. Demonstrative "WTF!" arm gestures? T. Bitching while running back up the court? T unless it's really under your breath and you're not staring at 'em. Falling over after taking a jumper and splashing yourself down on the floor because you didn't get a call? T, unless you immediately pick yourself up and keep going (i.e. only a T if you sit there trying to show up the refs)

But players wanna chat. So during dead ball moments, during timeouts (or just after them as we're returning), in the couple seconds before free throws, all of that - go ahead and talk, without making a show of it. I think most players already do this, so it's a matter of saying X is no longer allowed but you can still do Y.

While the ball is in play, you're marring "the product". That's the main reason to put a stop to it. If the ball's not in play, feel free to say what you gotta say, as long as you don't cross the line.
JVG would joke that the Refs should get to use replay every time a player whines about a call or a missed call.

Pretty funny, obviously nobody wants more replay delay but some players instinctively complain whenever they get whistled or don't get the whistle.

Like everything new, I'd try out a ZERO Tolerance Whine policy in the G-League for at least a year before even considering it for the NBA.
 

bgo544

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 25, 2003
877
East Bay
To me the complaining about missed/wrong calls by players should be more of a coaching issue than a refereeing one, in that I don't really care about it unless a Celtics player is failing to get back on D or something because they are too busy complaining. Coach should address that, everything else is irrelevant to me. I want to see fewer technicals called, not more.
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
6,011
Cultural hub of the universe
The reason people always give the SSS warning with on/off is for reasons like the last two weeks with Tatum. The offense has been the same whether he’s been on or off the court, which shows he’s not playing to his capabilities on that end IMO, but it’s almost hard to describe how extreme the other teams shooting variance has been with Tatum on and off the court.

The screenshot below is the teams defense rating from the last ten games, with the players OFF the court. Hell, for the season, opponents shoot 37% from three when Tatum is in, and 29% when he’s out. Which is funny because his individual defensive numbers are really good.

View attachment 74682
If we're just talking the last 10 games I'll say I'm not surprised. His defensive effort has been sub par of late by my eye.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,366
Lynn
If we're just talking the last 10 games I'll say I'm not surprised. His defensive effort has been sub par of late by my eye.
His defense probably hasn’t been good, but one person’s defensive rating being almost 20 points lower than the next closest teammate is absurdly flukey.

Other teams have missed almost every three they’ve taken with Tatum off the court, over that time period. That’s not an exaggeration, either.