Sign and trades are almost impossible under the new CBA, so I don't know if including Rozier would work.I think it's more like they trade Rozier in a S-and-T than trade Smart. Pels need a true PG with Payton due to be a FA.
Sign and trades are almost impossible under the new CBA, so I don't know if including Rozier would work.I think it's more like they trade Rozier in a S-and-T than trade Smart. Pels need a true PG with Payton due to be a FA.
Plus would NO want to start their rebuild with a big contract for Rozier on their books? Is he a player they'd see as a piece for the future?Sign and trades are almost impossible under the new CBA, so I don't know if including Rozier would work.
How does this give NO more leverage? Few teams can join the fray and the public trade request means teams know they will have to deal him at some point. Wouldn’t they have been far better off with this all quiet shopping him as if they didn’t have to make a move?This makes sense. If they can get something done in the next week, great, you give them more leverage. If you can't, it goes to the summer when their leverage is decreased, but at least you gave them the option.
New Orleans' leverage doesn't decrease this summer though since Boston would jump right into the mix and raise the level of offers from every competing team. The worst thing New Orleans could do is to trade AD before the deadline unless a surprise team like Philly jumps into the mix and offers Simmons, which is probably unlikely since they can't risk being left with Embiid and nothing else if Butler/AD leave.This makes sense. If they can get something done in the next week, great, you give them more leverage. If you can't, it goes to the summer when their leverage is decreased, but at least you gave them the option.
I can actually see this being possibly true. He’s giving them a few different bites at the apple. It may be true that this pre-deadline bite isn’t going to be all that great from a competitive standpoint, but it’s better than giving them very little runway to work a deal. And perhaps he cares about NO fans and doesn’t want to be viewed in the same light as Kawhi.
"Just spoke to someone close to Anthony Davis about today's news.
Their thoughts: "It's just time for him to make that move. He always wanted to give everything he had to the organization. He feels like putting the request out now is his way of doing right by them."
I feel like there's a follow-up question that should have been asked.
"Just spoke to someone close to Anthony Davis about today's news.
Their thoughts: "It's just time for him to make that move. He always wanted to give everything he had to the organization. He feels like putting the request out now is his way of doing right by them."
True, but that doesn't stop them from taking the best deal from the Celtics, and Ainge rolling the dice on a one year with AD.Once again, Davis has the most leverage here. If he tells Demps et al that he will only sign with one team, that is his market. It sucks for the Pelicans but that is how the league works.
The single most important piece of information here isn't what the Pelicans want or what other teams can offer. Its whether Davis is open to more than just one destination long term.
He makes a good point, though. The Pelicans would be crazy to trade Davis before they learn how the 2019 draft lottery shakes out.I feel like there's a follow-up question that should have been asked.
This. And right now all we really have is speculation on this front. At some point, the Woj's of the world will find out and report on AD's intentions. If AD gets traded to the Lakers for some pupu platter of mediocre players, then the fix was always in. I bet there is a TON of back channel communicating going on, including guys like Kyrie telling AD to wait until the summer. It's quite possible that AD is a Lakers lean but hasn't completely ruled out teams like the Celtics. He's basically a FA at this point and teams will be making their pitches through players in a totally tampering but impossible to prove kind of way.Once again, Davis has the most leverage here. If he tells Demps et al that he will only sign with one team, that is his market. It sucks for the Pelicans but that is how the league works.
The single most important piece of information here isn't what the Pelicans want or what other teams can offer. Its whether Davis is open to more than just one destination long term.
Nailed it.Once again, Davis has the most leverage here. If he tells Demps et al that he will only sign with one team, that is his market. It sucks for the Pelicans but that is how the league works.
The single most important piece of information here isn't what the Pelicans want or what other teams can offer. Its whether Davis is open to more than just one destination long term.
Indeed but its hard to see Ainge gambling all of his hard work on Davis staying without a commitment. Trading for him and then him bolting could conceivably hamstring the franchise for the rest of Ainge's days running the club. Or it could hasten his exit as well.True, but that doesn't stop them from taking the best deal from the Celtics, and Ainge rolling the dice on a one year with AD.
They aren't "almost impossible". New Orleans qualifies to be on the receiving end of one as they won't be anywhere near the apron. And the amounts of money being discussed are large enough that a Rozier deal would fit comfortably.Sign and trades are almost impossible under the new CBA, so I don't know if including Rozier would work.
I mean there would be other options, for example if the Suns really wanted Rozier then a sign & trade there as part of an AD deal (with Josh Jackson headed to N'awlins) works. Boston has a lot of different options that don't involve Tatum and swamp anything the Lakers have to offer.Plus would NO want to start their rebuild with a big contract for Rozier on their books? Is he a player they'd see as a piece for the future?
Meanwhile, New Orleans is weeping in its jambalaya on both counts.As a side note, its Superbowl week and one of the top trending stories on Twitter is Anthony Davis. Silver should be roasting Goodell in their league commissioner group chat/text.
I mean if they really prefer a collection of roleplayers then there isn't much Boston's going to be able to do.I simply cannot see a Davis deal with Boston that doesn't have Tatum going to New Orleans. Anything is possible but I expect the Pelicans to make that the key ask. And I would expect Ainge to bite assuming that the rest of the package isn't prohibitively costly. I get the Cs have other valuable assets but Tatum is the one Demps and New Orleans are going to insist upon.
and now you fumbled it at the 2yrd line DeJesusI simply cannot see a Davis deal with Boston that doesn't have Tatum going to New Orleans. Anything is possible but I expect the Pelicans to make that the key ask. And I would expect Ainge to bite assuming that the rest of the package isn't prohibitively costly. I get the Cs have other valuable assets but Tatum is the one Demps and New Orleans are going to insist upon.
Agreed if Davis says Cs or bust. However I was contemplating a scenario where its more of a jump ball.and now you fumbled it at the 2yrd line DeJesus
AD has the leverage, as you stated above. AD will want to play with Tatum or have the Celtics retain that asset.
Brown + Draft Picks + TL + Rozier S&T + others should be enough for the Pels if Rich Paul announces that AD will only sign a deal with the Celtics.
Boston just has to have the top offer. If Demps says "We'll take the pupu platter of suck!" call his bluff. And publicly so that the owners understand that their GM is inept.Agreed if Davis says Cs or bust. However I was contemplating a scenario where its more of a jump ball.
There is no way Rich Paul is handing Demps/Pels the power to send AD to whomever they want. Especially if it means taking the very best assets from the team AD wants to win a championship with.Agreed if Davis says Cs or bust. However I was contemplating a scenario where its more of a jump ball.
I don't know anything more than any other random fan. However the scenario I envisioned was AD/Paul informing the Pelicans that they have a list of preferred destinations including Boston, Toronto, LAL, Philly etc. If that is the way this plays out, Tatum most definitely would be on the table.There is no way Rich Paul is handing Demps/Pels the power to send AD to whomever they want. Especially if it means taking the very best assets from the team AD wants to win a championship with.
From AD's perspective, he gave the Pelicans 7 seasons of All-Star hoops at a massive discount.
He's not saying Kyrie will sign there. He said the Knicks would be in a position to sign him or Kemba.https://sports.yahoo.com/sources-lakers-knicks-preparing-make-offers-anthony-davis-201159011.html
Chris Haynes reporting that Boston is not a preferred destination.
He's also saying that AD may be traded to the Knicks and then Durant and Kyrie will sign there this offseason so.
if this somehow comes to pass, we're in basketball hell.He's also saying that AD may be traded to the Knicks and then Durant and Kyrie will sign there this offseason so.
Why would the Knicks trade Porzingis, Knox, and presumably multiple future 1sts for Davis? Moreso, why would the Pelicans take that deal? Porzingis is coming off an ACL and who knows how he comes back off of it. Is he the superstar some may think he is still? 7'3" players with knee injuries don't normally come back better off.https://sports.yahoo.com/sources-lakers-knicks-preparing-make-offers-anthony-davis-201159011.html
Chris Haynes reporting that Boston is not a preferred destination.
He's also saying that AD may be traded to the Knicks and then Durant and Kyrie will sign there this offseason so.
Don't underestimate the possibility that Haynes' sources are playing their own game either.Why would the Knicks trade Porzingis, Knox, and presumably multiple future 1sts for Davis? Moreso, why would the Pelicans take that deal? Porzingis is coming off an ACL and who knows how he comes back off of it. Is he the superstar some may think he is still? 7'3" players with knee injuries don't normally come back better off.
I usually trust Haynes' work, but I can't see the Knicks as a viable trade partner.
Didn't Rich Paul/Maverick Carter come up with "The Decision"? These guys want client control and they enjoy flaunting that power. This is nothing new for agents in the NBA, David Falk use to shrewdly dictate to GMs/owners where his clients would play.I don't know anything more than any other random fan. However the scenario I envisioned was AD/Paul informing the Pelicans that they have a list of preferred destinations including Boston, Toronto, LAL, Philly etc. If that is the way this plays out, Tatum most definitely would be on the table.
All things equal, Davis may want to play with a guy like Tatum but it just may not be viable. If he likes Boston/Kyrie then I could see him being ok with Tatum going the other way. Where Davis holds most of the cards is whether he has one preferred destination or not.
If the Cs can acquire Davis without giving up Tatum, Ainge is even better than we thought. And he is clearly very shrewd.
Whether or not 'Zingis ever makes it back fully, Kevin Knox, an unprotected #1, and future picks is a pretty solid deal. Especially if Porzingis is able to make it back.Why would the Knicks trade Porzingis, Knox, and presumably multiple future 1sts for Davis? Moreso, why would the Pelicans take that deal? Porzingis is coming off an ACL and who knows how he comes back off of it. Is he the superstar some may think he is still? 7'3" players with knee injuries don't normally come back better off.
It does say that the Knicks could sign Durant and Irving, but probably because the writer's assuming that the Pelicans take on some of New York's deadweight deals in the trade. Which I don't see happening at all. If there's a trade it will be Kantner, Knox, Porzingis, and picks. So the Knicks would have room for, at best, one max contract.He's not saying Kyrie will sign there. He said the Knicks would be in a position to sign him or Kemba.
Seeing how Kyrie came out before the season and said he's gonna re-sign in Boston, the fact that there's this "uncertainty" now ALL stems from his phone call. One thinks he'd want to clear that up if that's a misread of things.
It's not better than any package Boston can put together. It really benefits NO to sit on Davis(even sit him out the rest of the year) and pick this up on July 1st so that Boston can get in the mix.Whether or not 'Zingis ever makes it back fully, Kevin Knox, an unprotected #1, and future picks is a pretty solid deal. Especially Porzingis is able to make it back.
It does say that the Knicks could sign Durant and Irving, but probably because the writer's assuming that the Pelicans take on some of New York's deadweight deals in the trade. Which I don't see happening at all. If there's a trade it will be Kantner, Knox, Porzingis, and picks. So the Knicks would have room for, at best, one max contract.
If Durant and Irving wanted to team up in the Big Apple, it's Brooklyn or bust.
I'm not arguing that because I've been explicitly saying it all along. The Pelicans aren't trading Davis until Boston can enter the bidding because their asset cache is far and away the best in the NBA at the moment.It's not better than any package Boston can put together. It really benefits NO to sit on Davis(even sit him out the rest of the year) and pick this up on July 1st so that Boston can get in the mix.
Then they're playing a dangerous game of LAL saying something like the "The offer is X now", but after the season it's "X minus something" and then AD more vehemently saying he will only sign in LA.I hope NO sits on this till summer if for no other reason than to say fuck LA and fuck Lebron.
I don’t think it’s that dangerous. That would be a transparent bluff from the Lakers. And they’d be risking another Kawhi/Toronto situation.Then they're playing a dangerous game of LAL saying something like the "The offer is X now", but after the season it's "X minus something" and then AD more vehemently saying he will only sign in LA.
That's assuming that New Orleans agrees to pay $19 million on the off chance that the New York pick isn't a mid lottery pick once they add Anthony Davis for the stretch run of Tank Battle: 2019!. And I just don't think they pay the cash.Knicks can trade first round pick this year, Zingis, Knox, and Hardaway and go after both Kyrie (or Kemba) and Durant in the offseason.
Huh? They’re at about 92% for home attendance, which puts them at like 21st and decimal point away from being higher. Are the Piston, Clippers and Nets going to cold too? Because they all have lower attendance numbers at home than the Pels. As do like six other teams.Yeah that’s what I meant above Draymond & Klay for AD. AD + Curry + KD.
There is a lot of thought that the pelicans don’t/can’t bottom out because there is a real chance the franchise folds sooner rather then later. No one goes to their games now, they are certainly not gonna go with a bunch of young guys without a star. Getting guys like Klay + Draymond would keep people in their seats. I highly doubt the Warriors would do that to those guys tho.