SidelineCameras said:
Lots of people with pets, kids, or a preference for a quiet neighborhood would welcome a fireworks ban with open arms.
This guy, he gets it.
SidelineCameras said:
Lots of people with pets, kids, or a preference for a quiet neighborhood would welcome a fireworks ban with open arms.
That might be his only option.canderson said:I wish JPP were able to give this thread a thumbs up.
I wouldn't say he's giving them the middle finger but it does sound a bit like a snap decision that will grab some headlines given his contract status.BigSoxFan said:So...what do we make of JPP's people not allowing the Giants to see him? They're just trying to get their fingers on the pulse of the situation...
You can't blame them for taking a hands on approach. And grabbing the bull by the horns. And wanting to give JPP a hand.BigSoxFan said:So...what do we make of JPP's people not allowing the Giants to see him? They're just trying to get their fingers on the pulse of the situation...
This is a huge HIPAA violation. I am shocked that he displayed the actual document in public.nattysez said:That hospital is going to get sued for a lot of money and whoever sent Schefter those pictures is going to lose his/her job.
nattysez said:That hospital is going to get sued for a lot of money and whoever sent Schefter those pictures is going to lose his/her job.
ShaneTrot said:This is a huge HIPAA violation. I am shocked that he displayed the actual document in public.
It's pretty outrageous. The NFLPA should blast them.NortheasternPJ said:
It's on the hospital. ESPN has no obligation to keep that record sealed. (Outside of moral grounds)
What person? How will they figure out who it is based on that picture?NortheasternPJ said:That person's f'd.
djbayko said:What person? How will they figure out who it is based on that picture?
Edit: I do see 3:09pm in the corner. If the software has the ability to audit who accesses specific records at specific times, then yeah.
Yeah, I mentioned the timestamp...didn't study the screenshot very hard. Kind of stupid. I'd bet a carefully trimmed picture wouldn't leave any identifying clues.NortheasternPJ said:
Most likely it's someone who's not supposed to have a need to access the data and they have a timestamp on it. It's pretty clear who it was.
Things like Fair Warning will even correlate if you access someone in your family (that it can detect) or home street address and alert on it. I've got multiple friends in the Healthcare IT community and it's amusing the stories of what happens when someone famous comes in. There's usually multiple people fired even though they're warned constantly that accessing things you don't need to (even if you are authorized access) will result in termination.
djbayko said:Yeah, I mentioned the timestamp...didn't study the screenshot very hard. Kind of stupid. I'd bet a carefully trimmed picture wouldn't leave any identifying clues.
nattysez said:That hospital is going to get sued for a lot of money and whoever sent Schefter those pictures is going to lose his/her job.
BigSoxFan said:So, JPP's stupidity costs him millions but then somebody else's stupidity gets the money right back. Even Steven!
The responsible party will have to give up a finger to him. Will be awkward if he's white.Shelterdog said:
This isn't my area but really? What are the damages in cases like this? It's not like he has a social disease or something--everybody was going to figure out that he was missing a finger sooner or later.
Shelterdog said:
This isn't my area but really? What are the damages in cases like this? It's not like he has a social disease or something--everybody was going to figure out that he was missing a finger sooner or later.
canderson said:That hospital - much less a person - is getting sued to oblivion. Wow.
Based on the rather crude image quality of the OR schedule, it looks like someone just took a quick shot of the monitor with their phone from a short distance, as opposed to actually navigating to JPP's record and saving a screenshot image (i.e. hitting ALT + Print Screen keys). A doctor or nurse could've had JPP's OR schedule up for completely legitimate reasons, and someone without much to lose may have had a brief opportunity to snap a photo while the computer station was left unattended.Papelbon said:They could still go into the system and see who accessed the file without need to.
I'm sure he will be willing to turn over his phone during any investigation.snowmanny said:It's pretty outrageous. The NFLPA should blast them.
Fishercat said:Walgreens recently lost a lawsuit when one of their pharmacists violated HIPAA to release a patient's Rx History with a 1.4m jury decision. The decision to do that was probably more personal and harmful than the JPP release, but JPP was far more public and costly.
He has a right to disclose this information how and when he wants. This is a very clear, almost certainly costly violation of his privacy.Ed Hillel said:
How was it costly? Do you think anyone was going to sign him before finding this information out?
Jnai said:He has a right to disclose this information how and when he wants. This is a very clear, almost certainly costly violation of his privacy.
Whoever was reviewing this information probably wouldn't have seen it in this format. Maybe someone who normally wouldn't see this information now has. This is serious shit.
Ed Hillel said:
Right, it's obviously illegal. I'm just trying to figure out how this instance has been far more "costly" to him than the Walgreen's guy, in terms of civil litigation. He's never getting signed without all of this information being disclosed.
DanoooME said:HIPAA violations typically involve fines not only for the company, but potential fines and jail time for the people that commit the act. The lawsuits would be on top of all of the fines/jail.
Whoever did this is royally fucked. Hard.
Fishercat said:Walgreens recently lost a lawsuit when one of their pharmacists violated HIPAA to release a patient's Rx History with a 1.4m jury decision. The decision to do that was probably more personal and harmful than the JPP release, but JPP was far more public and costly.
Comfortably Lomb said:
Typically? Nope. Breaches occur regularly (try several a week for hospitals or physician groups). Malicious breaches like this one occur far less often. OIG will likely swoop in and make the compliance department's life miserable for a while but the focus will be on the hospital's policies and training. The employee who improperly accessed this information and leaked it is likely already terminated and subject to criminal liability. There is no civil cause of action under HIPAA for JPP against the employee. However, IIRC some states allow civil suits under invasion of privacy or other theories with the HIPAA guidelines as a standard. So don't do something like this if you're a nurse or doctor.
Do you really need an index finger to play DL though?Ed Hillel said:Hey, so Mort was wrong again. When will we see him next? October?
Oil Can Dan said:I'm totally blown away by this turn of events.
BannedbyNYYFans.com said:Sucks for JPP. But if his NFL career is over, he can still pursue his lifelong dream of being a shop teacher.