Jurassic World 3: Where the Dinosaurs have Quad Injuries and Hate Their Shoe Deals

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,408
In most cases, the premise of taking less to send a guy out of the conference/division is absurd. Trading Kawhi means they know they won't win in the next few years anyway, and they are an extremely smart organization. They will just take the best offer.
This isn't most cases though even if it was/is true. Has there ever been a situation where if one team trades their star to a rival that the man some consider the greatest to ever play the game would join him while still in the prime of his career? The Spurs control whether the Lakers become a megateam for the next half decade or remain fighting their way out of the lottery...…..do people honestly believe the Spurs would willingly choose the former? Not a chance in high hell imho.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,408
The Lakers' plan is to sign LeBron/George this year so there would likely be no cap space to sign Kawhi next summer. In order to get their 3 headed monster of a team, they need to trade for Kawhi now.
Exactly. So why would the Spurs ever facilitate such a thing?

Could be an offer contingent on Smart being amenable to the parameters
If we have an offer in which is what has been reported it CAN work with the Spurs handing him a big overpay to close the deal. Complicated for sure and not one that will be done in Day One of FA without Marcus receiving other offers but if the Spurs like Marcus it can happen. The other option is the Spurs to make a huge overpay to Baynes to return to SA on a 3-year deal to make the numbers work. I'm not anywhere I can run the numbers but if someone wants to figure out how much Baynes deal would have to be while including Morris, Rozier, Yabusele, and Nader's contracts have at it.....it's a real option.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,784
Also, what actually is “the best offer” when you “know (you) won’t win in the next few years anyway”? The best players aren’t that unless you’re going to trade them. Sounds like getting a bunch of unprotected draft picks down the road or something would be the best deal.
 

Marbleheader

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2004
11,744
I love that Pop is in charge of this situation. Most other teams would cave. He won't.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,276
Exactly. So why would the Spurs ever facilitate such a thing?
QUOTE]

They'd be getting 2 or 3 cost-controlled players they can build with. Just look at their roster, it's not in great shape. As far as young talent goes, all they have is Dejounte Murray and Lonnie Walker. That's basically it. They always make the playoffs so getting more elite young talent is near impossible for them in the short-term.

End of the day, the Warriors are still around and are in their primes. They're not going anywhere any time soon so I'm not going to worry about wading into great white shark-infested waters if there is also a megalodon lurking.

If the Spurs are able to get LA to give them all their young talent in Ingram/Kuzma/Ball for a disgruntled Kawhi, I take that deal and run. You'd have Aldridge who is still a beast and a bunch of young talented guys in Murray, Walker, Ingram, Kuzma, Ball or whatever you get for Ball if you don't want to keep him. That's a lot of talent that you can build with or trade for more established help. The only negative is helping out a blood rival, which is more of a PR issue, but fans will quickly get over it if they see some exciting talent coming in. Right now, there is a huge void of marketable talent on the Spurs. Duncan is gone. Ginobili and Parker might be gone. Having lived in SA, those guys were huge stars with the fanbase for obvious reasons. Kawhi was supposed to be the heir apparent and that's no longer happening. They need to find the next generation of Spurs stars and trading with LA gives them their best chance of doing so, imo.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,280
This isn't most cases though even if it was/is true. Has there ever been a situation where if one team trades their star to a rival that the man some consider the greatest to ever play the game would join him while still in the prime of his career? The Spurs control whether the Lakers become a megateam for the next half decade or remain fighting their way out of the lottery...…..do people honestly believe the Spurs would willingly choose the former? Not a chance in high hell imho.
That’s a pretty narrow circumstance you’re describing, so I’m not really moved by the fact that it’s never happened exactly as you described. But I can recall the Celtics deciding that a draft pick that turned into Tony Allen was well worth them helping Detroit pick up Rasheed Wallace to win a title. Peter May criticized them heavily for it, which I never understood — if the C’s were not going to win the title anyway, why would they care if Detroit did?
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,408
That’s a pretty narrow circumstance you’re describing, so I’m not really moved by the fact that it’s never happened exactly as you described. But I can recall the Celtics deciding that a draft pick that turned into Tony Allen was well worth them helping Detroit pick up Rasheed Wallace to win a title. Peter May criticized them heavily for it, which I never understood — if the C’s were not going to win the title anyway, why would they care if Detroit did?
Cmon now, are you really comparing Rasheed Wallace with LeBron James? Wallace was a decent piece.....LeBron is well.....

It's easy for us to not care about how the Spurs organization feels......I'm guessing they don't share in that same attitude about working with the Lakers.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,280
Cmon now, are you really comparing Rasheed Wallace with LeBron James? Wallace was a decent piece.....LeBron is well.....

It's easy for us to not care about how the Spurs organization feels......I'm guessing they don't share in that same attitude about working with the Lakers.
The Spurs are trading LeBron to the Lakers?

If they are trading Kawhi, the Spurs almost certainly aren't going to win a title in the next three years, regardless of where he goes or where LeBron goes. Why would they sacrifice the best deal to just to make sure that say, Golden State wins the title and not LA? Why would they care?
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,276
Cmon now, are you really comparing Rasheed Wallace with LeBron James? Wallace was a decent piece.....LeBron is well.....

It's easy for us to not care about how the Spurs organization feels......I'm guessing they don't share in that same attitude about working with the Lakers.
I mean, the Spurs hate, hate, HATE the Lakers but they're a very smart group. End of the day, they need to worry about the long-term health of the franchise and adding 2-3 young talented players helps them greatly in that department. This franchise desperately needs a youth infusion and assets. I don't care if the next 3 years appear dim if the years 4+ are promising. There are always going to be good teams around so might as well do what you can to make sure you're one of them.
 

cheech13

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 5, 2006
1,608
Do the Spurs really think of the Lakers as a blood rival though? I can see the Lakers and Celtics not wanting to deal with each other. Same with the Clippers and Lakers because of the LA issue. But does San Antonio really care? Take the best deal and sort the rest out later. If you're avoiding the best package out of spite you're doing a disservice to your organization. I can't see Pop operating like that.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,573
If the choices are:
  1. Acquire 2 of Ingram/Ball/Kuzma + picks
  2. Acquire some combo of Saric/Covington/Fultz picks
  3. Acquire expiring deals, picks, plus Rozier or Smart
  4. Stare down Kawhi and lose him for nothing
I personally don’t think it is even a choice but ymmv.
 

Big John

New Member
Dec 9, 2016
2,086
Do the Spurs really think of the Lakers as a blood rival though? I can see the Lakers and Celtics not wanting to deal with each other. Same with the Clippers and Lakers because of the LA issue. But does San Antonio really care? Take the best deal and sort the rest out later. If you're avoiding the best package out of spite you're doing a disservice to your organization. I can't see Pop operating like that.
I can't see it either. He's very likely going to LA one way or the other. It occurs to me that maybe the Spurs suspect the Lakers of tampering but can't prove it. That might explain why Buford and Popovich are digging in their heels. Otherwise, I see no reason for it.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,276
Do the Spurs really think of the Lakers as a blood rival though? I can see the Lakers and Celtics not wanting to deal with each other. Same with the Clippers and Lakers because of the LA issue. But does San Antonio really care? Take the best deal and sort the rest out later. If you're avoiding the best package out of spite you're doing a disservice to your organization. I can't see Pop operating like that.
The Spurs absolutely do view the Lakers as a rival. The prime Duncan teams were going up against the prime Kobe/Shaq teams every year. The fans scream “Beat LA” at games. They hate the Lakers more than any other team. Only other teams that were close was Dallas during their heyday and Phoenix.

With all that said, Pop and Buford are rational thinkers. I think they’d absolutely trade with LA if that’s the best package. If the packages are close, then they’ll ship him East.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,310
If the choices are:
  1. Acquire 2 of Ingram/Ball/Kuzma + picks
  2. Acquire some combo of Saric/Covington/Fultz picks
  3. Acquire expiring deals, picks, plus Rozier or Smart
  4. Stare down Kawhi and lose him for nothing
I personally don’t think it is even a choice but ymmv.
1 is clearly the best offer, unless the picks in 1 suck and the Celtics are doing SAC+MEM.

The only good reason I can see for the Spurs to avoid dealing with LA is if they think this will kick off a 5+ year cycle of LA being able to continually attract free agents. I probably still do the deal with the Lakers, but it's a legitimate concern.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,408
The Spurs are trading LeBron to the Lakers?

If they are trading Kawhi, the Spurs almost certainly aren't going to win a title in the next three years, regardless of where he goes or where LeBron goes. Why would they sacrifice the best deal to just to make sure that say, Golden State wins the title and not LA? Why would they care?
Yes, they would be essentially guaranteeing LeBron, and maybe George, join him in LA. If Buford and Pop build a dynasty in LA I'll be the first to admit I was wrong.
 

Swedgin

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2013
702
1 is clearly the best offer, unless the picks in 1 suck and the Celtics are doing SAC+MEM.

The only good reason I can see for the Spurs to avoid dealing with LA is if they think this will kick off a 5+ year cycle of LA being able to continually attract free agents. I probably still do the deal with the Lakers, but it's a legitimate concern.
The picks are key to evaluating these hypothetical deals, including LAL vs. Philly. Lakers 2019 and 2021 would have limited value. The unprotected 2021 Heat pick, Philly now owns is a big chip. Philly own pick in out years also has some upside given 1) Embid's health and 2) the possibility that Kawhi bolts in 2019 free agency.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,280
Yes, they would be essentially guaranteeing LeBron, and maybe George, join him in LA. If Buford and Pop build a dynasty in LA I'll be the first to admit I was wrong.
So they will take a lesser deal, even when their chances of wining a title are near zero either way, just to spite the Lakers?
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,557
That’s a pretty narrow circumstance you’re describing, so I’m not really moved by the fact that it’s never happened exactly as you described. But I can recall the Celtics deciding that a draft pick that turned into Tony Allen was well worth them helping Detroit pick up Rasheed Wallace to win a title. Peter May criticized them heavily for it, which I never understood — if the C’s were not going to win the title anyway, why would they care if Detroit did?
Bill Simmons spent two years kicking Ainge in the balls for this too.

Why would he help a rival JackO? It's un-buh-weeee- va- bull.

So dumb. Take the best deal. You're not beating the Warriors without Kawhi anyway.
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
64,041
Rotten Apple
If the choices are:
  1. Acquire 2 of Ingram/Ball/Kuzma + picks
  2. Acquire some combo of Saric/Covington/Fultz picks
  3. Acquire expiring deals, picks, plus Rozier or Smart
  4. Stare down Kawhi and lose him for nothing
I personally don’t think it is even a choice but ymmv.
Yes and the Spurs are smart which means whatever offer they officially get, they'll call Magic and squeeze another asset him at the last minute. I'd be surprised if KL is not a Laker.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,521
deep inside Guido territory

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,310
Bill Simmons spent two years kicking Ainge in the balls for this too.

Why would he help a rival JackO? It's un-buh-weeee- va- bull.

So dumb. Take the best deal. You're not beating the Warriors without Kawhi anyway.
Ainge also facilitated LeBron's return to Cleveland by taking Zeller and a pick that was then moved for IT, whose presence led to team results that helped in convincing Horford and Hayward to come.

Stopping rivals from winning titles when you're a few years away is generally bad business.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,276
Bulpett says the Celtics and Spurs talked today about Kahwi but they are "miles away" from a deal and that a formal offer was never given. Says they aren't willing to move Tatum or Brown and the Sacramento pick is not on the table until or even if they get to talk to Leonard.

http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/celtics/2018/06/sides_have_contact_but_celtics_remain_far_away_from_landing_kawhi_leonard
Sounds about right. Ainge is going to keep up the dialogue in the event things change.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,521
deep inside Guido territory

Update from this morning’s story. The Lakers re-engaged the Spurs Wednesday in aggressively pursuing Kawhi Leonard. Story w/ @wojespn coming shortly on ESPN. This is the first contact between the teams since the Spurs “shut the door” on them after an initial call.


Multiple teams that have engaged the Spurs on Kawhi have come away with a similar feeling: The Spurs will listen to offers, but are not showing any urgency in making a deal. SA didn’t see the draft as a deadline, they likely won’t see free agency as a deadline, either.
 

ThePrideofShiner

Crests prematurely
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
10,785
Washington
How can they expect more than what the Cavs got for Kyrie when Kyrie was on a two-year deal and hadn't just missed an entire season?

Seems like that's what they are asking for hoping the Lakers blink. Hopefully that means the Celtics stay far away.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,992
Los Angeles, CA
How can they expect more than what the Cavs got for Kyrie when Kyrie was on a two-year deal and hadn't just missed an entire season?

Seems like that's what they are asking for hoping the Lakers blink. Hopefully that means the Celtics stay far away.
They know they have the Lakers on the ropes and they have all the time in the world to field offers. It’s a fantastic situation to be in for a team who just had their superstar player tell them they wanted out.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,276
Tick...tick...tick

Spurs are really going to hold LA’s feet to the fire here. End of the day, you can’t let Lonzo Ball get in the way of a super team if you’re Magic and you know overpaying for Kawhi gets you LeBron and maybe George too.

Kawhi
Mills

For

Lonzo
Ingram
Kuzma
Deng

Works on trade machine. Spurs get a young SF that they need, a young PF that they also need, and another asset in Lonzo that they would probably flip.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,056
St. Louis, MO
Tick...tick...tick

Spurs are really going to hold LA’s feet to the fire here. End of the day, you can’t let Lonzo Ball get in the way of a super team if you’re Magic and you know overpaying for Kawhi gets you LeBron and maybe George too.

Kawhi
Mills

For

Lonzo
Ingram
Kuzma
Deng

Works on trade machine. Spurs get a young SF that they need, a young PF that they also need, and another asset in Lonzo that they would probably flip.
I suspect the Spurs also want Randle in a sign and trade. Pretty sure Wagner would be coming too.
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
How can they expect more than what the Cavs got for Kyrie when Kyrie was on a two-year deal and hadn't just missed an entire season?

Seems like that's what they are asking for hoping the Lakers blink. Hopefully that means the Celtics stay far away.
In addition to the unique leverage that LeBron presents, there's also the fact that Kawhi is probably rightly regarded as a tier higher than Kyrie. Kawhi has two top 3 MVP finishes (and a top 10 finish). Kyrie has never made the top 10.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,295
Pittsburgh, PA
What are the precedents for a top-5 in-his-prime player in the league being traded? Some candidates (numbers are previous year's WS) might be:

30yo Garnett (10.7) --- for --- Gomes (4.2), Green (1.6), Jefferson (6.6), Ratliff (0.1), Telfair (0.5), and two 2009 1sts.

31yo Shaq (9.9) --- for --- Caron Butler (2.1), Lamar Odom (8.4), Brian Grant (4.9), a 1st and a 2nd.

31yo Wilt Chamberlain (20.4) --- for --- Archie Clark (7.9), Darrall Imhoff (4.9), and Jerry Chambers (1.4).

27yo Kareem (12.9*) and Walt Wesley (0.2) --- for --- Junior Bridgeman (just drafted #8), Dave Meyers (just drafted #2), Elmore Smith (4.7) and Brian Winters (1.1).

* this really doesn't represent his value since he missed a bunch of games that year. The 4 years prior, he'd averaged 22 WS.

I'm really not sure that there's all that much precedent for trading a 26yo Kawhi, but I guess the Kareem trade would be the closest.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
What are the precedents for a top-5 in-his-prime player in the league being traded? Some candidates (numbers are previous year's WS) might be:

30yo Garnett (10.7) --- for --- Gomes (4.2), Green (1.6), Jefferson (6.6), Ratliff (0.1), Telfair (0.5), and two 2009 1sts.

31yo Shaq (9.9) --- for --- Caron Butler (2.1), Lamar Odom (8.4), Brian Grant (4.9), a 1st and a 2nd.

31yo Wilt Chamberlain (20.4) --- for --- Archie Clark (7.9), Darrall Imhoff (4.9), and Jerry Chambers (1.4).

27yo Kareem (12.9*) and Walt Wesley (0.2) --- for --- Junior Bridgeman (just drafted #8), Dave Meyers (just drafted #2), Elmore Smith (4.7) and Brian Winters (1.1).

* this really doesn't represent his value since he missed a bunch of games that year. The 4 years prior, he'd averaged 22 WS.

I'm really not sure that there's all that much precedent for trading a 26yo Kawhi, but I guess the Kareem trade would be the closest.
Not to bust balls but Kawhi’s 27th bday is in about 24 hours [emoji6]

I’ll also add - and it’s my biggest concern with any more for him for the Celtics - is the injury concern. I - personally - can’t slap ‘in his prime’ on him when there’s so much unknown about his quad.

End of day, anyone giving up much without getting a commitment to resign is - in my opinion - foolish to trade what it would take for a one year rental. And that’s before considering the injury.

Garnett and Shaq wanted out, but Ainge didn’t do anything until he got Ray and KG committed to it. Shaq saw he writing on the wall that in a him v Kobe battle, he’d lose, as did Buss.

The old men neither you or I are old enough to gauge circumstances very accurately but financials and location (even on a smaller scale than modern) likely played a role, as it seems to be for Kawhi. KAJ obviously went to UCLA and Wilt was from Bel Air.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,608
Somewhere
How can they expect more than what the Cavs got for Kyrie when Kyrie was on a two-year deal and hadn't just missed an entire season?
The Lakers’ situation is more analogous to Brooklyn trading for Garnett and Pierce. The Spurs may be able to secure a similar package. Why not ask? They’re not the ones on a deadline.
 

Imbricus

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 26, 2017
4,879
That Bulpett story is reassuring if true. If Danny hasn't even put the Sacramento pick on the table yet (which is what it sounds like from the "miles away" and "It’s not believed the Celts are willing to move either Jayson Tatum or Jaylen Brown, and whether they’d put the 2019 Sacramento first round pick (protected only if it’s No. 1 overall) on the table likely is dependent on the sides getting serious enough"), that's a real lowball offer. I'm sure he'd throw in Sacramento, if the sides really got talking, but hopefully not Brown. I bet his offer before the trade deadline was a lot better.
 

southshoresoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,249
Canton MA
Is it possible RC Buford and Popp just aren’t enamored with Kuzma and Ball? Ingram, fine you can project him, but it’s possible they look an older rookie gunner and a very flawed offensive player whom they don’t need and has limited trade value and go, meh we’ll ride it out.
 

JCizzle

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2006
20,716
The Lakers’ situation is more analogous to Brooklyn trading for Garnett and Pierce. The Spurs may be able to secure a similar package. Why not ask? They’re not the ones on a deadline.
Yeah, it seems like ESPN is falling all over themselves presenting it like the Spurs have to trade him to LAL. And they have to do it now. It's silly, this is all on San Antonio's schedule until February hits. Maybe they want to see how Fultz looks? Who knows. I'm in HRB's camp that the Spurs will probably deal him to Philly or another team unless the Lakers offer a stupid package like the Nets one + their 3 young players.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,276
Is it possible RC Buford and Popp just aren’t enamored with Kuzma and Ball? Ingram, fine you can project him, but it’s possible they look an older rookie gunner and a very flawed offensive player whom they don’t need and has limited trade value and go, meh we’ll ride it out.
Possible although I’m not sure Ball has limited trade value. Would be interesting to see how much GMs value him. Kuzma isn’t a foundation piece but he’s still a good scorer on essentially a vet minimum deal for the next few years. There’s real value there. Ingram would be the real prize for SA and he plays a position where they don’t have any young talent.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,573
If Lonzo is included as part of a package for Kawhi I’d say that he definitely does not have limited trade value.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,276
In a vacuum, Ball should easily be the Lakers' best asset. Of course he exists in something far from a vacuum.
Agreed. And this could complicate the Kawhi trade with LA. The Spurs know what they have in Ingram and Kuzma and probably have use for both guys. But that's not going to be enough for them to trade Kawhi to LA and take on Deng's contract. Ball adds value but SA doesn't really have a big need for him. The key to all this could be LA finding a 3rd team that would be willing to give up a real asset for Ball that could be shipped over to SA along with Ingram/Kuzma. I see the options here for potential Ball landing spots as Phoenix, Clippers, New York, and maybe Chicago.
 

Soxfan in Fla

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2001
7,187
Is that the right way to look at it though? One could argue that if the Lakers could sign Kawhi as a free agent they should offer less now, not more, since they'd have the inside track a year from now. A capped out team like Boston would pay the premium to get him and his Bird rights on the assumption that they could sell him on the franchise long-term. We saw this exact scenario a year ago with Paul George.
If they sign both LBJ and PG they cannot sign Kawhi in a year. No cap room.
 

ElUno20

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
6,150
This SOB is gonna end up on the Lakers with pg and lebron. Damn it. I thought the spurs wouldn't break. Trading him to Lakers is going to demoralize their fanbase
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,521
deep inside Guido territory

Marc Stein: "This doesn't guarantee Kawhi Leonard is going to the Lakers this week -- since San Antonio could always trade him elsewhere and/or drag things out -- but league sources say of the Spurs: "They're ready" to move on from Kawhi"
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,521
deep inside Guido territory
Wow.....Woj makes it sound like it's Lakers vs. Celtics for Kahwi.


The Spurs are fully engaged in trade talks with several teams on Kawhi Leonard, including the Lakers and Celtics, league sources tell ESPN. Boston has long had the assets that the Spurs most covet in a potential Leonard trade.
 

CreedBratton

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2009
3,753
Wow.....Woj makes it sound like it's Lakers vs. Celtics for Kahwi.


The Spurs are fully engaged in trade talks with several teams on Kawhi Leonard, including the Lakers and Celtics, league sources tell ESPN. Boston has long had the assets that the Spurs most covet in a potential Leonard trade.
Here we go. Love Jaylen but it’s Kawhi Leonard. Let’s do it it Danny.

& I believe after being here for a year & winning a title over Warriors would convince him to stay.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,236
Here
Pop with a smart leak to really put the screws to Magic. He’s going to LA and they are going to give up a king’s ransom.