Stanley Cup Final: Rangers vs. Kings

Who do you want to win the Cup?


  • Total voters
    89

ForceAtHome

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2008
4,011
Maine
Stanley Cup Finals Schedule
GAME DATE TIME (EDT) MATCH UP TELEVISION
Game 1 Wednesday, June 4  8 p.m.  NY Rangers at Los Angeles  NBC, CBC, RDS
Game 2 Saturday, June 7  7 p.m.  NY Rangers at Los Angeles  NBC, CBC, RDS
Game 3 Monday, June 9  8 p.m.  Los Angeles at NY Rangers  NBCSN, CBC, RDS
Game 4 Wednesday, June 11  8 p.m.  Los Angeles at NY Rangers  NBCSN, CBC, RDS
Game 5* Friday, June 13  8 p.m.  NY Rangers at Los Angeles  NBC, CBC, RDS
Game 6* Monday, June 16  8 p.m.  Los Angeles at NY Rangers  NBC, CBC, RDS
Game 7* Wednesday, June 18  8 p.m.  NY Rangers at Los Angeles  NBC, CBC, RDS

 
Edit: Added television network information.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,536
Someone needs to explain why games 3 and 4 are on NBCSN. Shouldn't ALL of these games be on basic cable?
 

Nomar813

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
7,846
They wouldn't want to preempt NBC's glorious Monday and Wednesday prime time lineups, which include... has anyone seen anything on NBC other than sports in the last decade?
 

Stanley Steamer

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 11, 2012
1,439
Rossland, BC
The Western Conference final was the de facto Stanley Cup. This should just be a coronation. (Get it?.....Kings!)
I don't even think the ghost of St. Louis' mom can affect the outcome.
Too bad about our B's. They probably could've given LA a series.
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,161
Tuukka's refugee camp
Nomar813 said:
They wouldn't want to preempt NBC's glorious Monday and Wednesday prime time lineups, which include... has anyone seen anything on NBC other than sports in the last decade?
Considering they lead in the 18-49 demo, yes, yes they have.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,509
deep inside Guido territory
Everybody is underselling the Rangers' chances in this series.  Henrik is playing at an even more elite level that he usually does.  He can steal 1 or even 2 games in this series.  LA is big, strong, and fast but so are the Rangers.  Hagelin, St. Louis, Kreider, Zuccarello all have great speed that will test LA.  The addition of Kreider has greatly improved their offense and Rick Nash has begun to play better around the net in addition to his increased physical presence.  The third line of Brassard, Zuccarello, and Benoit Pouliot has been on fire this postseason having combined for 12 goals. 
 
I am still picking LA in 6 because I think LA is the better overall team but to think that the Kings should just roll over them because the West is better is wrong. 
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
kenneycb said:
Considering they lead in the 18-49 demo, yes, yes they have.
 
In fairness, that's 100% to do with the NFL, the Olympics, and The Voice. It has absolutely nothing to do with their scripted programming in any way whatsoever. So the point kind of stands.
 

McDrew

Set Adrift on Memory Bliss
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,075
Portland, OR
Quick (and much of the team) has been there before, and I think that means they have a slight edge.  I think each team clearly wins 2, but then Quick steals 2 more to Lundqvist's 1.  LA in 7 (Kopitar)
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,254
306, row 14
Even with Quick's troubles, I'll say LA in 5. Hank may steal a game or two, but LA is the better team pretty much across the board.
 

Titoschew

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 28, 2006
3,283
Chip Woolley's Trailer
Quick has been bad, downright awful at times, and if I am LA, that scares me.  I think the grind of things to this point is about even for both.  Series starts to tip in NY's direction with their fourth line contributions and the King.  Oh, and positive vibes from Mrs. St. Louis.  Rangers in 6.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,124
Faceoffs could loom large in the Finals.  NYR are collectively one of the worst faceoff teams compared to the LAK who are one of the best.  Kopitar in particular should feast on the likes of Stepan and Richards who are both sub 50% on draws.  LA is very good at generating offense from the blue line, if they can consistently win offensive zone draws that could be a huge problem for NYR.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
Kings are a pretty big favorite at -170. That seems a bit high but the western team should have been a favorite. The Rangers at +155 are a decent value, especially in hockey, where a couple of lucky bounces could be the difference between winning and losing.
 

TFP

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2007
20,391
I'm not going to lie, this series is giving off big reminders of the Bruins - Canucks in 2011. Highly favorite Western Conference team with a less than rock solid goalie, Eastern conference team with 4 deep lines, adversity experience, and a veteran trying to win a final Cup (Recchi/St. Louis). I could easily see the Rangers going down early and crawling back to a 7 game series win. People are seriously underestimating what they bring to the table.
 
Plus, Alain Vigneault's involved. For better or worse.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,944
That Vancouver team was soft and entitled. LA is neither of those things. I know what you're saying, but I think the situations are only somewhat analogous.
 

PedroSpecialK

Comes at you like a tornado of hair and the NHL sa
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2004
27,169
Cambridge, MA
Agreed Ferm - LA's size and tenacity up front will be a huge factor against a D-corps that, aside from Girardi/McDonagh, doesn't really have the answer. Staal hasn't been the same since his concussion woes, and Diaz/Klein/Strålman aren't exactly stalwarts on the back end.

In particular, on top of Brown/Kopitar/Stoll, King and Pearson will make life miserable for NYR's d-corps. They haven't faced a team with that kind of forechecking aggression yet, and Hank will have to be Herculean (dare I say Thimas-esque) for the Rangers to withstand that kind of pressure.

On the flip side, if the Rags can get a couple of Zuccarello/Hagelin/Kreider on against Matt Greene LA could be exposed, but their center play is so responsible that I can see most of those chances being kept to the wings/corners.

LAK in 6
 

TFP

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2007
20,391
My analogy was a clumsy one (I'm in London and drunk...so sue me), but I just wanted to point out that it's not ridiculous to think the Rangers might give them a go of it here. LAK in 6 is a very reasonable outcome.
 

Dummy Hoy

Angry Pissbum
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2006
8,250
Falmouth
Quick's numbers have not been good, but I think it's going a bit far to say he's been terrible. I realize long time UMass hater Ryan Lambert gets a national platform to shit on Quick (and again- his numbers have not been good), but he's getting the job done against far superior opponents than the Rags have faced. In three rounds quick has faced the numbers 1, 2, and 6 best scoring offenses (by g/g in the regular season) and has been the winning goalie in each series on the road in 7. On the eye test, while he's not been dominating, he's had a few spectacular timely saves that kept his team in games or kept the game from ending. Lundquist is the better goalie no doubt, but I think Quick will be fine.

Kings in 6, another Cup presentation on the road.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,254
306, row 14
I hate agreeing with Lambert, but the Kings are winning in spite of Quick. They've caught fire offensively, which has masked some of Quick's struggles. After averaging 2.42 goals per game in the regular season, they've jumped more than a goal per game in the playoffs to 3.48. Their shooting percentage has spiked to 11.3% in the playoffs, from 7.6% in the regular season. All 3 teams the Kings have faced have been below average in net, so Quick hasn't had to do much stealing. 
 

Dummy Hoy

Angry Pissbum
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2006
8,250
Falmouth
I think you're missing my point (or more likely I'm doing a shitty job of making it).
 
While Quick's numbers are not good, he's been victimized by top notch offensive teams while his team seems to be more concerned with offense (and thus selling him out?)- his whole team has sucked at defense at times. Can't blame just him for the first three games of the Sharks series, and he followed those by allowing 2 goals in final 3 games. Plus, I will note again that he has been very good at certain times, especially ones that seem momentous. Following that dogshit weird hopper to Sharp, he stops 33 of next 34 to win in OT. The one timer on Seabrook (?) in game 2 that kept it 2-0 when they later came back was huge. Stopping the Getzlaf PK early in game 7?
 
While he hasn't been nearly as good as LA would hope, there's a lot going on beyond the numbers. He'll be ok.
 

ForceAtHome

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2008
4,011
Maine
With the series set to kick off in under two hours, here's how the voting breaks down through 67 votes:

Who do you want to win the Cup?
-42 people (62.7%) want the Kings
-17 people (25.4%) want the Rangers.
-8 people (11.9%) have no preference.

Who will win the series and in how many games?
-53 people (79.1%) think the Kings will win. One person thinks it'll be a sweep, and six think it will go the distance, but the majority (46 vote) think the Kings will win in 5 or 6 games.
-14 people (20.9%) think the Rangers will win, all in either 6 or 7 games.

Who will win the Conn Smythe?
-The leader is Jonathan Quick with 15 votes (22.4%), though it's hardly a runaway.
-Henrik Lundqvist is the only Ranger to receive any Conn Smythe votes. Lundqvist had 14 people (20.9%) vote for him, which lines up perfectly with the 14 people who predict the Rangers to win the series.
-Marian Gaborik is tied with Lundqvist at 14 votes (20.9%).
-Anze Kopitar received 11 votes (16.4%), with Drew Doughty (9 votes, 13.4%) as the only other player to receive more than 2 votes.
-Jeff Carter received 2 votes, Justin Williams 1 vote, and one brave soul voted for an unlisted/other LA Kings player to win it.
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
64,041
Rotten Apple
Nice open. Is Kenny Albert really on the call? No Doc?
 
EDIT: Oh, he's filling in as Doc has a death in the family. Too bad he's not as tough as Simmons.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
ifmanis5 said:
Nice open. Is Kenny Albert really on the call? No Doc?
 
EDIT: Oh, he's filling in as Doc has a death in the family. Too bad he's not as tough as Simmons.
 
Some people are pros. Some are not. Simmons is a pro.
 

Jack Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 27, 2005
3,375
Pouliot - always so enticing. That burst is something special, too bad it's always just flashes with that player.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,254
306, row 14
The Kings are quickly going to find out that playing catch-up against Lundqvist is a lot harder than playing catch-up against Corey Crawford/Fredrik Andersen/John Gibson/Anti Niemi/Alex Stalock. 
 

TSC

SoSH's Doug Neidermeyer
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2007
12,339
Between here and everywhere.
cshea said:
The Kings are quickly going to find out that playing catch-up against Lundqvist is a lot harder than playing catch-up against Corey Crawford/Fredrik Andersen/John Gibson/Anti Niemi/Alex Stalock. 
 
That's one way to do it..
 

SidelineCameras

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2011
1,813
Long Island buddy posted "great start Rangers!" on Facebook about 12 seconds before the Kings goal.

Important lesson: Facebook is not a Gamerthread.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
Rangers had a lot of chances that period. Up 2-1 was probably the worst case.(although their 2nd goal was lucky) Still a great period.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
locknload said:
Anyone else audio choppy?  Driving me nuts but can't tell if its me or the feed.
 
Its the feed. It is utterly horrendous. First off, I have to jack up my volume way ahead of normal levels. Second, the crowd can't be heard and the announcers voice's are low, but you can clearly hear every single time someone pounds the boards from the stands. It's really bad.