This is now: BB and the direction of the Patriots

Status
Not open for further replies.

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,920
The Jets would probably be better but Rodgers behind the oline could have been in trouble with a different injury. I should write a post about the oline but no one would care. Today was the best group they have had since the Denver game. Saleh getting bullied out of playing Zach or whatever happened is so dumb. Zach probably wins today’s game.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,416
I get it the Patriots offense is terrible, one of the worst in the league. But people seem to want it to be uniquely bad as evidence of some fatal flaw rather than... not enough talent, and the talent that is there has underperformed....
But it is uniquely bad. If they had an injury at QB and sucked, that’s understandable. If they were playing a lot of rookies, that’s understandable. Those are the two big reasons why teams usually suck so bad on offense. To have your plan A go this bad - something entirely expected by a number of people on this board - typically only happens when it’s 2022 Broncos level dysfunction.
 

Garshaparra

New Member
Feb 27, 2008
545
McCarver's Mushy Mouth
Also, if this team would be super fantastic with just an average QB, why didn’t the team just acquire one?
This is what's killing us all. The '22 offense was really bad, but there were so many problems, it was unclear where to focus. They did make quite a few changes, but apart from getting Bourne out of the doghouse and drafting Pop, everything else backfired or only helped marginally (I count Zeke as a marginal win - he's done ok as a backup).

This all comes down to BB. He's bought the groceries and hired the chefs. The last 4 seasons, he's served:
- expired meatloaf (the Cam Newton season)
- fried dough and melted ice cream (Mac season 1)
- uncooked chicken tenders (Mac season 2)
- dogshit souffle (and it didn't even rise).

He cannot be trusted to continue to be the GM, choose the starters and direct the offensive game plan. Can we keep his defensive brilliance and replace him as GM? I don't think he'll go for it, and thus, he's gotta go.
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
I get it the Patriots offense is terrible, one of the worst in the league. But people seem to want it to be uniquely bad as evidence of some fatal flaw rather than... not enough talent, and the talent that is there has underperformed.... but that's the real answer. The Patriots offense is bad because it's not that talented, and the one area with some talent (O-line) spent a bunch of time injured and underperforming, add in that the 2 best performing WRs are now hurt (and the #1 RB) and it's a disaster. That's how bad offenses work, same for all the teams on your list... guys played poorly, they lack talent at key spots, and guys get hurt.
I'm pretty sure that most everyone thinks the Pats offense suffers from a lack of talent.

If anyone wants to use Douglas getting hurt for anything, go eff right off.

The simplest explanation as to why we are here is this:

If you compared the offensive rosters of the AFCE teams at the outset of the season and realized Mac was passing to the worst of that group, you would be concerned about the outcome of the season. Vegas agreed and gave them an O/U of 6.5. Even the sharps didn't know Mac would be this bad, but a shit season was easy to foresee.

The one-score record is both a testament to BB's defense and a joke to his effort on the other side of the ball. BB owns every point that didn't get scored.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,050
But it is uniquely bad. If they had an injury at QB and sucked, that’s understandable. If they were playing a lot of rookies, that’s understandable. Those are the two big reasons why teams usually suck so bad on offense. To have your plan A go this bad - something entirely expected by a number of people on this board - typically only happens when it’s 2022 Broncos level dysfunction.
I mean... you listed multiple teams that suck (Giants, STeelers, Raiders... you actually forgot the Titans) who are or were similarly terrible on offense with their plan A. If multiple teams in a year do a thing it is definitionally not unique. I also think only talking about QB injuries undervalues what is often the big reason a plan A goes sideways... line injuries. And the Patriots line was decimated early, bad lines hurt your QB play, and often lead to QB injuries.

Listen the Patriots offense is terrible, there is no denying that. I just think it's important to look at why it is terrible and how that fits into how other teams are similarly terrible this and in past years, and how they fix it. Reaching for how "no this offense isn't like other teams" for some undefined point is without value, because it means we have left a reality based evaluation of the problem and entered the "I FEEL like it is different and therefore..." realm.
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
I mean... you listed multiple teams that suck (Giants, STeelers, Raiders... you actually forgot the Titans) who are or were similarly terrible on offense with their plan A. If multiple teams in a year do a thing it is definitionally not unique. I also think only talking about QB injuries undervalues what is often the big reason a plan A goes sideways... line injuries. And the Patriots line was decimated early, bad lines hurt your QB play, and often lead to QB injuries.

Listen the Patriots offense is terrible, there is no denying that. I just think it's important to look at why it is terrible and how that fits into how other teams are similarly terrible this and in past years, and how they fix it. Reaching for how "no this offense isn't like other teams" for some undefined point is without value, because it means we have left a reality based evaluation of the problem and entered the "I FEEL like it is different and therefore..." realm.
All of those teams score points. The Patriots do not score points. Like, zero. So yes, this offense is not, in fact, like other teams. They are uniquely terrible.

I really don't need a reality based evaluation that the Patrots cannot, in fact, score a single point in an NFL game.

I mean, they don't have people who can either throw or catch footballs. It's really that friggin' simple. What the hell are we debating here?
 
Last edited:

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,119
And I've literally given you the quotes back with him saying Zappe also sucks.

But you want to believe he thinks Mac, and only Mac, sucks.

I don't get it. I mean, it would be like if someone was complaining about Trent Brown being bad or something, then he gets replaced by Vederian Lowe and you want to dunk on the guy because Vederian Lowe wasn't the answer.

No one that complains about a player being bad, wants to replace the guy with another bad player.

Strange stuff.

I'll just give up at this point.
Just to be clear, SJH hasn't just blamed the entire offensive woes on Mac, and Mac alone.

He's blamed bad special teams on Mac, he's blamed defensive lapses on Mac, he says the entire team plays poorly because of Mac. He thinks Mac's press conferences suck so bad, they infiltrate the locker room.

I'm pretty sure he's talked about replacing Mac with high school quarterbacks.
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
Listen the Patriots offense is terrible, there is no denying that. I just think it's important to look at why it is terrible and how that fits into how other teams are similarly terrible this and in past years, and how they fix it.
@Cellar-Door I think you're a great and thoughtful poster, so I want to give you the first shot at this.

Give us your thoughts and we can react in a reasonable, thoughtful manner.
 
Last edited:

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,920
Is this the first time since 72 the Pats got shut out multiple times in a season?

edit: could be 92
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,119
BB should be blamed for assembling this pile of hot vomit we call an offense. It sucks all over and has all season. Half the OL is washed. The WRs suck. The TEs can’t block. There isn’t a RB with breakaway speed. Annnnnd the QBs suck historically.

An average QB would have been injured 6 weeks ago behind this shit OL. And the WRs would still drop half the decent passes.
Welcome to the club.

This offense was a bottom 5 offense talent wise the minute the 2023 NFL draft ended. It was clear as day. It's never just been the quarterback. Tyquan drops passes, Boutte can't get his feet down, Parker drops passes, can't get his feet down, Bourne drops passes, JuJu LOL, you literally can't run Douglas on any route that isn't a screen or quick pass because he doesn't know where he's going, Henry is a JAG, Gesicki is on a milk carton, Rhamondre can't break tackles, the offensive line started as a sieve, got a little better but inconsistent and is back to sieving, the QB's aren't good enough AT ALL to overcome any of this, never mind all of it,

As you said, and I've been saying for 2 years now, even when we get a solar eclipse and our QB makes a play, someone else fucks it up, a penalty is called, a drop...

It's the Keystone Cops of NFL football.

And @Salva135 is 100% right. Just dropping an Andy Dalton or a Jameis Winston doesn't mean these games play out the same way, and we just score more points. That's literally not how sports work. It's nonsense. Maybe they make better throws only to see more balls bounce off receiver's hands into defenders arms, like JuJu a couple weeks back. Maybe we would have seen a few more strip sacks given the disaster of our offensive line. Maybe they get hurt. Maybe opposing teams don't run completely vanilla, boring offenses and open things up knowing they need to score more than 10 points.

The whole operation is fucking bad. The penalties alone would have been enough to bench or cut guys in years past. Now, they're barely even a blip on the radar of shit that is this offense.
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
I just realized they have 5 more games to play and they have to put someone out there for every one of them. Holy shit. :D
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,738
NOVA
They watched Mac and Zappe play very poor football in 2022 and brought the same QB room back this year and did nothing as this season sunk into the abyss.

I'm not mad at BB for any of his decisions, really. I'm looking at the totality of them over the last 3 years and saying this is way more complicated than "Mac sucks, BB got unlucky, let's spin the wheel again."
I think for me as an avowed in Bill We Trust fan I think it would be more helpful if your side of this argument was more generous in how you couched your criticisms. Yes, the offense is a complete mess. I do tend to agree with those who argue most of it can be laid at the feet of the QBs and you fix the QB you suddenly have a very competent team, just like that (we see this everywhere, hello Houston). But still the offense really sucks. The defense on the other hand has been completely rebuilt since 2019 and has had awful injuries to its best players this year and is still very good. Bill obviously rebuilt that side of the ball. So, I'm sort of stuck. He completely overhauled the defense in short order and it is a very good unit. He lost the GOAT on offense at the most important position and it's been a slog in trying to replace him. I think there was a poster who said Bill tried to rebuild everything on the fly on both sides of the ball after TB left and it sorta worked for a couple seasons instead of just outright tanking and maybe that was the critical error. Maybe tanking was the way to go. I think that's a good assessment of what has transpired. I think Bill recognized the direction the NFL was heading in as SMU Sox has pointed out. Bill was up on the trend with the two deep safety look (I'm a basketball guy but I think that's what's happened - very little deep stuff allowed with smallish, fast defenders) and tried to construct a tough, bully-ball offense that could take advantage of this but failed in his execution and mush of that goes back to the QB, again. At the end of the day, I'm not sure this was an egregious fireable offense Bill committed. And I'm open to him having his shot at a top tier QB pick. But, as I said, I'm a Bill guy.
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
I think for me as an avowed in Bill We Trust fan I think it would be more helpful if your side of this argument was more generous in how you couched your criticisms. Yes, the offense is a complete mess. I do tend to agree with those who argue most of it can be laid at the feet of the QBs and you fix the QB you suddenly have a very competent team, just like that (we see this everywhere, hello Houston). But still the offense really sucks. The defense on the other hand has been completely rebuilt since 2019 and has had awful injuries to its best players this year and is still very good. Bill obviously rebuilt that side of the ball. So, I'm sort of stuck. He completely overhauled the defense in short order and it is a very good unit. He lost the GOAT on offense at the most important position and it's been a slog in trying to replace him. I think there was a poster who said Bill tried to rebuild everything on the fly on both sides of the ball after TB left and it sorta worked for a couple seasons instead of just outright tanking and maybe that was the critical error. Maybe tanking was the way to go. I think that's a good assessment of what has transpired. I think Bill recognized the direction the NFL was heading in as SMU Sox has pointed out. Bill was up on the trend with the two deep safety look (I'm a basketball guy but I think that's what's happened - very little deep stuff allowed with smallish, fast defenders) and tried to construct a tough, bully-ball offense that could take advantage of this but failed in his execution and mush of that goes back to the QB, again. At the end of the day, I'm not sure this was an egregious fireable offense Bill committed. And I'm open to him having his shot at a top tier QB pick. But, as I said, I'm a Bill guy.

I love the honesty and there are lot of good points here. But this season has made the problems clearer.

You don't get to 2-10 with one bad decision. It's an organizational failure.
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
I feel like writing a sequel to Draft Day where BB's team is terrible and he's just calling around the league for Andy Dalton, Derek Carr, etc and he offers Mac, gets rebuffed, then brings his sons in on the calls and BB's new girlfriend brings some drama to this.
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,738
NOVA
I feel like writing a sequel to Draft Day where BB's team is terrible and he's just calling around the league for Andy Dalton, Derek Carr, etc and he offers Mac, gets rebuffed, then brings his sons in on the calls and BB's new girlfriend brings some drama to this.
As an aside, I 've seen like four movies since my son was born in 2012. Is Draft Day worth watching? Honestly, had no idea of its existence until recently lol.
 
As an aside, I 've seen like four movies since my son was born in 2012. Is Draft Day worth watching? Honestly, had no idea of its existence until recently lol.
It's surprisingly good.
Not that I wish to start another argument but it's compellingly awful, with Kevin Costner making one appalling choice after another and ending up with a mediocre-at-best result. Possibly the least heroic movie hero I've ever seen. If I were teaching a decision-making course I would literally use this movie to demonstrate how bad decisions get made.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,989
Deep inside Muppet Labs
JFC people. I wake up in the morning and this is what I get?

I am 100% sure I never said Zappe was the answer. I have always said Mac is the problem.

I watched the game yesterday, then sensibly went out and drank a great deal of wine. Sounds like some of you should have done the same.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,099
New York City
Not that I wish to start another argument but it's compellingly awful, with Kevin Costner making one appalling choice after another and ending up with a mediocre-at-best result. Possibly the least heroic movie hero I've ever seen. If I were teaching a decision-making course I would literally use this movie to demonstrate how bad decisions get made.
You sound like someone who had a birthday party and nobody showed up.
 

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,379
Draft Day is hilarious. It's the perfect blend of so bad it's good (particularly in its NFL logic) and a teeny bit legitimately entertaining. Anyone taking time out of their day to post on a sports board owes it to themselves to plop down on the couch with a good football loving friend or three and give it a watch, it's not a great movie but it is a great time.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,119
Draft Day is hilarious. It's the perfect blend of so bad it's good (particularly in its NFL logic) and a teeny bit legitimately entertaining. Anyone taking time out of their day to post on a sports board owes it to themselves to plop down on the couch with a good football loving friend or three and give it a watch, it's not a great movie but it is a great time.
Agree completely. It's terribly good, stressing the terribly. I watched it for the first time a couple weeks ago, definitely have used an hour and a half of my time less wisely than that on a regular basis.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,755
Oregon
As good a place as any for this:

@NFLonCBS
Fewest points allowed since Week 9
Patriots 46 (0-4)
49ers 49 (4-0)
Dolphins 62 (3-1)
Ravens 66 (3-1)
Colts 67 (4-0)
 
Oct 12, 2023
742
The 2004 team had McDaniels, Daboll, Fears, Scar, Pepper Johnson, Pees, Crennel, Weis, Mangini and Seely. Yes failed future head coaches abound in that list but they were skilled and talented at their specific role. Even the young guys in that group went on to bigger and better things before stalling out. This current group of coaches is nowhere near as inspiring.

I think your post - though well thought out is ignoring the fact that the 'coaching carousel' in all of the NFL is exactly that....networking, past experiences, and familiarity with whatever system the head coach is embracing.

By looking at that list, one could easily say it's a group of past relationships and BB-network as well (Crennel, Weis were 'Parcells guys' with BB ...and Pepper Johnson played for BB defenses with 3 different franchises). Let's not forget Scott Pioli, who was a young scout in the Jets organization with BB --- was brought to New England (and elevated) largely because they were on the same page with how to build an organization.

I understand the thought process with wanting some new blood --- but if you don't think the next coach Vrabel, Mayo, Harbaugh (whoever) isn't going to tap into their own network and familiarity with candidates to build the infrastructure then you've not been paying attention to how this coaching infrastructure gets built.
I think you missed my point to some extent. Perhaps I worded it poorly. I think it’s possible that the Belichick network has been depleted to the point where it no longer is generating the same quality of coaches internally and the external network dried up.

guys like Weis, Seely, Crennel, even Rob Ryan and later Scott OBrien etc had years of experience before joining the staff. Scarnecchia and Fears were long time assistants and respected. Younger positional coaches generally had more time to learn before being moved up and generally were high caliber at their new position.

outside of Steve Belichick who has worked his way up and OBrien, the current staff is a lot of very inexperienced guys or guys who have some experience but nothing really impressive

A new coach would have “his guys” of course but those guys wouldn’t necessarily be assistants who had to shoot through the coaching ranks to replace the brain drain the Pats have seen. I would hope it would be more like the early Patriots years with a collection of more experienced guys with thicker resumes.

every coaching staff has younger guys on it of course, but take the Titans for example since you mentioned Vrabel. Their WR coach, also a former receiver (Rob Moore) has 15 years experience, their RB coach has 18, OL coach has 17, etc. Not all in the NFL but guys who have been around longer than Troy Brown, Cam Achord and Vinnie Sunseri.

not to say experience makes a good coach or inexperienced guys can’t be good. But there are growing pains for young coaches and a lack of experience makes it hard to determine if the guy is any good.

regardless, I still want BB around for one more year but I do think the coaching staff degradation and overall brain drain is worth noting. They’re on their 5th or 6th “generation” of coaches through their mostly internal development system. At some point the quality just isn’t going to be there when you’re promoting guys every few years or are putting guys in key roles with virtually no applicable experience (Brown, Sunseri)
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,908
Hingham, MA
I think you missed my point to some extent. Perhaps I worded it poorly. I think it’s possible that the Belichick network has been depleted to the point where it no longer is generating the same quality of coaches internally and the external network dried up.

guys like Weis, Seely, Crennel, even Rob Ryan and later Scott OBrien etc had years of experience before joining the staff. Scarnecchia and Fears were long time assistants and respected. Younger positional coaches generally had more time to learn before being moved up and generally were high caliber at their new position.

outside of Steve Belichick who has worked his way up and OBrien, the current staff is a lot of very inexperienced guys or guys who have some experience but nothing really impressive

A new coach would have “his guys” of course but those guys wouldn’t necessarily be assistants who had to shoot through the coaching ranks to replace the brain drain the Pats have seen. I would hope it would be more like the early Patriots years with a collection of more experienced guys with thicker resumes.

every coaching staff has younger guys on it of course, but take the Titans for example since you mentioned Vrabel. Their WR coach, also a former receiver (Rob Moore) has 15 years experience, their RB coach has 18, OL coach has 17, etc. Not all in the NFL but guys who have been around longer than Troy Brown, Cam Achord and Vinnie Sunseri.

not to say experience makes a good coach or inexperienced guys can’t be good. But there are growing pains for young coaches and a lack of experience makes it hard to determine if the guy is any good.

regardless, I still want BB around for one more year but I do think the coaching staff degradation and overall brain drain is worth noting. They’re on their 5th or 6th “generation” of coaches through their mostly internal development system. At some point the quality just isn’t going to be there when you’re promoting guys every few years or are putting guys in key roles with virtually no applicable experience (Brown, Sunseri)
Agree with this point. It feels like promotions are happening more by necessity than through guys earning it.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,498
Agree with this point. It feels like promotions are happening more by necessity than through guys earning it.
Flores, Judge and McDaniels all took a number of younger staff with them when they became head coaches, most of whom still have jobs elsewhere.
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
We're just never going to know what Ernie Adams and his pink stripes brought to the table, are we? He seems like the kind of guy who worked 100% alone and didn't talk to anyone but BB. Only his cats know.
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
As good a place as any for this:

@NFLonCBS
Fewest points allowed since Week 9
Patriots 46 (0-4)
49ers 49 (4-0)
Dolphins 62 (3-1)
Ravens 66 (3-1)
Colts 67 (4-0)
Cross-posting my thoughts:

These defensive stats are sexy but they are 100% a mirage. Opposing teams know the Pats can't move the ball at all, they are designing game plans around it. The defense is putting in WORK, for sure, and I believe they are legit good, but they are not the best defense in football or anything. Nobody is testing them.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,755
Oregon
Cross-posting my thoughts:

These defensive stats are sexy but they are 100% a mirage. Opposing teams know the Pats can't move the ball at all, they are designing game plans around it. The defense is putting in WORK, for sure, and I believe they are legit good, but they are not the best defense in football or anything. Nobody is testing them.
So, your opinion is that opponents are purposely not trying to score more points?
 

NickEsasky

Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2001
9,228
So, your opinion is that opponents are purposely not trying to score more points?
Yeah, I don't see it. Maybe teams are keeping the powder dry on trick plays they may need later in the year, but they aren't sitting there saying "Well we got our 6 that should be enough let's run 25 dives up the middle from here on out."
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
So, your opinion is that opponents are purposely not trying to score more points?
I said they are putting in work and are legit good. Full stop. Do you think being the worst offense in football doesn't impact these stats? We're also talking about a tiny sample size. Not all defensive performances are created equal. What the 9ers have done is very different from what the Pats have done.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
As an aside, I 've seen like four movies since my son was born in 2012. Is Draft Day worth watching? Honestly, had no idea of its existence until recently lol.
It's funny in just how stupid it is.

In the world of Draft Day, an NFL GM seems to work maybe a month a year on the draft and no one really pays attention. It's one of those that you will probably laugh and shake your head at a lot.....definitely at the movie, not with it
 

Gdiguy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
6,273
San Diego, CA
I said they are putting in work and are legit good. Full stop. Do you think being the worst offense in football doesn't impact these stats? We're also talking about a tiny sample size. Not all defensive performances are created equal. What the 9ers have done is very different from what the Pats have done.
It's usually the opposite, though - most of the time a terrible offense leads to a defense that's ok for a half and then gets tired (and also gives up a lot of points because they're dealing with short fields the entire game)

Frankly I think what the defense is doing is remarkably incredible given how atrocious the offense has been (even with the caveat that it hasn't been against the best offenses of the NFL)
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,858
It's funny in just how stupid it is.

In the world of Draft Day, an NFL GM seems to work maybe a month a year on the draft and no one really pays attention. It's one of those that you will probably laugh and shake your head at a lot.....definitely at the movie, not with it
Yeah with literally minutes to go on their first round pick Costner is having his staff do research on a player. Any GM that didn’t know all this stuff by then should be fired instantly with no questions asked.

Anyone who thinks that that film is any good or is in any way a realistic representation of the process is a compete fool.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
Yeah with literally minutes to go on their first round pick Costner is having his staff do research on a player. Any GM that didn’t know all this stuff by then should be fired instantly with no questions asked.

Anyone who thinks that that film is any good or is in any way a realistic representation of the process is a compete fool.
1000% agree.

Which makes it even funnier that Steve Keim (ex-Cards GM; generally thought to be a pretty terrible exec) said that it was "very accurate"
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,099
New York City
Yeah with literally minutes to go on their first round pick Costner is having his staff do research on a player. Any GM that didn’t know all this stuff by then should be fired instantly with no questions asked.

Anyone who thinks that that film is any good or is in any way a realistic representation of the process is a compete fool.
Most movies made about things are not even close to an actual representation of what they are depicting. Draft Day is no different. It's ridiculous. But a fun B- movie.
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
It's usually the opposite, though - most of the time a terrible offense leads to a defense that's ok for a half and then gets tired (and also gives up a lot of points because they're dealing with short fields the entire game)

Frankly I think what the defense is doing is remarkably incredible given how atrocious the offense has been (even with the caveat that it hasn't been against the best offenses of the NFL)

No, I just don't believe it. When a team can't move the ball it's super easy to pin your ears back. And gunning for these losers who are terrible in the backfield is like collecting easy performance metric checks.

Again, they are legit good. But they've also played some mediocre ("they ass") offenses. I love what the defense is doing but the team on the whole is playing a disturbingly bad brand of football. It's so not a QB problem.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,490
So, even with injuries, BBs defense is performing like an elite defense.

"But there's 2 sides of the ball, KFP!"

Correct. And one of them is young, elite, and entirely signed through next season on the cheap, and the other can hopefully be upgraded with a top pick and a ton of cap space.

If you walk into next season with a young/elite defense, a top 2 drafted QB, and a ton of money invested on the offense...I dunno. I think a large majority of teams would love to be in the situation that BB the GM would be putting the 23 Patriots in.

But we can quibble over if Andy Dalton would make this team a fringe playoff contender instead.
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
Yeah with literally minutes to go on their first round pick Costner is having his staff do research on a player. Any GM that didn’t know all this stuff by then should be fired instantly with no questions asked.

Anyone who thinks that that film is any good or is in any way a realistic representation of the process is a compete fool.
Lol, nobody thinks it's realistic. What happens in NFL war rooms is probably as boring as what happens on Wall Street when big money movement is on the table. High stakes and tension but probably boring as hell and happens over a Teams chat. But as a movie introducing the general public to the unsexy life of being an NFL GM and Kevin Costner doing his thing, it's solid. OK, I'm done with my movie reviews but I also recognize that I started this. I stand by my sequel idea.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,119
Most movies made about things are not even close to an actual representation of what they are depicting. Draft Day is no different. It's ridiculous. But a fun B- movie.
Absolutely. The cast alone is worth seeing it. You have Costner, Jennifer Garner, Chadwick Boseman, Denis Leary, Roseanna Arquette, and a bunch of "that guys"

Even better were the cameos, Chris Berman, Mel Kiper, Gruden, Deion, Mayock, Sam Elliott, Arian Foster, Ray Lewis, Rich Eisen, Goodell,

You have even have an appearance by the one and only Zoltan Mesko:

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm5660806/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t61
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,984
The Jets would probably be better but Rodgers behind the oline could have been in trouble with a different injury. I should write a post about the oline but no one would care. Today was the best group they have had since the Denver game. Saleh getting bullied out of playing Zach or whatever happened is so dumb. Zach probably wins today’s game.
Per the Athletic... Zach may not even want to play?

"The Jets want to make a switch at QB. The team is leaning towards Zach Wilson to take over, but he is reluctant to stepping back in, sources tell
@DMRussini
and me. The team is hoping he changes his mind as they continue to discuss the next steps."

View: https://twitter.com/ZackBlatt/status/1731741502873723011
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,271
306, row 14
Do you blame him? He's got nothing to gain and will likely just get shit on by fans and media for another month and a half.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.