So what's Brady using? Since you seem to know.Because it really doesn't matter what he used because everyone is using something. Yes, everyone is doing it.
So what's Brady using? Since you seem to know.Because it really doesn't matter what he used because everyone is using something. Yes, everyone is doing it.
Probably a recently developed designer drug that isn't currently tested for.So what's Brady using? Since you seem to know.
Has CBS said anything about the AJTV report or even alluded to it during the broadcast today?
Because the media report wasn't recanted?Why discuss a recanted media report?
Man, I bet tons of surreptitiously recorded mobsters wish they could use this defense.Why discuss a recanted media report?
You need to get where the NFL and CBS are.Because the media report wasn't recanted?
its like 97% under the rug…. Nobody is talking about it anymore…. Not a peep on CBS today when he came into the gamehttp://money.cnn.com/2016/01/03/media/al-jazeera-manning-second-source/index.html
AJ standing behind their reporting...so not quite under the rug yet.
And it'll be 100% under the rug after Deborah Davies' offseason car "accident".its like 97% under the rug…. Nobody is talking about it anymore…. Not a peep on CBS today when he came into the game
“I was disappointed, because here is Al Jazeera for 25-30 years, however long they’ve been around, spewing anti-American propaganda all across the Middle East and now I have think they have all the answers on who is taking HGH and who isn’t taking HGH because of a disgruntledemployee? I hate it and I can’t stand it. I don’t consider them as a legitimate source and I hate that we have to have these discussions,” said Esiason. “I would like to see it from another source before we get into a conversation about it.”
Esiason said he doesn’t feel comfortable talking about such accusations given the source.
“I don’t like the whole thing around it. People can make all sorts of accusations and ruin people’s lives. I just don’t like it and I don’t feel comfortable about it. I sit behind a microphone for four hours every day, and can spew whatever I want. I take that responsibility very seriously,” he said.
“I’m not going to get myself caught up in a secondary, disgruntled employee, somebody who recanted his story, and try to connect the dots – that’s not my job,” he continued. “Until I get a factual and better reporter it doesn’t make sense to even discuss it.”
So even with the step up to AJ she's still being looked at as suspect. Makes sense to me and Boomah.Didn't the reporter also work for the NY Times?
Where was this attitude when I was forced to study Algebra in school?tl;dr: Arabs
Charlie Sly, from context, it would seem.Who is the disgruntled employee?
Boomer Esaison is not a details kind of guy.Right, but from everything I've seen, he's not a disgruntled employee. Is there something I'm missing?
Al Jazeera is owned by the government of Qatar, and is typically biased towards issues that Qatar cares about. Likely, the HGH story is not one of those issues.Serious question: Does Al Jazeera even have an anti-American slant in its coverage? My understanding is that it's a very reputable news organization.
FWIW, it would seem that the MSM--Nantz, Esiason (both of whom I tend to like)--are hanging their hats on the fact that Sly recanted. If I'm Al Jazeera, I might go hard at the other athletes he implicated. There will be a lot less resistance to the story about the Packers players and Teagarden -- and locking in those stories will make it very hard to ignore the Manning charges.
The NYT also buries another anecdoteIt seems that Sly is tied in with former Jeter trainer Jason Riley and many of the people named in the AJ piece, were clients of Riley as well.
If you're in deep conspiracy mode I think the government of Qatar would love to make sports other than soccer look as bad as possible to draw attention away from the world cup fiasco.Al Jazeera is owned by the government of Qatar, and is typically biased towards issues that Qatar cares about. Likely, the HGH story is not one of those issues.
When it comes to sweeping stories the NFL wants buried under the rug ESPN is the motherfucking Roomba of sports journalism."They might want to hurry. Last week, Elementz Nutrition voluntarily dissolved and closed its doors."
Hmm...I guess for a place that had such a good reputation with athletes wasn't doing that well that they needed to quickly shut down. I wonder how ESPN is going to sweep this one under the rug?
I don't buy this. Was it in their best interest to shit all over a franchise with false information going into the super bowl last year?It's not really in the league's interest, or any of the agencies that report on it, to expose widespread PED abuse, is it?
I don't think it's exactly a coincidence that *all* of the major networks (NBC, ABC/ESPN, CBS, FOX) has a stake in the NFL.
You can't suppress everything.Enough stuff got out earlier individuals who benefitted from getting the info out (some Grigson/Irsay/Kensil combo) that it was too late to do something coordinated to fix the situation.I don't buy this. Was it in their best interest to shit all over a franchise with false information going into the super bowl last year?
Well, for one, it doesn't really hurt any of the other franchises for the Patriots to get shit on. You could argue that shitting on the Patriots enhanced the league's popularity. Everyone loves to hate a villain.I don't buy this. Was it in their best interest to shit all over a franchise with false information going into the super bowl last year?
Hmmm.....Elementz.....Nantz........coincidentz?The NYT also buries another anecdote
Riley and Sly founded Elementz Nutrition, a nutritional supplements company whose website and Facebook page feature many athletes Sly mentioned on camera. Zimmerman is featured on the website; Howard, Neal and Keller on the Facebook page. In one photograph on Facebook, Riley poses at his gym, the Compound, between the mountainous Howard and the no less imposing Neal.
Al Jazeera is way more reliable than any of the news organizations based in the US. They're pretty good.Serious question: Does Al Jazeera even have an anti-American slant in its coverage? My understanding is that it's a very reputable news organization..
You can suppress bullshit rather than not issue a statement until way later.You can't suppress everything.Enough stuff got out earlier individuals who benefitted from getting the info out (some Grigson/Irsay/Kensil combo) that it was too late to do something coordinated to fix the situation.
As amusing as this is, this is the "needle length photo in the Exponent report" of the Guyer HGH scandal. Haircut, face leaning back vs leaning forward, camera lens type and distance... you could make Manning's face look like a Macy's Parade float if you wanted to. I take absolutely nothing from this other than "finger-painting with his forehead, Gorbachev-style" type jokes.There is clearly no evidence of any of the side effects of HGH use. His head has grown the normal amount over the past 20 years.
Just like Bonds!There is clearly no evidence of any of the side effects of HGH use. His head has grown the normal amount over the past 20 years.
I was shocked to see (mostly) intelligent comments. I may need to spend less time on sports news sites...You can suppress bullshit rather than not issue a statement until way later.
Side note.
NYT picked it up. Maybe they can be taken seriously. Interesting that the nutrition place voluntarily closed their doors last week.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/06/sports/baseball/al-jazeera-peyton-manning-derek-jeter-charles-sly.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&referer=http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1162601&page=2
From a comparative standpoint, I agree. But stepping outside this meme for a second and just looking at that right photo - I don't care what camera angle, hair cut, etc. is being used - that forehead is so huge that you just want to believe it's photoshopped.As amusing as this is, this is the "needle length photo in the Exponent report" of the Guyer HGH scandal. Haircut, face leaning back vs leaning forward, camera lens type and distance... you could make Manning's face look like a Macy's Parade float if you wanted to. I take absolutely nothing from this other than "finger-painting with his forehead, Gorbachev-style" type jokes.
I'm sorry: is it that hard to even mention Taylor Teagarden? He isn't just a name dropped by Sly that he can take back -- he's IN THE FUCKING VIDEO!! TALKING ABOUT THE PEDS SLY GAVE HIM!You can suppress bullshit rather than not issue a statement until way later.
Side note.
NYT picked it up. Maybe they can be taken seriously. Interesting that the nutrition place voluntarily closed their doors last week.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/06/sports/baseball/al-jazeera-peyton-manning-derek-jeter-charles-sly.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&referer=http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1162601&page=2