Celtics Trade Timelord, Brogdon, and picks for Jrue Holiday

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
26,056
Los Angeles, CA
This just reminds me of how pissed I still am that we choked against the Warriors. God I loved that fucking team and now Smart and Rob are gone for some of the most boring ass players you could ever watch hoop. Never mind losing the coach to a guy that imitated a cow on the sidelines until he got it under control.

Are they better? Probably. But it’s not what I wanted.

No Smart, No TimeLord…what a catastrophe.

We should get Boston Consulting Group as our sponsor. Fuck
I get it. I grew attached to them too. Those guys went to battle for us. The below tweet makes me sad. But I think we may grow attached to some of the new guys too. I respectfully hated Jrue on the Bucks - always seemed like he was in the right place at the right time.

View: https://twitter.com/ChrisForsberg_/status/1708513835622015060?s=20
Chris Forsberg

@ChrisForsberg_
Talked to Rob at 8 am this morning. He was gushing about the season ahead in Boston.

Sigh.
 

patinorange

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 27, 2006
31,183
6 miles from Angel Stadium
The team didn't have enough to win the title. They came close but didn't do it. I applaud Brad for making bold moves to bring them closer. I have no idea if it will work, but what we had last year was not enough. I really like Williams and hope he can stay healthy.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,831
Portland fans dealing with a talented big with serious health issues has been going on for a half a century. Hopefully Rob can stay healthy. They will absolutely fall in love with TL there.
 

Pablo's TB Lover

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 10, 2017
6,034
Fucking love this trade and Jrue has actually been improving into his 30s, which I don't see any of TL, Smart or Brogdon doing.

Blake has stuck his toe into the stand up comedian ring previously, so I think opportunities in media/entertainment could pull him away from basketball if the money and exposure are right. But to be a good standup, he'll need a LOT more hours bombing in relative obscurity.
 

Sprowl

mikey lowell of the sandbox
Dope
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
34,722
Haiku
I absolutely love Timelord and the run a couple years ago was magic but I don’t see any way he could ever get back to that short of some medical miracle. And it’s really kind of an anchor building a roster around too many guys who you KNOW are going to be banged up at some point. And TL, way more than the average player, is one awkward play away from being completely ineffective. He was already wildly less mobile last season and nowhere near the guy that was terrorizing offenses guarding 1-5 all at the same time.
I feel about trading TL like I did when Ainge added Isaiah Thomas to the Irving trade. In rapid sequence:

1) I hate it because I was emotionally attached to watching TL do things that nobody else in the NBA could do. Watching TL before his knee injury in 2022 was grand fun like watching IT during his monster year.

2) TL must be bone on bone and Brogdon must be quite the sourpuss in the locker room.

3) We traded all that for a 34-year-old point guard? What's the shelf life on those?
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,422
Pittsburgh, PA
This feels incomplete unless Boston goes for another big.
Trading what salary? Other than our top 6, which includes Horford who Brad has probably promised will not be traded under any circumstances, the top salaries on the team are:

Prichard $4.0
Kornet $2.4
Brissett $2.2
Banton $2.0

Pritchard is probably untradeable unless it's for a better version of himself, i.e. a point guard who can create his own shot. Kornet is our depth for bigs.

What we have to hope for are ring-chasers willing to take the taxpayer MLE, which under the new CBA will be $5.0M, and using it would hard-cap us this year at the second apron ($182.8). Like I'm not even sure we have the salary room to do it, which would leave us with only the Minimum Salary exception. What big worthy of our rotation - i.e. better than Luke Kornet - is available for a vet minimum, which for a mid-career vet would be in the $2.5-3.0 range? I'm not saying there isn't any out there, but we'd probably be looking for end-of-career ring-chaser types and those come with their own injury / effectiveness risks. DeAndre Jordan would've been a perfect one if he wasn't already signed to the defending champs at $2.0 for this season. My knowledge of the league's players isn't big enough to come up with any other names, but perhaps others can. But still - it's slim pickings to solve this problem.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,573
Trading what salary? Other than our top 6, which includes Horford who Brad has probably promised will not be traded under any circumstances, the top salaries on the team are:

Prichard $4.0
Kornet $2.4
Brissett $2.2
Banton $2.0

Pritchard is probably untradeable unless it's for a better version of himself, i.e. a point guard who can create his own shot. Kornet is our depth for bigs.

What we have to hope for are ring-chasers willing to take the taxpayer MLE, which under the new CBA will be $5.0M, and using it would hard-cap us this year at the second apron ($182.8). Like I'm not even sure we have the salary room to do it, which would leave us with only the Minimum Salary exception. What big worthy of our rotation - i.e. better than Luke Kornet - is available for a vet minimum, which for a mid-career vet would be in the $2.5-3.0 range? I'm not saying there isn't any out there, but we'd probably be looking for end-of-career ring-chaser types and those come with their own injury / effectiveness risks. DeAndre Jordan would've been a perfect one if he wasn't already signed to the defending champs at $2.0 for this season. My knowledge of the league's players isn't big enough to come up with any other names, but perhaps others can. But still - it's slim pickings to solve this problem.
They generated a 6.2M TPE in the Grant S&T, and have a lot of 2nds, so there's probably a fit out there if they want to go that way.

Wouldn't work for most positions, but there are always some cheapish centers.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,921
Melrose, MA
On the plus side, I think these moves do give the Celtics a better starting 5 and a team that is closer to being built for what Mazzulla wants to do with it and maybe more for what JT and JB want.
  • More 3-point shooting plus adding KP's post offense. An ability to run multiple lineups that can play 5-out. And an ability to have 5 guys on the floor late you would rather see the ball dumped off to with the shot clock running down than Marcus.
  • Replacing Smart at PG with a better ballhandler who can also shoot. It could be argued that Smart's biggest weakness was his propensity to turn the ball over even moreso than his shooting.
  • They are going more "traditional" for lack of a better word. JH is a traditional well-rounded PG who can handle the ball, run an offense, shoot, score, and defend. Marcus was a guy with great vision and otherwordly defensive anticipation, a willingness and understanding of how to defend bigs in the post, but who was also deficient as a ballhandler, shooter, driver. A healthy Rob was an elite switching and shotblocking big... KP is a good defensive big but he's a drop coverage guy.
  • Hopefully, between White, Holliday, and Tatum, there is enough ballhandling that they won't be so reliant on JB's also questionable ballhandling. Did they ever run JB around off ball screens to get him open looks? Maybe that is a thing they can add.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,573
On the plus side, I think these moves do give the Celtics a better starting 5 and a team that is closer to being built for what Mazzulla wants to do with it and maybe more for what JT and JB want.
  • More 3-point shooting plus adding KP's post offense. An ability to run multiple lineups that can play 5-out. And an ability to have 5 guys on the floor late you would rather see the ball dumped off to with the shot clock running down than Marcus.
  • Replacing Smart at PG with a better ballhandler who can also shoot. It could be argued that Smart's biggest weakness was his propensity to turn the ball over even moreso than his shooting.
  • They are going more "traditional" for lack of a better word. JH is a traditional well-rounded PG who can handle the ball, run an offense, shoot, score, and defend. Marcus was a guy with great vision and otherwordly defensive anticipation, a willingness and understanding of how to defend bigs in the post, but who was also deficient as a ballhandler, shooter, driver. A healthy Rob was an elite switching and shotblocking big... KP is a good defensive big but he's a drop coverage guy.
  • Hopefully, between White, Holliday, and Tatum, there is enough ballhandling that they won't be so reliant on JB's also questionable ballhandling. Did they ever run JB around off ball screens to get him open looks? Maybe that is a thing they can add.
On the "traditional" note, DWhite and Jrue are two of the best guards in the league if you want to play drop coverage. Probably not a coincidence they really wanted them on a KP/Al/Kornet team.
 

pjheff

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2003
1,345
They are going more "traditional" for lack of a better word. JH is a traditional well-rounded PG who can handle the ball, run an offense, shoot, score, and defend. Marcus was a guy with great vision and otherwordly defensive anticipation, a willingness and understanding of how to defend bigs in the post, but who was also deficient as a ballhandler, shooter, driver. A healthy Rob was an elite switching and shotblocking big... KP is a good defensive big but he's a drop coverage guy.
Do we think that JH will primarily be in the small rotation? I kinda wonder if those minutes will go to White and PP with JH more in the wing rotation.
 

The Mort Report

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 5, 2007
7,342
Concord
I'll add that I like the idea of adding another strong locker room presence. For as much as I love Smart, I always wondered if he had too much of "this is my team" attitude, both on the floor and in the locker room. That was fine when the Jays were just starting out, but I think his removal will help the other two grow even more in those areas. Now they have that presence but knows he's not the top dog

I also had the realization now the team's top 6 are no nonsense types. Who's the biggest personality? JB? I don't know much about KP, and I know there was talk of him being difficult in places, but he seems to have grown out of that. Despite multiple high end players I think this team is going to have a very blue collar, we are here to get shit done vibe
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,950
What is the expected close out lineup in close games, I see two options

A: Zinger, Tatum, Brown, Jrue, White

B: Al, Zinger, Tatum, Brown, Jrue

Is it A if behind and B if ahead? Matchup dependent I guess is the easy answer. If we just say best 5 I guess Al at his best is better than White but Al can be up and down depending on how rested he is.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,373
Imaginationland
Jrue becomes the first Celtics rotation player with a ring since... Kyrie?
Tristan Thompson.

I'm not as sorry as I thought I'd be moving off of TL. Around the ASG in 2022, Tatum told the media that Rob was the other Celtic (besides he and JB) that would be playing in an all-star game someday, and he wasn't wrong. It's too bad he couldn't stay healthy, because a 100% version of Robert Williams was a DPOY candidate and joy to watch on offense catching lobs and hitting guys on backdoor cuts. That guy just doesn't exist.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,950
Also, how damn funny is it that on the day the Pats will play the Cowboys there is a giant Celtics trade. Guess the lines could be very funny.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,557
Do we think that JH will primarily be in the small rotation? I kinda wonder if those minutes will go to White and PP with JH more in the wing rotation.
JH will exclusively be in the small rotation. He's not a wing.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,573
The more I think about this, the more I like ending the dumb 2-big roster orientation. It was a square peg in a round NBA hole.

Get really good normal players and play them in normal positions.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,422
Pittsburgh, PA
I’m kind of shocked at some of the negativity about this deal. Jrue Holiday is a SIGNIFICANT backcourt upgrade for this team. By a very large margin.
My head knows you're right, my heart still cries for how much fun it was to root for TimeLord (and Smart). I'll get over it in time.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,573
What is the expected close out lineup in close games, I see two options

A: Zinger, Tatum, Brown, Jrue, White

B: Al, Zinger, Tatum, Brown, Jrue

Is it A if behind and B if ahead? Matchup dependent I guess is the easy answer. If we just say best 5 I guess Al at his best is better than White but Al can be up and down depending on how rested he is.
I think it will always be A when it counts.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,557
What is the expected close out lineup in close games, I see two options

A: Zinger, Tatum, Brown, Jrue, White

B: Al, Zinger, Tatum, Brown, Jrue

Is it A if behind and B if ahead? Matchup dependent I guess is the easy answer. If we just say best 5 I guess Al at his best is better than White but Al can be up and down depending on how rested he is.
It should be A if behind, A if ahead, and A if tied.

It's A
 

pjheff

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2003
1,345
JH will exclusively be in the small rotation. He's not a wing.
I‘ll go out on a wing and disagree. I think JH will start, finish, and play in the middle largely as a 2 with White/Pritchard at the 1.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,573
I‘ll go out on a wing and disagree. I think JH will start, finish, and play in the middle largely as a 2 with White/Pritchard at the 1.
I'm pretty sure that OP meant 3/4 by wing and 1/2 by small, so I don't think anyone is disagreeing here.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,373
Imaginationland
Holiday replaces most of what we lost when Smart left, but he's just not nearly as good at guarding bigger guys. Smart had probably 20 pounds on him and was a couple of inches longer. Holiday frequently matched up against Butler, but a) it spoke more to the Bucks lack of wing defenders than anything else, and b) it clearly didn't work.

Regarding White or Horford at the end of games, it's gonna be somewhat matchup dependent, but White was a solidly better player than Horford this past season and considering the 8 year age gap, it should only get worse for Al. Other than against Philly and Denver, I can't think of any matchups in which Al is definitely a better end of game option than White. I hope it's a discussion we have throughout the year.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,599
It should be A if behind, A if ahead, and A if tied.

It's A
Yeah, that’s Warriors “lineup of death” level. Nearly impossible to defend and pretty versatile defensively. I’m giddy.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,557
I‘ll go out on a wing and disagree. I think JH will start, finish, and play in the middle largely as a 2 with White/Pritchard at the 1.
The 2 is a small.

Your smalls are Jrue, White, Pritchard, Banton
Your wings are Tatum, Brown, Hauser, Brissett, Svi, Walsh when not in Maine
 

pjheff

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2003
1,345
The 2 is a small.
I would use “guard” as a 1/2 and ”small” as the little guy on the floor (who may or may not have primary playmaking responsibility). With the trade, I expect more lineups with a single big (KP or Horford), single small (White or PP), and multiple wings (including the Jays and JH).
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,557
I would use “guard” as a 1/2 and ”small” as the little guy on the floor (who may or may not have primary playmaking responsibility). With the trade, I expect more lineups with a single big (KP or Horford), single small (White or PP), and multiple wings (including the Jays and JH).
I mean, it's the same lineup but for some reason you want to re-define 6'4" 205 lb career point guard Jrue Holiday as a wing.

A lineup of Jrue, White, Brown, Tatum, KP you can call it a single big, a single small, and multiple wings if that floats your boat I guess. Would be no different than claiming Smart was a wing last year in lineups where he was the PG.

Would you ever play want to play a lineup that included all three of Jrue, White and Pritchard? If not, and it should be not, Jrue isn't a wing. He's going to be the starting PG.

He's a guard, or a small, or whatever.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,573
Holiday replaces most of what we lost when Smart left, but he's just not nearly as good at guarding bigger guys. Smart had probably 20 pounds on him and was a couple of inches longer. Holiday frequently matched up against Butler, but a) it spoke more to the Bucks lack of wing defenders than anything else, and b) it clearly didn't work.

Regarding White or Horford at the end of games, it's gonna be somewhat matchup dependent, but White was a solidly better player than Horford this past season and considering the 8 year age gap, it should only get worse for Al. Other than against Philly and Denver, I can't think of any matchups in which Al is definitely a better end of game option than White. I hope it's a discussion we have throughout the year.
I always thought this was a problem with the last iteration of the Celtics: they had too many guys whose best skill was "doing X, for a Y".

Smart was elite at guarding bigger guys, for a guard. The problem is, what you really want from your guards is for them to be elite at being guards, and Holiday thoroughly outclasses Smart in that regard.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,950
I mean, it's the same lineup but for some reason you want to re-define 6'4" 205 lb career point guard Jrue Holiday as a wing.

A lineup of Jrue, White, Brown, Tatum, KP you can call it a single big, a single small, and multiple wings if that floats your boat I guess. Would be no different than claiming Smart was a wing last year in lineups where he was the PG.

Would you ever play want to play a lineup that included all three of Jrue, White and Pritchard? If not, and it should be not, Jrue isn't a wing. He's going to be the starting PG.

He's a guard, or a small, or whatever.
I dont know the naming convention you are using. I thought Stevens thing was ballhandlers, wings, bigs.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
31,011
Holiday replaces most of what we lost when Smart left, but he's just not nearly as good at guarding bigger guys. Smart had probably 20 pounds on him and was a couple of inches longer.
Holiday is 6'5"; Smart is 6'3". but agree that Smart guarded bigs better; though with drop coverage that won't be as big of an issue.
 

pjheff

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2003
1,345
I mean, it's the same lineup but for some reason you want to re-define 6'4" 205 lb career point guard Jrue Holiday as a wing.

A lineup of Jrue, White, Brown, Tatum, KP you can call it a single big, a single small, and multiple wings if that floats your boat I guess. Would be no different than claiming Smart was a wing last year in lineups where he was the PG.

Would you ever play want to play a lineup that included all three of Jrue, White and Pritchard? If not, and it should be not, Jrue isn't a wing. He's going to be the starting PG.

He's a guard, or a small, or whatever.
I‘m not trying to be argumentative. Given the roster construction, I expect him to play more off-ball with a smaller, primary ballhandler on the floor. I think that White is going to be the starting PG with Pritchard backing him up, even if you consider that distinction academic.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,373
Imaginationland
I always thought this was a problem with the last iteration of the Celtics: they had too many guys whose best skill was "doing X, for a Y".

Smart was elite at guarding bigger guys, for a guard. The problem is, what you really want from your guards is for them to be elite at being guards, and Holiday thoroughly outclasses Smart in that regard.
That's a fair point, but we're not exactly talking about N'Keal Harry here. Having a point guard who can hold his own against much bigger players was huge for a switch everything defense (just as it was that Horford could generally stay in front of much smaller players), and a healthy Smart was an absolute monster for this team. That versatility is a huge bonus, if you play into it. With KP and likely a couple of smaller guards on the court (and Horford continuing to age), I suspect the switch everything defense will largely be a thing of the past. I'm curious to see how it goes.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,422
Pittsburgh, PA
I get it. I grew attached to them too. Those guys went to battle for us. The below tweet makes me sad. But I think we may grow attached to some of the new guys too. I respectfully hated Jrue on the Bucks - always seemed like he was in the right place at the right time.

View: https://twitter.com/ChrisForsberg_/status/1708513835622015060?s=20
Brad Stevens must feel a bit like he traded his own child for a smarter, slightly more good-looking, better-behaved child who is dead-set on getting into Harvard. Like, sure, the new child is objectively better. But the old one was my kid, the one I watched grow from when he was a baby, changed his (metaphorical) diapers. More than a lot of coaches, Brad seems like he genuinely loves his players, has relationships with them that go beyond the court and last even after they leave the team, not unlike Popovich.

Real tough business sometimes. In so many walks of life, it pays to invest for the long term, to wait and give chances to something, to build a relationship and mend rather than replace... just not in the NBA.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,557
I‘m not trying to be argumentative. Given the roster construction, I expect him to play more off-ball with a smaller, primary ballhandler on the floor. I think that White is going to be the starting PG with Pritchard backing him up, even if you consider that distinction academic.
Jrue will 100% be the starting PG, likely with White starting alongside him. They'll surely be staggered so White will play PG when Jrue is off, and Pritchard will back them both up.

I don't know why you'd be looking to move the most experienced PG you have off ball.
 

pjheff

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2003
1,345
Jrue will 100% be the starting PG, likely with White starting alongside him. They'll surely be staggered so White will play PG when Jrue is off, and Pritchard will back them both up.

I don't know why you'd be looking to move the most experienced PG you have off ball.
I think he has been better off ball than on it.

I think the roster has more depth of smalls than wings.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,599
POR is killing it. They still could move Brogdon for a late first, and who knows what they do with TL.

But Dame goes out and they get 3 firsts, 2 swaps, Ayton, Brogdon, TL
Incredible job done by Portland. They will get more for Brogdon and TL by the deadline to boot!

Once we added Porzingis we turned TL into depth rather than as a key piece. I've felt his best days are behind him since two playoffs ago and he's now a veteran bench piece for a contender....who knows, we may have not seen the last of him.


Derek White is a Point Guard.
Jrue is as well and always has been. Not sure what the poster means.
 
Last edited:

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,557
That's a fair point, but we're not exactly talking about N'Keal Harry here. Having a point guard who can hold his own against much bigger players was huge for a switch everything defense (just as it was that Horford could generally stay in front of much smaller players), and a healthy Smart was an absolute monster for this team. That versatility is a huge bonus, if you play into it. With KP and likely a couple of smaller guards on the court (and Horford continuing to age), I suspect the switch everything defense will largely be a thing of the past. I'm curious to see how it goes.
This is what makes Smart a special defender.

I remember a clip from the Milwaukee series in 2022 where Jaylen got caught in a mismatch with Brook Lopez in the paint with Lopez begging for the ball.

Smart yelled at Jaylen to switch, came in and was so annoying aggressively rooting Lopez out of the paint that Lopez just stopped calling for the ball and slinked away.

It's a rare skill
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,573
That's a fair point, but we're not exactly talking about N'Keal Harry here. Having a point guard who can hold his own against much bigger players was huge for a switch everything defense (just as it was that Horford could generally stay in front of much smaller players), and a healthy Smart was an absolute monster for this team. That versatility is a huge bonus, if you play into it. With KP and likely a couple of smaller guards on the court (and Horford continuing to age), I suspect the switch everything defense will largely be a thing of the past. I'm curious to see how it goes.
I agree that the versatility was great. The problem, towards the end of Smart's tenure, was that you were getting it at the expense of the primary offensive and defensive things a guard needs to do.

I doubt they switch nearly as much now. KP + DWhite/Jrue is perfect personnel for an elite drop D.
 

Average Game James

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 28, 2016
4,380
How is Jrue against smaller/quicker guards? Always felt like a bit of the weak spot for the Celtics… does he help there at all?
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,557
I think he has been better off ball than on it.

I think the roster has more depth of smalls than wings.
When was Jrue better off the ball? He's been a PG forever.

And they definitely don't have more depth of smalls than wings

Jrue, White, Pritchard, Banton vs Tatum, Brown, Hauser, Brissett, Svi isn't really close.

I don't get it.

Jrue, White and Pritchard are all currently going to get plenty of minutes.

You want to bump Hauser/Brissett down a peg to get Banton more minutes?