Indeed. He is my least favorite Ranger. Still, the Ranger bullpen has been Texas' most consistent weak spot all year.I am certainly rooting against B-more. But fuck Aroldis Chapman for sure.
Indeed. He is my least favorite Ranger. Still, the Ranger bullpen has been Texas' most consistent weak spot all year.I am certainly rooting against B-more. But fuck Aroldis Chapman for sure.
It must be a brutal work environment, what with the gum disease.That studio shot with 2 people working on ARod's makeup gave me a solid chuckle.
You know that’s not how it works in the playoffs.So I guess the AL east isn't as good as we thought.
If it were just ONE team that took the goose egg I'd go with that. But THREE teams with zero wins? Maybe not as good as they seemed.You know that’s not how it works in the playoffs.
11-game postseason losing streak is awkward though, yeah?You know that’s not how it works in the playoffs.
Gotta cover up them blue lips somehowThat studio shot with 2 people working on ARod's makeup gave me a solid chuckle.
Ha yeah. All the pissing and moaning about how the system isn’t fair because favored teams aren’t playing well strikes me as really weird. That’s…sports?I know we are going to get a bunch of hot takes about the regular season not mattering, especially if the Dbacks can close it out.
Maybe baseball can keep things just the way they are, but tweak it a little so that if a team that won 100+ games in the regular year loses in the division round, you could say that they get to move on to the championship series anyway. Maybe that would satisfy folks.
In MLB, anyway, you are correct.I could be wrong, but I’m pretty certain that’s the first time Adley has ever been swept.
Yes, they mentioned thatI could be wrong, but I’m pretty certain that’s the first time Adley has ever been swept.
As to the bolded: the naked asymmetry of the current system - one that places number of games to sell to advertisers above any attempt at competitive fairness - leads to "folks not being satisfied"I know we are going to get a bunch of hot takes about the regular season not mattering, especially if the Dbacks can close it out.
Maybe baseball can keep things just the way they are, but tweak it a little so that if a team that won 100+ games in the regular year loses in the division round, you could say that they get to move on to the championship series anyway. Maybe that would satisfy folks.
Yea, I meant I don’t think the O’s have been swept since he’s been called upIn MLB, anyway, you are correct.
What has been unfair? Which of the 7 teams left does not deserve it?As to the bolded: the naked asymmetry of the current system - one that places number of games to sell to advertisers above any attempt at competitive fairness - leads to "folks not being satisfied"
Defintely.11-game postseason losing streak is awkward though, yeah?
Sometimes you just have to take one for the team. Anyone but Houston; fuck 'em.Rooting for the Rangers against the Astros is going to cause serious long term damage to my soul.
Red Sox the only one without a loss!!!I think that makes the AL East an almost impossible 3-17 in postseason games the last two years combined:
TB 0-4
TOR 0-4
BAL 0-3
NY 3-2 over CLE then 0-4 to HOU
BOS 0-0
Red Sox tied with one team that shall not be mentioned for best ALE playoff recordVaunted A.L. East teams on the way to a 0-7 postseason!
Eyes look much less calm than expectedWatching the Post Game on FS1; that scruffy beard does not look good on Jetes.
Imposing fundamentally different schedules on teams in the 5 days leading up to a best of 5 series is bullshit. It's not that it deterministically favors one situation/team vs. the other. It just mandates an apples-to-oranges in each and every series. I fucking hate it. If you don't, good for you. But it is the very definition of "unfair" - it is inequitable.What has been unfair? Which of the 7 teams left does not deserve it?
How the fuck do you eat that at a baseball game?
With a bib, unless you hate your shirtHow the fuck do you eat that at a baseball game?
And with a cardiologist on stand by.With a bib, unless you hate your shirt
With a full staff, and paddles and stentsAnd with a cardiologist on stand by.
They have picnic areas around the park. That is definitely not a "eat in your seat" food item, unless you hate yourself and the people around you, because that's going all over. Most definitely treat the onion rings like a side dish and remove from the burger before eating. (Two of them at least.)How the fuck do you eat that at a baseball game?
I do not understand anyone eating anything other than the most traditional baseball food at a game (if that): the food is not that good, wildly overpriced, and does not lend itself to eating in sitting in a folding chair (and, yes, I know there are some places to sit with tables etc).With a bib, unless you hate your shirt
This is exactly what I was rooting for. I was looking forward to clips of the Wheez Kids and young Cal Ripken, Jr. and Mike Boddicker, and all those cheesy, "1983/2023" comparisons.Gotta admit, I was kind of pulling for Baltimore, and an I-95, rematch of ‘83, two ballparks I like, World Series. My east coast , “baseball matters more here” bias/delusions requires me to now hope the Phillies at least uphold their half of the bargain.
Absolutely! Normally, I consume nothing at a ballgame, because I don't drink alcohol and a human being should be able to go 2-4 hours without eating. However, if I eat anything, it's pretty much a hot dog, a box/bag of Cracker Jack, and if I leave my seat, a helmet sundae. When it comes to ballpark food, I'm a traditionalist all the way. But if I'm at a game, I'm there to watch the game, not graze on substandard food.I do not understand anyone eating anything other than the most traditional baseball food at a game (if that): the food is not that good, wildly overpriced, and does not lend itself to eating in sitting in a folding chair (and, yes, I know there are some places to sit with tables etc).
I think it’s named after Schwarber because you only end up getting up .197 of it in your mouth.How the fuck do you eat that at a baseball game?
I usually do not eat at baseball games. But , if I can't eat it with one hand, I definitely do not eat it at a baseball game.I do not understand anyone eating anything other than the most traditional baseball food at a game (if that): the food is not that good, wildly overpriced, and does not lend itself to eating in sitting in a folding chair (and, yes, I know there are some places to sit with tables etc).
And it's definitely going to make you strike out more times than you get to second base.I think it’s named after Schwarber because you only end up getting up .197 of it in your mouth.
I think you're arguing to make the number of games each team plays in the first round more equal?Imposing fundamentally different schedules on teams in the 5 days leading up to a best of 5 series is bullshit. It's not that it deterministically favors one situation/team vs. the other. It just mandates an apples-to-oranges in each and every series. I fucking hate it. If you don't, good for you. But it is the very definition of "unfair" - it is inequitable.
Honestly, I'm not sure what I'm arguing for. Opening up the field for 3 WC's has gummed up the works, IMO. I kinda like your neutral field idea.I think you're arguing to make the number of games each team plays in the first round more equal?
MLB could add or subtract two wildcard teams. Do you think the Orioles would have preferred to have played an additional series against the Mariners or NYY? Or they could have started with a series against the Rays (if MLB eliminated two playoff teams). If asked two weeks ago, I think almost every MLB observer would have preferred to play Texas, with their rotation out of sequence, over the Rays and I can't imagine adding another series would help Baltimore's odds of making it through to the World Series.
(Maybe a true round robin tournament, with equal rest time, and games at neutral stadiums, would be equitable?)