2023 LDS Game/Discussion Thread

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,447
AZ
I know we are going to get a bunch of hot takes about the regular season not mattering, especially if the Dbacks can close it out.

Maybe baseball can keep things just the way they are, but tweak it a little so that if a team that won 100+ games in the regular year loses in the division round, you could say that they get to move on to the championship series anyway. Maybe that would satisfy folks.
 

azsoxpatsfan

Does not enjoy the go
SoSH Member
May 23, 2014
4,821
I could be wrong, but I’m pretty certain that’s the first time Adley has ever been swept.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,482
I know we are going to get a bunch of hot takes about the regular season not mattering, especially if the Dbacks can close it out.

Maybe baseball can keep things just the way they are, but tweak it a little so that if a team that won 100+ games in the regular year loses in the division round, you could say that they get to move on to the championship series anyway. Maybe that would satisfy folks.
Ha yeah. All the pissing and moaning about how the system isn’t fair because favored teams aren’t playing well strikes me as really weird. That’s…sports?
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,447
AZ
Fuck you, John Angelos, you thin skinned asshole. How is your Pravda brigade going to be forced to spin this?

Baltimore will be a handful for a few years to come, but I am happy that baby had to watch his team go down in flames this year.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,799
I know we are going to get a bunch of hot takes about the regular season not mattering, especially if the Dbacks can close it out.

Maybe baseball can keep things just the way they are, but tweak it a little so that if a team that won 100+ games in the regular year loses in the division round, you could say that they get to move on to the championship series anyway. Maybe that would satisfy folks.
As to the bolded: the naked asymmetry of the current system - one that places number of games to sell to advertisers above any attempt at competitive fairness - leads to "folks not being satisfied"
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,447
AZ
As to the bolded: the naked asymmetry of the current system - one that places number of games to sell to advertisers above any attempt at competitive fairness - leads to "folks not being satisfied"
What has been unfair? Which of the 7 teams left does not deserve it?
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,484
I think that makes the AL East an almost impossible 3-17 in postseason games the last two years combined:

TB 0-4
TOR 0-4
BAL 0-3
NY 3-2 over CLE then 0-4 to HOU
BOS 0-0
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,447
AZ
So, if the playoffs had been one wild card and three division winners, it would have been Braves/Phillies, Dodgers/Brewers, Houston/Twins and Os/Rays. So two series are the same, and the Dodgers probably would have jumped at the chance to take the Dbacks over the Brewers.

So to me, the primary utility of the expanded playoff has been to smoke out the Rays as frauds and the Os as not ready for prime time yet. I’m glad, given what we now know, that we didn’t have to sit through Rays/Os.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,799
What has been unfair? Which of the 7 teams left does not deserve it?
Imposing fundamentally different schedules on teams in the 5 days leading up to a best of 5 series is bullshit. It's not that it deterministically favors one situation/team vs. the other. It just mandates an apples-to-oranges in each and every series. I fucking hate it. If you don't, good for you. But it is the very definition of "unfair" - it is inequitable.
 

NorthwestSoxGuy

New Member
Oct 15, 2022
155
I'll admit, I was actually pulling for the O's to advance to the ALCS (I was rooting for a Twins-Orioles ALCS matchup). I personally dislike both the Rangers and the Astros.

Unless the Twins survive tomorrow, we'll have an All-Texas ALCS on our hands, and I'm not looking forward to that (no offense to fans from Texas here).
 
Last edited:

RobertS975

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
368
So if this round was a 7 game series, the Orioles would be down 0-3 right now. While we all know that's possible to overcome, it sure wouldn't be likely!
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,326
from the wilds of western ma
Gotta admit, I was kind of pulling for Baltimore, and an I-95, rematch of ‘83, two ballparks I like, World Series. My east coast , “baseball matters more here” bias/delusions requires me to now hope the Phillies at least uphold their half of the bargain.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,747
Unprovable takes.

Karma bites John Angelos in his pasty, unemployable ass.
The AL East was SUCH A BEAST this year that its playoff entries were worn to the nub by the time October rolled around.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,484
Alex Bregman's first full season was 2017, HOU (assuming they win one more) has made the ALCS at a minimum in each of his first seven full seasons.
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
How the fuck do you eat that at a baseball game?
They have picnic areas around the park. That is definitely not a "eat in your seat" food item, unless you hate yourself and the people around you, because that's going all over. Most definitely treat the onion rings like a side dish and remove from the burger before eating. (Two of them at least.)
 

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
939
With a bib, unless you hate your shirt
I do not understand anyone eating anything other than the most traditional baseball food at a game (if that): the food is not that good, wildly overpriced, and does not lend itself to eating in sitting in a folding chair (and, yes, I know there are some places to sit with tables etc).
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Gotta admit, I was kind of pulling for Baltimore, and an I-95, rematch of ‘83, two ballparks I like, World Series. My east coast , “baseball matters more here” bias/delusions requires me to now hope the Phillies at least uphold their half of the bargain.
This is exactly what I was rooting for. I was looking forward to clips of the Wheez Kids and young Cal Ripken, Jr. and Mike Boddicker, and all those cheesy, "1983/2023" comparisons.
 
Last edited:

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I do not understand anyone eating anything other than the most traditional baseball food at a game (if that): the food is not that good, wildly overpriced, and does not lend itself to eating in sitting in a folding chair (and, yes, I know there are some places to sit with tables etc).
Absolutely! Normally, I consume nothing at a ballgame, because I don't drink alcohol and a human being should be able to go 2-4 hours without eating. However, if I eat anything, it's pretty much a hot dog, a box/bag of Cracker Jack, and if I leave my seat, a helmet sundae. When it comes to ballpark food, I'm a traditionalist all the way. But if I'm at a game, I'm there to watch the game, not graze on substandard food.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,747
I do not understand anyone eating anything other than the most traditional baseball food at a game (if that): the food is not that good, wildly overpriced, and does not lend itself to eating in sitting in a folding chair (and, yes, I know there are some places to sit with tables etc).
I usually do not eat at baseball games. But , if I can't eat it with one hand, I definitely do not eat it at a baseball game.
 
Last edited:

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
939
Imposing fundamentally different schedules on teams in the 5 days leading up to a best of 5 series is bullshit. It's not that it deterministically favors one situation/team vs. the other. It just mandates an apples-to-oranges in each and every series. I fucking hate it. If you don't, good for you. But it is the very definition of "unfair" - it is inequitable.
I think you're arguing to make the number of games each team plays in the first round more equal?

MLB could add or subtract two wildcard teams. Do you think the Orioles would have preferred to have played an additional series against the Mariners or NYY? Or they could have started with a series against the Rays (if MLB eliminated two playoff teams). If asked two weeks ago, I think almost every MLB observer would have preferred to play Texas, with their rotation out of sequence, over the Rays and I can't imagine adding another series would help Baltimore's odds of making it through to the World Series.

(Maybe a true round robin tournament, with equal rest time, and games at neutral stadiums, would be equitable?)
 

Bozo Texino

still hates Dave Kerpen
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
12,038
Austin, Texas
A bunch of Metroplex morons unironically singing Creed at the top of their lungs?

Really hoping Houston gets the chance to fucking destroy them in the ALCS.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,799
I think you're arguing to make the number of games each team plays in the first round more equal?

MLB could add or subtract two wildcard teams. Do you think the Orioles would have preferred to have played an additional series against the Mariners or NYY? Or they could have started with a series against the Rays (if MLB eliminated two playoff teams). If asked two weeks ago, I think almost every MLB observer would have preferred to play Texas, with their rotation out of sequence, over the Rays and I can't imagine adding another series would help Baltimore's odds of making it through to the World Series.

(Maybe a true round robin tournament, with equal rest time, and games at neutral stadiums, would be equitable?)
Honestly, I'm not sure what I'm arguing for. Opening up the field for 3 WC's has gummed up the works, IMO. I kinda like your neutral field idea.