soxhop411 said:New York Jets @nyjets
#RL The New York Jets have announced this afternoon they have signed 9-year veteran QB David Garrard.
Likelihood he beats out Sanchez?
soxhop411 said:New York Jets @nyjets
#RL The New York Jets have announced this afternoon they have signed 9-year veteran QB David Garrard.
Manish Mehta
@MMehtaNYDN
Jets wasting little time to bring in free agents. WR Brandon Gibson will visit Florham Park tomorrow, per sources. #nyj
SeoulSoxFan said:Pouha will be a bigger loss than what some folks may think.
Eh, they'd probably wind up drafting Greg Oden with the first overall pick, anyway.soxfan121 said:If they were truly planning to suck, they wouldn't have signed Garrard. That's a move with "hope" written on it.
The only way to secure a Shit The Bed season is to announce a training camp competition between Sanchez & Tebow ... and then playing whoever was worse in the preseason.
The Jets can't even tank properly.
Tony C said:The "Garrardize?"
SeanBerry said:They Jets aren't winning 8 games. Not only that but I'd be pretty surprised if Garrard ever plays a snap that counts.
Lots of rumors point towards Kevin Kolb coming to Jets. I guess Marty Mornhinwig loves him.
SeanBerry said:They Jets aren't winning 8 games. Not only that but I'd be pretty surprised if Garrard ever plays a snap that counts.
Lots of rumors point towards Kevin Kolb coming to Jets. I guess Marty Mornhinwig loves him.
TheYellowDart5 said:The Raiders and Jets are going to be having a pretty compelling fail-off for that No. 1 pick.
So far this offseason, the Jets have lost or will lose:
Dustin Keller
LaRon Landry
Yeremiah Bell
Mike DeVito
Bart Scott
Calvin Pace
Eric Smith
Brandon Moore
That's a pretty amazing amount of loss and turnover.
Dick Pole Upside said:Don't forget Pouha, Revis and Shonn Greene.
Cro will be the only returning starter in the secondary. Defensive starters: 3 DBs, 2 LBs, 2DLs going or gone... That defense will be a shell. The offense sucks to begin with and has a new OC and no QB or RB.
Look out below.
Morgan's Magic Snowplow said:They will suck but these are the right moves.
What puzzles me is why they don't just cut Sanchez and take all the salary cap pain right now, to avoid having to take that pain next year. Its not like they have any chance of competing this season and he really has no future there anyway.
SeanBerry said:The Revis to TB appears to be somewhat stalled at the moment. Might just be posturing. Obviously the longer they wait to trade him, the less teams they can play off of Tampa. I hope they trade him. He's in the last year of his deal, he's not coming back and I am in the total blow it up camp.
I really hope the plan is what it appears to be...Shit The Bed In 2013. This team was going to be lousy this season regardless. The worst thing you can do is put yourself in a bad cap space for the future. Might as well be horrible and get some draft picks in the process.
tims4wins said:I can't believe Holmes took a straight pay cut. Very odd.
soxfan121 said:Holmes restructured his deal earlier this week.
Fitzpatrick was due a roster bonus of $3M, which is why he was cut when he was cut.
As said, cutting Sanchez in June spreads the $17.1M cap hit over two seasons. ($12.35 million in 2013 and $4.8 million in 2014)
Morgan's Magic Snowplow said:If I were Idzik/Woody, I'd take the Bucs 2014 1st rounder in a cocaine heartbeat, which is reportedly one offer on the table. I don't see why they are holding out for the 2013 1st rounder. The conventional wisdom about discounting the future really doesn't hold if you know that you're going to suck in the present anyway. If they're building for the future, its actually better to have a cost controlled player from 2014-2017 than from 2013-2016. Further, while you may end up with a slightly worse pick than the #13 the Bucs hold this year, next year's draft is absolutely stacked at the top, including tons of QB talent, and there is a non-negligible chance that things go badly in Tampa this season and you end up in the Top 10 in a loaded draft.
SeanBerry said:Another point to SSF's. Someone asked why not fire Rex earlier. Maybe they know they are going to tank bad this year and it's easier to get a BIG name coach if you have the #1 pick next year. Maybe that is Woody's angle?
SeanBerry said:Rex isn't going to quit. He'll get canned (or just not have his contract extended) after this upcoming season's debacle.
One aside: Jets losing Laron Landry sucks as he was a really nice player for them but the Colts are crazy giving him that much guaranteed money. Landry needed a day off each and every week from practice just to stay healthy last year.
KFP: I've said all throughout last year how horrid it was and I'm pretty open here about how next year is going to be insanely bad. Did I enjoy the seasons when the Jets went to the AFC Championship Games? Sure did. So what the fuck is your point?
soxfan121 said:There is no way the offense doesn't suck. Distancing yourself from that mess is logical.
As is calling the plays. Because the defense will probably improve and that ensures he gets another job as a DC right away, if not as a head coach. His explanation for his issues offensively is "Sanchez" and "Tannenbaum made me".
Rex is still a great defensive coach.
soxfan121 said:There is no way the offense doesn't suck. Distancing yourself from that mess is logical.
As is calling the plays. Because the defense will probably improve and that ensures he gets another job as a DC right away, if not as a head coach. His explanation for his issues offensively is "Sanchez" and "Tannenbaum made me".
Rex is still a great defensive coach.
PedroKsBambino said:Agree with the last statement, but abandoning the offense when you are the head coach is the best way to NOT get another DC job---no one wants a guy who throws up his hands and gives up, and that's really what you are advocating. As the head coach, you own the results of the offense either way; the only reason to stay out of it is if you're sure someone else is better at it (which may be the case with Rex).
PedroKsBambino said:Agree with the last statement, but abandoning the offense when you are the head coach is the best way to NOT get another DC job---no one wants a guy who throws up his hands and gives up, and that's really what you are advocating. As the head coach, you own the results of the offense either way; the only reason to stay out of it is if you're sure someone else is better at it (which may be the case with Rex).
I know i'm probably in the minority and am letting my dislike for his act cloud my judgement but I don;t know how great of a defensive coach he even is. During his time in Baltimore he was blessed with Ray Lewis and Ed Reed in their primes and in NY he's had Revis.soxfan121 said:Rex is still a great defensive coach.
steveluck7 said:I know i'm probably in the minority and am letting my dislike for his act cloud my judgement but I don;t know how great of a defensive coach he even is. During his time in Baltimore he was blessed with Ray Lewis and Ed Reed in their primes and in NY he's had Revis.
I know he was sans Revis last year and metrics show that they still had a good D but I would like to see what he can do without the benefit of generational talent on his side of the ball.
soxfan121 said:This is like doubting Phil Jackson or Red Auerbach's talents as a coach because they had all the talent. Yes, you might be right that with no talent, they'd be assclowns instead of Hall of Famers but it's just a thought exercise.
Rex has coached lots of very, very good defenses. Those defenses have had good talent. But don't make the mistake of assuming it is 100% ingredients, 0% chef.