2015 Ravens: Achilles 4, Suggs 0, Karma 7

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Super Nomario said:
Wouldn't the sensible thing to be to move Baltimore to the east, Miami to the south, and Indianapolis to the north?
8 games in the North? It would be the first incomplete season on record.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Gunfighter 09 said:
While we are on Ravens real fantasy scenarios, I do sometimes wonder how different the last 14 seasons would have been if the AFC divisions made more geographic sense and Baltimore and Buffalo switched divisions.
 
Per the numbers up thread, Baltimore probably has fewer playoff appearances overall, as pre-Flacco they would have been a Jets-esque opponent (great D, terrible offense) and would have traded wins over the Browns and Bengals for wins over the Jets and Miami, while losing a little more often to the Patriots than they did to the Steelers. 
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,890
Washington, DC
Gunfighter 09 said:
While we are on Ravens real fantasy scenarios, I do sometimes wonder how different the last 14 seasons would have been if the AFC divisions made more geographic sense and Baltimore and Buffalo switched divisions.
If the goal was geographical consistency, the logical moves would be Miami to the AFC South, Indy to the AFC North, and then Baltimore to the AFC East.

Edit: damn was working off an old version of the thread.
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,514
I thought this tidbit from King was interesting:
 
 Before the season the Ravens told the league they’d prefer their four western games—at Denver, Oakland, San Francisco and Arizona—be parceled out, two at a time. So the league scheduled Denver and Oakland roadies in Weeks 1 and 2, and Niners and Cardinals games in Weeks 6 and 7. Surely the Ravens didn’t count on being in an 0-2 hole with a brutal five-game stretch coming up beginning Sunday. 
 
 
Is this standard operating procedure?  This is the first I've heard of teams being able to express a preference regarding how their schedule shakes out.  
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,670
Hingham, MA
nattysez said:
I thought this tidbit from King was interesting:
 
 
Is this standard operating procedure?  This is the first I've heard of teams being able to express a preference regarding how their schedule shakes out.  
 
Pretty sure all teams submit certain preferences or requests, as well as logistical things like "we can't be home in week 9 because of a concert"
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Bump for 0-3. If Pitt was healthy at QB would be a lock 0-4 but these guys might lose anyways, defense is terrible.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
First 0-3 start in their 20-year history. Last team to start that way and make the postseason is the Bills, 17 years ago. Defense is bad.
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,716
NOVA
Seems most fans and media are blaming their tough schedule thus far. Things should turn around in two weeks when they face Cleveland.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
LMAO at having one third of the schedule be @ Oakland and complaining about schedule. Good chance they caught Denver at a relatively good time too.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,970
Unreal America
riboflav said:
Seems most fans and media are blaming their tough schedule thus far. Things should turn around in two weeks when they face Cleveland.
A should-be cupcake, a tough conference opponent and a division game. Where have I heard that before.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,826
Seems most fans and media are blaming their tough schedule thus far. Things should turn around in two weeks when they face Cleveland.
Plus a vocal portion are calling for the head of Dean Pees, complaints which I'm sure you are all familiar with.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,419
wade boggs chicken dinner said:
Plus a vocal portion are calling for the head of Dean Pees, complaints which I'm sure you are all familiar with.
Over @ The Russell Street Report it's also that they don't have any WR's. Every Flacco INT or incomplete isn't his fault, it's because of his WR's.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
The WR's after Smith are an atrocity that only an elite QB could win with, and the Ravens don't have one
 
Don't think Kamar Aiken threw that terrible pick six to lose to Denver though
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
wade boggs chicken dinner said:
Plus a vocal portion are calling for the head of Dean Pees, complaints which I'm sure you are all familiar with.
Yes. The same Pees that got them pretty far last season with a secondary beyond repair.

Harbaugh is very good at laying this off on coordinators during the season and swapping new guys in. Teflon. He has done on the other side of the ball late season, and it worked. I don't know that it could this time, so I don't know if he'll try it.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
In this respect, Harbaugh is helped by his special teams background. He's not seen as "responsible" for one side of the ball like most promoted coordinators. He can chuck Cam Cameron under the bus, and then find the next guy. Tomlin has similar positioning in PIT; he's the head coach, not the offense/defense guru. 
 

Valek123

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
985
Upper Valley
Jonathan Kraft doesn't appear to be playing politician as well as his father...
 

 
PATS PREZ WEIGHS IN ON RAVENS' WOES
 
Before Sunday's loss to Cincy dropped the Ravens to 0-3, Jonathan Kraft told 98.5 The Sports Hub: "It's too bad about Baltimore, isn't it?" Kraft deflected the host's quip about "karma" for the Ravens' reputed role as Deflategate whistleblowers (the Ravens denied it). Kraft said: "That has nothing to do with it. The Ravens are sweethearts. John Harbaugh, he's a sweetheart."
 
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,280
Valek123 said:
 
Jonathan Kraft doesn't appear to be playing politician as well as his father...
 
 
 
 
 
I guess there will be nowhere to go but down, but I worry about what will happen when Jonathan is running the show.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
If he lets football operations run football operations and spends to the cap over the cycle he'll be fine.  If he's out timing cornerback 40 times with a stopwatch and doesn't have a come to Jesus moment, we'll have a problem
 

Bleedred

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 21, 2001
10,031
Boston, MA
Stitch01 said:
If he lets football operations run football operations and spends to the cap over the cycle he'll be fine.  If he's out timing cornerback 40 times with a stopwatch and doesn't have a come to Jesus moment, we'll have a problem
Jonathan has a massive ego, but I think he's smart enough to let BB run things his way.  What I think is possible is that after BB retires, Jonathan may believe that his institutional knowledge of the Patriots under BB is translatable to running some part of the football side of the organization, or at least makes him deserving of input beyond the business, ownership and operation side.  If so, it could be an ugly tenure.
 

DourDoerr

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 15, 2004
2,941
Berkeley, CA
Bleedred said:
Jonathan has a massive ego, but I think he's smart enough to let BB run things his way.  What I think is possible is that after BB retires, Jonathan may believe that his institutional knowledge of the Patriots under BB is translatable to running some part of the football side of the organization, or at least makes him deserving of input beyond the business, ownership and operation side.  If so, it could be an ugly tenure.
Jerry Jones?
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,460
Overland Park, KS
The problem with the Ravens is they can't run the ball a lick which forces them to be one dimensional and they have one productive receiver. 
 

Gunfighter 09

wants to be caribou ken
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2005
8,550
KPWT
I think Flacco deserves more of the blame here, as this start pretty much confirms his lack of "eliteness". In all three losses Flacco has had the ball with a chance to win or tie at the end of the game. In two of those losses he threw an interception to seal the loss and blatantly missed open receivers on the fourth and long play at the end of the Bengals game. He only had 26 seconds to work with at the end of the Raiders game and has been hurt by drops, but this is why he is not on the Brady / Rogers / etc. level.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,670
Hingham, MA
ShaneTrot said:
The problem with the Ravens is they can't run the ball a lick which forces them to be one dimensional and they have one productive receiver. 
 
The lack of running game was so predictable. I wrote this after the Denver loss:
 


Their offense was a mess down the stretch in 2012 till they fired the OC. Then Caldwell took over and they won a Super Bowl.

Caldwell left in 2013 and their offense sucked again. So they hired Kubiak and he got a fluky, career year out of Forsett and ran an offense tailor made for Flacco's strengths and they had another great year.

Kubiak is now gone, and I think we may very well see a regression to the mid-2012 / 2013 offense. Combine that with the Suggs injury and a tough division and the Ravens may well be one of the 5-6 annual previous season playoff teams to miss out.
 
Nothing has changed. They can't run it.
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
64,041
Rotten Apple
Bleedred said:
Jonathan has a massive ego, but I think he's smart enough to let BB run things his way.  What I think is possible is that after BB retires, Jonathan may believe that his institutional knowledge of the Patriots under BB is translatable to running some part of the football side of the organization, or at least makes him deserving of input beyond the business, ownership and operation side.  If so, it could be an ugly tenure.
Agreed, but anyone coming in after BB and TB12 retire is basically in a no-win situation.
 
That said, JK should not be talking smack publicly about the Ravens at all. Let the team win and stay above that crap, it's what the coach does so take a cue from BB.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,826
Gunfighter 09 said:
I think Flacco deserves more of the blame here, as this start pretty much confirms his lack of "eliteness". In all three losses Flacco has had the ball with a chance to win or tie at the end of the game. In two of those losses he threw an interception to seal the loss and blatantly missed open receivers on the fourth and long play at the end of the Bengals game. He only had 26 seconds to work with at the end of the Raiders game and has been hurt by drops, but this is why he is not on the Brady / Rogers / etc. level.
 
Well, Flacco did engineer one 4th quarter comeback yesterday.  Too bad they needed two.  Plus as noted above, the Ravens have probably as bad a group of WRs as any team in football.
 
And even what were supposed to be their strength - their OL and DL - have been playing not very well insofar as I can tell.
 
A huge part of the problem I think is that the Ravens' player evaluations were inflated last year based on playing the NFC South.  They went 3-3 in their division and ended up beating CAR, ATL, NO, TB, JAC, and TEN for nine wins.
 
I thought all of the teams in that division were going to take a step back because of how much more difficult their schedules are this year, but apparently it's just BAL (at least until now).
 

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,685
wade boggs chicken dinner said:
 
Well, Flacco did engineer one 4th quarter comeback yesterday.  Too bad they needed two.  Plus as noted above, the Ravens have probably as bad a group of WRs as any team in football.
 
And even what were supposed to be their strength - their OL and DL - have been playing not very well insofar as I can tell.
 
A huge part of the problem I think is that the Ravens' player evaluations were inflated last year based on playing the NFC South.  They went 3-3 in their division and ended up beating CAR, ATL, NO, TB, JAC, and TEN for nine wins.
 
I thought all of the teams in that division were going to take a step back because of how much more difficult their schedules are this year, but apparently it's just BAL (at least until now).
 
That seems very overblown to me.  Regardless of the rest of the team, Steve Smith is good.  I would argue that the Browns, 49ers, Rams and Panthers have worse receivers.  If we are not including Tight Ends, I would put the Chiefs and Seahawks below the Ravens as well. 
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Even Snyder wouldn't screw with BB, as he didn't mess with Joe Gibbs II.  So I don't imagine Jonathan would either.
 
When BB retires, we'll find out.  If he runs it like Pops, we should be fine.  If he doesn't, it's a question of how many times his nose must be bloodied over how long before he wakes up.  Snyder has not woken up, and we're in year 17 or thereabouts right now.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
I was at the game.  Flacco played more than well enough to win, and the Bengals could not cover the 37 year old Superman.  (Put Steve Smith on the Pats, and we would be  astonished several times a game; he's quite amazing).
 
But they can't run the ball, the defense really stinks, they are playing sloppy, penalty-filled football, and Flacco is not "elite". That's the story.  Harbaugh walks because of an astute observation made by soxfan above about him and Tomlin.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
dcmissle said:
I was at the game.  Flacco played more than well enough to win, and the Bengals could not cover the 37 year old Superman.  (Put Steve Smith on the Pats, and we would be  astonished several times a game; he's quite amazing).
 
But they can't run the ball, the defense really stinks, they are playing sloppy, penalty-filled football, and Flacco is not "elite". That's the story.  Harbaugh walks because of an astute observation made by soxfan above about him and Tomlin.
Harbaugh also walks because his career record is 72-43 with a title and six playoff appearances in seven years.
 
(Aside: Belichick obviously has the best resume of any coach out there, but Mike McCarthy is probably #2: 47 games over .500, second only to BB, and a ring. Harbaugh's probably #3)
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,826
pappymojo said:
 
That seems very overblown to me.  Regardless of the rest of the team, Steve Smith is good.  I would argue that the Browns, 49ers, Rams and Panthers have worse receivers.  If we are not including Tight Ends, I would put the Chiefs and Seahawks below the Ravens as well. 
 
If you put Flacco under a truth serum, I think he's much rather be throwing to Boldin and Smith - again - than SSSr. and Kamar Aiken.  And as for the rest, I didn't really go through the depth charts to compare, but if the Ravens are better they aren't very much better.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Super Nomario said:
Harbaugh also walks because his career record is 72-43 with a title and six playoff appearances in seven years.
 
(Aside: Belichick obviously has the best resume of any coach out there, but Mike McCarthy is probably #2: 47 games over .500, second only to BB, and a ring. Harbaugh's probably #3)
No doubt. Harbaugh is a very good coach. I'm very disappointed in his behavior the last year or so, from a Pats fan perspective, but there is no taking that away from him.

It's going to be very interesting to see whether they can climb out of this hole and, if not get back into a playoff competitive position, how he handles the rest of the year.

Even when allowing for talent attrition, there is something not quite right this season. It's reflected in the sloppiness of their play, in all phases, which fairly should be pinned on the HC.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
dbn said:
Steve Smith has a hat that says "Smith" and a lifetime hit list for people that did nothing to him.
 
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25324850/ravens-wr-steve-smith-on-steelers-safety-hes-on-my-lifetime-hit-list
 
PS, I need a hat that reads "dbn".
So there are two guys I have long wanted to be in a Pats uniform. One is Sproles; the other Smith. It really irks me that weather contributed to him being in a Ravens uni instead. The guy is a 37-year-old wonder. God he'd be a great Patriot.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
Pats almost signed Mason but he went to the Ravens at the last second.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
dcmissle said:
So there are two guys I have long wanted to be in a Pats uniform. One is Sproles; the other Smith. It really irks me that weather contributed to him being in a Ravens uni instead. The guy is a 37-year-old wonder. God he'd be a great Patriot.
 
I have no doubt BB respects Smith and would love to have him on the Patriots - if Smith shut the fuck up. 
And I have no doubt Smith respects BB and would love to be a Patriot - if he didn't have to shut the fuck up. 

There was never much chance of Smith becoming a Patriot because neither guy has any intention of changing who they are, and how he likes to do his business. You can admire someone of a different style without necessarily wanting that guy on your team. I like Smith, too. But not the constant me-first yapping and the teammate punching. So, yeah - great player. Not a great Patriot, at least as long as Belichick is the coach.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,419
@CHICKatCSN: Per team source Ravens WR Steve Smith Sr. has 4 broken bones in his back. They will put him in wait & see mode (day 2 day) #ravenstalk cont
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,562
NortheasternPJ said:
@CHICKatCSN: Per team source Ravens WR Steve Smith Sr. has 4 broken bones in his back. They will put him in wait & see mode (day 2 day) #ravenstalk cont
Was wondering how broken back bones = day to day but Rapsheet says it's actually four ribs.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
soxfan121 said:
 
I have no doubt BB respects Smith and would love to have him on the Patriots - if Smith shut the fuck up. 
And I have no doubt Smith respects BB and would love to be a Patriot - if he didn't have to shut the fuck up. 

There was never much chance of Smith becoming a Patriot because neither guy has any intention of changing who they are, and how he likes to do his business. You can admire someone of a different style without necessarily wanting that guy on your team. I like Smith, too. But not the constant me-first yapping and the teammate punching. So, yeah - great player. Not a great Patriot, at least as long as Belichick is the coach.
I don't know - there are counter-examples of big mouths that Belichick did sign. Ochocinco is the latest example. Moss had his incidents. There's no one really like Steve Smith, but Bryan Cox was pretty close:
 
So far in his seven-year career--including his time with the Miami Dolphins, from 1991 through '95--Cox has flipped off the fans in Buffalo ($3,000 fine), spit at the fans in Buffalo ($7,500 fine), fought a Buffalo running back (ejection from game and $10,000 fine), flipped off and verbally abused a game official (fined a week's pay, $82,352), sued the NFL (twice, claiming there was inadequate security at Rich Stadium, and that the league was vindictive in fining him $82,352), called commissioner Paul Tagliabue and his advisers "clowns," unleashed a televised tirade in the Chicago locker room that included 38 profanities in 5 1/2 minutes and ended with the words "Praise be to God," and challenged the entire Cincinnati Bengals bench to a fight.
I'm not sure if Smith's yapping is qualitatively different from these guys in a way that Belichick would find unworkable, but he's made things work with other folks in the past.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Good point. I can envision a conversation between those guys and Belichick in which 'doing it differently' was discussed; all made obvious effort to change their former talking ways. I can see Smith saying "too much a part of my game" and Belichick nodding and saying, "I respect that."
 
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Like, I bet Belichick liked Clinton Portis as a player. But Halloween comes once a year in Belichickville, not every Tuesday during media availability.
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,105
A Scud Away from Hell
soxfan121 said:
Like, I bet Belichick liked Clinton Portis as a player. But Halloween comes once a year in Belichickville, not every Tuesday during media availability.
I never thought Talib nor Blount would be a "good" fit either. At this point BB gets the benefit of the doubt on pretty much anyone he wants to bring in.
 

crystalline

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 12, 2009
5,771
JP
soxfan121 said:
Good point. I can envision a conversation between those guys and Belichick in which 'doing it differently' was discussed; all made obvious effort to change their former talking ways. I can see Smith saying "too much a part of my game" and Belichick nodding and saying, "I respect that."
 
Yes, I vaguely remember Ochocinco saying he had agreed to stick to Patriots-speak when he came.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
So that running game better get fixed up by Sunday or they're going to lose at home to the Browns unless Kamar Aiken is a lot better than I remember.