8 games in the North? It would be the first incomplete season on record.Super Nomario said:Wouldn't the sensible thing to be to move Baltimore to the east, Miami to the south, and Indianapolis to the north?
8 games in the North? It would be the first incomplete season on record.Super Nomario said:Wouldn't the sensible thing to be to move Baltimore to the east, Miami to the south, and Indianapolis to the north?
Gunfighter 09 said:While we are on Ravens real fantasy scenarios, I do sometimes wonder how different the last 14 seasons would have been if the AFC divisions made more geographic sense and Baltimore and Buffalo switched divisions.
Huh?dcmissle said:8 games in the North? It would be the first incomplete season on record.
If the goal was geographical consistency, the logical moves would be Miami to the AFC South, Indy to the AFC North, and then Baltimore to the AFC East.Gunfighter 09 said:While we are on Ravens real fantasy scenarios, I do sometimes wonder how different the last 14 seasons would have been if the AFC divisions made more geographic sense and Baltimore and Buffalo switched divisions.
Before the season the Ravens told the league they’d prefer their four western games—at Denver, Oakland, San Francisco and Arizona—be parceled out, two at a time. So the league scheduled Denver and Oakland roadies in Weeks 1 and 2, and Niners and Cardinals games in Weeks 6 and 7. Surely the Ravens didn’t count on being in an 0-2 hole with a brutal five-game stretch coming up beginning Sunday.
nattysez said:I thought this tidbit from King was interesting:
Is this standard operating procedure? This is the first I've heard of teams being able to express a preference regarding how their schedule shakes out.
Peter King at MMQB wrote a long piece a couple years ago on the process of making the schedule:tims4wins said:
Pretty sure all teams submit certain preferences or requests, as well as logistical things like "we can't be home in week 9 because of a concert"
A should-be cupcake, a tough conference opponent and a division game. Where have I heard that before.riboflav said:Seems most fans and media are blaming their tough schedule thus far. Things should turn around in two weeks when they face Cleveland.
Plus a vocal portion are calling for the head of Dean Pees, complaints which I'm sure you are all familiar with.Seems most fans and media are blaming their tough schedule thus far. Things should turn around in two weeks when they face Cleveland.
Over @ The Russell Street Report it's also that they don't have any WR's. Every Flacco INT or incomplete isn't his fault, it's because of his WR's.wade boggs chicken dinner said:Plus a vocal portion are calling for the head of Dean Pees, complaints which I'm sure you are all familiar with.
Yes. The same Pees that got them pretty far last season with a secondary beyond repair.wade boggs chicken dinner said:Plus a vocal portion are calling for the head of Dean Pees, complaints which I'm sure you are all familiar with.
PATS PREZ WEIGHS IN ON RAVENS' WOES
Before Sunday's loss to Cincy dropped the Ravens to 0-3, Jonathan Kraft told 98.5 The Sports Hub: "It's too bad about Baltimore, isn't it?" Kraft deflected the host's quip about "karma" for the Ravens' reputed role as Deflategate whistleblowers (the Ravens denied it). Kraft said: "That has nothing to do with it. The Ravens are sweethearts. John Harbaugh, he's a sweetheart."
Valek123 said:
Jonathan Kraft doesn't appear to be playing politician as well as his father...
Jonathan has a massive ego, but I think he's smart enough to let BB run things his way. What I think is possible is that after BB retires, Jonathan may believe that his institutional knowledge of the Patriots under BB is translatable to running some part of the football side of the organization, or at least makes him deserving of input beyond the business, ownership and operation side. If so, it could be an ugly tenure.Stitch01 said:If he lets football operations run football operations and spends to the cap over the cycle he'll be fine. If he's out timing cornerback 40 times with a stopwatch and doesn't have a come to Jesus moment, we'll have a problem
Jerry Jones?Bleedred said:Jonathan has a massive ego, but I think he's smart enough to let BB run things his way. What I think is possible is that after BB retires, Jonathan may believe that his institutional knowledge of the Patriots under BB is translatable to running some part of the football side of the organization, or at least makes him deserving of input beyond the business, ownership and operation side. If so, it could be an ugly tenure.
ShaneTrot said:The problem with the Ravens is they can't run the ball a lick which forces them to be one dimensional and they have one productive receiver.
Their offense was a mess down the stretch in 2012 till they fired the OC. Then Caldwell took over and they won a Super Bowl.
Caldwell left in 2013 and their offense sucked again. So they hired Kubiak and he got a fluky, career year out of Forsett and ran an offense tailor made for Flacco's strengths and they had another great year.
Kubiak is now gone, and I think we may very well see a regression to the mid-2012 / 2013 offense. Combine that with the Suggs injury and a tough division and the Ravens may well be one of the 5-6 annual previous season playoff teams to miss out.
Agreed, but anyone coming in after BB and TB12 retire is basically in a no-win situation.Bleedred said:Jonathan has a massive ego, but I think he's smart enough to let BB run things his way. What I think is possible is that after BB retires, Jonathan may believe that his institutional knowledge of the Patriots under BB is translatable to running some part of the football side of the organization, or at least makes him deserving of input beyond the business, ownership and operation side. If so, it could be an ugly tenure.
Gunfighter 09 said:I think Flacco deserves more of the blame here, as this start pretty much confirms his lack of "eliteness". In all three losses Flacco has had the ball with a chance to win or tie at the end of the game. In two of those losses he threw an interception to seal the loss and blatantly missed open receivers on the fourth and long play at the end of the Bengals game. He only had 26 seconds to work with at the end of the Raiders game and has been hurt by drops, but this is why he is not on the Brady / Rogers / etc. level.
wade boggs chicken dinner said:
Well, Flacco did engineer one 4th quarter comeback yesterday. Too bad they needed two. Plus as noted above, the Ravens have probably as bad a group of WRs as any team in football.
And even what were supposed to be their strength - their OL and DL - have been playing not very well insofar as I can tell.
A huge part of the problem I think is that the Ravens' player evaluations were inflated last year based on playing the NFC South. They went 3-3 in their division and ended up beating CAR, ATL, NO, TB, JAC, and TEN for nine wins.
I thought all of the teams in that division were going to take a step back because of how much more difficult their schedules are this year, but apparently it's just BAL (at least until now).
Harbaugh also walks because his career record is 72-43 with a title and six playoff appearances in seven years.dcmissle said:I was at the game. Flacco played more than well enough to win, and the Bengals could not cover the 37 year old Superman. (Put Steve Smith on the Pats, and we would be astonished several times a game; he's quite amazing).
But they can't run the ball, the defense really stinks, they are playing sloppy, penalty-filled football, and Flacco is not "elite". That's the story. Harbaugh walks because of an astute observation made by soxfan above about him and Tomlin.
pappymojo said:
That seems very overblown to me. Regardless of the rest of the team, Steve Smith is good. I would argue that the Browns, 49ers, Rams and Panthers have worse receivers. If we are not including Tight Ends, I would put the Chiefs and Seahawks below the Ravens as well.
No doubt. Harbaugh is a very good coach. I'm very disappointed in his behavior the last year or so, from a Pats fan perspective, but there is no taking that away from him.Super Nomario said:Harbaugh also walks because his career record is 72-43 with a title and six playoff appearances in seven years.
(Aside: Belichick obviously has the best resume of any coach out there, but Mike McCarthy is probably #2: 47 games over .500, second only to BB, and a ring. Harbaugh's probably #3)
The case fell apart as it was determined she was disgruntled after being rebuffed when she pursued him, and the decorated former Baltimore homicide detective is cleared to return to work.
So there are two guys I have long wanted to be in a Pats uniform. One is Sproles; the other Smith. It really irks me that weather contributed to him being in a Ravens uni instead. The guy is a 37-year-old wonder. God he'd be a great Patriot.dbn said:Steve Smith has a hat that says "Smith" and a lifetime hit list for people that did nothing to him.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25324850/ravens-wr-steve-smith-on-steelers-safety-hes-on-my-lifetime-hit-list
PS, I need a hat that reads "dbn".
dcmissle said:So there are two guys I have long wanted to be in a Pats uniform. One is Sproles; the other Smith. It really irks me that weather contributed to him being in a Ravens uni instead. The guy is a 37-year-old wonder. God he'd be a great Patriot.
Was wondering how broken back bones = day to day but Rapsheet says it's actually four ribs.NortheasternPJ said:@CHICKatCSN: Per team source Ravens WR Steve Smith Sr. has 4 broken bones in his back. They will put him in wait & see mode (day 2 day) #ravenstalk cont
I don't know - there are counter-examples of big mouths that Belichick did sign. Ochocinco is the latest example. Moss had his incidents. There's no one really like Steve Smith, but Bryan Cox was pretty close:soxfan121 said:
I have no doubt BB respects Smith and would love to have him on the Patriots - if Smith shut the fuck up.
And I have no doubt Smith respects BB and would love to be a Patriot - if he didn't have to shut the fuck up.
There was never much chance of Smith becoming a Patriot because neither guy has any intention of changing who they are, and how he likes to do his business. You can admire someone of a different style without necessarily wanting that guy on your team. I like Smith, too. But not the constant me-first yapping and the teammate punching. So, yeah - great player. Not a great Patriot, at least as long as Belichick is the coach.
I'm not sure if Smith's yapping is qualitatively different from these guys in a way that Belichick would find unworkable, but he's made things work with other folks in the past.
So far in his seven-year career--including his time with the Miami Dolphins, from 1991 through '95--Cox has flipped off the fans in Buffalo ($3,000 fine), spit at the fans in Buffalo ($7,500 fine), fought a Buffalo running back (ejection from game and $10,000 fine), flipped off and verbally abused a game official (fined a week's pay, $82,352), sued the NFL (twice, claiming there was inadequate security at Rich Stadium, and that the league was vindictive in fining him $82,352), called commissioner Paul Tagliabue and his advisers "clowns," unleashed a televised tirade in the Chicago locker room that included 38 profanities in 5 1/2 minutes and ended with the words "Praise be to God," and challenged the entire Cincinnati Bengals bench to a fight.
I never thought Talib nor Blount would be a "good" fit either. At this point BB gets the benefit of the doubt on pretty much anyone he wants to bring in.soxfan121 said:Like, I bet Belichick liked Clinton Portis as a player. But Halloween comes once a year in Belichickville, not every Tuesday during media availability.
Yes, I vaguely remember Ochocinco saying he had agreed to stick to Patriots-speak when he came.soxfan121 said:Good point. I can envision a conversation between those guys and Belichick in which 'doing it differently' was discussed; all made obvious effort to change their former talking ways. I can see Smith saying "too much a part of my game" and Belichick nodding and saying, "I respect that."