In fact Crowder 's advanced stats has been putrid in Cleveland. I have not watched Cleveland play yet, so I have no idea why.
.
Because he's a role player and was put in the best possible situation to succeed in Boston.
In fact Crowder 's advanced stats has been putrid in Cleveland. I have not watched Cleveland play yet, so I have no idea why.
.
Yeah, I get the whole "let's not panic about the Cavs" thing, but without LeBron, they would barely be a playoff team.Yeah, I suppose it's possible Rose/Wade is a PG downgrade from Kyrie /intentional snark
The turnovers and poor offensive efficiency this year are unquestionably a direct result of replacing Kyrie with Rose/Wade at the PG position......I'm sure any reasonable basketball person can recognize this.
Without LeBron, they're in the lottery imo.Yeah, I get the whole "let's not panic about the Cavs" thing, but without LeBron, they would barely be a playoff team.
With LeBron I had them as a 4/5-seed in the East following the Kyrie trade as they are not built for an 82-game regular season. I recall when I posted this there was pushback from more than one poster about them being built MORE toward the regular season which made my head explode. They still have time to add pieces, change coaches/philosophy, etc to get ready for the playoffs as the regular season really means little to them but from a pure talent standpoint they aren't ahead of Boston, Washington, or Toronto (in the same league yes, but not ahead)......which doesn't even get into Orlando's rise and the Pistons/Pacers putting it together.Yeah, I get the whole "let's not panic about the Cavs" thing, but without LeBron, they would barely be a playoff team.
Yup, this is why I think the whole "someone has to beat LeBron in the East first" trope is a classic case of really static thinking. This team is FAR worse than anything he's been part of since his first Cleveland run, when he didn't make it out of the East for three years running.With LeBron I had them as a 4/5-seed in the East following the Kyrie trade. They still have time to add pieces, change coaches/philosophy, etc to get ready for the playoffs but from a pure talent standpoint they aren't ahead of Boston, Washington, or Toronto (in the same league yes, but not ahead)......which doesn't even get into Orlando's rise and the Pistons/Pacers putting it together.
This is exactly what Brad does. Seems simple but it isn't.Because he's a role player and was put in the best possible situation to succeed in Boston.
Anyone watching the Orlando games? Still trying to wrap my head around their 6-2 start, and last night they beat Memphis, in Memphis. ??? One thing I did notice: Jonathon Simmons (the other Simmons) has been very good so far coming off the bench for them. I really don't understand why San Antonio let him get away, because he had a few good games for them last year and showed a glimpse of his talent.
Edit for a quick add on Simmons: I know that apparently he wanted to leave because he didn't like the way he fit into Pop's system, but it doesn't sound like they did much to dissuade him.
SRN:
The "who's their #2 guy?" question remains for me. I almost feel like it may be Jae Crowder when you factor in both ends of the floor (which is why I was pissed the Cs coughed him up so easily), but that to me is the core problem: they seem stacked with specialists who are fine as your #5-12 rotation guys, but light on guys who are dominant or multi-dimensional enough to be part of a championship Big 3 or Big 4.
When the trade was being analyzed over the summer, someone said (Kevin O'Connor?) said that while Kyrie's stats might not have been the greatest, the reason he is such a special player is because he can score when everyone in the building is expecting him to score - like Game 4 against the Cs when LBJ was in foul trouble for the first time in his life - and there just aren't that many people in the NBA who can do that.However they are rebounding on the offensive end a bit worse than last year, they are taking and making fewer three pointers and they have been HORRIFIC with LBJ off the floor. Last year they may not have had a good record if LBJ didn't play, but at least they had a guy in Kyrie that could score the ball when he took a rest. They don't have that this year.
CLE is 25th in point differential at -6.9 per game, ahead of only SAC, CHI, DAL, PHO (skewed because of their terrible first three losses), and ATL. Surprisingly, MIN is next highest at -4.2.If before the season you had looked at the Cavs' last six games on the schedule — ORL, CHI, NYK, IND at home, NOP and BKN on the road — you would likely have predicted five Cavs blowouts, with possibly one close game in the bunch.
And ... you have would have been right! Five Cavs blowouts by their opponents, with one close game against the Bulls, the worst team in the NBA.
Or like this. I still don't know how he got free (and I'm not sure Brogdon and Middleton--or Henson-- realized he had until a half second later).When the trade was being analyzed over the summer, someone said (Kevin O'Connor?) said that while Kyrie's stats might not have been the greatest, the reason he is such a special player is because he can score when everyone in the building is expecting him to score - like Game 4 against the Cs when LBJ was in foul trouble for the first time in his life - and there just aren't that many people in the NBA who can do that.
Ugh. Bummer for them and him, but it could actually help them down the road if it forces them pick up a legitimately full-sized, defense-minded big man who can give them 10-15 minutes of rim D a game. Pretty sure there a few of those still lying around on the scrap heap (maybe even Edy Tavares, one of their last offseason cuts?)To add to their struggles, Tristan Thompson is out a month with a calf injury.
I think it's too early for them to make a panic move. At this point, we don't know what teams will be selling off players come February.Ugh. Bummer for them and him, but it could actually help them down the road if it forces them pick up a legitimately full-sized, defense-minded big man who can give them 10-15 minutes of rim D a game. Pretty sure there a few of those still lying around on the scrap heap (maybe even Edy Tavares, one of their last offseason cuts?)
Or of it forces them to cough up BKN 2018 and some salary ballast for Bledsoe and Tyson Chandler...
This falls in line with my criticism of some Celtics takes from last year about us "needing a rebounder." Sure we needed a rebounder and Cleveland needs some size but at what cost if they are unable to compete at an NBA level? Edy Tavares hasn't shown any ability to compete at an NBA level in Atlanta or Cleveland and when you are a 7'3 center that nobody cares to sign even with expanded rosters well......that speaks volumes. If it was easy to acquire that 15 mpg rim protector/rebounder than everyone would be doing it. Ainge did well this offseason with Baynes on a ridiculously cheap contract for a proven role player and Theis on his value 2-year deal.Ugh. Bummer for them and him, but it could actually help them down the road if it forces them pick up a legitimately full-sized, defense-minded big man who can give them 10-15 minutes of rim D a game. Pretty sure there a few of those still lying around on the scrap heap (maybe even Edy Tavares, one of their last offseason cuts?)
Or of it forces them to cough up BKN 2018 and some salary ballast for Bledsoe and Tyson Chandler...
I'm an Orlando believer (or at least I bet a decent chunk of change at 73:1 for them to win their division), but their shooters are basically the same as last year. It's just this year they're all going in. It's certainly possible everyone has had a breakout, but it's not like they brought in Kyle Korver and Kelly Olynyk or something. It's mostly existing guys all draining it from outside now.I don't think Memphis is for real, and will be closer to a .500 team. Orlando has looked like a completely different team though. Vucevic has become a legit threat from 3 and has been playing great defense. They will regress because there's no way they shoot .442 from 3 all year, but they actually do have some decent shooters on the team. Last year, they were .328 from 3.
I totally agree with your basic point — finding a useful player who doesn't suck is not nearly as easy as finding a player who checks a box of specific skill. But aren't the Cs' additions of Baynes and Theis early evidence that adding a cheap, readily available "defender/rebounder" or two (who outside of those skills are not NBA players) can be a big plus? You're probably right that Tavares is not that guy for Cleveland, but that doesn't mean there are no Baynes or Theis facsimiles still out there looking for jobs.This falls in line with my criticism of some Celtics takes from last year about us "needing a rebounder." Sure we needed a rebounder and Cleveland needs some size but at what cost if they are unable to compete at an NBA level? Edy Tavares hasn't shown any ability to compete at an NBA level in Atlanta or Cleveland and when you are a 7'3 center that nobody cares to sign even with expanded rosters well......that speaks volumes. If it was easy to acquire that 15 mpg rim protector/rebounder than everyone would be doing it. Ainge did well this offseason with Baynes on a ridiculously cheap contract for a proven role player and Theis on his value 2-year deal.
Yeah, but guys like Fournier and Augustin were way below their norms last year and even a return to form makes a drastic difference. Those players don't have to have break out years. They also added Speights and Simmons. It's really all on Gordon and Vucevic being acceptable 3 point shooters.I'm an Orlando believer (or at least I bet a decent chunk of change at 73:1 for them to win their division), but their shooters are basically the same as last year. It's just this year they're all going in. It's certainly possible everyone has had a breakout, but it's not like they brought in Kyle Korver and Kelly Olynyk or something. It's mostly existing guys all draining it from outside now.
Don't get me wrong, I think there's probably some real improvement there, but the fact that there hasn't been much roster turnover in that respect is a warning sign.
No that isn't what I pointing to at all. These guys ARE available in the offseason even on the cheap once the backup big market dries up which it did fast and furiously this year (otherwise we never get Baynes on such a steal of a deal) however it is rare to ever find a big sitting at home this time of year who can compete in NBA basketball. The guys who have been signed mid-season in recent years are the Joel Anthony types and those guys were only for end of bench insurance.....not to actually contribute unless an injured forced playing time.Aren't the Cs' additions of Baynes and Theis early evidence that adding a cheap, readily available "defender/rebounder" or two (who outside of those skills are not NBA players) can be a big plus? You're probably right that Tavares is not that guy for Cleveland, but that doesn't mean there are no Baynes or Theis facsimiles out there looking for jobs.
My point is that if the Cavs are smart/lucky enough to land the right one, integrate him into the Cavs' system while TT recuperates, and then cut one of their eight zillion surplus PGs when TT gets back, it could end up being a net plus for the roster, which is currently woefully understaffed in tough defenders and rim protectors.
Perhaps, but they still have only faced two teams that will likely miss the playoffs (NYK and SAC).Boston has really benefited from strength (weakness) of schedule so far. That's why I'm really interested in this OKC game on Friday. That should tell us a lot about how good this team is.
Three if you count the cruddy, #26-ranked Cavs.Perhaps, but they still have only faced two teams that will likely miss the playoffs (NYK and SAC).
Carmelo is looking really good in his role on this team where he only has to worry about scoring the ball where as with the Knicks he was often the prime facilitator as well. His 3FG% through 7 games is the highest of his career and in the games I've seen he is getting better looks than he ever did in New York.In the it's early department: Russell Westbrook is averaging 15.4 FGA a game, 8.6 less than last year. It's also the least amount of FGA per game since his 2nd season in the NBA, back in 09/10. Significantly less usage, too. Shows you what teammates can do.
Westbrook is shooting a career high in FG% and 3pt% himself, which could be because of better shot selection. Or ya know, SSS. At what point do we get past that issue anyway? 20 games?Carmelo is looking really good in his role on this team where he only has to worry about scoring the ball where as with the Knicks he was often the prime facilitator as well. His 3FG% through 7 games is the highest of his career and in the games I've seen he is getting better looks than he ever did in New York.
It was 31-12, it's 33-24 at the end of the quarter.31-14-Spurs...wow
This is were traditional scouting or eye tests are useful to use in conjunction with the stats. There is evidence of Carmelo having much cleaner looks than he's had in New York as well as Westbrook forcing fewer shots because he now has other scorers he trusts in George and Carmelo rather than his kickout going to Roberson in which case he recognized last year that forcing it himself was the better option.Westbrook is shooting a career high in FG% and 3pt% himself, which could be because of better shot selection. Or ya know, SSS. At what point do we get past that issue anyway? 20 games?
He's added that 16' jump shot the last 2 years and has been shooting it more this season. Makes you wonder if the 3 point shot is coming next year. To date though, he's been a pretty terrible offensive player his whole career. I never got the knock on him being a good offensive player but a bad defensive one. The stats say otherwise.The Blazers are fun on offense; getting Nurkic in a trade was a real steal for them since he can cover up mistakes on defense; eat rebounds, work the pick and roll and reliably make mid range jumpers. He's the perfect big to pair with CJ and Dame.
Didn't see the first. Nurkic got smoked over and over and over by Lopez in the secondNurkic is a really good defensive player.
Didn't see the first. Nurkic got smoked over and over and over by Lopez in the second