My thoughts exactly.If that isn't getting overturned, why even have the rule.
This. Seriously what’s the point? I mean come on.If that isn't getting overturned, why even have the rule.
Gronk's return=would have been OPI.So what the fuck does it take to overturn these PI type calls?
The NHL offside review kinda sucksDumbest rule any league has ever thought up.
Kind of, but the spinelessness of the NFL made it possible. Everyone could see that reviewing judgment calls was a bad idea.I blame the Saints for this.
Half-joking here but they should just make that the standard so we can all just forget about this farce.Creating a rule so that you can apply it only in a season defining instance is so idiotic. But, that seems to be the NFL intent with the PI review
You are right but the hope is something that obvious would be overturned. That was more egregious than a majority of challenges I have seen this year. All this rule was put into place for was window dressing for the saints fiasco last year.Nobody reasonably can be mystified by this by this point of the season. The numbers are beyond daunting.
Cause you are the bucs?How do leave Michael Thomas that wide open?
You could write a better rule. Overturning the ruling on the field is a bad standard when you can defer to the review official's judgement by simply looking at the play and saying penalty/no penalty.Everyone could see that reviewing judgment calls was a bad idea.
They love Dan Quinn.What the heck is with the falcons, playing good football for 1 1/4 games now?