Mark's nephew.Broncos playing someone named B. Rypien at qb.
Related to Mark? Not a common name.Broncos playing someone named B. Rypien at qb.
Surprised to see he was a big time recruit that went to Boise. He could easily take the starting role from Driskel until Lock comes back. Driskel is really bad.Mark's nephew.
I feel like the hook and ladder always works at the ends of games if executed properly. There, of course, it wasn’t.Holy shit, he was going to walk into the end zone. Oh man, that would have been epic.
Well well drawn up play. If only the Chargers guy caught the lateral. More in than DK Metcalf.Holy shit, he was going to walk into the end zone. Oh man, that would have been epic.
Yes.And further, did that DB just kick the ball up to complete a reception for Dal???
Ya, when the replayed showed it in slo mo. Pretty incredible. Glad Sea getting burned from some miracle catches.Yes.
Isn’t that the franchise motto?that was almost glorious from the Chargers
Clearly that 2-1 record after drubbing an 0-3 shitastic Broncos team paves the way for all time team.Schlereth on the Bucs:
“They’ve got a chance to be one of the all time greats.”
I think his ankle snapped.Damn, dirty play by the Cowboys player. May have just torn up Carson's knee.
I think Blake Bortles will be the starting QB next week.Surprised to see he was a big time recruit that went to Boise. He could easily take the starting role from Driskel until Lock comes back. Driskel is really bad.
Missing out on Dez Bryant and DK Metcalf is one of the most disappointing draft moments."DK Metcalf? Too dynamic." ~ Patriots
Wasn’t presnap like a false start.Why no 10-second runoff on that man downfield penalty?
I don’t think there was a runoff in that scenario.Pete accepting the penalty of like 3 net yards and not taking a loss of down and forcing DAL to use aTO to avoid the runoff is stupid as hell.
These game management fuckups willcatch up to him
I think @Mystic Merlin has bingo — there’s only a runoff if SEA declines the penalty.Wasn’t presnap like a false start.
Meh. 6 seconds left. Might as well throw it in the end zone while you have a chance.come on Dak, throw that away.
Only a runoff if the foul is the only reason the clock is stopped. Note it has to be the foul itself IMMEDIATELY stopping the clock, live-ball fouls such as holds don’t count.I think @Mystic Merlin has bingo — there’s only a runoff if SEA declines the penalty.
And the injuries continue to mount:Matt Ryan 450. Cam 397. Prescott 472 and counting. brutal pass defense from Seattle.
The play ended with a tackle in bounds, so there’s a runoff if Carroll declines the penalty, right?Only a runoff if the foul is the only reason the clock is stopped. Note it has to be the foul itself IMMEDIATELY stopping the clock, live-ball fouls such as holds don’t count.
It didn’t immediately stop the clock. By immediately, the clock must stop at the same second the foul occurs. The ball was still live and time elapsed after the flag was thrown.The play ended with a tackle in bounds, so there’s a runoff if Carroll declines the penalty, right?
(It obviously didn’t affect the outcome, but now I’m curious.)
Ah, gotcha. Thanks for the knowledge.It didn’t immediately stop the clock. By immediately, the clock must stop at the same second the foul occurs. The ball was still live and time elapsed after the flag was thrown.
Was he lined up tight on the ball? Also the officiating experts (and the NFL!) on a 50-50 situation will typically back the calling official.So in the Saints-Packers game just now, the Packers' D-lineman flinched forward without crossing into the NZ and the Saints' offensive lineman directly opposite him moved. From our past discussions here, I've been led to believe that that's still a neutral zone infraction. Yet when they asked the ref expert, he explained that unless he crosses into the NZ, it's not a NZ infraction, even if the OLineman moves.