2023 NBA Playoffs

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
47,398
Hartford, CT
If the Warriors hadn’t won any titles, then it would be defensible to suspend Draymond? I don’t understand the logic of Lowe’s argument.

The asterisk point by Spears is downright laughable. Ok, bud.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
49,316
Yes, we see NBA players trampolining off of other players all the time. Yawn.
That's not what I said. I think the players see these plays differently than the fans but maybe its wrong.

Players don't do what Draymond did all the time but there are lots of things going on each sequence that fans don't see that might be upsetting. Lots of pushing, grabbing and, yes even stepping on fallen opponents when people are tangled up on the ground.

Again, maybe that's not a good read.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,904
One video of the incident from the baseline looks like Sabonis had his arms around Green’s foot to protect him from getting kicked in the head. How is it that when Ndamukong Suh stomped on an opposing player the whole sports world was in agreement that he should be suspended, but in this care, there isn’t universal condemnation? Suh was suspended two games in 2011, and his stomp wasn’t as egregious as Green’s.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
26,134
Los Angeles, CA
That's not what I said. I think the players see these plays differently than the fans but maybe its wrong.

Players don't do what Draymond did all the time but there are lots of things going on each sequence that fans don't see that might be upsetting. Lots of pushing, grabbing and, yes even stepping on fallen opponents when people are tangled up on the ground.

Again, maybe that's not a good read.
I know that’s not what you said. It’s what I’m saying. Players get tangled up all the time yet we’ve never really seen this before. I don’t believe it’s on par with all of that other stuff, and I’m not sure those close to the game would agree. We are hearing from vocal GSW supporters.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
26,134
Los Angeles, CA
One video of the incident from the baseline looks like Sabonis had his arms around Green’s foot to protect him from getting kicked in the head. How is it that when Ndamukong Suh stomped on an opposing player the whole sports world was in agreement that he should be suspended, but in this care, there isn’t universal condemnation? Suh was suspended two games in 2011, and his stomp wasn’t as egregious as Green’s.
Cleats (+ football player known for being huge)
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,435
That's not what I said. I think the players see these plays differently than the fans but maybe its wrong.

Players don't do what Draymond did all the time but there are lots of things going on each sequence that fans don't see that might be upsetting. Lots of pushing, grabbing and, yes even stepping on fallen opponents when people are tangled up on the ground.

Again, maybe that's not a good read.
My read is that players tend to be forgiving for the occasional dirty play but the habitual stuff rubs them the wrong way because they're putting everyone's meal ticket at risk. Guys like Draymond, Rodman, Laimbeer, Bruce Bowen, Zaza, Grayson Allen, etc. who get called out for being dirty by multiple players/teams. The distinction is that the Rodman, Draymond types were dirty but also very good so I think players both appreciate how good they are/were while also being annoyed by some of their antics.

My annoyance with Draymond is that he shows zero remorse and seems to actually relish the role of being the bad guy, like Rodman. But, in a season, where he literally punched a teammate in the face and got suspended, he still can't rein it in. He just sucks all the enjoyment out of Dubs games for me.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
10,350
When people get tangled up or someone is being held from being up court, I’ve seen players kick at the other players hands/chest/face. It’s almost never a wind up kick but sort of a donkey kick like “get the fuck off of me”.

I’ve literally never seen anyone wind up and kick/stomp another player on the ground. If anyone has any video I would love to be proven wrong.

It seems like people defending Draymond can’t grasp the big difference between actually stepping/shooing a players hand off of you versus looking at the prone player and stomping on his chest as if he was a cockroach. It’s mind boggling that this is being explained away as if it’s some normal thing or that it happens semi-regularly (while also acting like the thing that does happen semi-regularly, grabbing someone’s ankle, is some sort of awful black mark on the game that we never see)

I don’t know if it’s that journalists/media know that Draymond is going to become a media member right after retirement and want to stay on his good side or if they appreciate his candor in interviews or what it is but the amount of discourse, by normally smart people, is fucking nauseating
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
26,134
Los Angeles, CA
When people get tangled up or someone is being held from being up court, I’ve seen players kick at the other players hands/chest/face. It’s almost never a wind up kick but sort of a donkey kick like “get the fuck off of me”.

I’ve literally never seen anyone wind up and kick/stomp another player on the ground. If anyone has any video I would love to be proven wrong.

It seems like people defending Draymond can’t grasp the big difference between actually stepping/shooing a players hand off of you versus looking at the prone player and stomping on his chest as if he was a cockroach. It’s mind boggling that this is being explained away as if it’s some normal thing or that it happens semi-regularly (while also acting like the thing that does happen semi-regularly, grabbing someone’s ankle, is some sort of awful black mark on the game that we never see)

I don’t know if it’s that journalists/media know that Draymond is going to become a media member right after retirement and want to stay on his good side or if they appreciate his candor in interviews or what it is but the amount of discourse, by normally smart people, is fucking nauseating
Contrarianism gets clicks.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,868
When people get tangled up or someone is being held from being up court, I’ve seen players kick at the other players hands/chest/face. It’s almost never a wind up kick but sort of a donkey kick like “get the fuck off of me”.

I’ve literally never seen anyone wind up and kick/stomp another player on the ground. If anyone has any video I would love to be proven wrong.

It seems like people defending Draymond can’t grasp the big difference between actually stepping/shooing a players hand off of you versus looking at the prone player and stomping on his chest as if he was a cockroach. It’s mind boggling that this is being explained away as if it’s some normal thing or that it happens semi-regularly (while also acting like the thing that does happen semi-regularly, grabbing someone’s ankle, is some sort of awful black mark on the game that we never see)

I don’t know if it’s that journalists/media know that Draymond is going to become a media member right after retirement and want to stay on his good side or if they appreciate his candor in interviews or what it is but the amount of discourse, by normally smart people, is fucking nauseating
Interesting. I had been doing the charitable interpretation of "these media guys don't know how fucking dangerous that was", but, unfortunately, I think many of them do want to stay on Draymond's good side and to maintain access. Because you're correct, he will be a prominent media member as soon as he retires. Heck, he already is, and he hasn't retired yet.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,904
Cleats (+ football player known for being huge)
Artificial turf game, where Suh’s footwear wasn’t that much different than Green’s. I’d rather get stomped on my arm by a 300 pounder than dead on my chest by a 230 pounder
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
26,134
Los Angeles, CA
Artificial turf game, where Suh’s footwear wasn’t that much different than Green’s. I’d rather get stomped on my arm by a 300 pounder than dead on my chest by a 230 pounder
Huh? You still wear cleats on artificial turf. It certainly isn’t flat soled basketball sneakers.

But I’m not arguing that Draymond’s play wasn’t dangerous- just trying to explain why one is more instinctively repulsive to a layperson.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
10,350
Spears is a lifelong Warrior homer isn't he? That part of the podcast was honestly embarassing to listen to, and I'm a huge Lowe fan....in his case, he admires Draymond the player and it was pretty clear that colored his ability to see the issue with Draymond's action. He also noted that this is a 'Last Dance' kind of situation potentially, and so taking Draymond off the court for a critical game is unfortunate way for that to go. That part I agree with as a basketball fan, but also as a basketball fan feel like is overdue.

I have generally liked the Warriors over their run---last year's finals notwithstanding---and I would be shocked if there's any serious basketball fan who doesn't recognize Draymond as an exceptionally dirty player.
I still am a big Lowe fan but his podcast has taken kind of a weird turn in the last year. He seems to want to showcase more of his personality on certain things while also trying to be an emotionless robot on other stuff…and I think he very often gets it wrong when to do which. There’s a handful of times where something interesting comes up and he grumbles “I don’t want to talk about this” but is willing to go full bore on other less interesting things. His biases also seem to be way more apparent than they were before (or maybe I just didn’t notice them)
Also, he now mentions predictions he got right or items that were written about in his 10 Things an annoying amount. We don’t need to hear 10 times a podcast that you wrote about Malik Monk in some random 10 things or that you predicted the Bucks to make the finals.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
49,316
I know that’s not what you said. It’s what I’m saying. Players get tangled up all the time yet we’ve never really seen this before. I don’t believe it’s on par with all of that other stuff, and I’m not sure those close to the game would agree. We are hearing from vocal GSW supporters.
We have seen it before plenty of times. The NBA on TNT had Shaq saying he would do what Draymond did and, more to the point, found a clip of Barkley stepping on a fallen opponent with what looked like intent from back in the day.

Again, Draymond's behavior was terrible (and stupid because it hurts his team) and nobody should condone it. My sense is simply that NBA lifers don't see these acts through the same moral lens as the fans. Perhaps that's why we are seeing some pushback from ex-players - in addition to those who may be close to GS/Draymond.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
26,134
Los Angeles, CA
We have seen it before plenty of times. The NBA on TNT had Shaq saying he would do what Draymond did and, more to the point, found a clip of Barkley stepping on a fallen opponent with what looked like intent from back in the day.

Again, Draymond's behavior was terrible (and stupid because it hurts his team) and nobody should condone it. My sense is simply that NBA lifers don't see these acts through the same moral lens as the fans. Perhaps that's why we are seeing some pushback from ex-players - in addition to those who may be close to GS/Draymond.
Okay so we found one time 30-40 years ago + Shaq holding up his tough guy image on air, as he always does, but not actually ever doing it during his playing days. Is there any other evidence that it happens plenty of times?
 
Last edited:

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
49,316
Okay so we found one time 30-40 years ago + Shaq holding up his tough guy image on air, as he always does, but not actually ever doing it during his playing days. Is there any other evidence that it happens plenty of times?
I am not going to go searching but I have indeed seen players stepping on others after getting tangled up on ground. Not with the same force as Green but it does happen in my viewing experience. We can agree to move on because it seems fruitless for either of us to try and prove a point.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,953
I still am a big Lowe fan but his podcast has taken kind of a weird turn in the last year. He seems to want to showcase more of his personality on certain things while also trying to be an emotionless robot on other stuff…and I think he very often gets it wrong when to do which. There’s a handful of times where something interesting comes up and he grumbles “I don’t want to talk about this” but is willing to go full bore on other less interesting things. His biases also seem to be way more apparent than they were before (or maybe I just didn’t notice them)
Also, he now mentions predictions he got right or items that were written about in his 10 Things an annoying amount. We don’t need to hear 10 times a podcast that you wrote about Malik Monk in some random 10 things or that you predicted the Bucks to make the finals.
I also feel like he's been told to feature the ESPN regional beat writers a lot, so there's a ton of pods with mediocre guests (mcmahon, ohm, etc.) rather than the mix he used to have. That helps talk about more teams a bit, but those guys generally are worse than he otherwise would have on and they usually pull the discussion away from tactics to narratives (Windhorst being the worst of that, though usually not a regular guest).

Agree on his finals predictions---is there ANYONE listening who doesn't know his finals pick already?
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
23,025
I also feel like he's been told to feature the ESPN regional beat writers a lot, so there's a ton of pods with mediocre guests (mcmahon, ohm, etc.) rather than the mix he used to have. That helps talk about more teams a bit, but those guys generally are worse than he otherwise would have on and they usually pull the discussion away from tactics to narratives (Windhorst being the worst of that, though usually not a regular guest).

Agree on his finals predictions---is there ANYONE listening who doesn't know his finals pick already?
I agree with most of this except that I love Windy and think he is a great guest.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,753
around the way
Cleats (+ football player known for being huge)
Not to mention that 2 NFL games is the rough equivalent to 10 NBA games (1/8th of the season). Suh was also a repeat offender, and the whole attempt-to-rip-a-guys-face-off was also pretty terrible.

I always try hard to avoid going V&N in here, but I'll say that the sports media commentary on this belies a lack of fact-based living that looks somewhat familiar to the rest of media to which we have become accustomed. #TeamDraymond is contorting itself to make its case for him in ways that bend reality.
 
Last edited:

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,953
Yeah, if you're going to do narratives, at least bring Windy on and do them right.
Exactly--he is the KING of narratives, and entertaining if you enjoy them. I like Lowe becasue he's the anti-narrative guy but everyone likes a different mix, all good....
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
10,350
I also feel like he's been told to feature the ESPN regional beat writers a lot, so there's a ton of pods with mediocre guests (mcmahon, ohm, etc.) rather than the mix he used to have. That helps talk about more teams a bit, but those guys generally are worse than he otherwise would have on and they usually pull the discussion away from tactics to narratives (Windhorst being the worst of that, though usually not a regular guest).

Agree on his finals predictions---is there ANYONE listening who doesn't know his finals pick already?
Agreed. There are some guests that he has on semi-regularly that are legitimately bad. (And the fact that Spears is anywhere close to the podcast helps prove your point. He’s terrible)

McMenamin, Ohm, Shelburne immediately jump to mind. All 3 of them don’t seem to have sources other than within the team they cover and generally don’t know that much about basketball. I remember he had McMenamin on a week or two after the trade deadline and he was talking about Vanderbilt and Beasley and it may as well have been a Lakers press release he was reading. He talked about what a great defender Beasley was (he’s at best mediocre) and how it’s amazing that a young stud like Vanderbilt who could do anything on the court had been traded multiple times. It got so bad that Lowe had to cut him off and go “….well Vanderbilt can’t shoot”.

It’s people like that that just brings nothing to the table. (I also think David Thorpe is a complete stooge who shouldn’t be on any form of media but some people may like him)

I like Lowe because he’s one of the few media members who has sources and can talk about possible trades/transactions from the lens of a GM while also having a good understanding of the game and tactics and I like all of his guests that can do at least one of those things (Howard Beck, Windhorst, Kirk Goldsberry). But I do think the pod, his hosting/takes/guests/moderating, have all had a noticeable dip in quality in the past year
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,589
Pittsburgh, PA
Marc Spears was on the Lowe Post and said that he thought that any NBA would react to getting pulled intentionally like Draymond did by stomping on their opponent (he added "maybe not as hard") and that he thinks the Kings are going to have an asterisk on the series if they win. Lowe said that he doesn't want to see the series be ended for such a legendary team because Draymond was suspended. Lowe also said that the Warriors were complaining that Sabonis is pushing too much for rebounds and swinging the ball around too aggressively on offense.
He's right about one thing, implicitly: Sabonis is going to be under more of a ref microscope than usual in Game 3. I still expect some pushing and the usual, but he should expect to not get the benefit of the doubt on just about anything.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,760
One video of the incident from the baseline looks like Sabonis had his arms around Green’s foot to protect him from getting kicked in the head. How is it that when Ndamukong Suh stomped on an opposing player the whole sports world was in agreement that he should be suspended, but in this care, there isn’t universal condemnation? Suh was suspended two games in 2011, and his stomp wasn’t as egregious as Green’s.
That's nicely put. Media herding is weird.

Kawhi is out tonight. Knee soreness.

Load management, I guess.
I truly HATE people who talk about guys who are soft, who should toughen up, calling guys "street clothes" etc. But I have to say, c'mon man. I mean, Kawhi looked awesome in game 2 after his supposed injury, and now he can't play? That is really weak.
 

ElUno20

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
6,222
If this is truly load management in the playoffs, nothing short of a title will save for for Kawhi. That's beyond disgusting. Gross
 

ElUno20

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
6,222
So you can kick (and probably punch) just dont make clean contact. Absolute bullshit
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,953
There is no argument that kicking someone intentionally in the balls is within the game—-that’s a pretty clear flagrant 2 by the rules. Gutless officiating.

”Dangerous’ is nowhere in the definition of a flagrant 2—unnecessary and excessive is. That qualifies

I agree that is nowhere near as dangerous as Draymond’s play
 
Last edited:

jmcc5400

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
5,468
There is no argument that kicking someone intentionally in the balls is within the game—-that’s a pretty clear flagrant 2 by the rules. Gutless officiating.

”Dangerous’ is nowhere in the definition of a flagrant 2—unnecessary and excessive is. That qualifies

I agree that is nowhere near as dangerous as Draymond’s play
  • Flagrant Foul Penalty 1: Unnecessary contact committed by a player against an opponent
  • Flagrant Foul Penalty 2: Unnecessary and excessive contact committed by a player against an opponent
A lot of gray area there. And if he had connected in the groin, I'd say there would be a good case to be made that that would make it "excessive." But he didn't.