I also feel like he's been told to feature the ESPN regional beat writers a lot, so there's a ton of pods with mediocre guests (mcmahon, ohm, etc.) rather than the mix he used to have. That helps talk about more teams a bit, but those guys generally are worse than he otherwise would have on and they usually pull the discussion away from tactics to narratives (Windhorst being the worst of that, though usually not a regular guest).
Agree on his finals predictions---is there ANYONE listening who doesn't know his finals pick already?
Agreed. There are some guests that he has on semi-regularly that are legitimately bad. (And the fact that Spears is anywhere close to the podcast helps prove your point. He’s terrible)
McMenamin, Ohm, Shelburne immediately jump to mind. All 3 of them don’t seem to have sources other than within the team they cover and generally don’t know that much about basketball. I remember he had McMenamin on a week or two after the trade deadline and he was talking about Vanderbilt and Beasley and it may as well have been a Lakers press release he was reading. He talked about what a great defender Beasley was (he’s at best mediocre) and how it’s amazing that a young stud like Vanderbilt who could do anything on the court had been traded multiple times. It got so bad that Lowe had to cut him off and go “….well Vanderbilt can’t shoot”.
It’s people like that that just brings nothing to the table. (I also think David Thorpe is a complete stooge who shouldn’t be on any form of media but some people may like him)
I like Lowe because he’s one of the few media members who has sources and can talk about possible trades/transactions from the lens of a GM while also having a good understanding of the game and tactics and I like all of his guests that can do at least one of those things (Howard Beck, Windhorst, Kirk Goldsberry). But I do think the pod, his hosting/takes/guests/moderating, have all had a noticeable dip in quality in the past year