Baseball thoughts without threads

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
44,962
Mtigawi
Today Bobby Bonilla is being paid approximately 1.2 million by the Mets. These payments will go on for another two decades.

To put this in context, he'll make make than Russell Wilson does this year
 

johnnywayback

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 8, 2004
1,422
AlNipper49 said:
Today Bobby Bonilla is being paid approximately 1.2 million by the Mets. These payments will go on for another two decades.

To put this in context, he'll make make than Russell Wilson does this year
 
I love Bobby Bonilla Day.  And I'd like to think that, if I were to sign a contract for that much money, I'd do some serious deferrals, too, just for the psychological lift of knowing I have a seven-figure no-show job for decades to come.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,188
How would this have worked out for Bobby-Bo if Wilpon hadn't found a way to muddle through after losing the bulk of his fortune in the Madoff fraud? 
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,267
This is more than Mike Trout will make this year.
 
Long live Bobby Bonilla.
 

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
Would you trade Brock Holt for Ben Zobrist, straight up?
 
Before this season started, you would.  Probably pretty quickly.  Zobrist had a track record.
 
Now you would have to think about it. 
 
Or am I wrong?
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,749
NY
Merkle's Boner said:
Ahh, 8% interest rates. How I miss you.
 
Yeah the rate is the only out of whack thing here compared with today's rate.  Everyone likes to mock the Mets (it's pretty easy in most cases) but this is a simple deferred compensation arrangement and really nothing to make a big deal out of.  Are people going to laugh at the Nats when they're still paying Scherzer in 2028?
 

rembrat

Member
SoSH Member
May 26, 2006
36,345
TheoShmeo said:
Would you trade Brock Holt for Ben Zobrist, straight up?
 
Before this season started, you would.  Probably pretty quickly.  Zobrist had a track record.
 
Now you would have to think about it. 
 
Or am I wrong?
 
I wouldn't do it just going off their ages. There is a 7 year gap there which is huge in today's game.
 
Zobrist also spends most of his time in the OF these days. Brock can pick it anywhere.
 

Hagios

New Member
Dec 15, 2007
672
johnnywayback said:
 
I love Bobby Bonilla Day.  And I'd like to think that, if I were to sign a contract for that much money, I'd do some serious deferrals, too, just for the psychological lift of knowing I have a seven-figure no-show job for decades to come.
 
Unfortunately he called 877-Cash-Now and spent it all on bling. It was good while it lasted.
 

Merkle's Boner

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2011
3,854
rembrat said:
 
I wouldn't do it just going off their ages. There is a 7 year gap there which is huge in today's game.
 
Zobrist also spends most of his time in the OF these days. Brock can pick it anywhere.
I think the question the Sox will have to answer is who will you trade Brock for. He is, in my mind, the new Zobrist, who is getting paid $7.5 million this year.  There will be a market for Holt at the trade deadline. He strikes me as exactly the kind of mid-season pickup who can help a team make the playoffs.
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,543
Don't forget about Goose!  From 1984:
 
Gossage's new contract, details of which have been circulated to baseball offices in recent days, includes guaranteed salaries totaling $4,625,000 and deferred payments from 1990 through 2016 that on paper total $5.33 million but that realistically have a value computed at $1,626,099. That makes the total value of the contract $6,251,099, or an average of $1,250,220 a year.
 
 

Hagios

New Member
Dec 15, 2007
672
Merkle's Boner said:
I think the question the Sox will have to answer is who will you trade Brock for. He is, in my mind, the new Zobrist, who is getting paid $7.5 million this year.  There will be a market for Holt at the trade deadline. He strikes me as exactly the kind of mid-season pickup who can help a team make the playoffs.
 
What value do you put on having guys with a plus makeup in your organization? Are there spillovers? I tried to do a search and could only come up with one study, but it does include a literature review and finds that there are significant spillovers:
 

After controlling for team effects, 6 ballpark effects, manager effects, and individual player effects, the regression analysis revealed that teammate statistics contributed significantly to individual performance: “Pitchers post lower ERAs if other pitchers on their team played well in the same season or in the previous season; batters achieve higher averages if their batting colleagues perform well in the current season” (Papps, p. 18).
In addition to team performance as a whole, he showed that an increase in manager quality also improves the performance of individual pitchers and batters. Moreover, he found that the manager’s winning percentage from his past teams was relatively more significant compared to managing experience
 
Those studies did not specifically focus on plus makeup guys, but I suspect they'd find something similar. In fact, I wonder if plus makeups are one of the few remaining market inefficiencies.
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,749
NY
Merkle's Boner said:
Pretty sure the Sox will be paying Manny for many more years.
 
Yeah I was going to mention that but since he isn't on Cots I got lazy.  But here are the details (posted in 2011):
 
 
Ramirez, who left baseball after his second bout with steroid accusations, will reportedly be receiving money from the Boston Red Sox until he is 54 years old.
 
As reported on Boston.com, Ramirez is going to be paid $32 million over the course of 16 years. His first payment in that deferred sum comes July 1 of this year. Basically, he'll be paid about $2 million per year until he's 54. (via CBS Sports)
 
 
 
 
The Globe reports that Ramirez will be paid $1,968,677 in 2011, and the payments increase slightly through 2026, when Ramirez will receive $2,043,809. Not a bad for a retired guy, huh?
 
 

santadevil

wears depends
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
6,520
Saskatchestan
glennhoffmania said:
 
Are people going to laugh at the Nats when they're still paying Scherzer in 2028?
Probably, but Bonilla will still have 8 more years if payments after that.
 

swiftaw

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2009
3,443
AlNipper49 said:
Today Bobby Bonilla is being paid approximately 1.2 million by the Mets. These payments will go on for another two decades.

To put this in context, he'll make make than Russell Wilson does this year
And they don't end until 2035.
 

Soxfan in Fla

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2001
7,187
Manny will get paid until 2026? Wonder what year he will cash all the checks? I'm guessing 2036.
 

TheYaz67

Member
SoSH Member
May 21, 2004
4,712
Justia Omnibus
Hope all the evangelical Christians on the Texas Rangers don't glance at the standings today and notice their current runs allowed and runs scored numbers....
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
Soxfan in Fla said:
Manny will get paid until 2026? Wonder what year he will cash all the checks? I'm guessing 2036.
That was Ricky.
 

mt8thsw9th

anti-SoSHal
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
17,121
Brooklyn
drleather2001 said:
That was Ricky.
 
That was Manny, too:
 
That was Boston's initial offer to Ramirez. And it wasn't nearly enough. It was about $53 million light, even for a man who once left two weeks worth of salary behind in a cowboy boot, once got a concerned call from Cleveland management after forgetting to cash five consecutive paychecks and once left $40,000 cash in his Impala's glove compartment.
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,749
NY
Toronto's run differential is now 215.  Only one other team is in triple digits- St. Louis at 114.  If they don't win the division and have to play in the ridiculous rat tail game it would be a travesty.
 

mt8thsw9th

anti-SoSHal
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
17,121
Brooklyn
glennhoffmania said:
Toronto's run differential is now 215.  Only one other team is in triple digits- St. Louis at 114.  If they don't win the division and have to play in the ridiculous rat tail game it would be a travesty.
 
They're currently 9 games under their expected W-L record. John Gibbons' teams are a combined 24 games under in his managerial career. With better-than-average luck, they'd already be over 100 wins, not at 86-64 and still in a division race.
 

DanoooME

above replacement level
SoSH Member
Mar 16, 2008
19,956
Henderson, NV
glennhoffmania said:
Toronto's run differential is now 215.  Only one other team is in triple digits- St. Louis at 114.  If they don't win the division and have to play in the ridiculous rat tail game it would be a travesty.
 
And the Rangers lead the West with a -5 differential.  Crazy stuff
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,358
The dumbest is that right now PIT and CHC have the second and third best records in all of baseball, yet only one can even make it to the NLDS where they'll face the team with the best record. It's a truly ridiculous system currently.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,809
Oregon
jon abbey said:
The dumbest is that right now PIT and CHC have the second and third best records in all of baseball, yet only one can even make it to the NLDS where they'll face the team with the best record. It's a truly ridiculous system currently.
 
Nah, it's a unfortunate series of events this year. If this set of circumstances were to happen every season, it would signal the need for change. But it doesn't
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,566
San Andreas Fault
George Springer just hit a big triple to knock in 2 and give the Astros the lead over the Angels. After he gets to third, he looks into his dugout clapping hands, all excited and yells "let's go." Guys always do this. You already did the big thing. Isn't there anything else they could come up with? Better than a crotch grab I guess.

The other one is when guys strike out, especially on a great pitch, they head back toward the dugout, then turn and look back at the mound, or the pitcher. Is that some kind of information gathering for their next AB?
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,358
E5 Yaz said:
 
Nah, it's a unfortunate series of events this year. If this set of circumstances were to happen every season, it would signal the need for change. But it doesn't
Dump divisions and it will never happen again.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,809
Oregon
jon abbey said:
Dump divisions and it will never happen again.
 
I'll agree to this if you agree that all teams will travel the same amount of miles per season with a balanced scheduled
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,358
E5 Yaz said:
 
I'll agree to this if you agree that all teams will travel the same amount of miles per season with a balanced scheduled
 
Balanced schedules would be another step forward, but I'm even just saying keep the schedules the same for now and just dump the divisions and have the top four teams make the postseason in each league, 1 vs 4 and 2 vs 3. If you need to keep the idiotic 4 vs 5 coin flip game, fine, but this would still be a major step forward to start. 

(And of course dump the idiotic "All-Star game determines home-field in the World Series" rule, that one is so nonsensical it's hard to believe.)
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,809
Oregon
jon abbey said:
 
Balanced schedules would be another step forward, but I'm even just saying keep the schedules the same for now and just dump the divisions and have the top four teams make the postseason in each league, 1 vs 4 and 2 vs 3. If you need to keep the idiotic 4 vs 5 coin flip game, fine, but this would still be a major step forward to start. 
 
It would be a huge mistake. 
 
More than any of the major sports, baseball is a regional rivalry-based game. You'd throw that away for the sake of a minimal benefit that only occurs in an outlier season.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,358
Fine, keep the schedules the way they are, just eliminate the divisions as I said above. You're not cutting into any regional rivalries then. 
 
Same thing as the NBA, keep the schedule the way it is but then seed the best 16 teams at the end 1-16 regardless of conference. Both of those would go a long way to rewarding regular season performance.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,358
Or you could even keep everything exactly the same as it is now, and the five teams that make the postseason are seeded 1-5 based on record. If that means the Mets and Dodgers play the coin flip game, good, because that's more fair for everyone.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,809
Oregon
jon abbey said:
Or you could even keep everything exactly the same as it is now, and the five teams that make the postseason are seeded 1-5 based on record. If that means the Mets and Dodgers play the coin flip game, good, because that's more fair for everyone.
 
I like this better than the other alternatives you propose. The prize for winning the division is a ticket to the postseason. Want a better seeding? Win more games
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,749
NY
I agree with Jon 101%. There shouldn't be a prize for winning a shitty division if four other teams in your league won more games. And the unbalanced schedule exacerbates the problem by letting a decent team beat up on shitty division rivals while a team in a strong division has to face good teams all season.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,809
Oregon
Well then, let's eliminate leagues altogether and have the teams with the 10 best records be seeded for the playoffs. That way, no team with a good record in one league has to sit out while teams with lesser records in the other league are in the playoffs
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,358
Well, you could keep leagues intact and still do that, that's what I think the NBA needs to do next (they have dumped divisions essentially this past offseason).
 
But yeah, if you could make the DH standard across all of baseball, that would also make me a happy camper but I'm not holding my breath on that (or any of this really, but that even more). If a handful of pitchers are good enough to hit, nothing's stopping them from pitching/DHing on the same day, but no one needs to see the 90+ % of pitchers that are automatic outs.
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,890
Washington, DC
jon abbey said:
(And of course dump the idiotic "All-Star game determines home-field in the World Series" rule, that one is so nonsensical it's hard to believe.)
I generally agree that it's nonsensical but MLB seems committed for logistical reasons to the idea that home field needs to be determined ahead of time (i.e. you can't just use best record). So what would be a good solution? I prefer the current system to the old one of simply alternating leagues, which is even more nonsensical. Maybe "league that wins gets home field advantage for next season"?
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,358
Well, they could give it to the team from the league with the better record against the other that season.
 
Under the current 'system', there will still be probably 7-8 candidates to host the WS into the weekend of Oct 4, which is only three weeks lead time, so unless it's a neutral site (please god no never), I don't understand how deciding HFA early really helps anyone.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
30,013
Alamogordo
Agreed, jon.  I mean, it's not like home field for the Championship Series' is determined in advance, and they seem to do okay with that.  I get the World Series is a bigger deal, but is it really that much more preparation?  
 

mt8thsw9th

anti-SoSHal
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
17,121
Brooklyn
Al Zarilla said:
The other one is when guys strike out, especially on a great pitch, they head back toward the dugout, then turn and look back at the mound, or the pitcher. Is that some kind of information gathering for their next AB?
 
When they look at the center field scoreboard to see the pitch information?
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,749
NY
E5 Yaz said:
Well then, let's eliminate leagues altogether and have the teams with the 10 best records be seeded for the playoffs. That way, no team with a good record in one league has to sit out while teams with lesser records in the other league are in the playoffs
 
While no system will be perfect you can certainly improve the system to make it less ridiculous.  Playing 72 games against 4 teams in your division while competing with the other 10 teams for a WC spot isn't even close.