Not just because he used his fake behind the back move tonight but he looks more like Rondo to me. Seems long and impossibly quick, like he could get to any place on the floor he wants. But like Rondo the pull up jumpers weren't there and obviously he's not as adept at the pick and roll. Defensively he's active but not great position ally at denying penetrationradsoxfan said:You can see why Rozier probably did well in individual workouts, ala Marcus Banks.
Like a rookie. He had a few good moves down low, but even facing nobody over 6'8" and probably nobody who will make the league he struggled badly on defense, often forced up ugly 10 footers and got easily boxed out on the defensive glass. Also weirdly for a guy who showed great hands in college he had real trouble corralling the ball and holding onto it in traffic. On the good side he hit the offensive boards better, and he showed some real strength once he got to a spot he liked.LondonSox said:For those who watched the game, how did Okafor look? I'm not sure you get a lot of info out of these game tbh but interested in some outside eyes opinions.
LondonSox said:For those who watched the game, how did Okafor look? I'm not sure you get a lot of info out of these game tbh but interested in some outside eyes opinions.
He adds shot blocking and defensive rebounding translate well, while shooting, offensive rebounding, usage rate, and steals translate poorly. Steals are the surprise there - they're fairly robust between college and the NBA.Overall, the correlation between players with at least 100 minutes in summer league and during the regular season is just .288, a relatively small figure on the correlation scale of zero (meaning no linear relationship) to one (or minus one, meaning completely in line)
.
However, that figure gets more interesting when it's broken down by NBA experience. Veteran players who were in the league the previous season have an even smaller correlation of .101 between 2012 summer performance (as measured by my per-minute win percentage rating) and 2012-13. Once we account for how well these players were projected to play in 2012-13, their summer-league stats have zero predictive value.
By contrast, the correlation of .463 for rookies is far higher. In fact, it's nearly as strong as the relationship between my college stat translations and rookie performance (.468). When we combine the two factors to try to predict how well players will fare as rookies, summer-league stats make up about a quarter of the combined projection.
It looked to me that he wanted to be anywhere in the world except in Utah competing against 6-8 forwards who will be playing in Israel come November. Little intensity, little explosion. One area he will have trouble with moving forward is a lack of lift and quick hops but that is only magnified when he isn't putting forth a ton of effort in summer league.LondonSox said:For those who watched the game, how did Okafor look? I'm not sure you get a lot of info out of these game tbh but interested in some outside eyes opinions.
Any reason for this snark? They have had decent rep since brown got therebowiac said:Yes, that legendary Sixers training staff...
Oh yeah? This isn't something I've heard, so I was just thinking of the repeated Embiid issues. But I can't claim to know all the NBA training staffs inside and out.LondonSox said:Any reason for this snark? They have had decent rep since brown got there
He's putting up borderline Olynyk summer league numbers.ifmanis5 said:Myles Turner is tearing it up so far. He was a rumored possible Boston pick. Too bad it didn't happen.
They're all playing pretty well. Smart has taken some dumb shots and had 2 or 3 plays where he made lazy passes that turned into layups for SA.oumbi said:Can't watch the game, but judging from the box score Smart has shown he is a bit better than most summer league players. Good to see him shoot well. Can someone provide info on how he looks tonight?
EDIT: and based solely upon the box score, Rozier may be in the same category.
EDIT II: And upon further investigation, Mickey seems to be doing well as well.
That bulldozing in the paint works against 19-year old skinny college sophomores and a front line of 6-7 summer league players like Jack Cooley......it doesn't work in the NBA with the length and athleticism of opponents frontlines even if he is able to use angles to offset his poor first step to get in the paint to begin with.Kliq said:Smart's shot selection is no big deal for me right now, I didn't see this game but after witnessing the first two, a Smart contested triple is probably the best shot we are going to get on any given possession. What I liked about him over the two game stretch was that he seemed more aggressive attacking the basket. Someone with his build should be cannonballing his way into the paint and getting to the line.
HomeRunBaker said:That bulldozing in the paint works against 19-year old skinny college sophomores and a front line of 6-7 summer league players like Jack Cooley......it doesn't work in the NBA with the length and athleticism of opponents frontlines even if he is able to use angles to offset his poor first step to get in the paint to begin with.
It's his size that is a detriment to his first step and lift in the paint......not a benefit. He was tentative because he knew he couldn't get where he wanted on the floor. I mean he had enough trouble getting to the passing angles off the dribble when he was initiating the offense which is why he was moved off the ball so much. It isn't a part of his skillset at this level against these athletes. He's a 3 and D guy who needs to focus on improving his shot selection while finding his comfort zone with his physical limitations.Kliq said:
Obviously it is going to be different against NBA-level opponents, but it is still a useful skill that he can use, as opposed to just being a jump shooter. Last year he was very tentative in attacking the basket, 17% of his FG attempts were at the rim, he should be able to do a better job then that. A guard weighing 220lbs is still huge at the NBA level, I'd like to see him use more of that skill set.
HomeRunBaker said:It's his size that is a detriment to his first step and lift in the paint......not a benefit. He was tentative because he knew he couldn't get where he wanted on the floor. I mean he had enough trouble getting to the passing angles off the dribble when he was initiating the offense which is why he was moved off the ball so much. It isn't a part of his skillset at this level against these athletes. He's a 3 and D guy who needs to focus on improving his shot selection while finding his comfort zone with his physical limitations.
He was also clearly bothered by the severely sprained ankle all year.Kliq said:
The guy was 20 years old last season, he is a work in progress. SSS, but his 57% FG% at the rim last season was better than the percentages of such vaunted rim attackers like Damian Lillard, Chris Paul, James Harden and Russell Westbrook during their rookie years. I don't think Smart is going to end up being as good as those guys at finishing at the rim, but I'm not ruling out the possibility that he could develop that part of his game.
The only people who said he couldn't shoot were those who looked only at last seasons 3-point pct. He has a very nice stroke, soft touch and tight rotation.....and also shot a good pct as a freshman. His challenge is as you say, learning how to best utilize his speed/skillset to the NBA game and that comes with experience that he'll be able to get probably backing up Isaiah at the point assuming Bradley is finally traded. Rozier has a real good chance to make it in this league which is a win with the 16th pick.jscola85 said:For a guy who supposedly couldn't shoot, Rozier is 7/17 from deep so far. Promising sign, though he clearly needs work learning how to play at the proper speed and how to finish in the paint against the tall trees in the NBA.
Paul Flannery @Pflanns 3m3 minutes ago
Per the Celtics, Smart dislocated two fingers. He's getting x rays and is out for the rest of the night.
A. Sherrod Blakely @SherrodbCSN 4m4 minutes ago
Source close to Marcus Smart says he "should be OK." They added that they are "almost 100 percent sure nothing" is broken.
Well it's a good thing Marcus was out there reverting to his old habits.....oh and then there were the fingers. Those are not pretty fingers. Glad that's all the bad that happened to him the past two weeks. Zero to gain.....dumb decision by Ainge.HomeRunBaker said:The reason I don't see what Smart gains here is that he fell back into his Oklahoma State bad habits of being able to muscle his way into the paint while not worrying much about long athletic big men to challenge him at the rim. He spent all of last season figuring out and learning what he could and could not do at the NBA level while determining what constituted a quality shot after repeatedly hoisting up ill-advised shots in college. Smart grew in these areas as a rookie.....muscling into the paint to go up against Cooley in the paint while launching long 3's with no consequence is a regression and not a development. It's bringing back these bad habits that he was learning how to break last year.
I'm wondering how many of these games he plays in. Ainge/Stevens have to see how this isn't doing him any good. Not only that.....his high Usage isn't helping the rookies get their feet wet.
To be fair, especially in the second half Young defended very well and Hunter was garbage on that end.oumbi said:Rozier just took over the game. But Hunter is the one who impressed me during the fourth quarter. Despite shooting like shit, Hunter had a real impact on the game. He has great passes and was always near the ball. He will be one of the smartest players on the Celtics. He anticipates the plays and is near the ball so often.
Young, in contrast, was passive. He seems to shy away from taking over a game or making a crucial play. Twice towards the end he had the ball and seemed eager to pass it off. Still lacks confidence perhaps.
Only one game, but it was a fun finish.