Celtics vs Da Culture - Round 1 (FIGHT!)

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,878
Here
Issue could be that in blowouts, SVG doesn't have a lot to say because his strength - breaking down games - isn't really needed.

Also, his co-announcer kept egging him on and I'm sure the producer was thinking it was great TV. I mean we're sitting here talking about SVG 12 hours later.
Maybe SVG is just needling his brother?
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
6,220
Cultural hub of the universe
I thought the 2nd quarter offense was way worse than the 4th quarter offense. Go watch the last 10 minutes of the half. It was brutal.

- Jrue made a layup at 10:30 to get the Celts to 39
- Celts then went 7 straight possessions without scoring
- Jrue makes crazy off balance bank shot at 6:26
- scoreless next 2
- 4:40 White makes crazy 29 foot 3
- 3:58 White makes heat check 3
- Celts go 2 minutes without scoring
- JB hits 1 of 2 after a loose ball foul
- 50 secs JT hits stepback 3
- 21 secs Al dunk off the fastbreak

They scored 14 points over the final 10:30 of the half.

They also only scored 5 points over the first nearly 5 minutes of the 2nd half.

19 points over 15:30 ish.
For all that they still had an offensive rating for the game of 111pts/100, which isn't bad at all for the playoffs. DW sure helped with that.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,512
AZ
Issue could be that in blowouts, SVG doesn't have a lot to say because his strength - breaking down games - isn't really needed.

Also, his co-announcer kept egging him on and I'm sure the producer was thinking it was great TV. I mean we're sitting here talking about SVG 12 hours later.
Probably right. Also, how much does it take to break down games in 2024? It gets tedious to say 70 times: “Ok, this guy is going to bring the ball up. They will screen, and there will be a switch, and then they will have three options. Let’s see if they pick the right one.“
 

The Raccoon

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2018
956
Germany
But none of this excuses SVG's color way outside the lines analysis last night, it was beyond partisan babbling, and bordered on delusional obsession.

It was flat out out weird
Chris Vernon mentioned in the Mismatch Podcast today, so it did not go unnoticed by the national Media...
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,216
SVG was equally terrible in the NCAA tournament. He gets fixated on these points, and he will spend 20 seconds on them after an offensive possession talking over what the other team is doing.

His go to move is to criticize the offense, but do it in a way to suggest the defense is actually playing poorly even when they are winning. So team A did not make the extra pass on a possession leading to a break out for team B, and while team B is having an alley oop jam on the other end, he is shitting on their defense after they got a stop. It’s fucking weird.

The craziest example was in the regional final. Connecticut allegedly wasn’t even playing very good defense, according to SVP. It was Illinois being shitty, which he kept harping on while the Connecticut team was having a highlight filled 30-0 run.

My take is that he is not playing favorites. He wants a close and good game. So when it is not, he gets all blamey and weird, denigrating the defense of the winning team because of the offense’s ineptitude. He’s fucking awful.

Edit — he needs to call the game he is watching more, instead of trying to call the game he wishes it was.
I was flipping back and forth between the TNT broadcast and the local broadcast with Scal/Gorman. The thing that immediately stood out to me was how fucking much the national guys talk, about anything, constantly and for no fucking reason. There is almost no silence at all. I had never thought Scal shut up that much either, but when you watch them both during the same game, it was like going from an infomercial to just dead air, and it was fucking glorious. I wish there was a way to track numbers of words spoken by an announcer during a game. I'd bet the national guys had Scal/Gorman beat by like a 6:1 ratio.
 

Koufax

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,950
Last night Gorman was the master of letting the game speak for itself. I was amused however that he flatly contradicted Scal on the question of whether the Celtics would get possession of the ball after the technical called on Bam after play had stopped. Scal said the Celts would get the ball, Gorman said no they wouldn't and Scal was right. It may have been a lucky guess, since Scal said more than once that he had never seen something like that before.

Back to the main point - we have been blessed to have Mike.
 

Red Right Ankle

Formerly the Story of Your Red Right Ankle
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
12,033
Multivac
I was flipping back and forth between the TNT broadcast and the local broadcast with Scal/Gorman. The thing that immediately stood out to me was how fucking much the national guys talk, about anything, constantly and for no fucking reason. There is almost no silence at all. I had never thought Scal shut up that much either, but when you watch them both during the same game, it was like going from an infomercial to just dead air, and it was fucking glorious. I wish there was a way to track numbers of words spoken by an announcer during a game. I'd bet the national guys had Scal/Gorman beat by like a 6:1 ratio.
Someone get the game audio and the AI fired up.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,353
The game on Saturday, was there something going on with where Mike and Scal were located? Because they were exceptionally quiet during that game.
 

Gene Conleys Plane Ticket

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
3,374
I was flipping back and forth between the TNT broadcast and the local broadcast with Scal/Gorman. The thing that immediately stood out to me was how fucking much the national guys talk, about anything, constantly and for no fucking reason. There is almost no silence at all. I had never thought Scal shut up that much either, but when you watch them both during the same game, it was like going from an infomercial to just dead air, and it was fucking glorious. I wish there was a way to track numbers of words spoken by an announcer during a game. I'd bet the national guys had Scal/Gorman beat by like a 6:1 ratio.
I started game 3 watching TNT, then remembered that the local guys were doing the game. I switched over and it felt like the sun shining through the clouds after a gray, rainy day. I literally breathed a sigh of relief. Brain Anderson simply would not shut up. Listening to him is like being beaten with a hammer. He just talks and talks and talks until my brain can't take it anymore. Say what you want about Gorman. I know he's older than he used to be. But his approach has always been to simply call the game. That's all I ever want from an announcer.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,588
I started game 3 watching TNT, then remembered that the local guys were doing the game. I switched over and it felt like the sun shining through the clouds after a gray, rainy day. I literally breathed a sigh of relief. Brain Anderson simply would not shut up. Listening to him is like being beaten with a hammer. He just talks and talks and talks until my brain can't take it anymore. Say what you want about Gorman. I know he's older than he used to be. But his approach has always been to simply call the game. That's all I ever want from an announcer.
I really wish a "less is more" play by play man could take center stage on a national broadcast. Would be so refreshing. Different sport, but I always thought Summerall nailed the balance.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,443
Imaginationland
Verno spends a couple minutes ripping SVG on today's Ringer Mismatch pod, "Was SVG getting paid by the negative word about the celtics??"
It was just an insane performance by SVG. Literally a dozen times talking about how much he hated the Celtics' defensive effort (as they were on the road against a smart, desperate team and were up 10 after 1, 17 after 2 and 22 after 3), but him spending the entire 5 minute review break blaming Tatum for Bam sliding his feet into Tatum's landing zone was beyond the pale. His TV partners seemed stunned, and the way he tried to come back after it by throwing in a plug for Tatum's shoe was disgusting.

View: https://twitter.com/alpacinogrunt/status/1785161523976892508
 

jezza1918

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
2,850
South Dartmouth, MA
It was just an insane performance by SVG. Literally a dozen times talking about how much he hated the Celtics' defensive effort (as they were on the road against a smart, desperate team and were up 10 after 1, 17 after 2 and 22 after 3), but him spending the entire 5 minute review break blaming Tatum for Bam sliding his feet into Tatum's landing zone was beyond the pale. His TV partners seemed stunned, and the way he tried to come back after it by throwing in a plug for Tatum's shoe was disgusting.

View: https://twitter.com/alpacinogrunt/status/1785161523976892508
Wow. That is savage. I do wonder if the production crew is made aware of stuff like this and whispers to SVG to tone his hate down a little?
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,593
Lynn
My buddy AHP, he’s a fun account in that he completely leans into being a doomer.

SVG has been like this with the Celtics for years. In the Raptors/Celtics bubble series, he went on a two minute rant about how tired he was of watching Marcus Smart flop all over the court, while saying nothing about Kyle Lowry.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,732
around the way
My buddy AHP, he’s a fun account in that he completely leans into being a doomer.

SVG has been like this with the Celtics for years. In the Raptors/Celtics bubble series, he went on a two minute rant about how tired he was of watching Marcus Smart flop all over the court, while saying nothing about Kyle Lowry.
Yeah he has. He's the fucking worst.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,823
I haven't loved SVG but have never found him to be ludicrously unbalanced before. Last night was embarrassing - his Tatum take was preposterous, so his double-triple-quadrupling down on it was just nuts. It was so bad he may visibly walk it back a bit the next game...
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,593
Lynn
Looking bigger picture than this series, I cannot explain how well it bodes for the rest of the playoffs that he has a 3.43 assist to TO against this level of defensive attention, and Bam/Spo. It tells you what level he’s now reading the game at, as he either gets this look, or Bam+help. His scoring numbers are just being dragged down by shooting 18% on C&S threes so far.

View: https://twitter.com/StoolGreenie/status/1785348460545544367
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,219
St. Louis, MO
I haven't loved SVG but have never found him to be ludicrously unbalanced before. Last night was embarrassing - his Tatum take was preposterous, so his double-triple-quadrupling down on it was just nuts. It was so bad he may visibly walk it back a bit the next game...
Shaq is equally bad, stunningly biased.
 

dhellers

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2005
4,410
Silver Spring, Maryland
I started game 3 watching TNT, then remembered that the local guys were doing the game. I switched over and it felt like the sun shining through the clouds after a gray, rainy day. I literally breathed a sigh of relief. Brain Anderson simply would not shut up. Listening to him is like being beaten with a hammer. He just talks and talks and talks until my brain can't take it anymore. Say what you want about Gorman. I know he's older than he used to be. But his approach has always been to simply call the game. That's all I ever want from an announcer.
NBA league pass, to listen to max and sean, are always my go to choice. And sean now realizes this, and every so often announces the game clock to simplify sycning up the broadcast to the NBA audio.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,744
Looking bigger picture than this series, I cannot explain how well it bodes for the rest of the playoffs that he has a 3.43 assist to TO against this level of defensive attention, and Bam/Spo. It tells you what level he’s now reading the game at, as he either gets this look, or Bam+help. His scoring numbers are just being dragged down by shooting 18% on C&S threes so far.

View: https://twitter.com/StoolGreenie/status/1785348460545544367
Yeah, this is has been a masterclass from Tatum and Joe. They understand exactly what Miami wants to do, and are picking it apart while keeping extreme economy of effort/dribbling from Jayson.

It's sad to me that the overall level of basketball appreciation in the commentariat is such that this performance this series won't get the love it deserves.
 

Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,804
Boston, MA
I like this one better. Tatum dunking on Martin was sweet enough, but then JB calmly signaling to Martin that it was on his head was the best part.
View: https://twitter.com/TheAthletic/status/1785122849826783680
Yes, this one is brilliant in every way.

But the pure nonchalance on the Tatum screen with everyone - refs, Heat, crowd, SVG --just accepting it, was beautiful. This said to me the C's are done with the Heat culture bullshit, and I love it.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,730
I thought the 2nd quarter offense was way worse than the 4th quarter offense. Go watch the last 10 minutes of the half. It was brutal.
Yes it was definitely worse during that 1H stretch bc they were still playing in the natural flow of the game and Miami’s defense had us shut down. In the 4Q we were purposely reducing the overall possessions in the game to protect the lead. As has been said it would have been much more aesthetically pleasing had layups been converted with the floor spread.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,744

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,443
Imaginationland
Not only is Miami playing without Jimmy Butler and Terry Rozier, Jaime Jaquez is out tomorrow night as well. He's been really good this series.

View: https://twitter.com/MiamiHEAT/status/1785383071241392592
Not that it should change the outcome, but this makes the simple plan all that more important - crowd the three point line, make them create their own shots. Let Bam work hard for his 25 points on 20 shots, because no one else can reliably score off the dribble.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,614
Santa Monica
I had KP > Bam for these playoffs:mad:

Mea culpa time, that didn't age well at all. My bad guys

credit to @Euclis20 @the moops

KP is just too damn fragile and Bam is a bull

I don't hate Bam, but definitely don't think he is a TOP20-30 NBA player.
IMO defense-first Centers, that run around screening on offense are a great place to find value in the NBA

Question, would you swap KP for Bam for these playoffs?
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,744
I know we were all worried about Miami's physicality, but watching these other games makes playing the current Heat look like a nice, comfortable stroll in the park.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,744
I think "we" thought Miami would be borderline dirty to level the gutter in which they prefer to engage. And in that regard they have not disappointed.
The level of physicality is not in the same zip code as this Philly-NYK series.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
49,178
The level of physicality is not in the same zip code as this Philly-NYK series.
I think all these series are physical as hell. As everyone and Shams' mom has been pointing out, the officiating down the stretch of the regular season shifted. The results are 2020s hoops style with a 90s twist but its not a Heat culture thing as you point out. Its going on across the first round.

That said, the Phil-NYK series is the top of the card. Every possession is a battle and I dig that style of play.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,593
Lynn
Yeah, this is has been a masterclass from Tatum and Joe. They understand exactly what Miami wants to do, and are picking it apart while keeping extreme economy of effort/dribbling from Jayson.

It's sad to me that the overall level of basketball appreciation in the commentariat is such that this performance this series won't get the love it deserves.
The fact that he’s making extremely quick decisions while facing what Spo throws at him is kind of wild, the coaching staff deserve a ton of credit too. No matter how much fans on Twitter and even Celtics fans may say whatever about Tatum, I keep thinking back to this clip, because it shows how other players and coaches look at him.

View: https://twitter.com/therechigoes/status/1785398148308885799?
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
45,011
Melrose, MA
I thought the 2nd quarter offense was way worse than the 4th quarter offense. Go watch the last 10 minutes of the half. It was brutal.

- Jrue made a layup at 10:30 to get the Celts to 39
- Celts then went 7 straight possessions without scoring
- Jrue makes crazy off balance bank shot at 6:26
- scoreless next 2
- 4:40 White makes crazy 29 foot 3
- 3:58 White makes heat check 3
- Celts go 2 minutes without scoring
- JB hits 1 of 2 after a loose ball foul
- 50 secs JT hits stepback 3
- 21 secs Al dunk off the fastbreak

They scored 14 points over the final 10:30 of the half.

They also only scored 5 points over the first nearly 5 minutes of the 2nd half.

19 points over 15:30 ish.
It was brutal, but, much like the first quarter of game 3, what took the sting out of it was holding the Heat to 12 points in the quarter.

Looking bigger picture than this series, I cannot explain how well it bodes for the rest of the playoffs that he has a 3.43 assist to TO against this level of defensive attention, and Bam/Spo. It tells you what level he’s now reading the game at, as he either gets this look, or Bam+help. His scoring numbers are just being dragged down by shooting 18% on C&S threes so far.

View: https://twitter.com/StoolGreenie/status/1785348460545544367
There was a play late in yesterday's game where Tatum was dribbling at the 3 point line, maybe took a step in, and there were 3 Heat players and no Celtics around him. I was thinking, "OK, Tatum, there are multiple open guys on the floor, you have to get it to one of them" and he did.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,730
Are you guys listening to the LeBron and Redick pod? If you aren’t you are missing out. It’s like a college course on NBA basketball. They both speak a lot about Spo and the attention to detail that comes down from “The Riles Tree” I think in Pod 5 or 6 that relates to what Iggy is referring to for every single team regardless of who they are.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,526
Pittsburgh, PA
Jrue is team best +46 over the three games. Maybe +\- isn’t the best stat but I think it says that Jrue’s contributions ...
Just to unfairly pick on WBCD here, I wanted to put a nail in the coffin of +/- small sample size analysis:

1) Everyone here who was watching on Monday agreed that Jaylen Brown had a bad game, some were even calling it borderline nightmarish. I personally thought it was merely bad, as perhaps did Mazzulla who to my eyes kept him out of a good chunk of his usual 2Q playtime, though he ended up playing most of the second half and finished 2nd in minutes with 39.

2) Jaylen Brown led the team in +/- at +17 in Monday's Game 4. Second was Horford at +15. Holiday was a +4 in a game we won by 14.

For every cherry picked example that can show that SSS +/- is silly to use as evidence for anything, there is an equally cherry picked data point available (surely!) that can say whatever happens to align with one's agenda. Which is exactly the point: data, sufficiently tortured, will confess to anything. For samples smaller than 10 games, but even really lower than 20-30, we might as well be arguing using astrology and the positions of celestial objects as an evidentiary basis. Please, for the love of God, stop being an otherwise intelligent poster here who resorts to using small sample +/- to bolster or quantify an argument. That's addressed to everyone, not just WBCD, and even to myself at times - I've been guilty too. But it's a nonsense way to argue anything, and we really need to bear that in mind before pulling that tool off (the very back of) the shelf.
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
6,220
Cultural hub of the universe
Just to unfairly pick on WBCD here, I wanted to put a nail in the coffin of +/- small sample size analysis:

1) Everyone here who was watching on Monday agreed that Jaylen Brown had a bad game, some were even calling it borderline nightmarish. I personally thought it was merely bad, as perhaps did Mazzulla who to my eyes kept him out of a good chunk of his usual 2Q playtime, though he ended up playing most of the second half and finished 2nd in minutes with 39.

2) Jaylen Brown led the team in +/- at +17 in Monday's Game 4. Second was Horford at +15. Holiday was a +4 in a game we won by 14.

For every cherry picked example that can show that SSS +/- is silly to use as evidence for anything, there is an equally cherry picked data point available (surely!) that can say whatever happens to align with one's agenda. Which is exactly the point: data, sufficiently tortured, will confess to anything. For samples smaller than 10 games, but even really lower than 20-30, we might as well be arguing using astrology and the positions of celestial objects as an evidentiary basis. Please, for the love of God, stop being an otherwise intelligent poster here who resorts to using small sample +/- to bolster or quantify an argument. That's addressed to everyone, not just WBCD, and even to myself at times - I've been guilty too. But it's a nonsense way to argue anything, and we really need to bear that in mind before pulling that tool off (the very back of) the shelf.
So when Jaylen was on the court the team was highly successful, but that was in spite of him? I don't think you get to put the nail in the coffin.

Edit, as I've thought about this more than I should.

WBCD's post is done in the spirit of humility and curiosity. He points out that the team has actually done quite well with Jrue on the court, and thus maybe we should reconsider his contributions in spite of him shooting poorly. Great posting imo. No one is arguing that single game +/- tells you if a player was good or not. It is perfectly reasonable on the other hand to use it as a tool to say you may have missed something watching the game that led you to jump to conclusions.

Your post insists that there is only one point of view and shuts down further discussion. I'm personally a fan of humility and curiosity so WBCD keep on posting and don't let the arrogant shut you down.
 
Last edited: