He’s a TON of fun to watch.Castellanos is so good.
Didn’t play anyone and are undefeated and from a “big” conferenceHow on earth did Penn State get to number seven? They are terrible.
Colorado State recovered two against Boise last week in their comeback, although one was called back on a penalty.I feel like I haven't seen a recovered onside kick in years.
No.Harrison seems fine - even very good, but I’m really not seeing the Megatron type player I hear about on podcasts. That was all Day getting him open on the pick. Is he really a physical freak?
And the Tigers close it put 21-14.Princeton clearly outplaying Harvard in early going at the Stadium
You said it. I turned it off several times. I’m not enough of a PSU fan anymore to watch. Though, some of that might be confirmation bias, at least for tOSU, because it felt like they weren’t getting Harrison the ball enough yet I just looked at the box score and he had 11 catches for 162 yards.Both Ohio State and Penn State look very pedestrian. A Big XII offense would score at will against both.
The idea is your comeback requires two touchdowns anyway. So with your point after tries, you can either kick two extra points or you can go for two with the first. If you make it, you'll win with your second TD+XP. If you miss, you still have another try to get back to 14. Assuming your 100% on XPs and 50% on 2-pointers, you're trading a 100% chance at a tie for equal 33% chances at winning, losing, and tying. Obviously those aren't the real life base rates, so I assume the actual math tips it in favor of going for it.I don’t get going for 2.
It wouldn't have covered the spread, which was 4 points.The idea is your comeback requires two touchdowns anyway. So with your point after tries, you can either kick two extra points or you can go for two with the first. If you make it, you'll win with your second TD+XP. If you miss, you still have another try to get back to 14. Assuming your 100% on XPs and 50% on 2-pointers, you're trading a 100% chance at a tie for equal 33% chances at winning, losing, and tying. Obviously those aren't the real life base rates, so I assume the actual math tips it in favor of going for it.
Alternatively, it's James Franklin, so there's a very real chance he's trying to cover the spread.
Egregious may be an understatement. Openly corrupt might be more accurate after forcing Tennessee to burn a timeout when the runner was clearly moving forward while going out of bounds.Just an egregious display of favoritism, spotting everything forward to Bama and everything backward for Tennessee.
At least they got that last one right.
Also, given enough time left in the game, cutting the deficit to 6 opens up the opportunity to kick 2 field goals to tie it up.The idea is your comeback requires two touchdowns anyway. So with your point after tries, you can either kick two extra points or you can go for two with the first. If you make it, you'll win with your second TD+XP. If you miss, you still have another try to get back to 14. Assuming your 100% on XPs and 50% on 2-pointers, you're trading a 100% chance at a tie for equal 33% chances at winning, losing, and tying. Obviously those aren't the real life base rates, so I assume the actual math tips it in favor of going for it.
It's like watching the Chiefs. Just leaning so hard in one direction.Egregious may be an understatement. Openly corrupt may be more accurate after forcing Tennessee to burn a timeout when the runner was clearly moving forward while going out of bounds.
Not in most of those situations when there is 58 seconds left.Also, given enough time left in the game, cutting the deficit to 6 opens up the opportunity to kick 2 field goals to tie it up.
Yeah I was just going to edit my post when I realized this was about the PSU/OSU game. That aspect of it only comes into play when there is more than enough time for a few drives.Not in most of those situations when there is 58 seconds left.
Nah, Texas will win in the end.Houston is probably going to beat Texas. Dear lord.