#DFG: Canceling the Noise
- Thread starter nattysez
- Start date
Jason La Canfora @JasonLaCanfora 16s17 seconds ago
NFL says that in destroying his phone Brady kept them from being able to access 10,000 potential text messages
NFL says that in destroying his phone Brady kept them from being able to access 10,000 potential text messages
Guess what NFL. He was under no obligation to turn over his personal cell phone. Its not in the CBA. So suck a dick
Doug Kyed @DougKyedNESN 31s31 seconds ago
The NFL says Tom Brady directed for his cell phone to be destroyed before meeting with Ted Wells. Wasn't disclosed until June 18.
The NFL says Tom Brady directed for his cell phone to be destroyed before meeting with Ted Wells. Wasn't disclosed until June 18.
You can expect the NFLPA to bring the Wells report into the court proceedings now since none of it disclosed that Brady destroyed his phone.
Turns out, he upgraded to the iPhone 6 and traded it in to Gazelle. They wiped the information from it and sold it...soxhop411 said:
This is ridiculous.
They all know you can just delete messages from a phone, right? I do it the next morning every time I get drunk and text an ex.
They all know you can just delete messages from a phone, right? I do it the next morning every time I get drunk and text an ex.
As I've been saying, at every juncture of this fiasco, things turn out worse than I'm expecting.
I'm so glad Brady didn't settle. I'm really looking forward to the final phase of this saga. I don't see how this can end any other way than Brady exonerated and the perfidious buffoonery of Rog& co. being fully exposed.
If Brady did indeed knowingly and willingly destroy his cell phone - does that change anyone else's opinion on his guilt?
It does for me. Those are the actions of someone with something to hide.
It does for me. Those are the actions of someone with something to hide.
I'd be careful with those words. You could have said something like that at every stage so far.NWsoxophile said:
Like pretty much everything with this saga, I'm going to wait a while before jumping to a conclusion.TheShynessClinic said:
I don't get into the "whys" of all this. For all I know, Brady told Goodell that he dropped it into the shitter while enjoying some porn and then when it didn't work, told his kid, "Just bash it with a hammer, it doesn't work anymore anyway." That is "ordering it destroyed."
In its usual connotation, however, it appears to give the NFL some ammo. Not 4-game ammo.
But I'd like to read the full decision, such as it is. And hear from the PA, if they chose to.
You mean until the court decides that it won't hear the case and Brady has no recourse than to accept the 4 games and miss the playoffs?NWsoxophile said:
DrewDawg said:
My all-time record is in the 12,000 range for one month and I'm not even rich and famous
So here is the legally aignificart part from what I have seen so far:
Wells said TB was only generally aware of deflation, more likely than not. RG has drawn the conclusion from alleged destruction of the phone that TB directed the deflation.
This is an effort to prop up one of the major legal weaknesses in the case
Wells said TB was only generally aware of deflation, more likely than not. RG has drawn the conclusion from alleged destruction of the phone that TB directed the deflation.
This is an effort to prop up one of the major legal weaknesses in the case
Many variables. What does it mean that it was "destroyed"? What may he have been hiding? I mean, it's possible that he was cheating on Giselle and really REALLY did not want his texts exposed for all to see. Who knows.TheShynessClinic said:
As usual, we need to wait to hear more before passing judgment, I think.
I'm not jumping to anything. I'm saying if he did do it - it certainly looks suspicious.kenneycb said:
I await Team Brady's response though.
The cover up is always worse than the "crime." I admit that if the destruction of the cell phone is true it gives me more doubt about Brady's activities.
From a legal standpoint, does the claim - and perhaps fact - that he destroyed his phone have any bearing on his ability to get an injunction?
If he's not obligated to do so in the first place, I would think not, but posing the question to the actual legal minds...
If he's not obligated to do so in the first place, I would think not, but posing the question to the actual legal minds...
This is just like the leak about McNally taking the balls to the bathroom. The NFL leaked that "someone took the balls to a private area". Hours later we found out it was a freaking bathroom. The NFL has now leaked that Brady "destroyed" his phone. We need to wait for clarification on what that means.
Everything about this gets spun. We need to wait for it to be brought back to center.
Everything about this gets spun. We need to wait for it to be brought back to center.
Silverdude2167 said:
Minus the secretary part, that's what everyone should do with their cellphones when they get a new one. Especially rich and famous people.
GreyisGone said:
This is what I was going to ask. I always thought that destroying a phone doesn't mean the texts can never be retrieved.
Sounds like Brady's spinning it as "SOP when I get a new phone, to prevent TMZ from getting their grubby little hands on my private data."Silverdude2167 said: