Judge Berman will rule in favor of Brady. But Brady will not be out of the woods– and not for the reasons you think. Judge Berman will vacate the arbitrator’s decision using Section Ten of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). Section Ten of the FAA provides that a judge may vacate an arbitrator’s award if the arbitrator acted with evident partiality to one of the parties before him (see images below for my legal take on evident partiality is the winning argument). Here’s the catch: A vacation of an arbitrator’s award does not conclude the matter. Unlike the “law of the shop” argument, which would nullify the grounds and reasoning for the suspension, a section ten vacation would send the matter back down to be re-heard by a neutral arbitrator (my guess: former NFL Commissioner (and lawyer) Paul Tagliabue or a mutually agreed upon panel of three arbitrators).
This is the classic, “Everybody wins and everybody loses” outcome. For Judge Berman it is the most reasonable and most prudent route.
.....
First, the issue on appeal would be: “Was the Commissioner of the NFL objectively partial to the NFL when he served as arbitrator?” Not only is this a difficult legal argument for the NFL, it is an argument that will not hold well in the court of public opinion. (Really NFL? Rather than going back to arbitration you are going to fight tooth and nail by arguing Goodell wasn’t partial to his company?). Second, If the NFL feels strongly about their case, the Wells report, and the propriety of their investigation, wouldn’t they welcome the opportunity to present their case to a neutral third party and settle the issue once and for all?