I mean, I understand the general argument - but in light of the nuanced discussion on what constitutes failure it was a noticeably superficial take. Not super surprising from Shaq, who has the depth of a potato and is the architect of much of the "rings Erneh" drivel.
I think Giannis talking about how a season can be a stepping stone or build toward something is apt. You're not going to win a championship every year, it doesn't necessarily mean a season didn't yield valuable lessons toward the goal. Would I call the Bucks season a failure? Yeah, I probably would - but that doesn't mean every single one where you don't win is a failure.
Great example of this is last year - I wouldn't consider the '22 Celtics season a failure. I know some would, and I understand that, but hopefully those lessons apply toward a championship at another point (please be this year).
Ernie brought up the topic and threw it first to Chuck. Ernie framed it, and clearly wanted to talk about, failure in a larger sense and how to frame it and deal with it. Chuck gave a very strong answer and talked about how he couldn’t think of himself as a failure because of how far he had come from growing up poor in Alabama to what he was now. He brought up Shaq only winning 4 championships in his 20 years but that he was still a success
They then go to Shaq who says how he came from a military background, defines failure, then says yes every year I didn’t win a championship was a failure.
It was such a stark contrast to what Chuck said and what they were clearly trying to talk about that it was jarring. Ernie then threw it to Kenny and I think it was kind of decided that Shaq shouldn’t contribute anymore.
BTW, I do think the Bucks season was a failure this year but there’s much more nuance and layers to it than what Shaq said…which isn’t surprising because as you said, Shaqs contributions and insight are basically nil