Mugsy's Walk-Off Bunt said:They are not trading Bogaerts. As you allude to, he's part of why they are able to spend some of this money. There's a lot of frantic "trading X and Betts" energy on SOSH right now. It's ludicrous.
I rate Betts much higher than X. I wouldnt trade him, I dont have a problem with trading X though.
BTW: If Hanley is just a 3B now, why would there be reports that we are still in on Sandoval? How would that play out in terms of positions?