I find I can remember the careers of those journeymen who played for the Sox much better. Lots of play for Royce Clayton, Bruce Chen, Matt Stairs, Julian Tavarez, Ken Brett, and Bartolo ColonI completed the grid today with a score of 59. A couple of things I try to work into my game is to see how many current or former Sox players I can list each day (4 today) and to also factor in relocated franchises.
I made the same mistake on the Reds .300 hitter.8/9 with a high 334 rarity score. I screwed up and guessed Joey Votto for Reds .300 hitter instead of just going with Rose right away.
My strategy is that I try to remember big deadline trades between the two teams and then use the lesser-known players. For example if it's the Red Sox and Twins I remember that they made a big deal in 1995: the Sox received Rick Aguiliera for Frankie Rodriguez and a bunch stuff that didn't do much. Aguiliera might rank a 2 or 3%, but no one remembers Frankie Rodriguez, so you can get him in the decimaled percentages.I find I can remember the careers of those journeymen who played for the Sox much better. Lots of play for Royce Clayton, Bruce Chen, Matt Stairs, Julian Tavarez, Ken Brett, and Bartolo Colon
I'm not gonna lie: when I play this, I try to pull names from my head, but more than half the time I treat it as a research challenge and mess around on b-ref until I find an answer. Which I know is not the spirit of the game, so I never share my score. It's more a learning exercise for me...I already know I fail the memory test.I absolutely suck at free recall, and thus I absolutely suck at this game. And MAN, I wish it was "3 strikes" instead of "9 entries"
I think that’s a fine way to play too! As long as you’re not boasting about your scoreI'm not gonna lie: when I play this, I try to pull names from my head, but more than half the time I treat it as a research challenge and mess around on b-ref until I find an answer. Which I know is not the spirit of the game, so I never share my score. It's more a learning exercise for me...I already know I fail the memory test.
I nearly did that, but caught myself. George Bell was my Blue Jay choice in the same category and caught myself again as it seems there was a George Bell who played in the early 1900s. Always check that there isn't another player with the same or similar name before you click onto your choice.Was headed for a score of around 50 but I usedinstead ofTony Armas Jr.Tony Armas.
I’m such a dweeb that I do both! I play once “off the dome” and then again on a different device where I look up players to try to get a better rarity score (the ones I post here are the first version!)I'm not gonna lie: when I play this, I try to pull names from my head, but more than half the time I treat it as a research challenge and mess around on b-ref until I find an answer. Which I know is not the spirit of the game, so I never share my score. It's more a learning exercise for me...I already know I fail the memory test.
I vote YES.Would it make sense to merge the two Immaculate Grid threads?
Yeah I'm amazed that he didn't hit .300 career lifetime. And I have no recollection of Tommy Herras a Met at all.Finally got to use my old HS teammate Tom Herr in the SFG-NYM cell.
8/9/235
I felt pretty confident when I entered Barry Bonds in the SFG .300+ Average Caeer / 3000+ PA cell. To my chagrin, Bonds missed the mark by .002
It sure was. Thought for sure my streak was over. Rockies/Padres was the tough one for me and I was not confident at all that I was remembering correctly that he was briefly a Rockie. He was.The one today is a nightmare
I plunked in two squares right away (COL-STL and CLE stolen bases) and now I’m just sitting here trying to remember random dudes that played for the D-Backs, Rockies, and Padres. Not good!The one today is a nightmare
No. Lurkers cannot get into P&GWould it make sense to merge the two Immaculate Grid threads?
How about moving the P&G posts here?No. Lurkers cannot get into P&G
Agree, when I started playing before seeing discussion here I perused MLB Discussion before searching and finding the thread in P&G.How about moving the P&G posts here?
I do this a lot, too. I think it's fun to try to find the weirdest possible combination and/or learn about some players I've never heard of before. Or go down the rabbit hole of just learning about the journeyman ends of careers for otherwise famous players.I'm not gonna lie: when I play this, I try to pull names from my head, but more than half the time I treat it as a research challenge and mess around on b-ref until I find an answer. Which I know is not the spirit of the game, so I never share my score. It's more a learning exercise for me...I already know I fail the memory test.
This game reminds me that my brain absolutely refuses to recognize Rookie of the Year as an important award. Probably because the rules seem so arbitrary and so many of the best players are never eligible since they come up midseason, so the award often just becomes "identify the young player who can put up a 3-WAR season while satisfying these random criteria."My streak is over. 16 straight days of 9/9 (including both puzzles on All Star Tuesday). Damn Tigers ROY tripped me up.
Lol, I didn't even think of him because for some reason I was thinking the player had to win both awards in the same season. My bad.I may stare at this some, today. Just glad I got to use this, as I'm sure many others are.
edit - @Deweys New Stance, I bet you were expecting someone else. Posted without seeing yours. Lower percentage, too!
Yeah. I'm pretty sure that's part of why he's a lower percentage.Lol, I didn't even think of him because for some reason I was thinking the player had to win both awards in the same season. My bad.
I was really curious about these two . Wondering if the more recent might be better remembered.
I found a place for both. I just got a 7/9
I checked MVP and ROY in the same season was remembered more.I was really curious about these two . Wondering if the more recent might be better remembered.
Agree with you that this is a helpful technique, but speaking as a 60’s/70’s baseball nerd who read Ball Four about a dozen times as a teenager, Lou Piniella doesn’t count in this game for the Pilots. He never played a regular season game for them because he was traded to the Royals at the end of spring training. As Bouton wrote, “Lou Piniella has the red ass”It might not work for everyone but something that helps me is expansion years, so think 1961, '62, '69, '77 etc.
So for the Sox in the '60 expansion draft they lost Jerry Casale to the Angels and Willy Tasby to the Senators.
Or how about Lou Piniella (Cle/Seattle) or Hoyt Wilhelm (CWS/KC) in '69. Nothin' to it right?