In-season NBA news thread

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,571
around the way
Yeah he’s been awful in his 19, 20 and 21-yr old years which lowers his ceiling but the kid still has the physicals and possesses NBA-ball skills…..plus time is on his side to still find a niche in this league. He still needs to get stronger so I do wonder how hard he works. I mean it took Gerald Green 10 years to find his way to a meaningful role and career so I wouldn’t write him off just yet.
Definitely. Kid's physicals are fantastic, and it's not like has been in a place that would develop him right. It's hard to expect guys that age to fully own their own development. Obviously some do, but man is Orlando kind of a black hole. Great buy low candidate.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,298
Pittsburgh, PA
A "berth in the conference semifinals" comes after winning a single playoff series.
Seems like some water carrying for Snyder. "Despite 6 straight playoff appearances, Snyder's teams never won more than one playoff series" is a better description of what actually happened.
ok, but that still compares favorably to more than half the league. Making the playoffs 6 years in a row (out of 8 years in charge; missed in the first 2) without a transcendent talent on the roster (I guess it was Gobert and Mitchell? Some Joe Ingles?) is an accomplishment most coaches don't achieve. It's a consistency that speaks well of team buy-in and health maintenance.

In 2017, the 5-seed Jazz beat the 4-seed Clippers in 7, followed by getting swept by the title-bound Warriors. George Hill was their #3 player behind Gobert and Hayward.
In 2018, the 5-seed Jazz beat the 4-seed Thunder in 6, a team led by Westbrook, Steven Adams, Paul George, and a still-useful Carmelo. Hayward was gone, Mitchell was a rookie, starters included him, Gobert, Ingles, Derrick Favors, and Ricky Rubio. They then lost in 5 to the peak Harden / Paul / Capela Rockets.
In 2019, the 5-seed Jazz again lost in 5 to the Rockets, with mostly the same lineup. Mitchell improved on his rookie season, Jae Crowder played a much bigger role.
In 2020, the 6-seed Jazz lost in 7 to the Jokic-led Nuggets in the bubble. Ingles started falling off at age 32, Bojan, Royce O'Neale and an aging Mike Conley played big roles behind Gobert and Mitchell.
In 2021, the 52-20 Jazz were the 1-seed, the #1 team in the league by SRS. They brushed off a Morant-led Grizzlies team in 5, who had beaten GSW in Overtime in the play-in game. They were then up 2-0 on the #2 team in the league by SRS, the Clippers, before getting blown out in games 3 and 4, lost a close game 5 at home to a monster Paul George performance (the Jazz led at half), and had a 25-point lead in the 3Q of game 6 before it got closed to 3 by the end of that quarter (41-22), and George and Beverley continued the beatdown in the 4th (40-25) to close out the series. Those Clippers would lose in 6 to the Suns, who of course then lost to the Bucks.
In 2022, the 5-seed Jazz lost in 6 to the Doncic Mavs. Was largely the same team (Gobert / Mitchell, backed by Conley, O'Neale, Bojan, and Ingles relegated to bench duty), with a rejuvenated Hassan Whiteside contributing mightily (and who we should maybe consider signing). Snyder resigns at the end of the season.

I dunno, that's not a bad run given what he had to work with. No real down years, no humiliating playoff exits (always beat by a demonstrably better team with a star-studded top of the roster), except maybe in 2021 - when they lost to their nearest peer by SRS. How sure are we that (say) Tyronn Lue is a better coach? Steve Kerr? Pretty hard to separate the coaching talent from the roster talent, at least for me.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
ok, but that still compares favorably to more than half the league. Making the playoffs 6 years in a row (out of 8 years in charge; missed in the first 2) without a transcendent talent on the roster (I guess it was Gobert and Mitchell? Some Joe Ingles?) is an accomplishment most coaches don't achieve. It's a consistency that speaks well of team buy-in and health maintenance.
I agree. Making the playoffs 6 straight years *is* a solid job. The "conference semifinal" mention just struck me more like weirdly official NBA-speak (or Indy Colts banner-talk) than how most basketball fans see it (one then done). I know Snyder stepped away, but it seems like more coaches get fired for 6 straight 2nd round exits than get retained for 6 straight playoff appearances.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,298
Pittsburgh, PA
For a league where half the teams don't make the playoffs, and then by definition half the first-round participants don't advance, "one then done" is an odd choice of slam, when it's used. Unless the team was absolutely stacked and paying through the nose in luxury tax, and anything less than a championship was a humiliation, I guess. "you were only better than 75% of the league! nyah nyah!" Like, OK, but most of y'all aren't exactly rooting for juggernauts.

I feel like when you fire or separate from a coach that has that record, there's a lot more room to fall down than there is to rise further up.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,790
The Athletic polled players on some interesting topics over the weekend. Here are some results.

Cross posting from the All Star thread because I think folks here without an Athletic sub will be interested.

1. Who is the NBA’s trash-talker?
Pat Beverley: 6

Draymond Green: 4

Udonis Haslem, Dillon Brooks, Joe Ingles, Damian Lillard, Memphis Grizzlies: 1

Bam Adebayo, Miami: “The obvious answer is Draymond, so I’m gonna say Draymond.”

Domantas Sabonis, Sacramento: “Nowadays everyone’s trash-talking, so I can’t even tell you.”

Jaren Jackson Jr., Memphis: “I know he’s not in the league anymore, but Joakim Noah was on my team, and the first time he came to practice, he was talking crazy to me. He was screaming at me and pounding the ball in my chest. It was great.”

Zion Williamson, New Orleans: “I’d have to say the entire Memphis Grizzlies team. They do it in like a collective way, you can’t help but respect it.”

Tyrese Haliburton, Indiana:“Maybe Pat (Beverley). I know a lot of these guys wouldn’t agree with that. He never stops talking, which is what the good guys do. So probably Pat Bev.”

Paul George, LA Clippers: “Pat Bev is undefeated at trash-talking.”

Kevin Huerter, Sacramento: “Think Pat Bev knows that’s his role, that’s his effect on the game, kind of junking it up and get guys off their game.”

Jayson Tatum, Boston: “No doubt, Draymond.”

4. How many games should a player have to play to be MVP?
62: 4

No minimum: 3

42: 2

82: 1

75: 1

K.J. Martin, Houston: “That’s a tough question because I mean, a guy could play 75 percent of the season and have ridiculous numbers. It just depends. You have to play at least more than half the season. If you play less than half the season, you shouldn’t be in the conversation.”

Clarkson: “Early games, guys compete trying to get to the All-Star, and then after, in terms of the playoff push, maybe the last 15 games in terms of teams tanking and sit guys out – I think to that point those guys shouldn’t be chosen for those awards.”

Adebayo: “If a guy plays 50 games, but he’s the best player in those 50, it’s kind of hard to justify not giving it to him.”

De’Aaron Fox, Sacramento: “I’d say 65-ish (games). I don’t know the percentage of 65 out of 82.”

Haliburton: “I don’t think there should be a requirement. I think it’s overblown. I think the idea of having to set a game minimum, amount or whatever, I think is dumb. If this guy gets hurt, how can he control that? And if he’s the best player in the league that year, having the best year, what can you do? I think the voters take that into consideration.”


DeRozan: “All of them. All 82. … Minimum? 78.”

George:“I think if you play at least 75 to the full 82, it just says a lot about that particular player to be able to do it for that many games. To go that long into the season with consistency requires to just be healthy and available on a nightly basis. You got to play the majority of them.”
And this one may surprise some people here... except for Deuce's dad (LFG!)


5. Besides yourself, is there a player in the league you’d love to see win a ring?
Damian Lillard: 3

Chris Paul: 3

Russell Westbrook: 2

Aaron Holiday, Devin Booker, Jonas Valančiūnas, Trae Young, Cade Cunningham, Luka Dončić, Bruno Fernando, Ja Morant: 1

Buddy Hield, Indiana: “Westbrook. Good dude, man. Lotta people give him a lot of crap. He’s a Hall of Famer. He doesn’t get the credit he deserves. A great dude and you can hear the way his teammates talk about him. The way the media portrays him isn’t accurate.”

Collin Sexton, Utah: “CP3. He’s one of those guys who comes in and does the work and never complains.”

Jrue Holiday, Milwaukee: “My older brother (Justin) won one with Golden State in 2015, I won one in 2021, and then my little brother would be next.”

Sabonis: “Jonas Valančiūnas, my fellow Lithuanian.”

Haliburton:“Probably CP, just because I’ve grown up watching him for so long and to see him get a ring would be dope.”

George: “Probably Russ. Just as much as he’s been through, as much – they paint the picture of him. He’s absolutely one of the best dudes, one of the best people in this league. And it would be nice to see him get decorated.”

Tatum:“Nah, nobody. I’ve gotta get one first.”

Nikola Jokić, Denver: “I’d have to say Luka because he’s such a good friend. That’s about it.”

Huerter: “I’d say Bruno Fernando. He’s my boy, a Maryland guy, we’re really close.”

Williamson: “Ja’s my guy. We grew up together. We were both on the same team and nobody knew us, and to see us both here now as All-Stars, it’s pretty crazy, so if there’s anybody outside of myself who I’d like to see a ring, it’s Ja.”


Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Oklahoma City: “Chris Paul, for sure. Or my cousin, Nickeil (Alexander-Walker).”
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,790
Well that's a change from the reports yesterday. I don't agree that its a good fit. Atlanta just blew out their GM and coach in the midst of the same season and the chatter is the chemistry there is bad.

Udoka definitely seems like a culture builder but we also we know how that whatever actually went down with the Cs was pretty bad. The Hawks don't seem to have the sort of organizational stability that you would want around Ime at his next spot.

That said, maybe Atlanta has done good due diligence and knows full well what its getting. I would not wager on that being the case though.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,417
I’ve said from the get-go that Ime will be the clear cut #1 guy on the market this summer but like the Nets job…..anything in-season this year does feel too soon. It’s Atlanta though….nobody cares about the Hawks or what Ime did.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,242
Meaningless, and I posted in college hoops thread, but interesting: The starting lineup for Southern Miss last night was 22.6 years old. The OKC Thunder recently had a starting lineup with an average age of 22.0.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
For a league where half the teams don't make the playoffs, and then by definition half the first-round participants don't advance, "one then done" is an odd choice of slam, when it's used. Unless the team was absolutely stacked and paying through the nose in luxury tax, and anything less than a championship was a humiliation, I guess. "you were only better than 75% of the league! nyah nyah!" Like, OK, but most of y'all aren't exactly rooting for juggernauts.

I feel like when you fire or separate from a coach that has that record, there's a lot more room to fall down than there is to rise further up.
If I was the GM, I'd probably agree. It doesn't seem like most NBA organizations see it the same way, though.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,278
Imaginationland
Sucks. Kid turned himself into a player. Bone on bone is bad stuff.
The Bulls were 27-13 when he went down last January (and 1st in the conference) and are just 45-56 since then. They always seemed like fools gold so it probably wouldn't have lasted regardless, but that's a rough turnaround for the Bulls.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,278
The Bulls were 27-13 when he went down last January (and 1st in the conference) and are just 45-56 since then. They always seemed like fools gold so it probably wouldn't have lasted regardless, but that's a rough turnaround for the Bulls.
That Vucevic trade isn’t looking so hot now. Bulls traded Wendell Carter, the pick that became Franz Wagner, and their 2023 first (currently #7). Good thing for Bulls that Magic agreed to top 4 protection on the 2023 pick so the hope of Wembanyama magic is alive.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,424
Santa Monica
That Vucevic trade isn’t looking so hot now. Bulls traded Wendell Carter, the pick that became Franz Wagner, and their 2023 first (currently #7). Good thing for Bulls that Magic agreed to top 4 protection on the 2023 pick so the hope of Wembanyama magic is alive.
They did some decent moves in getting DeRozan, Caruso & Lonzo on the cheap.

BUT that Vucevic deal :eek: just robbed them of 3 young, reasonable assets.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,417
They did some decent moves in getting DeRozan, Caruso & Lonzo on the cheap.

BUT that Vucevic deal :eek: just robbed them of 3 young, reasonable assets.
I have a hard time complaining about that trade if I’m a Bulls fan. It wasn’t the Vucevic deal that robbed them of assets, it was the heathy of Lonzo, LaVine and Caruso that derailed them from being in the contenders mix. I’d argue that with normal health they wouldn’t be picking 7th this year nor would they have selected Wagner being fully stocked at the wings…..and nobody beneath them would really have made a difference (unless they stretched and picked Sengun 8th).

The Bulls made all the moves to make a leap….and did. Some things you can’t control like all those injuries.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,881
Vucevic has been a good player for Chicago but not nearly worth the assets. I think HRB makes a good point that if Lonzo/Caruso/LaVine had been healthy, the team is probably a lot better and they are a solid playoff unit so the loss of the pick wouldn't sting as much.

The thing that really hurts is Franz turning into such a player on top of the draft picks. There were also concerns about Lonzo's knees back to his time with the Lakers so it wasn't a total mystery that he would be an injury risk.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,417
Meh. I am totally fine with teams making a move. But not for a player like Vucevic
They had no big on the roster and got one of the, if not the, best one available…..and it was working really well. A floor spacing 5 who was among the best at his position in scoring, rebounding and passing. I mean this isn’t some average JAG rotation piece.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,609
Somewhere
I have a hard time complaining about that trade if I’m a Bulls fan. It wasn’t the Vucevic deal that robbed them of assets, it was the heathy of Lonzo, LaVine and Caruso that derailed them from being in the contenders mix.
Yeah, the Orlando youngs are fine but as complimentary guys, not franchise players. The Bulls rolled the dice on Lonzo and he’s basically done. Looked great when healthy though.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,424
Santa Monica
I have a hard time complaining about that trade if I’m a Bulls fan. It wasn’t the Vucevic deal that robbed them of assets, it was the heathy of Lonzo, LaVine and Caruso that derailed them from being in the contenders mix. I’d argue that with normal health they wouldn’t be picking 7th this year nor would they have selected Wagner being fully stocked at the wings…..and nobody beneath them would really have made a difference (unless they stretched and picked Sengun 8th).

The Bulls made all the moves to make a leap….and did. Some things you can’t control like all those injuries.
Orlando is definitely not complaining with Franzy, WCJ, and a TOP10 this year. I expect them to be a thorn in Boson's side for the next few seasons.

Trading multiple firsts + a young starting Center for a 30yr old, Bulk Center is not my jam. YMMV

Injuries happen, it's kind of why going ALL IN on Vucevic is sub-optimal. BUT folks love themselves some POINTZ
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,881
Yeah, the Orlando youngs are fine but as complimentary guys, not franchise players. The Bulls rolled the dice on Lonzo and he’s basically done. Looked great when healthy though.
I think a lot of people around the league would disagree on Franz as a potential franchise guy; he's REALLY good.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,424
Santa Monica
They had no big on the roster and got one of the, if not the, best one available…..and it was working really well. A floor spacing 5 who was among the best at his position in scoring, rebounding and passing. I mean this isn’t some average JAG rotation piece.
Meh...they had Wendell Carter, Lauri Markkanen, Daniel Gafford, Thaddeus Young, Kornet & they landed Daniel Theis for free. A perfectly acceptable BIG rotation.

Hindsight is 20/20, but they couldn't have played it any worse.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,278
Imaginationland
I think a lot of people around the league would disagree on Franz as a potential franchise guy; he's REALLY good.
Yeah, I'm a fan. Of all the teams that where Wemby could [reasonably] land, there is none scarier than Orlando. A Wemby/Paolo/Franz front line for the rest of the decade is pretty scary to think about.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,417
Orlando is definitely not complaining with Franzy, WCJ, and a TOP10 this year. I expect them to be a thorn in Boson's side for the next few seasons.

Trading multiple firsts + a young starting Center for a 30yr old, Bulk Center is not my jam. YMMV

Injuries happen, it's kind of why going ALL IN on Vucevic is sub-optimal. BUT folks love themselves some POINTZ
If you view it as “going all in on Vucevic” then feeling this way is natural as I would as well. The process as a whole however was going all in on DeRozan, Ball, Caruso and Vucevic joining LaVine which we saw how good they were pre-injuries.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,790
The Bulls tried to put together a contender on the fly and it failed. Results folks can have a field day with the fail but the process seemed ok when viewed against the backdrop of a Bulls team that was essentially irrelevant before the moves.

Setting aside the pieces and their cost, if a team doesn't have young talent to build around they kind of had limited options. They could certainly tank and rebuild however that carries obvious risks like picks not working out (and the results folks would have their lolz then too!).

Not everyone gets the chance to draft two+ foundational stars and most teams fail to get one. The Bulls can be faulted for what they did but there's definitely some logic to it.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,762
Saint Paul, MN
If you view it as “going all in on Vucevic” then feeling this way is natural as I would as well. The process as a whole however was going all in on DeRozan, Ball, Caruso and Vucevic joining LaVine which we saw how good they were pre-injuries.
The Bulls acquired Vuc at the deadline in 2021. They were 19-24 at the time. They didn't acquire Ball/Caruso/DeRozan until the offseason. Are you arguing that they knew they were going to get those guys when they decided to trade two firsts and a guy they had just drafted #7 overall 2 years prior?
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,408
They had no big on the roster and got one of the, if not the, best one available…..and it was working really well. A floor spacing 5 who was among the best at his position in scoring, rebounding and passing. I mean this isn’t some average JAG rotation piece.
Vucevic cannot defend at a position where defense is the most important skill. It's nearly impossible to have a quality defense without a quality big, let alone a sieve like Vuc. The traits you list make him a nice piece, not a foundation of your team.

Also, it was working really well in the sense that they were outplaying their scoring differential. It was a totally unsustainable run that was reliant on Derozan magic at the end of games. They gave up two high lottery picks and Wendell Carter to be first round chum for a couple of years. No revisionist history is going make it not seem like malpractice... and most people thought it was a bad, nonsensical trade at the time.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,790
Vucevic cannot defend at a position where defense is the most important skill. It's nearly impossible to have a quality defense without a quality big, let alone a sieve like Vuc. The traits you list make him a nice piece, not a foundation of your team.

Also, it was working really well in the sense that they were outplaying their scoring differential. It was a totally unsustainable run that was reliant on Derozan magic at the end of games. They gave up two high lottery picks and Wendell Carter to be first round chum for a couple of years. No revisionist history is going make it not seem like malpractice... and most people thought it was a bad, nonsensical trade at the time.
Your points are fair except the last one. People think all sorts of things about transactions. They tend to remember the good takes and dismiss their bad ones.

Also, "people" are typically at a huge information disadvantage to the parties involved.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,424
Santa Monica
If you view it as “going all in on Vucevic” then feeling this way is natural as I would as well. The process as a whole however was going all in on DeRozan, Ball, Caruso and Vucevic joining LaVine which we saw how good they were pre-injuries.
I'm criticizing the asset cost (Wendell Carter Jr, Otto Porter, two 1sts) of going and getting Vucevic. I criticized it then and now. No revision is necessary, although some "folks" were pining for Danny to go use similar assets to go get Vucevic.

Correct me if I'm wrong but there was ZERO asset cost in getting Caruso, DeRozan, & Ball. I complimented them on that and the injuries to Ball have been brutal
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,417
The Bulls acquired Vuc at the deadline in 2021. They were 19-24 at the time. They didn't acquire Ball/Caruso/DeRozan until the offseason. Are you arguing that they knew they were going to get those guys when they decided to trade two firsts and a guy they had just drafted #7 overall 2 years prior?
I would have to guess that they knew they were going be “going all in” for sure. Maybe not with that particular exact group but moving picks for veteran talent alongside LaVine is what I recall the talk being.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,417
I'm criticizing the asset cost (Wendell Carter Jr, Otto Porter, two 1sts) of going and getting Vucevic. I criticized it then and now. No revision is necessary, although some "folks" were pining for Danny to go use similar assets to go get Vucevic.

Correct me if I'm wrong but there was ZERO asset cost in getting Caruso, DeRozan, & Ball. I complimented them on that and the injuries to Ball have been brutal
Yeah but those assets figured to be kinda crappy in the big picture. It wasn’t like they moved off an All-Star level player. They moved slightly more than hot garbage with only injuries preventing the draft pick from being low teen/20’s.

To the other point, the Bulls were bad and didn’t have many assets…..and turned what they did have into a good team. Good for those people who hated it at the time and it worked out for their narrative but that one year pre-injuries was the most excitement Chicago had for their basketball team since Butler and Rose.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,790
some "folks" were pining for Danny to go use similar assets to go get Vucevic
If this was directed at me - and I am on the record as liking Vuc as a player and I thought he might fit the Cs at the time (it didn't happen so you can credit me with a L for your research). That said, I cannot recall anyone here advocating for the Cs to trade "similar assets" to get Vuc. Maybe you have the post saved as part of your bookmarks?
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,424
Santa Monica
Yeah but those assets figured to be kinda crappy in the big picture. It wasn’t like they moved off an All-Star level player. They moved slightly more than hot garbage with only injuries preventing the draft pick from being low teen/20’s.

To the other point, the Bulls were bad and didn’t have many assets…..and turned what they did have into a good team. Good for those people who hated it at the time and it worked out for their narrative but that one year pre-injuries was the most excitement Chicago had for their basketball team since Butler and Rose.
how big of a piece was Vuceivic for those exciting months of basketball?

DeMar and Zach were scoring the POINTZ.
Vucevic was chipping in 17ppg along with bad defense from the 5 last season. WCJ could have done pretty much that
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,424
Santa Monica
If this was directed at me - and I am on the record as liking Vuc as a player and I thought he might fit the Cs at the time (it didn't happen so you can credit me with a L for your research). That said, I cannot recall anyone here advocating for the Cs to trade "similar assets" to get Vuc. Maybe you have the post saved as part of your bookmarks?
Dude I have no idea if you love/hate Vucevic? BUT you liking him isn't shocking.

We're basically criticizing the Bulls/Vucevic trade.
I like reasonable 5s that play defense to roster build, it's been my stance for a while. I recall some folks suggesting Vucevic
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,349
Bulls have been consistently better every year with Vuci not on the court than with Vuci on the Court.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,349
Correct me if I'm wrong but there was ZERO asset cost in getting Caruso, DeRozan, & Ball. I complimented them on that and the injuries to Ball have been brutal
DeRozan cost the bulls their '25 1st (top 10 protected), assuming their '23 1st conveys to the Magic this year (top 4 protected). Also, a '22 2nd & '25 2nd.

The '22 2nd ended up being Kennedy Chandler who has done not much for the Grizzlies.

Caruso was completely free (4/$37m free agent signing).

Lonzo was pretty free - Garrett Temple S&T, Satoransky, a '24 2nd & cash.

I'm pretty sure I was critical of Vuci, pretty critical of DeRozan, thought Ball was a steal, & that Caruso was a pretty good move.

ETA - nope, I was very critical of DeRozan lol. His team was better with him off the floor 11 of his 1st 12 seasons & he seemed like an outdated archetype. He stepped up his game a ton with the Bulls in his age 32 & 33 seasons & I was wrong.
 
Last edited:

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,424
Santa Monica
DeRozan cost the bulls their '25 1st (top 10 protected), assuming their '23 1st conveys to the Magic this year (top 4 protected). Also, a '22 2nd & '25 2nd.

The '22 2nd ended up being Kennedy Chandler who has done not much for the Grizzlies.

Caruso was completely free (4/$37m free agent signing).

Lonzo was pretty free - Garrett Temple S&T, Satoransky, a '24 2nd & cash.

I'm pretty sure I was critical of Vuci, pretty critical of DeRozan, thought Ball was a steal, & that Caruso was a pretty good move.
OK thanks. Nice correction on the DeRozan deal. I was always shocked he didn't end up with the Lakers (same with Caruso)

https://www.nba.com/bulls/news/bulls-acquire-demar-derozan
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,790
Dude I have no idea if you love/hate Vucevic? BUT you liking him isn't shocking.

We're basically criticizing the Bulls/Vucevic trade.
I like reasonable 5s that play defense to roster build, it's been my stance for a while. I recall some folks suggesting Vucevic
Nice. But par for the course for a moron, right?

In any event, we can do these Monday morning QB exercises for lots of trades and quickly point out what shouldn't have happened/who screwed up. If only people were privy to all that information ahead of time!

Again, if the Bulls screwed up a rebuild on the fly then it was a fair bet they would have mishandled WCJ and their picks.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,424
Santa Monica
Nice. But par for the course for a moron, right?

In any event, we can do these Monday morning QB exercises for lots of trades and quickly point out what shouldn't have happened/who screwed up. If only people were privy to all that information ahead of time!

Again, if the Bulls screwed up a rebuild on the fly then it was a fair bet they would have mishandled WCJ and their picks.
You like points/offense, so it's not exactly shocking (hence your Bojan Bogdanovic interest earlier this year)

What private information would you like to have access to in order to like/dislike a trade? I mean there is a lot that has been written about the Wolves thinking behind the Gobert trade. At the time I hated the trade, for Minnesota, along with 95% of the Cellar. Are we Monday Morning QBing that one?

https://theathletic.com/3396336/2022/07/02/rudy-gobert-timberwolves-trade/
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,424
Santa Monica
if the Bulls screwed up a rebuild on the fly then it was a fair bet they would have mishandled WCJ and their picks.
Again, I was only critical of the Vucevic trade.

DeMar, Ball, & Caruso were all trades/signings that made sense at the time.

I have no idea if it's a "fair bet" they would have mishandled WCJ and their picks. BUT adding Vecevic definitely was a bad move for the cost.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,310
"This team can't make bad trades because they're so bad at team-building that they'd screw it up without the trades anyway so any trade they make is better than not trading"........honestly I'm just impressed.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,790
"This team can't make bad trades because they're so bad at team-building that they'd screw it up without the trades anyway so any trade they make is better than not trading"........honestly I'm just impressed.
That's not my argument at all.

People are lolz-ing at the moves a team made because it didn't work out. Results based analysis without any context or attempt to understand motives is always high quality but we take it to the next level in this forum.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,349