I didn’t think the column was actually that negative. It’s negative, of course, but it concedes his brilliance.
I think the core of a lot of it is right. Being like BB works when you have the credibility of winning. If all of your players suck, his coachingstyle makes you just an impotent jerk. Isn’t that kind of how it’s gone for his coaching tree? They try to be BB but without his record of winning and without nearly as much talent and it goes to shit.
I think the core of a lot of it is right. Being like BB works when you have the credibility of winning. If all of your players suck, his coachingstyle makes you just an impotent jerk. Isn’t that kind of how it’s gone for his coaching tree? They try to be BB but without his record of winning and without nearly as much talent and it goes to shit.