Let's talk about Michael Pineda

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,330
unexplained loss of velocity, which was noticed in the 2nd half of last year.
This really isn't true, and I wish people would stop repeating it. They semi-shut him down in early September because he was close to their innings limit, and then they let him throw 80 pitches in a game eleven days after his previous appearance. His velocity was down in this one game under odd circumstances, that's it.

 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
You are wrong JA.

http://www.fangraphs...duced-velocity/

Pineda spent a good part of the second half of 2011 experimenting with pitching at reduced velocities early in games, and then he cranked up the volume when he needed to as the game wore on. Now, I think an argument could be made that it’s a little disconcerting that Pineda feels it’s necessary to start games with diminished velocity, suggesting that perhaps he doesn’t feel he can throw in the mid-90s for 100 pitches per start over a full season.
His results in the 2nd half were poor as well. He was lights out in the 1st half, and then changed his approach, and was not very good, but did not give up the "experiment"..

Reduced velocity in early innings and then increased velocity in later innings is a signature of a pitcher having trouble getting loose, typical of pitchers with arm problems.
Pineda and the Mariners said otherwise, but players/teams are not always honest.talking about these things.

edit, that chart you showed shows a clear downward slope.
 

keyalyn

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
552
The overall range of his velocity was more or less the same, but that graph shows an obvious decrease in his average FB velocity. He was at or above 95 in 7 of his first 14 starts, but only 2 of his last 14. He may have reached back to throw one in the high 90s every so often in games in the second half, but it wasn't happening nearly as often as it was in the first half.
 

Trlicek's Whip

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 8, 2009
5,607
New York City
He was lights out in the 1st half, and then changed his approach, and was not very good, but did not give up the "experiment"..
If Pineda's 2nd half in 2011 looked like Brandon McCarthy's 2011 or Brandon Morrow's season so far in 2012, I'd be inclined to think that, in the words of Pee Wee Herman, that he meant to sacrifice fastball velocity for the sake of becoming a better pitcher.

McCarthy converted from a FB pitcher to a GB pitcher in 2011, and the numbers since last year support this change in philosophy: his FB% dropped over 10% since 2009, and his GB% has raised 8% in that same span.

Small sample size in 2012 for Brandon Morrow, but his numbers appear to be of a pitcher that is changing his approach: K/9 way down and FB velocity down as well (still lower 90's, but down for him). Huge spike in GB% (48% where previous it lives at an average of 8-10% lower than that.

Pineda's got an even smaller SSS to work with, but anecdotally one never heard that he was reworking his mechanics or approach last year in a "pitch to contact" kind of way in SEA, or during the pre-NYY offseason.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,330
Really? That was all people talked about since NY signed him, "he needs to develop a changeup" and his FB had tons of movement all spring training until that last disastrous start.

I just think it's funny that people seem so sure about what they think happened, when there's very little actual evidence to go on. To me, it seems pretty clear that he was perfectly healthy when NY traded for him, he came to camp out of shape expecting to pitch himself into shape, he spent most of training camp working on his offspeed stuff because that is what everyone told him he needed to do, he figured his fastball would be there when he needed it, and he hurt himself in or just before that last start trying to ramp up the velocity. But I'm well aware that all of that could be wrong.

And I don't buy the reduced velocity in 2011 still, I think it's at least as likely that he was trying to mimic Verlander's very successful approach, break out the big fastball if and when you need it and often in the later innings, not all game long.

Anyway, the bottom line is that he's hurt now, and today we will hopefully learn more specifics.
 

terrynever

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 25, 2005
21,717
pawtucket
Bottom line is right. It doesn't really matter how he got hurt. As Cashman said over the weekend, "we've got to get him healthy." If that takes a year or more, so be it.

This deal is still about the Yankees getting Pineda and Jose Campos for Montero and Noesi. What we do know is Pineda's injury hurts the Yankees' chances to succeed in 2012.
 

Trlicek's Whip

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 8, 2009
5,607
New York City
Really? That was all people talked about since NY signed him, "he needs to develop a changeup" and his FB had tons of movement all spring training until that last disastrous start.

I just think it's funny that people seem so sure about what they think happened, when there's very little actual evidence to go on. To me, it seems pretty clear that he was perfectly healthy when NY traded for him, he came to camp out of shape expecting to pitch himself into shape, he spent most of training camp working on his offspeed stuff because that is what everyone told him he needed to do, he figured his fastball would be there when he needed it, and he hurt himself in or just before that last start trying to ramp up the velocity. But I'm well aware that all of that could be wrong.

And I don't buy the reduced velocity in 2011 still, I think it's at least as likely that he was trying to mimic Verlander's very successful approach, break out the big fastball if and when you need it and often in the later innings, not all game long.

Anyway, the bottom line is that he's hurt now, and today we will hopefully learn more specifics.
We're agreeing more than we are disagreeing, JA. He did show up physically and probably mentally complacent, and that led to a mediocre spring.

As to his actual approach as a pitcher that doesn't concern his coming in behind schedule in ST and at the risk of one more hair-split:

I didn't follow hot stove or ST this year so have no idea if the Yankees expected Pineda to be in the 2012 rotation, or if he did in fact have to perform in ST make the team. But "he needs to develop a changeup" is how you talk about a nascent developing minor leaguer that *projects* to show promise, or maybe a one-pitch pony in the bullpen with good stuff that you want to convert to starter.

My comps to the Brandons differ. Their mantra wasn't that "they needed changeups," but "they needed to pitch to contact and reduce their fly balls and/or their pitch counts." James Shields comes to mind last year too as someone who did this.

I guess it's a picture-straighteningly slight distinction, but "Pineda should stop pumping fastballs and learn to pitch" is a different objective than that of the the two/three more established pitchers I mentioned.

And Verlander might have learned a "dial-it-down vs. dig deep to get it" fastball approach, but your speculation is as anecdotal as mine likely is - i.e. how much of Verlander's approach has to do with his specific career trajectory and his physical gifts? Maybe the Verlander Method is unique and achievable only by Verlander.

But as Terry said, the bottom line is still the same, and the trade is still terrific. [It must be, I'm still furious that the NYY signed him]. They got a live and talented arm in Pineda - young and cost controlled. He may not be the ace in 2012, his value still is high over the length of NYY's commitment - softening the blow for the rest of the aging NYY rotation going forward. And heaven forbid if there is arm trouble, but he's on the right side of age to recover, rehab, and still perform well in theory.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,330
Yeah, I still like the deal even if Pineda misses the whole year, but it sure would be nice if he didn't. This is not promising:

Lohud Yankees Blog ‏ @LoHudYankees

Pineda going for a second opinion after an MRI today. Girardi said his agent requested a second opinion before going for the first opinion.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
And I don't buy the reduced velocity in 2011 still, I think it's at least as likely that he was trying to mimic Verlander's very successful approach, break out the big fastball if and when you need it and often in the later innings, not all game long.

Anyway, the bottom line is that he's hurt now, and today we will hopefully learn more specifics.
Makes perfect sense. You have a rookie who is lights out in the first half deciding to change his approach so he can become a better pitcher in the future and save his arm, which gets much worse results in the present, and sticks with the latter instead of going back to the former. Despite his efforts to become and better pitcher and save his arm by throwing at reduced velocity in ST, his arm suddenly develops problems because he attempts, but fails, to throw at last years first half velocity.

Makes much more sense than the theory that Pinedas arm troubles began in the 2nd half last year which caused his early game velocity to be low, causing the Mariners to look to unload him, and that these arm problems persisted into ST and worsened during the course of ST, culminating in his velocity dropping to 88-89 in the last inning of his last ST start, initially diagnosed as tendonitis with a straight MRI, but with an enhanced MRI showing something requiring a 2nd opinion.

Occams razor applies here folks.

I think it's probably still a good deal for the Yankees long term even if it's the worst case for Pineda, especially if Campos is the age he says he is. Three years from now you may have 2 very good cost controlled starting pitchers as a result of the trade. Even if Montero develops into the hitter he was expected to be, that's still a good deal.
 

terrynever

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 25, 2005
21,717
pawtucket
Yeah, I still like the deal even if Pineda misses the whole year, but it sure would be nice if he didn't. This is not promising:

Lohud Yankees Blog ‏ @LoHudYankees

Pineda going for a second opinion after an MRI today. Girardi said his agent requested a second opinion before going for the first opinion.
I'm more than a little bit excited about Campos. I think we all are. 6-foot-4, 195 pounds, from Venezuela. Dominating in his first three starts, solid in his fourth after giving up an early homer. Still, same thing as with all young pitchers, it's a long road filled with pitfalls.
 

terrynever

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 25, 2005
21,717
pawtucket
Makes perfect sense. You have a rookie who is lights out in the first half deciding to change his approach so he can become a better pitcher in the future and save his arm, which gets much worse results in the present, and sticks with the latter instead of going back to the former. Despite his efforts to become and better pitcher and save his arm by throwing at reduced velocity in ST, his arm suddenly develops problems because he attempts, but fails, to throw at last years first half velocity.

Makes much more sense than the theory that Pinedas arm troubles began in the 2nd half last year which caused his early game velocity to be low, causing the Mariners to look to unload him, and that these arm problems persisted into ST and worsened during the course of ST, culminating in his velocity dropping to 88-89 in the last inning of his last ST start, initially diagnosed as tendonitis with a straight MRI, but with an enhanced MRI showing something requiring a 2nd opinion.

Occams razor applies here folks.

I think it's probably still a good deal for the Yankees long term even if it's the worst case for Pineda, especially if Campos is the age he says he is. Three years from now you may have 2 very good cost controlled starting pitchers as a result of the trade. Even if Montero develops into the hitter he was expected to be, that's still a good deal.
Cool post. I love sarcasm as much as anyone and it works here. Your final point is good, too. But the truth is, it takes five or 10 years to evaluate trades involving young players and prospects.
 

Rough Carrigan

reasons within Reason
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Yeah, I still like the deal even if Pineda misses the whole year, but it sure would be nice if he didn't. This is not promising:

Lohud Yankees Blog ‏ @LoHudYankees

Pineda going for a second opinion after an MRI today. Girardi said his agent requested a second opinion before going for the first opinion.
Oh come on. If he missed the whole year you'd be terrified that they gave up a once in a decade prospect bat in Montero for a guy who missed most of the 2009 season with injury, then missed most of the 2012 season with injury (if that happened), has a rough delivery and is likely to become increasingly hefty. if you put the second piece of bad news (2012) in there with the others you can't possibly say you like the trade except in a whistling past the graveyard sort of fashion.
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,314
Washington
Oh come on. If he missed the whole year you'd be terrified that they gave up a once in a decade prospect bat in Montero for a guy who missed most of the 2009 season with injury, then missed most of the 2012 season with injury (if that happened), has a rough delivery and is likely to become increasingly hefty. if you put the second piece of bad news (2012) in there with the others you can't possibly say you like the trade except in a whistling past the graveyard sort of fashion.
I agree with jon -- I still like the deal too. I'd be worried about it, but the many years of cost control + Campos still make me think it was a good idea. Especially since it doesn't seem like Montero is going to be a solid catching option. I have more confidence in the Yankees acquiring a quality FA DH (if needed) over the next couple of years than I do quality FA pitchers.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,330
Yep, pretty much what EE said. I love the Noesi for Campos part (NY had a logjam at Noesi's level, and Campos has a higher upside), and Montero has no position besides DH.

Anyway, hopefully the news today on Pineda isn't too bad.
 

cromulence

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 25, 2009
6,826
So goddamn angry - I hated the shit out of the trade the moment I heard about it, and it couldn't have possibly turned out worse. Montero is gonna be a stud and I was extremely pumped to root for him. One of Cashman's biggest mistakes.
 

czar

fanboy
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
4,318
Ann Arbor
I might be missing someone but I think Curt Schilling (surgery in the late 90's when he was with Philly, IIRC) might be the only guy who had labrum surgery and came back as the same guy afterward.
I think Peavy had a labrum procedure as well. Jury still out on him but he keep showing flashes.

That said, this sucks big time. Labrum surgery is no Tommy John (in a lacking demonstrated success kind of way). Don't wish that type of injury on any pitcher, really, especially when you are in your early 20's and a rising star.
 

steveluck7

Member
SoSH Member
May 10, 2007
4,003
Burrillville, RI
I think Peavy had a labrum procedure as well. Jury still out on him but he keep showing flashes.

That said, this sucks big time. Labrum surgery is no Tommy John (in a lacking demonstrated success kind of way). Don't wish that type of injury on any pitcher, really, especially when you are in your early 20's and a rising star.
I was just going to point this out. Labrum surgery will bring with it the eternal tag of "damaged goods". Even if he reaches 80% of his pre-injury potential, the Yankees (and every other team) are going to be very reluctant to give him big money over a number of years. Really sucks for him
 

derekson

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2010
6,264
It's officially an anterior labral tear(SLAP tear?) DRS or radsoxfan, does this mean his season is over? Long-term prognosis?
I'm no doctor, but I can't imagine he pitches this season.

Even if he makes a quick recovery, the Yankees are probably going to be extremely cautious in pushing his rehab.

Does this mean Cashman won't be making any trades with Seattle any time soon?
 

ThePrideofShiner

Crests prematurely
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
10,789
Washington
Man, this is awful news. If Montero keeps hitting, this will surely go down as Cashman's worst trade.

Is there any way to know when it happened?
 

cromulence

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 25, 2009
6,826

BryanHoch Cashman says that in no way does he believe the Mariners had any knowledge of an injury. Says Pineda was a fully healthy player in January3 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite




BryanHoch Target date for Pineda to be on a big league mound will be May 1, 20133 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite




BloggingBombers Dr. Ahmad called it "a discreet tear," which is why they're doing arthroscopic surgery.5 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite




BloggingBombers Cashman: "Without a doubt, the injury occurred during the rehab outing." He said this tear would have shown up on a normal MRI.6 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite


BloggingBombers Cashman said the MRI taken at the time of the trade and the MRI taken in spring training were clean and had no sign of a shoulder tear.7 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite


BryanHoch Cashman says Yankees physicals/MRI at time of trade were clean. Not damaged goods. Tear happened in extended spring game



Some of this doesn't make much sense regarding the injury suddenly occurring and not existing previously, and it feels like they may not have handled him properly. Did they do a dye contrast MRI the first time? Would that have made a difference (I know Cashman says no but I'd rather hear from someone who isn't in need of ass covering)? I don't think Seattle knew, but that doesn't mean it or a precursor to it wasn't there. I now expect nothing from him.

Andy Pettitte is now crucial. And man I'm pissed at Cashman.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,582
deep inside Guido territory
I talked to my sister the athletic trainer and she says that this injury can lead to extremely limited range of motion and chronic rotator cuff and biceps tendinitis. It really sounds like he won't ever be the same again as was said above thread.
 

czar

fanboy
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
4,318
Ann Arbor
I don't get the "injury definitely happened in XST rehab outing" stuff Cashman is peddling.

His velocity was down 5 mph this spring and the whole reason he was in XST was a weak/sore shoulder. Are they trying to spin this like everything else was fine and then (coincidentally) he ended up tearing something?
 

cannonball 1729

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 8, 2005
3,581
The Sticks
I might be missing someone but I think Curt Schilling (surgery in the late 90's when he was with Philly, IIRC) might be the only guy who had labrum surgery and came back as the same guy afterward.
Pedro did this, too. And Freddy Garcia. Up until recently, it was a career-ender, but it seems like that has changed over the last couple years. Jake Peavy's doctor actually has a huge grant from MLB, presumably because his treatment of Peavy's injury was a.) unprecedented, and b.) surprisingly effective.

Edit: Actually, I think Chris Carpenter had a SLAP tear as well.
 

DaveRoberts'Shoes

Aaron Burr
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 1, 2005
4,271
OR 12
Bad injury no doubt. Very guarded prognosis for pitchers but if it was truly a discrete event and not a chronic thing, he might have a better chance of a functional return. I doubt he'll ever have the same velocity again, though.
 

cromulence

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 25, 2009
6,826
I don't get the "injury definitely happened in XST rehab outing" stuff Cashman is peddling.

His velocity was down 5 mph this spring and the whole reason he was in XST was a weak/sore shoulder. Are they trying to spin this like everything else was fine and then (coincidentally) he ended up tearing something?
This is what I'm thinking. Of course Cashman wants it to be a freak accident and something no one could have foreseen cause it makes him look like less of an idiot. Just doesn't add up.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,182
As I've been saying all along, the most troubling part of the Pineda deal for the MFY was that Seattle was willing to do that -- because if Pineda became anything close to the pitcher his 2011 stats and scouting reports suggested he would become, trading him for a DH made zero sense.

Once the initial shock wears off, the recriminations are going to start flying.
 

DaveRoberts'Shoes

Aaron Burr
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 1, 2005
4,271
OR 12
This is what I'm thinking. Of course Cashman wants it to be a freak accident and something no one could have foreseen cause it makes him look like less of an idiot. Just doesn't add up.
Unless he had some shoulder fatigue/tendonitis that caused him to alter his mechanics and that led to the injury, like Papelbpn's subluxation episode.

Or Cashman's an idiot, I'm fine with that too
 

rembrat

Member
SoSH Member
May 26, 2006
36,345
I don't think Cashman's career will be judged soley by this move. Kudos to those Debbie Downers that called it from Day 1.

And this is why you don't trade excess pitching in April.
 

terrynever

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 25, 2005
21,717
pawtucket
As I've been saying all along, the most troubling part of the Pineda deal for the MFY was that Seattle was willing to do that -- because if Pineda became anything close to the pitcher his 2011 stats and scouting reports suggested he would become, trading him for a DH made zero sense.

Once the initial shock wears off, the recriminations are going to start flying.
In line with this thinking, maybe the Mariners tossed in their best young pitching prospect (Campos) to assuage their conscience!
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,182
In line with this thinking, maybe the Mariners tossed in their best young pitching prospect (Campos) to assuage their conscience!
I think the MFY overvalued their own guy (Montero), and it never occurred to them that they should be leery of why Pineda was available at any price, let alone in exchange for a guy whose stock had fallen significantly since he'd been perhaps the top prospect in baseball two years earlier.
 

Gdiguy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
6,274
San Diego, CA
As I've been saying all along, the most troubling part of the Pineda deal for the MFY was that Seattle was willing to do that -- because if Pineda became anything close to the pitcher his 2011 stats and scouting reports suggested he would become, trading him for a DH made zero sense.

Once the initial shock wears off, the recriminations are going to start flying.
I wouldn't go that far - the Mariners have a number of good to excellent pitching prospects on the horizon for the next couple years, whereas they have what, 3 hitters that (going into this year) were likely to be above-average (Ackley, Smoak, Ichiro)? Ichiro's likely on the downswing, and they have maybe a couple people who could theoretically become reasonable... but even now, they're running Olivo and his .273 wOBA (2011) out there (and he's currently OPS'ing .372). That's the definition of a team that needs to trade strength (pitching) for weakness (hitting).

Yeah, pitching prospects are at best a gamble, and you can never have too many starting pitchers... but when your lineup is historically terrible, it's time to take a gamble on getting an all-star-caliber hitter. (Plus, I assume they figured Noesi in that ballpark would provide a reasonable #4 or so performance)
 

terrynever

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 25, 2005
21,717
pawtucket
I think the MFY overvalued their own guy (Montero), and it never occurred to them that they should be leery of why Pineda was available at any price, let alone in exchange for a guy whose stock had fallen significantly since he'd been perhaps the top prospect in baseball two years earlier.
Every team overvalues its prospects. And Montero's abilities were no secret by the time the Yankees traded him. They dealt him off the high of his performance with the big club last September. But the Mariners and everyone else knew he was a project behind the plate. And even though Montero seems like a can't-miss hitting prospect, that doesn't mean he's going to hit like Edgar Martinez. Or even Victor Martinez.

The Yankees of 2012 had no real role for Montero. Unfortunately, they had big plans for Pineda, and they won't be able to fill the void he leaves behind. Which means the starting pitching might be good enough to get them into the playoffs, and not much farther. It is a story Yankee fans know only too well.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044

BryanHoch Cashman says that in no way does he believe the Mariners had any knowledge of an injury. Says Pineda was a fully healthy player in January3 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite




BryanHoch Target date for Pineda to be on a big league mound will be May 1, 20133 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite




BloggingBombers Dr. Ahmad called it "a discreet tear," which is why they're doing arthroscopic surgery.5 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite




BloggingBombers Cashman: "Without a doubt, the injury occurred during the rehab outing." He said this tear would have shown up on a normal MRI.6 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite


BloggingBombers Cashman said the MRI taken at the time of the trade and the MRI taken in spring training were clean and had no sign of a shoulder tear.7 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite


BryanHoch Cashman says Yankees physicals/MRI at time of trade were clean. Not damaged goods. Tear happened in extended spring game



Some of this doesn't make much sense regarding the injury suddenly occurring and not existing previously, and it feels like they may not have handled him properly. Did they do a dye contrast MRI the first time? Would that have made a difference (I know Cashman says no but I'd rather hear from someone who isn't in need of ass covering)? I don't think Seattle knew, but that doesn't mean it or a precursor to it wasn't there. I now expect nothing from him.

Andy Pettitte is now crucial. And man I'm pissed at Cashman.

Classic CYA response by Cashman, The straight MRI's Pineda had after the trade and after his last start in ST both showed no tears. As pointed out before, this is not unusual. This was the first contrast dye MRI, and it caught it.

Shoulder injuries tend to be progressive in nature. The first symptom was him "changing his approach" in the 2nd half last year but throwing with lower velocity in the early innings and getting worse results. Undoubtedly, Pinedas shoulder injury got worse as he pitched through it in ST with reduced velocity, especially during that last game when he completely lost command and his velocity was down to 89. He probably should have been shut down earlier if they had known what was going on. A tear that might have responded to rest and a strengthening program became larger and more discrete requiring surgery.

Seattle may not have had an MRI showing the slap tear, but they probably suspected something was up.

Water over the dam. A big loss the way Hughes and Garcia are pitching. Andy will help, but you can never have too much SP'ing.

Maybe Campos is the silver lining, but knowing the Mariners, I have to wonder if he is as young as they say. Wouldn't be the first time.
 

terrynever

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 25, 2005
21,717
pawtucket
He wasn't even the best 19 year-old pitcher in their system.
Who knows? Only time will tell.

The flip side of this trade is that Montero will have a more difficult time putting up power numbers in Seattle than in NY. He's off to a puny start in 59 ABs with Seattle, OPSing around .640. He's not showing much patience at the plate with two walks in 61 PAs. Over a full season, that's 20 walks in 610 ABs. He doesn't have the protection that the Yankees' lineup would have provided him.

I understand that Pineda is a huge loss for the Yankees this season. The 98-mph flamethrower may never be seen again. But Montero still has to prove he is the stud hitter everyone thought he would become. It's a process and 59 ABs are just a starting point. But Smoak has been there two seasons and isn't doing much either. Maybe he would have hit more in Texas.

Seattle is where good young hitting prospects go to die.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
Who knows? Only time will tell.

The flip side of this trade is that Montero will have a more difficult time putting up power numbers in Seattle than in NY. He's off to a puny start in 59 ABs with Seattle, OPSing around .640. He's not showing much patience at the plate with two walks in 61 PAs. Over a full season, that's 20 walks in 610 ABs. He doesn't have the protection that the Yankees' lineup would have provided him.

I understand that Pineda is a huge loss for the Yankees this season. The 98-mph flamethrower may never be seen again. But Montero still has to prove he is the stud hitter everyone thought he would become. It's a process and 59 ABs are just a starting point. But Smoak has been there two seasons and isn't doing much either. Maybe he would have hit more in Texas.

Seattle is where good young hitting prospects go to die.
Pedroia was awful his first 59 AB's, actually, more like 180 going back to 2006, and he got over it.

From what I saw of Montero, he had great opposite field power. I think he would have really done well at YS3. Should fare better at SAFECO than pure pull hitters. Prospects tend to be a crap shoot, but I think Montero will be a very good hitter.

As to the diminished value of a DH, look at Edgar Martinez and Papi. Most teams have crappy DH for whatever reason, having a 4 WAR DH can put you a couple of wins above another team (all else being equal).

Yankees situation with guys like A-Rod and Jeter means they really don't want a full time DH, so Montero was expendable. They rolled the dice, pitching is always a crap shoot, and who is to say they won't get good results. Just not this year.
 

terrynever

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 25, 2005
21,717
pawtucket
Pedroia was awful his first 59 AB's, actually, more like 180 going back to 2006, and he got over it.

From what I saw of Montero, he had great opposite field power. I think he would have really done well at YS3. Should fare better at SAFECO than pure pull hitters. Prospects tend to be a crap shoot, but I think Montero will be a very good hitter.

As to the diminished value of a DH, look at Edgar Martinez and Papi. Most teams have crappy DH for whatever reason, having a 4 WAR DH can put you a couple of wins above another team (all else being equal).

Yankees situation with guys like A-Rod and Jeter means they really don't want a full time DH, so Montero was expendable. They rolled the dice, pitching is always a crap shoot, and who is to say they won't get good results. Just not this year.
Fair enough. I am struck by how much ballparks determine hitting success. Griffey Jr. tried to get out of Seattle as soon as they built Safeco. Now the Twins hitters are crying about their new field. Balls die in the gaps, as we saw two nights ago. OTOH, Fenway and NYS are very favorable places to hit.
 

Freddy Linn

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
9,151
Where it rains. No, seriously.
Who knows? Only time will tell.
Which is why I said wasn't - Campos wasn't their "best young" pitching prospect at the time of the trade. Taijuan Walker was a far superior prospect at a higher level and at a younger age than Campos at the time of the trade. And, considering how recent that was, he still is considered a superior talent.

As mediocre as he has been in such a small sample size, Montero is still leading the M's in homers and RBI (tallest midget in the room, granted). They needed a non-pull (for a right-handed hitter), middle-of-the-order bat in the worst way, and they aren't going to get that guy in free agency without a massive overpay. He has a huge value to the team that isn't necessarily captured in relative metrics.

I do fear about the pressure that Campos will be under now that Pineda will not touch a mound for 12 months. At least he has thus far missed inclusion in the Royal Flush.
 

doc

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
4,499
It's officially an anterior labral tear(SLAP tear?) DRS or radsoxfan, does this mean his season is over? Long-term prognosis?

A study in 2008 examined the success rates of SLAP repairs in over 40 Major League Pitchers. In considering statistics such as earned-run-average (ERA), innings pitched (IP), and walks and hits per inning pitched (WHIP), the group showed a postoperative decline in pitching performance in comparison to their pre-injury levels. Of the 42 pitchers, 69% returned to the Major Leagues for one year, but only 29% lasted for up to three years. In terms of statistics, most showed no difference in ERA or WHIP but there was a sharp decrease in IP throughout the group (Cerynik, 2008).
Labral tears are bad news for pitchers, it's better than it used to be pre 2004 the return to pitching rate was only 3% with Schilling being one of the lucky few.


http://www.google.co...AL4-V_w&cad=rja
This is a PDF of a review article dated April 2011 it is pretty detailed, but there are cool anatomy diagrams, MRI and OR pictures and it's very baseball specific DRS and Radsoxfan amoung others may find it pretty cool.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Labral tears are bad news for pitchers, it's better than it used to be pre 2004 the return to pitching rate was only 3% with Schilling being one of the lucky few.


http://www.google.co...AL4-V_w&cad=rja
This is a PDF of a review article dated April 2011 it is pretty detailed, but there are cool anatomy diagrams, MRI and OR pictures and it's very baseball specific DRS and Radsoxfan amoung others may find it pretty cool.
I just read the quote but if that Yankees only get 3 years or less out of Pineda that would be insanely bad. Especially if Cashman is flat-out lying about how he got hurt.
 

Doctor G

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 24, 2007
2,331
I feel sorry for the kid. Now we know why he was close to tears during the interview after his last spring start.
i also don't buy the injury timeline that Cashman is trying to peddle.
 

melonbag

New Member
Sep 29, 2011
133
Cashman is a terrible GM.
So goddamn angry - I hated the shit out of the trade the moment I heard about it, and it couldn't have possibly turned out worse. Montero is gonna be a stud and I was extremely pumped to root for him. One of Cashman's biggest mistakes.
One of his biggest mistakes? Well see since Cashman has a long list of mess ups.

He screws up with the ARod contract so he needs to clear space at the DH spot. And his jewel for Montero will end up being a large guy who can't throw hard. When he gives free agents opt outs, like CC, he can at least throw millions at the problem. At least this happened before Cashman gave Pineda an AJ Burnett type contract. The bright side for the Yanks is when Cashman blows it with young players, it doesn't cost the team as much money.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Cashman is a terrible GM.

One of his biggest mistakes? Well see since Cashman has a long list of mess ups.

He screws up with the ARod contract so he needs to clear space at the DH spot. And his jewel for Montero will end up being a large guy who can't throw hard. When he gives free agents opt outs, like CC, he can at least throw millions at the problem. At least this happened before Cashman gave Pineda an AJ Burnett type contract. The bright side for the Yanks is when Cashman blows it with young players, it doesn't cost the team as much money.
The problem is that in the end it will end up costing the team money. Who's going to replace Pineda in the rotation? Andy, who cost the Yankees another 2.5$ mill to sign. Who's going to replace him next season? Another free agent signing. It's going to hurt them $$ wise it's just not as obvious.

On the bright side Noesi is doing TERRIBLE for the Mariners, so you take can solace in that.
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,697
I know that some of you folks who still like this deal are trying to put the best spin on a bad situation, but let's be honest - if Pineda had gotten hurt last fall and it came out that Cashman was offering the exact same deal, you'd have been calling for his head (and rightfully so).