Which is what they did.BCsMightyJoeYoung said:This is probably one of those review scenarios where the umps get to make shit up by placing runners where they would be if the right call had been made. "If he had been called safe he wouldn't have left for the dugout."
Imagine the Dodgers scoring THREE runs with TWO outs on the Mets when it looked like they were dead; imagine the odds of scoring THREE runs with TWO outs.BornToRun said:I'd be breaking shit right now if I were a mets fan. This is ridiculous.
They certainly have had issues before getting to the closer.Rough Carrigan said:This game isn't over yet. The Mets have two shots against the Dodgers' uninspiring bullpen.
"And Tejada could have tagged him because he still hadn't touched the base." And no, we don't know if Tejada would have or not. I'm okay with letting Utley's slide go because the runner at first was safe anyway. Letting Utley on second is a really strained reading of the rules and, more importantly, a totally unjust outcome.BCsMightyJoeYoung said:This is probably one of those review scenarios where the umps get to make shit up by placing runners where they would be if the right call had been made. "If he had been called safe he wouldn't have let for the dugout."
Well played, sir.54thMA said:Imagine the Dodgers scoring THREE runs with TWO outs on the Mets when it looked like they were dead; imagine the odds of scoring THREE runs with TWO outs.
When have we seen that in the playofffs/World Series?
kieckeredinthehead said:"And Tejada could have tagged him because he still hadn't touched the base." And no, we don't know if Tejada would have or not. I'm okay with letting Utley's slide go because the runner at first was safe anyway. Letting Utley on second is a really strained reason of the rules and, more importantly, a totally unjust outcome.
Oh .. I agree completely. But that's what you get with Replay .. Umps making up What If scenarios. I hate it.kieckeredinthehead said:"And Tejada could have tagged him because he still hadn't touched the base." And no, we don't know if Tejada would have or not. I'm okay with letting Utley's slide go because the runner at first was safe anyway. Letting Utley on second is a really strained reading of the rules and, more importantly, a totally unjust outcome.
I agree 100%.
I have no issue with the slide. But he should not have been awarded the base without touching it.
tie to the runner?soxhop411 said:Wut?
@Stareagle: According to MLB rules, on a replay where BOTH the fielder misses the bag/tag AND the runner misses the bag, the runner is ruled safe.
Yes. If the ump called him out and he left the field. And it was overturned on replay. Apparently.hbk72777 said:So if this was a force out at home plate, and he never touched the bag, they'd give him the run?
patinorange said:Yes. If the ump called him out and he left the field. Apparently.
MakMan44 said:So they're just making this shit up as they go along. Good to know.
So, Eric Byrnes wasn't an idiot he was just prescient?hbk72777 said:
That's good for the players to know. Never go back and touch the plate if you missed it and the catcher missed the tag, this way you can challenge and be called safe.
We all wanted replay. Here it is.BCsMightyJoeYoung said:Well .. To give the devil his due .. Any choice is wrong .. How can you have the runner safe if he never reaches the bag/plate .. Conversely how can he out if the fielder never touches the bag?
It's an enigma wrapped in a conundrum .. Leading to the universe swallowing itself.
Not all of us. I hate it.patinorange said:We all wanted replay. Here it is.
Rough Carrigan said:So, Eric Byrnes wasn't an idiot he was just prescient?
Now that's funny. I was thinking that. Good times.Rough Carrigan said:So, Eric Byrnes wasn't an idiot he was just prescient?
I AGREE WITH A YANKEE FANhbk72777 said:
Watching MLB network, the correct answer is always "Eric Byrnes is an idiot"
Sounds like MLBs position is that the throw pulled him off, so his touching the bag becomes mandatory/reviewable.Savin Hillbilly said:
Seriously. Can anybody explain what's the difference in that context between a force play and a neighborhood play?
No doubt Utley is going to get drilled should the opportunity present itself.soxhop411 said:@BillShaikin: Tejada has broken leg.
I'm going to disagree.BornToRun said:No doubt Utley is going to get drilled should the opportunity present itself.
Dogs and cats living together, MASS HYSTERIA!!Bob Montgomery's Helmet Hat said:I AGREE WITH A YANKEE FAN
I think there is some doubtBornToRun said:No doubt Utley is going to get drilled should the opportunity present itself.
Yeah that's really problematic. Tejada no doubt puts more effort into tagging the bag if he knew for sure he had to.nvalvo said:Sounds like MLBs position is that the throw pulled him off, so his touching the bag becomes mandatory/reviewable.
I'm not sure that's a wise rule, but it is a rule.
You might be right. It's the playoffs and you don't want to put a runner on for free and risk a suspension. I'd say he deserves it, though. Should've thought that comment through a little more.patinorange said:I'm going to disagree.
Also, the whole point of the neighborhood rule is to protect infielders. Don't put cracks in that edifice.kieckeredinthehead said:Yeah that's really problematic. Tejada no doubt puts more effort into tagging the bag if he knew for sure he had to.
I would think Flores takes over, tears and all. So-so defensively. Pretty solid hitternvalvo said:So what's NY's SS situation like?
This is also what I see.BCsMightyJoeYoung said:On further review that slide WAS illegal .. He didn't even "slide" until he was passed the bag. If MLB considers a full body block on the second baseman a legal play then I don't know what to say. On another night he's called out with the batter out as well for interference. And the Metskies would still be leading.