NLDS game thread

Gdiguy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
6,282
San Diego, CA
As a mets fan I don't care about utleys slide, that's borderline dirty but looked worse because tejada messed up the transfer and was blindsided

I'm at the game, and between the dodgers fans cheering tejada's broken ankle and the replay I may strangle someobe
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,172
Westwood MA
BornToRun said:
I'd be breaking shit right now if I were a mets fan. This is ridiculous.
Imagine the Dodgers scoring THREE runs with TWO outs on the Mets when it looked like they were dead; imagine the odds of scoring THREE runs with TWO outs.
 
When have we seen that in the playofffs/World Series?
 

kieckeredinthehead

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
8,635
BCsMightyJoeYoung said:
This is probably one of those review scenarios where the umps get to make shit up by placing runners where they would be if the right call had been made. "If he had been called safe he wouldn't have let for the dugout."
"And Tejada could have tagged him because he still hadn't touched the base." And no, we don't know if Tejada would have or not. I'm okay with letting Utley's slide go because the runner at first was safe anyway. Letting Utley on second is a really strained reading of the rules and, more importantly, a totally unjust outcome.
 

glasspusher

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
9,973
Oakland California
54thMA said:
Imagine the Dodgers scoring THREE runs with TWO outs on the Mets when it looked like they were dead; imagine the odds of scoring THREE runs with TWO outs.
 
When have we seen that in the playofffs/World Series?
Well played, sir.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,978
Oregon
kieckeredinthehead said:
"And Tejada could have tagged him because he still hadn't touched the base." And no, we don't know if Tejada would have or not. I'm okay with letting Utley's slide go because the runner at first was safe anyway. Letting Utley on second is a really strained reason of the rules and, more importantly, a totally unjust outcome.
 
And you just know that there might have been an ump or two, and people in the mlb offices, hoping AGon made the third out
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,476
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
kieckeredinthehead said:
"And Tejada could have tagged him because he still hadn't touched the base." And no, we don't know if Tejada would have or not. I'm okay with letting Utley's slide go because the runner at first was safe anyway. Letting Utley on second is a really strained reading of the rules and, more importantly, a totally unjust outcome.
Oh .. I agree completely. But that's what you get with Replay .. Umps making up What If scenarios. I hate it.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,609
Wut?

@Stareagle: According to MLB rules, on a replay where BOTH the fielder misses the bag/tag AND the runner misses the bag, the runner is ruled safe.
 

BroodsSexton

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 4, 2006
12,800
guam
soxhop411 said:
Wut?

@Stareagle: According to MLB rules, on a replay where BOTH the fielder misses the bag/tag AND the runner misses the bag, the runner is ruled safe.
tie to the runner?
 

hbk72777

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
1,945
So if this was a force out at home plate, and he never touched the bag, they'd give him the run?
 

hbk72777

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
1,945
patinorange said:
Yes. If the ump called him out and he left the field. Apparently.
 
That's good for the players to know. Never go back and touch the plate if you missed it and the catcher missed the tag, this way you can challenge and be called safe.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,476
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Well .. To give the devil his due .. Any choice is wrong .. How can you have the runner safe if he never reaches the bag/plate .. Conversely how can he out if the fielder never touches the bag?

It's an enigma wrapped in a conundrum .. Leading to the universe swallowing itself.
 

patinorange

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 27, 2006
31,289
6 miles from Angel Stadium
BCsMightyJoeYoung said:
Well .. To give the devil his due .. Any choice is wrong .. How can you have the runner safe if he never reaches the bag/plate .. Conversely how can he out if the fielder never touches the bag?

It's an enigma wrapped in a conundrum .. Leading to the universe swallowing itself.
We all wanted replay. Here it is.
 

hbk72777

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
1,945
Rough Carrigan said:
So, Eric Byrnes wasn't an idiot he was just prescient?
 
Watching MLB network, the correct answer is always "Eric Byrnes is an idiot"
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,773
Rogers Park
Savin Hillbilly said:
 
Seriously. Can anybody explain what's the difference in that context between a force play and a neighborhood play? 
Sounds like MLBs position is that the throw pulled him off, so his touching the bag becomes mandatory/reviewable.

I'm not sure that's a wise rule, but it is a rule.
 

Dahabenzapple2

Mr. McGuire / Axl's Counter
SoSH Member
Jun 20, 2011
8,928
Wayne, NJ
Dirty douchebag play.

Not sure you call the batter out but if that doesn't get you thrown out of the game, what should?!?!
 

kieckeredinthehead

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
8,635
nvalvo said:
Sounds like MLBs position is that the throw pulled him off, so his touching the bag becomes mandatory/reviewable.

I'm not sure that's a wise rule, but it is a rule.
Yeah that's really problematic. Tejada no doubt puts more effort into tagging the bag if he knew for sure he had to.
 

BornToRun

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 4, 2011
17,583
patinorange said:
I'm going to disagree.
You might be right. It's the playoffs and you don't want to put a runner on for free and risk a suspension. I'd say he deserves it, though. Should've thought that comment through a little more.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,476
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
On further review that slide WAS illegal .. He didn't even "slide" until he was passed the bag. If MLB considers a full body block on the second baseman a legal play then I don't know what to say. On another night he's called out with the batter out as well for interference. And the Metskies would still be leading.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,773
Rogers Park
kieckeredinthehead said:
Yeah that's really problematic. Tejada no doubt puts more effort into tagging the bag if he knew for sure he had to.
Also, the whole point of the neighborhood rule is to protect infielders. Don't put cracks in that edifice.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,773
Rogers Park
BCsMightyJoeYoung said:
On further review that slide WAS illegal .. He didn't even "slide" until he was passed the bag. If MLB considers a full body block on the second baseman a legal play then I don't know what to say. On another night he's called out with the batter out as well for interference. And the Metskies would still be leading.
This is also what I see.