No more Pat Patriot uniforms?/Helmet Thread

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,775
Hingham, MA
jercra said:
So when the Headset/Mic in the QB or MLB's helmet stops working and you see them swap out the helmet for a different one is that not also a custom fit helmet?  Are the players under a greater risk of injury when that happens?  If not, I'll echo everyone else's sentiments and ask why they couldn't have 4 of them or 6 or 10?
 
Right, if it is just based on calibrations / measurements, it shouldn't be difficult to reproduce the same helmet in a different color
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,545
deep inside Guido territory
That picture is a normal looking helmet for somebody that hits a lot.  Judging from the marks, he leads with his head which is a concussion risk as we all know.  A beating like that *could* hinder the shell, but in most cases it doesn't.  Equipment managers go around every week and check all parts of the helmet and tighten screws where they need to be tightened among other things. Teams at all levels send their helmets out after the season is over to get reconditioned.  They strip the paint off and look for cracks and other damages to the shell.  They then determine if a helmet is approved or rejected for use for the next season. 
 
In the pros, it's a different story though as far as helmets.  Some guys tend to feel comfortable in a certain helmet they wore in college and stay with it for many years.  Brett Favre played in the same helmet for over a decade and so did Tom Brady.  In the NFL, if a guy wants to wear a helmet an equipment guy doesn't have that much power in stopping him.  He can tell him the risks of doing so, but ultimately it's the player's decision.  That's not how it works at any other level.  Equipment guys have all the power in high school and college.  We'll put a helmet on a kid only if it's a perfect fit and he's comfortable in it at the same time.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,545
deep inside Guido territory
jercra said:
So when the Headset/Mic in the QB or MLB's helmet stops working and you see them swap out the helmet for a different one is that not also a custom fit helmet?  Are the players under a greater risk of injury when that happens?  If not, I'll echo everyone else's sentiments and ask why they couldn't have 4 of them or 6 or 10?
Yes, it is a custom fit helmet just like everybody else's helmet is.  The backup QB headset helmet is not just a random one off the shelf.  Each QB and designated defensive player should be getting fitted for 2 helmets.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,545
deep inside Guido territory
tims4wins said:
 
Right, if it is just based on calibrations / measurements, it shouldn't be difficult to reproduce the same helmet in a different color
Helmets are fitted based upon the size of the shell(S, M, L, XL, etc) and then the appropriate size jaw pad.  If the shell fits the kid but the standard size jaw pad doesn't touch the skin or is a bit tight, there are different size jaw pads you can put on as they just snap on and snap off.  Then, you can use air pressure to help the comfort factor.
 
So, yes it is very easy to make 2 helmets for the same player.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,212
Missoula, MT
drleather2001 said:
 
Eh.  Some are pretty good, some are pretty bad (49ers, Cowboys, Vikings).
 
Mostly, though, almost all of them are too busy; too many fine details that would look awful off of a computer screen and placed on a uniform or piece of clothing.
 
Also, they are very stylistically of the moment.  That is, in 10 years, they will all look incredibly dated, and smack of the "dark, gritty, realism" that is really hip right now (See, e.g. Chris Nolan's movies).  
 
 
Well, man, that's like just your opinion, man.
 
Man.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,289
drleather2001 said:
 
Really?  How about this for motivation:  Do something ostensibly in the name of safety that will cause a lot of press leading up to the week's games, and that the broadcasters will talk about, so the fans think we care about safety, but that won't impact revenue at all.
 
Don't the alternate helmets help stimulate sales of the throwback stuff?  And is this really generating a lot of press?  I dunno, I find it easier believe that with a lot of attention paid to fitting a helmet specific for each player, they'd rather stick with just one helmet if at all possible.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
moondog80 said:
 
Don't the alternate helmets help stimulate sales of the throwback stuff?  And is this really generating a lot of press?  I dunno, I find it easier believe that with a lot of attention paid to fitting a helmet specific for each player, they'd rather stick with just one helmet if at all possible.
 
and yet multiple colleges use 3, 4, or even 5 or more different helmets during a season
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,289
Lose Remerswaal said:
 
and yet multiple colleges use 3, 4, or even 5 or more different helmets during a season
 
 
So two completely separate organizations have to deal with every issue the exact same way?  Obviously it's possible to use different helmets, but the NFL is being a bit more cautious.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Paul Lukas with an NFL equipment guy discussing theories on this move
 
 
EG: I think that's the big message that the NFL's trying to give. But I think, personally, one of the bigger issues is that there are currently guys in the NFL -- on our team, on every team -- who wear helmets that aren't made anymore, like the Riddell VSR4. Riddell doesn't make that helmet anymore. So whatever we have in stock is what we give to players who like that helmet. And after this year, we're going to run out, so players will eventually have to switch to something else.
UW: But what does that have to do with the new rule?
EG: Let's say you're a team with a throwback helmet, and you're not going to be able to get a certain player his preferred helmet model because it's not made anymore. So now he's not just wearing a different helmet -- he's wearing a different type of helmet. I think the NFL, with all those lawsuits they're dealing with, they don't want to have a guy switching to a different helmet for one game, then he gets hurt, and then he says, "Well, I had to switch to a different helmet because they made us wear these throwbacks."
UW: That's really interesting. So you're saying the NFL is concerned about players who wouldn't be able to get a true duplicate of their current helmet because they're wearing obsolete equipment.
EG: I think that's their bigger concern, yes. They don't want a situation where a player has to change to a different model, and then something goes wrong, and that's on their plate. Now, again, that problem will soon go away, at least for our team, because we'll run out of stock on those helmets that aren't made anymore. But other teams may have more stock on those.
 

dcdrew10

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
1,404
Washington, DC via Worcester
Lose Remerswaal said:
Paul Lukas with an NFL equipment guy discussing theories on this move
 
 
Brady is one the guys who wears the VSR-4, hence him wearing different helmet when the Pat's use the throwbacks. He has tinkered with new helmets before, but he seems to prefer the VSR-4, despite it's low rating and less padding between the head and shell, less jaw coverage and no padding around the jaw. I've also seen comments that the newer helmets cover more of the back of the head. Brady is going to have to give this helmet up next year or so, but helmet fit is obviously a big deal if he is willing to use an, older less effective model.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,775
Hingham, MA
dcdrew10 said:
 
Brady is one the guys who wears the VSR-4, hence him wearing different helmet when the Pat's use the throwbacks. He has tinkered with new helmets before, but he seems to prefer the VSR-4, despite it's low rating and less padding between the head and shell, less jaw coverage and no padding around the jaw. I've also seen comments that the newer helmets cover more of the back of the head. Brady is going to have to give this helmet up next year or so, but helmet fit is obviously a big deal if he is willing to use an, older less effective model.
 
Interesting article. Granted it was 2 years ago but I can't believe the NFL allows each player to choose their helmet manufacturer - a league that puts its foot down on everything, and is (at least to the public) trying to show an increased interest in player safety, should have a mandated list of 3 or 4 approved helmets that meet a certain rating criteria. It's hypocritical of the NFL to not do something like this, IMO (but hey, what's new).
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
dcdrew10 said:
 
Brady is one the guys who wears the VSR-4, hence him wearing different helmet when the Pat's use the throwbacks. He has tinkered with new helmets before, but he seems to prefer the VSR-4, despite it's low rating and less padding between the head and shell, less jaw coverage and no padding around the jaw. I've also seen comments that the newer helmets cover more of the back of the head. Brady is going to have to give this helmet up next year or so, but helmet fit is obviously a big deal if he is willing to use an, older less effective model.
 
Why can't players such as Brady simply buy a half-dozen of the VSR-4 (or however many that are still available) and just use them for the next 4 or 5 years?
 

OCST

Sunny von Bulow
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2004
24,572
The 718
This whole thing is over a concern for the perception of safety, not for actual safety.
 
The idea that players get to choose their own helmet is insane.  I fully get that players may prefer one over the other for fit, comfort, ability to see, etc.  I'm pretty sure, though, that there are engineering studies that show that Helmet X is safer than Helmet Y.  If that's the case, then X should be mandatory, tough titty if you don't like it.
 

Rudi Fingers

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
1,848
Adianoeta
OilCanShotTupac said:
This whole thing is over a concern for the perception of safety, not for actual safety.
 
The idea that players get to choose their own helmet is insane.  I fully get that players may prefer one over the other for fit, comfort, ability to see, etc.  I'm pretty sure, though, that there are engineering studies that show that Helmet X is safer than Helmet Y.  If that's the case, then X should be mandatory, tough titty if you don't like it.
 
I wonder, from a QB's perspective, if some of the helmets that are safer in terms of impact create more of a cocoon effect which makes them feel less safe -- for example, making it more difficult to not just see, but also hear and feel pressure coming in from the blind side.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,545
deep inside Guido territory
OilCanShotTupac said:
This whole thing is over a concern for the perception of safety, not for actual safety.
 
The idea that players get to choose their own helmet is insane.  I fully get that players may prefer one over the other for fit, comfort, ability to see, etc.  I'm pretty sure, though, that there are engineering studies that show that Helmet X is safer than Helmet Y.  If that's the case, then X should be mandatory, tough titty if you don't like it.
As I've explained before, there is not one helmet that will fit every person.  That's just not how it works.  It's not just "tough titty" and wear it if you don't like it.  That would open up liability issues. 
 
By the way, there wasn't one thing that the unidentified NFL equipment guy said that I didn't already go over in this thread.
 
You guys all owe me $10.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,775
Hingham, MA
RedOctober3829 said:
As I've explained before, there is not one helmet that will fit every person.  That's just not how it works.  It's not just "tough titty" and wear it if you don't like it.  That would open up liability issues. 
 
 
Fine, but couldn't there be 3 or 4 approved helmets that pass the safety criteria, instead of it being completely open to the player to choose?
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,775
Hingham, MA
RedOctober3829 said:
There are helmet ratings put out from the Virginia Tech study that we go off of.
 
Right, so couldn't / shouldn't the NFL approve a handful of these helmets, and then give the players their choice among the approved helmets? If Brady's helmet gets a 1 I don't think it's in anyone's interest for him to wear it, even if he likes it best.
 
The lone exception I can think of was mentioned above - if other helmets are more obstructive to his peripheral vision / hearing and are therefore more likely to lead to hits (especially from the blind side), then there could be a safety benefit to a poorly rated helmet.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,545
deep inside Guido territory
tims4wins said:
 
Right, so couldn't / shouldn't the NFL approve a handful of these helmets, and then give the players their choice among the approved helmets? If Brady's helmet gets a 1 I don't think it's in anyone's interest for him to wear it, even if he likes it best.
 
The lone exception I can think of was mentioned above - if other helmets are more obstructive to his peripheral vision / hearing and are therefore more likely to lead to hits (especially from the blind side), then there could be a safety benefit to a poorly rated helmet.
They should ban the VSR-4, but it has to come from NOSCAE first. No one below the NFL vets use it anymore. No college equipment guy worth his salt would have one on his shelf let alone put it on a kid.

The helmet wouldn't restrict your vision. The type of mask would and there are many different masks that fit a particular helmet.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,775
Hingham, MA
RedOctober3829 said:
They should ban the VSR-4, but it has to come from NOSCAE first. No one below the NFL vets use it anymore. No college equipment guy worth his salt would have one on his shelf let alone put it on a kid.

The helmet wouldn't restrict your vision. The type of mask would and there are many different masks that fit a particular helmet.
 
Thanks. So what you're saying is that the NFL really doesn't have a good excuse as to why these helmets aren't banned.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,545
deep inside Guido territory
tims4wins said:
 
Thanks. So what you're saying is that the NFL really doesn't have a good excuse as to why these helmets aren't banned.
What I'm saying is that the NFL can't ban a helmet without having NOSCAE(national governing body of athletic eq standards) telling them definitively that's its 100% unsafe.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,775
Hingham, MA
RedOctober3829 said:
What I'm saying is that the NFL can't ban a helmet without having NOSCAE(national governing body of athletic eq standards) telling them definitively that's its 100% unsafe.
 
Ah thanks. Misread your post.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,775
Hingham, MA
moondog80 said:
 
 
So two completely separate organizations have to deal with every issue the exact same way?  Obviously it's possible to use different helmets, but the NFL is being a bit more cautious.
 
Speak of the devil
 
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9716220/virginia-tech-wear-special-hokie-stone-helmets-georgia-tech
 
Oh and they are hideous to boot
 

 
After saluting the military with a special camouflage helmet, the Virginia Tech Hokies are ready to rock out for Thursday night's game against Georgia Tech.
 

simplyeric

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 14, 2006
14,037
Richmond, VA
Papelbon's Poutine said:
Something is awry on this topic because I just watched Brady switch out his helmet.
I mentioned that in the game thread. His radio communication goes out and suddenly it's the salmon mousse out there, because clearly those are Highlander helmets: there can be only one!!!
 

swiftaw

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2009
3,442
It certainly looks like the Rams aren't wearing their usual helmets with their throwbacks today (although it does look like Washington is wearing their usual helmets with their throwbacks)
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
Those are awful.
 
However, after the 'Skins and the Lions, the Patriots helmet might be the best.
 

( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)

T&A
SoSH Member
Feb 9, 2010
5,302
Providence, RI
It seems that most of their design ideas were just, "Make the Logo Bigger"  pretty lame.  
 
Although I do like the Patriots one.  They remind me of the helmets that Navy sometimes wears, I always really liked these:
 

gingerbreadmann

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
750
It always bothers me when one of these "makeovers" hits the mainstream media. I used to be a frequent poster at the CCSLC and there is always work there that is eons better than whatever Yahoo or Reddit or whatever decides to pick up on. Highly recommended for logo/uni design enthusiasts.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,635
I couldn't figure out the "Windows" motif on the Jets one, until I realized it was just reflections from the room the helmet was in.
 

GeorgeCostanza

tiger king
SoSH Member
May 16, 2009
7,286
Go f*ck yourself

Section30

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2010
1,264
Portland OR
GeorgeCostanza said:
Guessing that's supposed to be cheese but I get much more of a SpongeBob vibe there.
Well, if it brings in the young fans.
 
Conversely it may be a subtle comment on the brains of football players.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
dynomite said:
So long as Kraft is the owner the Patriots are never going to wear red as their primary uniform -- I believe he said something about finding it inappropriate for the New England Patriots to wear the color most associated with the English troops in the Revolutionary War.
 
That's fine, but then they should consider ditching the silver for a colonial off-white.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,439
dynomite said:
So long as Kraft is the owner the Patriots are never going to wear red as their primary uniform -- I believe he said something about finding it inappropriate for the New England Patriots to wear the color most associated with the English troops in the Revolutionary War.
 
You said the same thing back in the End Zone logo thread a couple years ago. I've never heard this outside of your posts. I'm not saying you're wrong but I can't find any reference.
 
I thought it was always due to the fact the red uni's were a time when the team was not any good. Kraft started over when he took over and doesn't want to go back.
 
when I googled this earlier, your post is the only top hit that has anything to do with the New England Patriots:
http://sonsofsamhorn.net/topic/78357-patriots-will-have-new-end-zone-logo/page-2
 

Rudi Fingers

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
1,848
Adianoeta
dynomite said:
So long as Kraft is the owner the Patriots are never going to wear red as their primary uniform -- I believe he said something about finding it inappropriate for the New England Patriots to wear the color most associated with the English troops in the Revolutionary War.
 
Kraft never said that - it was Orthwein who said that at the press conference announcing the new blue uniforms.
 

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
( . ) ( . ) and (_!_) said:
It seems that most of their design ideas were just, "Make the Logo Bigger"  pretty lame.  
 
Although I do like the Patriots one.  They remind me of the helmets that Navy sometimes wears, I always really liked these:
 
That Navy helmet is freaking awesome.
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
Weird. I just googled and can't find it, and -- most damning of all -- the team changed their uniforms PRIOR to the 1993 season, but Kraft didn't purchase the team until AFTER the 1993 season. Still, I have a distinct memory of hearing/reading Kraft talk about how the red uniform color never made sense to him for that reason.

Still, this article gives the same reason: http://www.thesunchronicle.com/sports/patriots-set-to-cross-the-pond/article_5758bc22-efe6-5514-8491-9cd3723f7961.html

It's odd, but I can't find any articles about the uniform change generally. Will try to keep searching.

Edit: Ah ha:

Rudi Fingers said:
 
Kraft never said that - it was Orthwein who said that at the press conference announcing the new blue uniforms.
That makes sense. I still recall Kraft saying he agreed or expressing a similar sentiment.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,439
RedOctober3829 said:
The only reason they don't wear the Pat Patriot uniform is because the NFL does not allow them to switch out of their primary helmets anymore.
 
We're talking about the Pats using the red uniforms as their primary uniforms, not on Throwback Day/ Weekend.