No Town Hall this year at Red Sox Winter Weekend

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
570
Looks like the booing last year really had an effect on the brass. I guess they weren't prepared for chants of "Full throttle, really?" this year. It is yet another back look for this ownership group.
 

Archer1979

shazowies
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
7,960
Right Here
I said this last year when it happened. My son and his friends hit MGM that weekend right after the Town Hall. They had no idea that the Winter Weekend was happening when they walked in, but they sat about a table or two away from Bloom who was staring aimlessly into his cell phone like an inmate who was just asked to relinquish his shoe laces for fear of doing himself harm.
 

JOBU

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 22, 2021
8,663
Just a ridiculously bad look from an ownership group that has struggled with accountability in recent years. I don’t blame them though as I wouldn’t want to be a part of it after what happened last year with the booing incident and the subsequent denial afterwards.

Ease off the throttle!
 

CR67dream

blue devils forevah!
Dope
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
7,590
I'm going home
Just a ridiculously bad look from an ownership group that has struggled with accountability in recent years.
No doubt it's a really bad look. Someone posted this news in the rumors thread yesterday but it got lost.

I guess they feel another round of angry intoxicated fans bulldozing their presentation would be a worse look. Not saying I agree, but it makes sense that that's probably the calculus here. They decided to to take this hit now instead of risking much worse optics at MGM. Again, not endorsing, but it's understandable.

I don't take it as a sign moves won't be made before then, just that even if they are, there would be people looking to turn it into a shit show just for kicks. Tough spot they put themselves in.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,942
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
It's not really understandable at all in my view, showing up when fans are restless is the definition of accountability for ownership. Yeah, it would be a terrible look *for them* to be booed and jeered, but put a good product on the field and that won't happen.
 

CR67dream

blue devils forevah!
Dope
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
7,590
I'm going home
It's not really understandable at all in my view, showing up when fans are restless is the definition of accountability for ownership. Yeah, it would be a terrible look *for them* to be booed and jeered, but put a good product on the field and that won't happen.
I don't like it, I just understand their reasoning. I think it's chickenshit, to be honest.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,612
Miami (oh, Miami!)
Eh. I have mixed thoughts. It's one thing to go and be responsible. It's another to fight to have your say through a bunch of mouth-breathers who aren't going to listen, have already made up their minds, and are just going to post on social media how awesome they were by heckling.

Overall, I think it's a courtesy thing. If the fan base at that event can't act like civil adults, why bother?

If I were in their shoes, I'd probably go this year. But if the fans did that two years running, I'd cancel it.
 

TapeAndPosts

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2006
581
I think the team/ownership were surprised last year and have not yet really figured out the landscape of sports fandom and Red Sox fandom in 2024. Part of it is that the team has had a number of disappointing years, and part of it is how media has changed to be always-on and more engagement/anger-driven. Last year they expected more of a happy love fest with fans just glad to be there, this year they have realized that's not what's happening but they haven't figured out a better way to engage. (I don't know what that better way is, to be honest.)
 

Seels

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
4,978
NH
fans shouldn't go either. Every passing day I'm more and more in rooting for Henry to sell.
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
614
New York, USA
I’m glad they packed it up. It’s a fan festival that got high jacked by blowhards. It’s not an investor meeting to discuss the financials of the company.

I think a better fan statement is not attending games, buying NESN and/or doing something that makes them happy.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,685
I don't like it, I just understand their reasoning. I think it's chickenshit, to be honest.
Bingo.

It's complete chickenshit but I also completely understand why they wouldn't want to do it again. I am not sure how they can put positive spin on the offseason thus far and I don't think anyone wants to get in front of a group of angry fans to be booed (not to mention how uncomfortable John Henry looks any time he has to speak in public).

I am a bit surprised that Henry and Werner didn't run Sam Kennedy out there to be the sacrifical lamb, although that would come with its own set of criticisms
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
It's not really understandable at all in my view, showing up when fans are restless is the definition of accountability for ownership. Yeah, it would be a terrible look *for them* to be booed and jeered, but put a good product on the field and that won't happen.
"restless" would be ok. Last year was more than "restless." This year would likely be even more so. I dont think they like being booed. But they've put up with that. I really think they have a rational fear for their safety. (Would you bet against the occurrence of a physical altercation? Physical intimidation is talk radio currency.) That that is also a convenient excuse doesn't make it less likely.

OTOH--They could just sit there for 90 minutes and remain silent while the people throw shit. They wouldnt have to say a thing! win-win.
 
Last edited:

CR67dream

blue devils forevah!
Dope
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
7,590
I'm going home
Eh. I have mixed thoughts. It's one thing to go and be responsible. It's another to fight to have your say through a bunch of mouth-breathers who aren't going to listen, have already made up their minds, and are just going to post on social media how awesome they were by heckling.

Overall, I think it's a courtesy thing. If the fan base at that event can't act like civil adults, why bother?

If I were in their shoes, I'd probably go this year. But if the fans did that two years running, I'd cancel it.
That's fair, and I also don't think some people understand that it was beyond ridiculous last year. Ugly unacceptable shit.

And I agree with Rod that it won't happen if the team is good, but there's no wand that gets them there by then. I still wish they'd face the music and think they should, but I was only half kidding when I said MGM was going to need to add extra security this year earlier in the thread.
 
Mar 30, 2023
194
Eh. I have mixed thoughts. It's one thing to go and be responsible. It's another to fight to have your say through a bunch of mouth-breathers who aren't going to listen, have already made up their minds, and are just going to post on social media how awesome they were by heckling.

Overall, I think it's a courtesy thing. If the fan base at that event can't act like civil adults, why bother?

If I were in their shoes, I'd probably go this year. But if the fans did that two years running, I'd cancel it.

Those mouth-breathers made John Henry a billionaire (he wasn't one when he bought the team). This is a chickenshit move by a man who used to make communication with the fans a priority, and your constant holier-than-thou fan-policing on every page of every thread is the worst thing about this board right now.
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
614
New York, USA
Those mouth-breathers made John Henry a billionaire (he wasn't one when he bought the team). This is a chickenshit move by a man who used to make communication with the fans a priority, and your constant holier-than-thou fan-policing on every page of every thread is the worst thing about this board right now.
And yet you still support him.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
Those mouth-breathers made John Henry a billionaire (he wasn't one when he bought the team). This is a chickenshit move by a man who used to make communication with the fans a priority, and your constant holier-than-thou fan-policing on every page of every thread is the worst thing about this board right now.
I didn;t see RR's post as fan-policing at all. UNLESS you think its ok for fans to, say hurl profanity and maybe objects at the owners. Those fans need policing, wouldn;t you say?
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,685
"restless" would be ok. Last year was more than "restless." This year would likely be even more so. I dont think they like being booed. But they've put up with that. I really think they have a rational fear for their safety. (Would you bet against the occurrence of a physical altercation?) That that is also be a convenient excuse doesn't make it less likely.

OTOH--They could just sit there for 90 minutes and remain silent while the people throw shit. They wouldnt have to say a thing! win-win.
I think this is pretty hyperbolic. I highly, highly doubt that they cancelled this because they felt like the stage was going to be rushed and they were going to be beaten up or that they were in danger of having bottles thrown at them or whatever.

Plus, as was pointed out earlier, if that was really a strong fear they could have paid for more security.

IMO, it's pretty simple. These are incredibly rich men who aren't used to hearing the word "no", let alone being booed and harangued by a crowd.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,276
Might not be a bad idea for Breslow to hop on a podcast with Speier or whoever in the next coupe of days, even if he doesn't really say anything concrete?
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,942
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
"restless" would be ok. Last year was more than "restless." This year would likely be even more so. I dont think they like being booed. But they've put up with that. I really think they have a rational fear for their safety. (Would you bet against the occurrence of a physical altercation? Physical intimidation is talk radio currency.) That that is also a convenient excuse doesn't make it less likely.

OTOH--They could just sit there for 90 minutes and remain silent while the people throw shit. They wouldnt have to say a thing! win-win.
I 100% would bet against the occurrence of a physical altercation, yes.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,685
And yet you still support him.
Really? I mean, he's a fan of the Boston Red Sox. He can still be a fan and think John Henry is chicken shit. I don't even know what this adds or what you thought it would add or what it's even trying to accomplish
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,685
Might not be a bad idea for Breslow to hop on a podcast with Speier or whoever in the next coupe of days, even if he doesn't really say anything concrete?
100%. Maybe even include Sam Kennedy.

Make no mistake, this is a really bad look. They need to get out in front of this and give out some sort of plan or information
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
I think this is pretty hyperbolic. I highly, highly doubt that they cancelled this because they felt like the stage was going to be rushed and they were going to be beaten up or that they were in danger of having bottles thrown at them or whatever.

Plus, as was pointed out earlier, if that was really a strong fear they could have paid for more security.

IMO, it's pretty simple. These are incredibly rich men who aren't used to hearing the word "no", let alone being booed and harangued by a crowd.
Security might keep them safe. What would a fan fest with 100 security guards actually accomplish?
Heckling didn't work last year. I think the same adult fans that would heckle a speaker wouldn't really differentiate that from throwing shit when they're a year more pissed off. YMMV.
 

HfxBob

New Member
Nov 13, 2005
631
Might not be a bad idea for Breslow to hop on a podcast with Speier or whoever in the next coupe of days, even if he doesn't really say anything concrete?
Maybe, but unless something happens before the podcast what can he say that will be well received by fans?
 

CR67dream

blue devils forevah!
Dope
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
7,590
I'm going home
The people who made the biggest disruption last year were a bunch of drunken shit stirrers, so mouthbreathers is colorful but accurate. I assure you they in particular had nothing to do with Henry becoming a billionaire. RR can speak for himself, but he's not fan policing here. .

I highly, highly doubt that they cancelled this because they felt like the stage was going to be rushed and they were going to be beaten up or that they were in danger of having bottles thrown at them or whatever.
Of course not, just that it seems they believe that it would provide worse optics if they did it than by calling it off.
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
614
New York, USA
I support the institution he currently happens to be the caretaker of. It's the generations of fans who have made the Red Sox what they are today, not the owner who collects the gate receipts.
The owner that renovated a run down ballpark.
The owners that brought (and bought) four World Series championships.

How can people be so disillusioned and still come back for more?

Because we are fans! Betts has been gone for years and the fans who were done with the team are still complaining.

Take a true stand. Back up a statement and quit being a fan.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,612
Miami (oh, Miami!)
Those mouth-breathers made John Henry a billionaire (he wasn't one when he bought the team). This is a chickenshit move by a man who used to make communication with the fans a priority, and your constant holier-than-thou fan-policing on every page of every thread is the worst thing about this board right now.
Oh, but I'm a fan of you @Midnight Ryder Jones

Does that give me license to act any way I want toward you?
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,962
Unreal America
It’s such a strange dynamic we’re experiencing. Usually when a club ousts an unpopular GM there’s a surge of optimism for the new guy. Just because he’s the new guy.

But here we are, nearly 3 months into Breslow’s tenure, and the negativity persists. It may even be getting stronger.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,276
Maybe, but unless something happens before the podcast what can he say that will be well received by fans?
Probably nothing beyond general "we expect to contend this year" statements, but there would be no live audience.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
It’s such a strange dynamic we’re experiencing. Usually when a club ousts an unpopular GM there’s a surge of optimism for the new guy. Just because he’s the new guy.

But here we are, nearly 3 months into Breslow’s tenure, and the negativity persists. It may even be getting stronger.
How many games have they won since he's been here? I'll hang up and listen.
 

HfxBob

New Member
Nov 13, 2005
631
It’s such a strange dynamic we’re experiencing. Usually when a club ousts an unpopular GM there’s a surge of optimism for the new guy. Just because he’s the new guy.

But here we are, nearly 3 months into Breslow’s tenure, and the negativity persists. It may even be getting stronger.
For obvious reasons, frankly. The negativity is mainly directed toward the owners and not Breslow.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
Any way you want? No. But if I were the steward of a a community institution that's responsible for my personal fortune, the members of that community should be able to yell at me if I'm doing a shitty job. Accountability is generally considered a good thing.
I hope you dont mean that literally.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,612
Miami (oh, Miami!)
Any way you want? No. But if I were the steward of a a community institution that's responsible for my personal fortune, the members of that community should be able to yell at me if I'm doing a shitty job. Accountability is generally considered a good thing.
"Yelling at people" is not accountability. It's just yelling at people. And nobody should have to put up with that.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,734
It really feels like some folks feel as if criticism of the club affects the purity of fandom. This board loves process but values results like the real world. The reality is that the Sox haven't had great results, they don't have a ton of interesting or cool players (to the casuals - not talking about YOU people) and they haven't landed a true "star" in a long time.

I get that we all love the franchise and they have a lot of potential stars coming through the system. But they don't have many brand name players and they haven't won.

These are facts - yet if you point them out, its a problem. FSG really doesn't deserve some of these people as fans but I believe they do depend on them. And they keep showing up regardless of whatever narrative is spun. Why bother with outreach?
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
614
New York, USA
Really? I mean, he's a fan of the Boston Red Sox. He can still be a fan and think John Henry is chicken shit. I don't even know what this adds or what you thought it would add or what it's even trying to accomplish
I’ll play. So you think Henry and crew should go and get shit on by the fans because it’s the fan’s right to be belligerent at a fan friendly event?

It’s in person Twitter comments.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
That's fair, and I also don't think some people understand that it was beyond ridiculous last year. Ugly unacceptable shit.

And I agree with Rod that it won't happen if the team is good, but there's no wand that gets them there by then. I still wish they'd face the music and think they should, but I was only half kidding when I said MGM was going to need to add extra security this year earlier in the thread.
Your first statement leaves me questioning WTF they made this announcement a week prior to the event. I mean I'm right there with you as far as last year goes, but if there isn't going to be a Town Hall event make that known well in advance.
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
614
New York, USA
Any way you want? No. But if I were the steward of a a community institution that's responsible for my personal fortune, the members of that community should be able to yell at me if I'm doing a shitty job. Accountability is generally considered a good thing.
You do realize JWH was already mega rich before he bought the Sox? Some all world arbitrage stuff. Kind of already had a fortune. Kind of has partners that expect a return on their investment.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
Your first statement leaves me questioning WTF they made this announcement a week prior to the event. I mean I'm right there with you as far as last year goes, but if there isn't going to be a Town Hall event make that known well in advance.
They waited as long as they could to see if Breslow would give them anything to talk about. Fail.