Offseason rumors

Status
Not open for further replies.

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,519
Verdugo will get $9M+ on his last year of arbitration, not sure that’s appealing to a team that is looking to deal Soto and presumably not contending (although I don’t really understand why they’d be moving him to begin with- they can clearly contend next year). I don’t see Verdugo being with much- there’s not a ton of excess value there. I’d imagine if they do move Soto, they’d be looking for cost controlled impact pitching, especially since Snell, Hader, Lugo, and Wacha could all be gone .
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,773
Rogers Park
Verdugo will get $9M+ on his last year of arbitration, not sure that’s appealing to a team that is looking to deal Soto and presumably not contending (although I don’t really understand why they’d be moving him to begin with- they can clearly contend next year). I don’t see Verdugo being with much- there’s not a ton of excess value there. I’d imagine if they do move Soto, they’d be looking for cost controlled impact pitching, especially since Snell, Hader, Lugo, and Wacha could all be gone .
Yeah. If SD wanted Verdugo, why not just keep Soto?

Soto for Bleis and whatever Verdugo could return from a third team isn’t a terrible trade.

Or Soto for Houck: one year of an expensive slugger for five (I think) years of a cheap SP who could probably thrive in that ballpark.

Soto for all of that AND Perales is bizarre, unless SD is paying Soto’s contract or something.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,736
Verdugo will get $9M+ on his last year of arbitration, not sure that’s appealing to a team that is looking to deal Soto and presumably not contending (although I don’t really understand why they’d be moving him to begin with- they can clearly contend next year). I don’t see Verdugo being with much- there’s not a ton of excess value there. I’d imagine if they do move Soto, they’d be looking for cost controlled impact pitching, especially since Snell, Hader, Lugo, and Wacha could all be gone .
There's only one year there. They're not getting the haul they gave up for Soto because there's going to be an epic bidding war when he reaches free agency and the acquiring team has no guarantees that they're getting anything past that. Think back to the underwhelming offers Boston got for Mookie when they offered him around in 2019. And Betts was a much better player than Soto.

EDIT: Including from the Padres who wanted Boston to eat deadweight salary in the transaction in order to get a couple of prospects back.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,530
There's only one year there. They're not getting the haul they gave up for Soto because there's going to be an epic bidding war when he reaches free agency and the acquiring team has no guarantees that they're getting anything past that. Think back to the underwhelming offers Boston got for Mookie when they offered him around in 2019. And Betts was a much better player than Soto.

EDIT: Including from the Padres who wanted Boston to eat deadweight salary in the transaction in order to get a couple of prospects back.
We only have one season to go on, but it seems like owners are much more willing to spend under the current CBA than the previous one.

FWIW, Soto already turned down a 15/440 deal in 2022 before being traded from WAS, Betts signed for 12/365 (I agree that Betts is a better player).
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,619
It's hard to know how much of turning down that deal was just wanting to get out of DC though.

(and of course say it with me: Betts. Signed. During. COVID.)
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,736
We only have one season to go on, but it seems like owners are much more willing to spend under the current CBA than the previous one.

FWIW, Soto already turned down a 15/440 deal in 2022 before being traded from WAS, Betts signed for 12/365 (I agree that Betts is a better player).
Yeah, and that's the point, I know that he wants to play for Boston, but with the pending bidding war even the Red Sox have no guarantees that he's going to extend. I recall from the Betts rumors that the Padres wanted Boston to eat Myers's contract and that their top 5 prospects were off limits in any proposed trade. That's what the Pads are looking at if they deal Soto this offseason.

Yeah. If SD wanted Verdugo, why not just keep Soto?
Because they're convinced that he's leaving and Verdugo is easy to extend and therefore deal when the time comes?
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,736
Yeah, more recently Judge got 9/360 (40AAV) so the bidding starts around there. And goes up.
Soto will be a lot younger than Judge was when free agency arrives, so the bidding is definitely going up from there. You just don't get the opportunity to land hitters that good entering their prime years.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Soto will be a lot younger than Judge was when free agency arrives, so the bidding is definitely going up from there. You just don't get the opportunity to land hitters that good entering their prime years.
Well Judge was coming off a historic 10.6 bWAR season, which is more than the last two seasons of Soto. I think the length of Soto's next deal will certainly exceed Judge's but not the AAV.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,736
Well Judge was coming off a historic 10.6 bWAR season, which is more than the last two seasons of Soto. I think the length of Soto's next deal will certainly exceed Judge's but not the AAV.
Yes, but with Judge you were buying the contract year of a 31 year player (and one with an injury history at that). With Soto you're buying his prime. I'm guessing that we might see the first half billion dollar man.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Yes, but with Judge you were buying the contract year of a 31 year player (and one with an injury history at that). With Soto you're buying his prime. I'm guessing that we might see the first half billion dollar man.
Well as I said Soto will probably get more years at least, but his peak value is below that of Judge's so far. Maybe you get 12/480 -- same AAV?
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,530
Yes, but with Judge you were buying the contract year of a 31 year player (and one with an injury history at that). With Soto you're buying his prime. I'm guessing that we might see the first half billion dollar man.
Let’s see if Ohtani beats him to it.
 

HangingW/ScottCooper

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,508
Scituate, MA
Setting aside if the Sox should/would be interested in Soto, either the one year or extended version of him, would that package even be attractive the the Padres? Maybe if Bleis was healthy but I would think the Padres would covet a centerpiece of any trade who is closer to the majors and not coming off shoulder surgery.
I would imagine any chance of the Red Sox getting Soto would be contingent on the Padres interest in Durran.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,563
As I've mentioned, one of my crew is friend's with the owner of the Padres (who apparently is struggling with cancer right now)... but that guy isn't trading Soto, period. They're going to try and work out an extension apparently and Soto just didn't want to be in DC. I can't see how the Padres can keep X, Machado, Soto, etc... and still find all the pitching that's walking away. How that team didn't run away with the division is still baffling.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
I'm not sold on the idea, but IMO any move to bring Soto in should only happen AFTER the pitching needs are filled.
Ehh, not sure it matters that much. adding runs and preventing them are two sides of the same coin.

An early offseason trade for Soto also signals to potential free agents that we are very much going for it now, which they’d have reason to question as it currently stands.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,829
Soto is an absolute butcher on defense, and putting him at DH means Raffy and Masa (and to a lesser extent, Houses) are out there playing the field for as long as we have him.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,563
Soto is an absolute butcher on defense, and putting him at DH means Raffy and Masa (and to a lesser extent, Houses) are out there playing the field for as long as we have him.
I'm in agreement here with Bergs. Adding Soto would require a lot of changes across the entire OF and would hamstring the corner infield defense issue too (with DH likely Raffy's future). The more I think about it, the more I really want to see the Sox aggressively pursue a trade for Trout who makes more sense than Soto. There's obviously issues with the No-Trade but I can't imagine he's loving being on team going nowhere but down even further. Deal Abreu, Verdugo, Yorke and pick up all of Trout's salary.
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
622
New York, USA
A healthy Trout would be a good piece for the Red Sox. The problem is over the past 7 years he hasn’t been healthy. He’s a huge gamble going forward. He probably isn’t a CF any more. I would be worried about giving him a 7/260 today as a free agent. Definitely wouldn’t take on the contract and include multiple prospects.

Regarding Soto. I’d trade for him and hope to sign him long term. Sure the defense is bad but the bat is Elite. As Chawson said above.. adding runs works also. Nothing to prevent the Sox from getting two starters and Soto and the infield defense improving. The Phillies are showing you can mash your way to wins with horrible defense.
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
8,071
Boston, MA
I'm in agreement here with Bergs. Adding Soto would require a lot of changes across the entire OF and would hamstring the corner infield defense issue too (with DH likely Raffy's future). The more I think about it, the more I really want to see the Sox aggressively pursue a trade for Trout who makes more sense than Soto. There's obviously issues with the No-Trade but I can't imagine he's loving being on team going nowhere but down even further. Deal Abreu, Verdugo, Yorke and pick up all of Trout's salary.
Trout would look great in right at Fenway. The Angels wouldn't need Verdugo on a one year deal and I think you'd want to keep him for the time when Trout is injured. Verdugo-Duran-Trout with Yoshida as DH can easily become Yoshida-Duran-Verdugo when he's on the IL. Abreu would be a nice 4th or 5th outfielder, but I'd guess he'd be attractive to the Angels as part of the deal.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,230
Regarding Soto. I’d trade for him and hope to sign him long term. Sure the defense is bad but the bat is Elite. As Chawson said above.. adding runs works also. Nothing to prevent the Sox from getting two starters and Soto and the infield defense improving. The Phillies are showing you can mash your way to wins with horrible defense.
I tend to agree, at least in a vacuum. But they'd have to be really freaking good starters. Sure, the Phillies defense is horrific, but they also have two "SP1" type pitchers (possibly aces) at the front of their rotation and "Brayan Bello" as their 3rd starter. The Sox have nobody that profiles particularly closely to Wheeler or Nola heading the rotation. I like Bello, but his value has been a lot more like Ranger Suarez than Nola or Wheeler - which isn't a knock on Bello at all, I like Suarez a good deal, but he (and Bello) I feel a lot more confident calling either a decent SP2 or an excellent SP3 and not at all similar to Wheeler or Nola.

Yes, the Red Sox can of course go out and sign pitching, but in a world where you have traded for and then extended Soto, have Devers and still need to either sign your own version of "Nola and Wheeler" or give up the prospects necessary to acquire Soto while signing your version of Wheeler and trading for your version of Nola, the costs get pretty expensive.

(Bello's fWAR the last two seasons were 1.3 and 1.6; Suarez were 2.3 and 2.4; Nola's were 6.3 and 3.9 and Wheeler's were 4.2 and 5.9).

Also, I really want the Red Sox to sign Aaron Nola...
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
622
New York, USA
If the Sox could sign Soto…. What could Devers bring back in a trade? Would a younger top of the rotation SP be a possibility? Could the Sox find a 3B replacement with decent pop and defense?

Potential to add to SP, improve infield D and upgrade offense with Soto.

I want the WS to finish yesterday. I need things to start happening.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,400
I would much rather go the Soto route than Trout. The latter has missed so many games and it gets quite challenging to build a team with that near inevitability. Trout hasn’t played 140 games since 2018 and seems to have a major injury basically every year now. His bat also seemed to fall off a bit last year even before the hamate injury.

Soto’s bat is elite and he’s much younger. He obviously isn’t signed long-term so that’s the risk you wouldn’t have with Trout but I’d rather just acquire the best possible talent and deal with the defensive fit later.

But how they approach FA will likely tell us a lot.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
21,045
Maine
I would much rather go the Soto route than Trout. The latter has missed so many games and it gets quite challenging to build a team with that near inevitability. Trout hasn’t played 140 games since 2018 and seems to have a major injury basically every year now. His bat also seemed to fall off a bit last year even before the hamate injury.

Soto’s bat is elite and he’s much younger. He obviously isn’t signed long-term so that’s the risk you wouldn’t have with Trout but I’d rather just acquire the best possible talent and deal with the defensive fit later.

But how they approach FA will likely tell us a lot.
It's not just a defensive fit. The lineup is already very LHH heavy (Devers, Yoshida, Casas, Verdugo, Duran). Adding Soto exacerbates that even if he makes the lineup better.

I also think the Soto talk is probably a waste of time. I expect San Diego wants to keep him. It's not like they're breaking up the band out there. They're going for it again and having Soto helps that effort. If they're moving him this winter, it's because he won't sign an extension to stay there. If he won't sign an extension there, where they are clearly comfortable paying top dollar, after he turned down a MONSTER contract offer in DC, he's unlikely to sign an extension anywhere. He's going to free agency come hell or high water. So the Sox should spend their prospect capital this winter on something more long term. If next winter he's out there and they still want him, go for it. Then it's only cash.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,230
If the Sox could sign Soto…. What could Devers bring back in a trade? Would a younger top of the rotation SP be a possibility? Could the Sox find a 3B replacement with decent pop and defense?

Potential to add to SP, improve infield D and upgrade offense with Soto.

I want the WS to finish yesterday. I need things to start happening.
I think it'd be tough to find that match for Devers. There are only maybe 5-10 teams out there that could afford that contract, then you'd need to find one with a need at 3b (or 1b) that has a young top of the rotation SP they're willing to move. I don't know what team that would be. That's a tough needle to thread.

I think the more likely trade (if at all likely) would be moving Casas as the centerpiece for said starter. That would allow the Red Sox to do something like Soto in LF, Devers at 3b (or move him to 1b and putting Urias at 3b as a stop gap if they want to go that route) while having Yoshida at DH. I'm not against the idea at all, but you're still looking at a good amount of prospect capital spent to acquire Soto, then extending him.

I can see something like: Yoshida - DH; Rafaela - CF; Soto - LF; Devers - 3b; Turner - 1b; Story - SS; Abreu - RF; Urias - 2b; Wong - C possibly working; depending on Turner's ability to play the field every day.

This is a way I could possibly see it fitting (if Abreu has the arm to play RF in Fenway, I'm assuming he has the range since he played CF, but I don't know either of these for sure). In this scenario, Verdugo and Duran are traded, obviously.

Keep in mind, I don't think any of the above is likely. But it's not like we have a lot else to talk about at this point.
 
Last edited:

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,261
Soto probably isn't possible, I'm not sure why San Diego would move on from him after the contract they gave to Bogaerts. Trout just seems like a recipe for setting money on fire. The guy has barely played the last four years. Best hitter in baseball, yes, but if he was having back issues at 29, I'm not sure what his 30's are going to look lie.

Moving on from Soto and Trout pipe dreams might be the safe move. I'd explore signing Matt Chapman or Cody Bellinger before I traded for Mike Trout. Ohtani too: I imagine the market for him will have chilled given that he's uncertain as a pitcher for a while. If FSG has their limits these days, which they appear to, I would rather we splurge on Yamamoto and then spread the rest of our spending money out over a couple of good 3-4 win players than blow all our cash on one guy.
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
8,071
Boston, MA
Soto probably isn't possible, I'm not sure why San Diego would move on from him after the contract they gave to Bogaerts. Trout just seems like a recipe for setting money on fire. The guy has barely played the last four years. Best hitter in baseball, yes, but if he was having back issues at 29, I'm not sure what his 30's are going to look lie.

Moving on from Soto and Trout pipe dreams might be the safe move. I'd explore signing Matt Chapman or Cody Bellinger before I traded for Mike Trout. Ohtani too: I imagine the market for him will have chilled given that he's uncertain as a pitcher for a while. If FSG has their limits these days, which they appear to, I would rather we splurge on Yamamoto and then spread the rest of our spending money out over a couple of good 3-4 win players than blow all our cash on one guy.
Soto and Bellinger are both lefties. The Red Sox need some right handed hitters, preferably with power. Trout fits the bill, if you can get him subsidized from the Angels. He's no doubt going to miss time, but his skills started at such a high level he'll be productive when he's on the field for quite a while.

Chapman can still play defense but he's barely holding on as an offensive player. He had old player skills in his late 20s. His 30s could be a total disaster.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,261
Soto and Bellinger are both lefties. The Red Sox need some right handed hitters, preferably with power. Trout fits the bill, if you can get him subsidized from the Angels. He's no doubt going to miss time, but his skills started at such a high level he'll be productive when he's on the field for quite a while.

Chapman can still play defense but he's barely holding on as an offensive player. He had old player skills in his late 20s. His 30s could be a total disaster.
I'm not so hung up on the lefty/righty thing. We spend a lot of time looking for right-handed power but fail to look at these guys actual splits. Soto has posted an OPS of .836 against lefties in his career, which is about as good as Devers' career OPS. Bellinger has a fairly neutral split too, 850 against righties versus 780 against lefties (and he does much better against lefty starters, it's really the relievers that kill him). It's not like we're looking at Verdugo, who's an 800/660 guy.

I'm hoping -- and maybe this is deranged! -- that the right-handed power problem is solved in part by healthy seasons from Story and Urias - both of those guys have 20+ home run power in their bats.

And I don't see Chapman falling off, tbh. He's not a great hitter, but he is a good fielder. He's still posting BB rates north of 10% and his HH% last year was 56%, which is crazy good and the best he's posted in his career. He strikes out too much, but if the deal isn't prohibitive, it could be a good fit for us. Devers would go to DH, but then you're left parking Yoshida in LF, which is obviously not ideal.

As for the bolded -- sure he'll be productive, but if he's literally on the field for half the games then he's not going to be worth more than 2-3 wins. Why blow good prospects and money on a guy who's not going to play when you can get a few guys on relatively short money who have consistently been 4-5 win players? There's definitely a version of the Trout deal I could see happening and that I would support, but I think there's propositions that are much less risky and don't involve committing a huge chunk of our salary cap to a guy who can't stay on the field
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
I'll put it this way: I'd be shocked if the Sox don't acquire a superstar this offseason. Though he's not a perfect fit, Soto seems to me the one most likely to age well and retain value over his contract, massive though it will be.

He's the kind of player you acquire and worry about the rest later. The defense has fallen off, but the bat is perfect for Fenway. And it's quite possible that he wants to be here, which is a factor a lot of us overlook when we talk about acquiring top-shelf players.

Any Soto trade will probably be complex, but I think one built around Duran, maybe with Sale attached, could work. I don't see a ton of problems with this lineup.

Soto - LF
Casas - 1B
Story - SS
Devers - 3B
Teoscar Hernandez, Adam Duvall (FA signing) or Chas McCormick, Mitch Haniger (trade) - RF
Yoshida - DH
Wong - C
Cronenworth/Urias - 2B
Rafaela - CF

Bench: Nola, Urias/Cronenworth, Reyes, Refsnyder/Abreu (*Verdugo is traded in a separate deal)
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,519
I know folks love Tek but his literal title was “game planning coordinator”, and I don’t recall lots of praise for the Sox in that regard. I suspect getting out of Boston would be best for his career, long term.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,249
Portland
It's possible Soto was someone they had circled in red if things this season had gone better - say an 84 win team with only one major flaw. But the roster was so ill conceived with 3 DH's locked in for the foreseeable future that they need to outspend it like the Phillies. Except the Phillies had front line pitching as mentioned upthread. I think it will be difficult to attract starters since they can't afford to add more batters that do not fit their defensive needs. Acquiring a not likely to age well Mike Trout and this version of Ohtani unfortunately doesn't seem like a good fit because Bloom fucked up SO badly with roster construction and they are not nearing contention.

-I would wait and see how the Yamamoto thing plays out first which seems like the most slam dunk option of turning this thing around (obviously)
-Try and move Yoshida. That was Bloom's baby so the new GM isn't going to be married to him.
-Slide Duran to left and keep him there if Rafaela seems playable. Maybe consult Keith Law's scouts for an update.
-Move Abreu to right assuming they move on from Verdugo. The one guy they maybe could have re-signed were it not for his unreliability.

The bottom line with Bloom, now that I have slept on it, is that he failed almost everywhere to bring in his own long term impact players and could have ruined the roster even worse had Dombrowski not handed them their few core players. Story is running out of prime years, Devers is running out of time to not be a very expensive long term one dimensional player, and it may be time to pull the plug on Whitlock as a starter.
'
 
Last edited:

BornToRun

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 4, 2011
17,583
I think the angels are dumb enough to just keep trying to compete and failing at it but if Trout is something they’d actually consider doing then I’m not at all against kicking the tires. I think he’s the right kind of old and hurt enough to not cost full price but talented enough to be worth bringing in so long as it’s mostly a salary dump. I couldn’t tell you what kind of money and prospects going back I’d be comfortable with but the concept is one I’m definitely intrigued by.
 

derekson

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2010
6,277
The other question is if Trout would be okay moving to RF. He's still fine in CF but you'd think it would reduce wear and tear to move to RF. And his defense would play wonderfully in Fenway's RF. Didn't Joe Maddon partially get fired for trying to shift him to LF?
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,736
Trout’s injury list is so long that he should be moved to DH. He’s averaged 79 games per year the last three seasons and that’s not likely to improve playing RF in Fenway.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,885
Trout’s injury list is so long that he should be moved to DH. He’s averaged 79 games per year the last three seasons and that’s not likely to improve playing RF in Fenway.
So two things about this though.

First, let's say you only get 81 games out of him (so, half a season). Over the last three seasons, here's what he's given you per 162 and per 81 games:

per 162: 111 runs, 34 2b, 45 hr, 97 rbi, .283/.382/.579/.962, 162 ops+
per 81: 56 runs, 17 2b, 23 hr, 49 rbi, .283/.382/.579/.962, 162 ops+

So you're getting 23 homers and a .962 ops for half a season, plus a positive dWAR. In fact, for those 81 games, he's giving you roughly 3 bWAR total. This past season, only ONE regular player gave the Sox more than 2.6 bWAR - Raffy Devers at 3.5. So in just half a season, Trout would give the Sox a player worth more wins than anyone else but Raffy gave them for their entire seasons.

Then you'd have Abreu or Rafaela come in and replace him for the games he's missing, and that player is going to give you something, so maybe you're talking about a total of a 4-4.5 win player with Trout+Rafaela (or whomever). That's pretty nice.

Second, if you rotate DH between Yoshida, Turner (if he's even on the team in 2024), Casas, and Trout, you probably can get more games out of Trout than you otherwise would. So maybe you get 100 games out of him. Maybe 120. And then the value goes even higher.

They desperately need RH power, and there are few better than Trout. Yes it's a $37.1m per year commitment through 2030 (!). Yes that may be rough down the road. But in so many ways he'd be a perfect fit for what this team needs - both from a marketing standpoint (what a splash, that would generate all kinds of fan interest) and from an on-field standpoint.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,261
So two things about this though.

First, let's say you only get 81 games out of him (so, half a season). Over the last three seasons, here's what he's given you per 162 and per 81 games:

per 162: 111 runs, 34 2b, 45 hr, 97 rbi, .283/.382/.579/.962, 162 ops+
per 81: 56 runs, 17 2b, 23 hr, 49 rbi, .283/.382/.579/.962, 162 ops+

So you're getting 23 homers and a .962 ops for half a season, plus a positive dWAR. In fact, for those 81 games, he's giving you roughly 3 bWAR total. This past season, only ONE regular player gave the Sox more than 2.6 bWAR - Raffy Devers at 3.5. So in just half a season, Trout would give the Sox a player worth more wins than anyone else but Raffy gave them for their entire seasons.

Then you'd have Abreu or Rafaela come in and replace him for the games he's missing, and that player is going to give you something, so maybe you're talking about a total of a 4-4.5 win player with Trout+Rafaela (or whomever). That's pretty nice.

Second, if you rotate DH between Yoshida, Turner (if he's even on the team in 2024), Casas, and Trout, you probably can get more games out of Trout than you otherwise would. So maybe you get 100 games out of him. Maybe 120. And then the value goes even higher.

They desperately need RH power, and there are few better than Trout. Yes it's a $37.1m per year commitment through 2030 (!). Yes that may be rough down the road. But in so many ways he'd be a perfect fit for what this team needs - both from a marketing standpoint (what a splash, that would generate all kinds of fan interest) and from an on-field standpoint.
But if he's just the 81 game guy, you've got 37 million committed to a 3 win player. That's not going to get them over the hump, and worse, if the luxury tax matters at all to Henry, you can't really go spending that much elsewhere. And what if he's not the 165 OPS+ guy going forward? What if he's not only an injury risk, but a risk to become a worse hitter? K rate has gone through the roof the last couple of years, after all. What if he becomes a worse defender, as almost everyone does in their 30s?

The money and trade chips are better spent elsewhere IMO. We're not so desperate for right-handed power that we should get a guy who cant stay on the field, on a megadeal, headed into his 30s. This is exactly the complaint about the Sale deal, isn't it? Sale probably riskier as a pitcher.
 

EyeBob

New Member
Dec 22, 2022
138
So two things about this though.

First, let's say you only get 81 games out of him (so, half a season). Over the last three seasons, here's what he's given you per 162 and per 81 games:

per 162: 111 runs, 34 2b, 45 hr, 97 rbi, .283/.382/.579/.962, 162 ops+
per 81: 56 runs, 17 2b, 23 hr, 49 rbi, .283/.382/.579/.962, 162 ops+

So you're getting 23 homers and a .962 ops for half a season, plus a positive dWAR. In fact, for those 81 games, he's giving you roughly 3 bWAR total. This past season, only ONE regular player gave the Sox more than 2.6 bWAR - Raffy Devers at 3.5. So in just half a season, Trout would give the Sox a player worth more wins than anyone else but Raffy gave them for their entire seasons.

Then you'd have Abreu or Rafaela come in and replace him for the games he's missing, and that player is going to give you something, so maybe you're talking about a total of a 4-4.5 win player with Trout+Rafaela (or whomever). That's pretty nice.

Second, if you rotate DH between Yoshida, Turner (if he's even on the team in 2024), Casas, and Trout, you probably can get more games out of Trout than you otherwise would. So maybe you get 100 games out of him. Maybe 120. And then the value goes even higher.

They desperately need RH power, and there are few better than Trout. Yes it's a $37.1m per year commitment through 2030 (!). Yes that may be rough down the road. But in so many ways he'd be a perfect fit for what this team needs - both from a marketing standpoint (what a splash, that would generate all kinds of fan interest) and from an on-field standpoint.
That’s an interesting way to look at it. However I would not be shipping anything close to what’s been mentioned in a trade. What would the cal look like if the Sox take the whole contract, and trade someone like a Duran ? I am too lazy to go look at the baseball trade value website
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
16,071
That’s an interesting way to look at it. However I would not be shipping anything close to what’s been mentioned in a trade. What would the cal look like if the Sox take the whole contract, and trade someone like a Duran ? I am too lazy to go look at the baseball trade value website
Trout is a -89.5 on BTV. I hate BTV in so many ways. But yeah, trading actual assets to take on that entire underwater contract would be crazy.
 

koufax32

He'll cry if he wants to...
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2006
9,141
Duval
A LF/DH rotation of Trout/Yoshida with LAAAAA paying enough to get MT’s average annual salary down to $20m/year would be something I’d be very interested in. Yes, there’s injury risk. Yes, that increases the prospects heading the other way. I’m still intrigued by the idea.
The big money question, literally, is what that prospect price tag would be. An associated question is, in that scenario, how many other teams would be lining up to make a similar trade offer?
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
16,071
I was looking at this yesterday, but thought it was kind of interesting that Trout hasn't played LF since 2013 & hasn't played RF since 2012.
 

Heating up in the bullpen

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,118
Pittsboro NC
A LF/DH rotation of Trout/Yoshida with LAAAAA paying enough to get MT’s average annual salary down to $20m/year would be something I’d be very interested in. Yes, there’s injury risk. Yes, that increases the prospects heading the other way. I’m still intrigued by the idea.
The big money question, literally, is what that prospect price tag would be. An associated question is, in that scenario, how many other teams would be lining up to make a similar trade offer?
How about trade Yoshida (+ prospects or Duran, depending on $$$ coming back with Trout) for Trout?
Clears out some money and two poor defenders. Trout mostly in LF, Dugie in RF, Rafaela in CF, Abreu and Refy moving around as needed. Two lefties, three righties, and at worst average defense with plus potential across the board with Trout/Little Raffy/Dugie.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
How about trade Yoshida (+ prospects or Duran, depending on $$$ coming back with Trout) for Trout?
Clears out some money and two poor defenders. Trout mostly in LF, Dugie in RF, Rafaela in CF, Abreu and Refy moving around as needed. Two lefties, three righties, and at worst average defense with plus potential across the board with Trout/Little Raffy/Dugie.
If the Angels trade Trout, they're clearly going into a deep rebuild. So why would they want Masa? Duran is a different story.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
16,071
I assume the theory is that they'd rather take on Yoshida than eat a bunch of Trout's salary & that Yoshida's contract is underwater.

Then BTV said Yoshida was worth basically exactly his contract (0.4). & I was like "oh". But then I was like oh yeah, lol BTV.

Yoshida's biggest value is if Yamamoto wants to play with him again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.