Offseason rumors

Status
Not open for further replies.

BornToRun

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 4, 2011
17,524
Yeah some folks look at this as a year to spend $$$ and they wouldn't be wrong, but there comes a point when you have to do something with prospects and IMO a deal to fill one of the top two needs at starter would be a good use of some prospects. You're not going to be able to hang on to them all because there isn't going to be room for them all at the major league level nor will you be able to protect everyone on the 40 man roster. Part of the reason that having a strong farm system is to provide a team with talent that can be used to fill needs from outside the organization.
I’d be more excited by potential trade scenarios than what’s out there on the FA market. Yamamoto is enticing but beyond that, I feel like shelling out big bucks for the available options would be paying premium prices in kind of a weak class. I’d love to have someone like Montgomery, don’t get me wrong, but he’s not what I’d call a game changer. More of a supplementary piece to complement a big ticket addition and I think we have the prospect capital to make that addition through trade.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,496
I’d be more excited by potential trade scenarios than what’s out there on the FA market. Yamamoto is enticing but beyond that, I feel like shelling out big bucks for the available options would be paying premium prices in kind of a weak class. I’d love to have someone like Montgomery, don’t get me wrong, but he’s not what I’d call a game changer. More of a supplementary piece to complement a big ticket addition and I think we have the prospect capital to make that addition through trade.
Agree here. Sox really need a young ace and that guy seems like it’s Yamamoto. After that, there’s older guys who have been up and down.
If the Sox don’t get Yamamoto then adding Montgomery and another “no.2” would be okay but they need to leverage the excess MI talent and that’s either Yorke plus, plus or Mayer plus and I think Mayer will bounce back.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,325
I mean I'd eat whatever contract Hernandez and Anderson required if it also meant getting YY, but those two just make no sense for us.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,344
Teoscar makes a ton of sense & hopefully we'd be buying low. He just sucked at hitting in Seattle which severely depressed his #s. He had a 81 wRC+ at home & 126 on the road.

He's not like good at defense, but he's coming off his 1st non-negative OAA season (0) & hits 25+ homers every year. Plus RHH.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,280
Teoscar makes a ton of sense & hopefully we'd be buying low. He just sucked at hitting in Seattle which severely depressed his #s. He had a 81 wRC+ at home & 126 on the road.

He's not like good at defense, but he's coming off his 1st non-negative OAA season (0) & hits 25+ homers every year. Plus RHH.
Can only pick one (because I don't think there's space for two): Teoscar or Turner or Duvall? Assume similar deals.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,280
Doesn't getting Teoscar assume that Verdugo will be traded?
Maybe, but if you have Teoscar/Yoshida handling LF/DH, that definitely does not leave room for Turner and maybe Duvall as CF/RF is tough with a subpar LF already in place.

Though they aren't going to have perfect players at every spot, some corners will have to be cut somewhere.
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,977
Honestly, if (and it's a big if) we can get Yamamoto for 9/$225 and Montgomery for 6/$150 - I don't see why we shouldn't try to land both of them.
Can someone help me understand the Montgomery love? MLBTR predicts 6/$150M for both Montgomery and Nola. If I'm picking one, I'm taking Nola every time. They've both been durable but Nola even more so. Both limit walks, but Nola misses bats at a much higher level. And it's not like Nola has relies heavily on elite fastball velocity either. His average velo has remained pretty steady year over year.

I'd be happy with Montgomery and think he's good. But if (big if) they could sign Yamamoto, I think I'd rather split the 6/$150 between a lesser tier starter FA plus someone like Teoscar or Gurriel. Or just spend it on Nola.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,344
Can only pick one (because I don't think there's space for two): Teoscar or Turner or Duvall? Assume similar deals.
If the cost was the same on all 3? Teoscar ez.

I enjoy Turner & think he's a great guy, but he's also going to be 39 next year & seems to be in a slow inevitable decline.

Duvall is interesting because he hit better than Teoscar this year, & fielded better than him ever year but this one, but he's 4 years older & the defensive decline might be real, & Teoscar was a significantly better hitter prior to this year.

Duvall's season could also be considered a bit of a Fenway mirage as he had a 137 wRC+ at home & 97 on the road.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,656
Mariners: we have money too. And it's six hours closer to Japan. And Black Francis lives in Portland now.
Red Sox: we have more money and for the amount of money we give you, all of your friends and family can come visit you when you want AND it’s not like you’re flying back to Japan every weekend so the six hours closer to home is only really important twice a year.

Plus we can get Kay Hanley to sing you Happy Birthday.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,826
Alamogordo
Can someone help me understand the Montgomery love? MLBTR predicts 6/$150M for both Montgomery and Nola. If I'm picking one, I'm taking Nola every time. They've both been durable but Nola even more so. Both limit walks, but Nola misses bats at a much higher level. And it's not like Nola has relies heavily on elite fastball velocity either. His average velo has remained pretty steady year over year.

I'd be happy with Montgomery and think he's good. But if (big if) they could sign Yamamoto, I think I'd rather split the 6/$150 between a lesser tier starter FA plus someone like Teoscar or Gurriel. Or just spend it on Nola.
I agree with you. I like Montgomery, but I honestly think he is a bad fit for a team that is not one or two players away from having what I would consider a "good" defense. Part of the reason he was so good for Texas was because he could pitch into their defense, and his BABIP after the trade was 11 points better than it was in St Louis, which helped him to turn into the pitcher he was for Texas. Only Pivetta and Crawford had better BABIP's on the Red Sox (which, sadly, makes me nervous about Pivetta going into 2024), and while I think Montgomery would be fine, I hope people expect closer to the High 2/Low 1, than the absolute stud that Texas had.
 

BornToRun

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 4, 2011
17,524
Why doesn't Hernandez make sense for us? Power hitting right handed bat, corner outfielder. Seems like it fills a need quite well.
Had the same thought. Coming off a down year but a solid track record and no pick attached. Given the left handed nature of our lineup, he seems like a great fit
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,325
Teoscar makes a ton of sense & hopefully we'd be buying low. He just sucked at hitting in Seattle which severely depressed his #s. He had a 81 wRC+ at home & 126 on the road.

He's not like good at defense, but he's coming off his 1st non-negative OAA season (0) & hits 25+ homers every year. Plus RHH.
His numbers have been declining for 4 years in a row, and Statcast has Fenway suppressing his HR significantly. No thanks.

Also DRS prefers Verdugo 9 to 1.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,274
What the hell happened to Tim Anderson? Slugging just absolutely nosedived and he was a -2.0 WAR player last year. I’d only take him on an extremely cheap deal.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,280
Duvall's season could also be considered a bit of a Fenway mirage as he had a 137 wRC+ at home & 97 on the road.
Well, he would be playing half of his games at Fenway again if they resigned him, right?
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,344
His numbers have been declining for 4 years in a row, and Statcast has Fenway suppressing his HR significantly. No thanks.

Also DRS prefers Verdugo 9 to 1.
I mean...yes that's technically true, but the "decline" is 142 in the Covid season, 132 & 130...& then this past season when he couldn't hit in Seattle & struggled there, but was excellent on the road.

& obviously he's not in the same league as Verdugo defensively. But he's probably better than Duvall, obviously better than Yoshida & comparable to Duran.

But it all depends on the price tag & if we would be buying low.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,344
Well, he would be playing half of his games at Fenway again if they resigned him, right?
Yes, but so would Teoscar. & half his games on the road, where he was a much, much better hitter than Duvall.

How did I suddenly become a Teoscar defender? lol. Hadn't really even seriously considered signing him before this conversation, but it makes sense if the market isn't crazy. It might be, though.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,706
Rogers Park
His numbers have been declining for 4 years in a row, and Statcast has Fenway suppressing his HR significantly. No thanks.

Also DRS prefers Verdugo 9 to 1.
Statcast may have Fenway suppressing his HR, but I’ve seen the dude play in Fenway plenty, and he was an unholy terror. 950 career OPS in almost 200 PA in Fenway. He has hit more HR (14! Or one every 13.5 PA, which is ~48 in 650 PA.) in Fenway than in any park other than Rogers and Safeco, both of which were his home parks.

And the Sox had pretty good pitching for some of those seasons. It’s not like he hit them all in 2020.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,161
Duvall had a nice year but he's been exactly average for his career as a hitter and is going to command somewhere around 10 million again. Last year was his best year ever but he's been a remarkably up and down guy for his career. We've already got a glut of 2 win guys, we don't need another. Use the roster spot on a better player if we can.

I could see Teoscar maybe being that guy, but I think this team should shoot higher. We'd want to park him in LF or DH, I would think, and then if we do, its to watch him strike out 30% of the time and give us an OBP of .315 or so. The power is there but I can't imagine he's not gonna be prohibitive cost-wise. And I don't want him patrolling right field just as our defensive situation is looking up.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,344
Can someone help me understand the Montgomery love? MLBTR predicts 6/$150M for both Montgomery and Nola. If I'm picking one, I'm taking Nola every time. They've both been durable but Nola even more so. Both limit walks, but Nola misses bats at a much higher level. And it's not like Nola has relies heavily on elite fastball velocity either. His average velo has remained pretty steady year over year.

I'd be happy with Montgomery and think he's good. But if (big if) they could sign Yamamoto, I think I'd rather split the 6/$150 between a lesser tier starter FA plus someone like Teoscar or Gurriel. Or just spend it on Nola.
Part of the reason the projected salaries for Montgomery & Nola are similar probably relates to the fact that the Phillies QO'd Nola & the Rangers weren't able to QO Montgomery because he was acquired mid-season.

If the Red Sox sign a player who rejects a QO, they lose their 2nd round pick & $500k of their IFA budget.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,706
Rogers Park
Part of the reason the projected salaries for Montgomery & Nola are similar probably relates to the fact that the Phillies QO'd Nola & the Rangers weren't able to QO Montgomery because he was acquired mid-season.

If the Red Sox sign a player who rejects a QO, they lose their 2nd round pick & $500k of their IFA budget.
What’s the expected value of a mid-second rounder? $15m?
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,229
What’s the expected value of a mid-second rounder? $15m?
That needs to include the loss of draftwide financial flexibility tied to the pick too, harder to overpay lower round picks if you want to.
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,761
I thought he said he was done riding after the second accident. I really hope he is not dumb enough to keep riding with everything he has on the line.
ya like I said it’s just hearsay but this person would know and I was told that he’s difficult to pin down. Not in an asshole malcontent way but in an impulsive “dont worry it’ll be fine” way.
 

Steve Dillard

wishes drew noticed him instead of sweet & sour
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2003
5,979
I’m too warry about Japanese pitchers coming over and adjusting to the different schedule. I view the comps of Tanaka’s seven-year, $155 million contract, the fifth-largest deal ever given to a pitcher at the time. Without looking at total value for the Yankees, it seems he had a shorter period of peak value and then many seasons compromised by injuries making him completely average. We also have our own Matsuzaka experience with a top value for a nice 3/4 starter.
It seems the different balls and pitching schedules leads to injury risk beyond the already high risks of giving a pitcher a 6+ year deal. My impression is there is much better value and health for the second tier older Japanese pitchers like Kuroda and the like who are more pitch ability guys than throwers.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,274
I’m too warry about Japanese pitchers coming over and adjusting to the different schedule. I view the comps of Tanaka’s seven-year, $155 million contract, the fifth-largest deal ever given to a pitcher at the time. Without looking at total value for the Yankees, it seems he had a shorter period of peak value and then many seasons compromised by injuries making him completely average. We also have our own Matsuzaka experience with a top value for a nice 3/4 starter.
It seems the different balls and pitching schedules leads to injury risk beyond the already high risks of giving a pitcher a 6+ year deal. My impression is there is much better value and health for the second tier older Japanese pitchers like Kuroda and the like who are more pitch ability guys than throwers.
Not sure I agree with some of this. Tanaka averaged 167 IP his first 6 years and had several good seasons. He had the partial tear in the elbow ligament but was able to pitch through it. Give me the elite Japanese SP who’s 25 every day of the week over the 30 year-old non-elite guy like Nola or Montgomery. I acknowledge that Yamamoto would likely be more expensive but he also has more upside.

I think the reality is all major FA deals for SP are inherently risky. Every year, key guys are going down to TJ. I’m less concerned about the conversion risk although it’s definitely present.

I do agree that Japan has provided a lot of second tier value guys like Maeda.
 

Skiponzo

Member
SoSH Member
ya like I said it’s just hearsay but this person would know and I was told that he’s difficult to pin down. Not in an asshole malcontent way but in an impulsive “dont worry it’ll be fine” way.
FWIW I have a good friend who runs on field promotions for the Padres (our boys play HS ball together). Been there for 15+ years. In the clubhouse a lot. This is his take as well.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,202
Alcantara had TJS last month and will be back in 2025.
So you're telling me there's a chance...

Good call. Fully admit to not watching / paying attention to one second of Marlins baseball after the trade deadline. But in many ways that helps to illustrate the point that I was making. Yes, I'd personally RATHER the Sox package some prospect redundancy to acquire a Beckett/Sale type, but that is going to be incredibly tough when you have no lets say top 150ish pitching prospects to include in the deal. They might have painted themselves into a corner where the only avenue is to spend big in free agency and hope you've identified the right guys - or of course have another season of somewhere between "slightly below average" to "horrendous" starting pitching. Breslow certainly has his work cut out for him.

Yes, but so would Teoscar. & half his games on the road, where he was a much, much better hitter than Duvall.

How did I suddenly become a Teoscar defender? lol. Hadn't really even seriously considered signing him before this conversation, but it makes sense if the market isn't crazy. It might be, though.
In a lot of ways, this is where I am too regarding TH. On paper he seems like such a great fit. RHH power bat that plays a corner OF position. The market is the big concern for him, at least in my opinion.

As to the defensive point, I think a lot of that comes down to whom is patrolling the OF with him. In some hypothetical world of Duran being a LF, Rafaela being a CF and Teoscar in RF, I can see it working to a decent level, thus moving Yoshida to DH the majority of the time. On the other side, while I'm mostly fine with the idea of a sub-optimal defense in the OF if it means spending big on SPs, the idea of going something like Yoshida, Rafaela, Hernandez and trying to be in the bargain basement on SPs again is terrifying.

However: Yoshida, Story, Devers, Hernandez, Casas, Wong, Duran, Urias, Rafaela seems like a line up I'd be pretty comfortable with that can mash at the beginning and manufacture runs at the bottom. The hypothetical money spent on Hernandez while not being allocated toward starting pitching is the greater concern.
 

Tony Pena's Gas Cloud

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 12, 2019
374
If the cost was the same on all 3? Teoscar ez.

I enjoy Turner & think he's a great guy, but he's also going to be 39 next year & seems to be in a slow inevitable decline.

Duvall is interesting because he hit better than Teoscar this year, & fielded better than him ever year but this one, but he's 4 years older & the defensive decline might be real, & Teoscar was a significantly better hitter prior to this year.

Duvall's season could also be considered a bit of a Fenway mirage as he had a 137 wRC+ at home & 97 on the road.
How is Turner really in decline at the plate? He played through an injury for the last month of the season. Through August 31 he was .287/.488/.845. His career numbers are .288/.465/.829. You can make whatever argument you'd like if he's a fit for the team, but there was no evidence of an offensive decline in '23 when he was healthy.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,344
How is Turner really in decline at the plate? He played through an injury for the last month of the season. Through August 31 he was .287/.488/.845. His career numbers are .288/.465/.829. You can make whatever argument you'd like if he's a fit for the team, but there was no evidence of an offensive decline in '23 when he was healthy.
"When healthy" is an awfully big qualifier for a 39 year old. Obviously he's not the hitter he was in '17 & '18 when he was a 150+ wRC+ guy. In '19 & '20 he was in the 130s. In '21 & '22 he was in the 120s & last year he was 115. He also battled through injuries in several of those other years.

His primary value is as a DH because he's not at all a good fielder at this stage of his career... leading to him only being worth 1.2 fWAR (2.1 bWAR). & we have plenty of guys on our roster who would be best suited to play DH at this stage of their careers.

If they, for example, moved on from Yoshida, the fit would be much better. He was OK at 1B this year, but Casas is an every day player now, & bad at 3B (-3 OAA in only 57 innings).

I love the guy & if the price is right? Of course. But having the RH power hitter acquisition be able to play more than just 1B makes a lot of sense to me.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
I’m too warry about Japanese pitchers coming over and adjusting to the different schedule. I view the comps of Tanaka’s seven-year, $155 million contract, the fifth-largest deal ever given to a pitcher at the time. Without looking at total value for the Yankees, it seems he had a shorter period of peak value and then many seasons compromised by injuries making him completely average. We also have our own Matsuzaka experience with a top value for a nice 3/4 starter.
It seems the different balls and pitching schedules leads to injury risk beyond the already high risks of giving a pitcher a 6+ year deal. My impression is there is much better value and health for the second tier older Japanese pitchers like Kuroda and the like who are more pitch ability guys than throwers.
Two Japanese guys from a decade ago have nothing to do with Yamamoto in terms of his individual arm health. If you are saying he won't be durable, maybe, but not because he's Japanese. I strongly suspect that a couple decades of guys coming over has made teams a lot more sophisticated about the transition, and that he's almost certainly been grooming himself for MLB for several years. If you want to compare him to other skinny 5'10" guys, regardless of nationality, that might be a bit more on point. The different balls might lead to different pitch movement, but injury? Not sure why that would be the case.
 

Sin Duda

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
846
(B)Austin Texas
Two Japanese guys from a decade ago have nothing to do with Yamamoto in terms of his individual arm health. If you are saying he won't be durable, maybe, but not because he's Japanese. I strongly suspect that a couple decades of guys coming over has made teams a lot more sophisticated about the transition, and that he's almost certainly been grooming himself for MLB for several years. If you want to compare him to other skinny 5'10" guys, regardless of nationality, that might be a bit more on point. The different balls might lead to different pitch movement, but injury? Not sure why that would be the case.
I generally agree with your argument, but I also believe starting pitchers only pitch once a week in Japan. So it's not Japanese starters per se, but rather NPB starters' schedules. Here's a good BR article I found. https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/1975617-do-professional-asian-pitchers-go-through-the-same-mlb-learning-curve.amp.html
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
20,688
Row 14
Cody Bellinger to the Yankees or Giants for 12/$264… which is insanity to me. I’d be really happy if the Yankees signed him to such an idiotic contract. Guy has been dogshit in three of the past four years.
But 22 million a year doesn't get you that much. You are looking at 2.8 WAR player on the open market over a three year contract. If you think Cody would produce 30 WAR over those 12 year it would be not a bad contract. I wouldn't do that contract but I don't think it is insane anymore.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,344
I generally agree with your argument, but I also believe starting pitchers only pitch once a week in Japan. So it's not Japanese starters per se, but rather NPB starters' schedules. Here's a good BR article I found. https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/1975617-do-professional-asian-pitchers-go-through-the-same-mlb-learning-curve.amp.html
The schedule is definitely an adjustment, but it's a similar adjustment to the one Minor League pitchers make. In the Red Sox org, they pitch once a week through AA (off every Monday & 6-man rotation) then usually about every 6 days in AAA (off every Monday & 5-man rotation).

Good article on the other adjustments besides just the schedule.
 
Last edited:

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
I generally agree with your argument, but I also believe starting pitchers only pitch once a week in Japan. So it's not Japanese starters per se, but rather NPB starters' schedules. Here's a good BR article I found. https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/1975617-do-professional-asian-pitchers-go-through-the-same-mlb-learning-curve.amp.html
Thanks, I was looking for something like that, but even this article is 9 years old. Surely there have been some changes to how the very top guys prepare? The once a week thing is still happening though, I believe.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,202
While certainly not a rumor, but Pete Abraham Tweeted (or does one say X'ed now) earlier today:

"Asked Boras his thoughts on the Sox. He said they made it clear they intend to be aggressive in improving."

Obviously this isn't news, and it serves Boras for this to be out there, but it's good to hear anyway.
 

opes

Doctor Tongue
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
What the hell happened to Tim Anderson? Slugging just absolutely nosedived and he was a -2.0 WAR player last year. I’d only take him on an extremely cheap deal.
I was thinking the same thing. We already lit a pile of money on fire for story, and he should be back to full strength. We will see if Mayer and Yorke can play SS/2nd this year.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,541
Some Breslow highlights: 1) Houck/Whitlock are still going to be stretched out as starters for now. That could change later this offseason. 2) Sox want a 2B, preferably (but not absolutely) a RHH with versatility 3) Breslow said it’s safe to assume Sox will meet with agents …
… of all top starting pitchers and teams with starting pitching to trade. He said cost of top starters will be “steep” but that Sox “need to be prepared to make this team better.” 4) LH relievers aren’t a priority right now. 5) Breslow feels ready to make trades right now…
…if right oppty presents itself, acknowledging all trades come with “imperfect information” and risk. “If you wait for the perfect trade you will likely never transact.”
6) He’s talked to Verdugo, who is “committed to performing as best he possibly can.” But he notes other teams have asked about him in trades. “We have to look at every opportunity.”
View: https://twitter.com/alexspeier/status/1722348702885626165

View: https://twitter.com/alexspeier/status/1722348698091573498
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
While certainly not a rumor, but Pete Abraham Tweeted (or does one say X'ed now) earlier today:

"Asked Boras his thoughts on the Sox. He said they made it clear they intend to be aggressive in improving."

Obviously this isn't news, and it serves Boras for this to be out there, but it's good to hear anyway.
These Boras press conferences are such empty calories, but writers like Pete Abe can't quit them. It's like political writers covering CPAC. Never any news, just pure infotainment.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,202
These Boras press conferences are such empty calories, but writers like Pete Abe can't quit them. It's like political writers covering CPAC. Never any news, just pure infotainment.
While obviously correct (infotainment), I'd rather get this kind of update and corroboration as opposed to reading multiple "Red Sox feel confident with what they have" updates. If nothing else it shows a greater understanding of the landscape of what is in the organization, what is in the organizations of the rest of the AL contenders, and understanding that what is here simply isn't close to good enough - and isn't only a couple of short term reclamation projects and mixing and matching away from being good enough.

Being serious about contending means being serious about understanding the scope of moves that need to be made. I'm glad that it seems to be recognized.

Though obviously it's all speculation and "empty calories" until something actually happens.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,325
Interesting that we aren't prioritizing a LHRP, does Breslow think he can can make the summer version of Murphy sustainable?
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
While obviously correct (infotainment), I'd rather get this kind of update and corroboration as opposed to reading multiple "Red Sox feel confident with what they have" updates. If nothing else it shows a greater understanding of the landscape of what is in the organization, what is in the organizations of the rest of the AL contenders, and understanding that what is here simply isn't close to good enough - and isn't only a couple of short term reclamation projects and mixing and matching away from being good enough.

Being serious about contending means being serious about understanding the scope of moves that need to be made. I'm glad that it seems to be recognized.

Though obviously it's all speculation and "empty calories" until something actually happens.
I feel like the Sox know what we want to hear and are never ever going to tell us something unpopular. Thankfully, the reality of the team's situation lines up well with an aggressive strategy, so I wouldn't read anything untoward into these signals. But I personally prefer to tune them out until, as you wisely note, something actually happens.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,023
Isle of Plum
Interesting that we aren't prioritizing a LHRP, does Breslow think he can can make the summer version of Murphy sustainable?
Key phrase may have been ‘right now’ though. Maybe it’s something they address as part of a larger trade, or are deprioritizing while they focus on the SPs and/or rh power.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.