Malcolm, come!Will be interesting if Flores moves on him.
Malcolm, come!Will be interesting if Flores moves on him.
Butler also was on the field for nearly all (97%) of the team's defensive snaps last season. The only other player to be in that same stratosphere for the Titans, Kevin Byard, played most of his snaps at free safety. Pats rotated their corners more often, with JC Jackson leading the way at 84%.2020 Malcolm Butler vs. Jason McCourty
Butler (31): 127 targets, 80 completions (63.0%), 873 yards, 10.9 yds/comp, 6.9 yds/target, 5 td, 4 int, 83.2 passer rating
JMac (33): 45 targets, 29 completions (64.4%), 417 yards, 14.4 yds/comp, 9.3 yds/target, 5 td, 0 int, 131.4 passer rating
If we need a 4th CB (behind Gilmore, JC, and Jones), I'd MUCH prefer Butler over McCourty, who was absolutely horrific last season. But I will say...man they threw at Butler a TON last season (8 attempts per game...yikes).
Given that Guy is a UFA and we have no idea what Beau Allen is, yes, DT to me is by far the #1 need on that side of the ball.So given that Chung and Hightower seem to be back in the mix, what is the #1 need on defense at this point? Last year I felt they needed more speed at LB and someone disruptive in the pass rush either at DT or on the edge. They also need a better run stuffer at DT.
Hightower helps against the run, provides some interior pass rush options, and probably keeps the defense better prepared on the field. Maybe Chung gives them more options to play Dugger in the box as a sub LB and helps address the lack of speed at LB.
Is the big draft need on defense now a disruptive DT? Does that guy exist in the draft?
@SMU_Sox Talked a little about DTs in the prospect thread. McNeill is his guy.So given that Chung and Hightower seem to be back in the mix, what is the #1 need on defense at this point? Last year I felt they needed more speed at LB and someone disruptive in the pass rush either at DT or on the edge. They also need a better run stuffer at DT.
Hightower helps against the run, provides some interior pass rush options, and probably keeps the defense better prepared on the field. Maybe Chung gives them more options to play Dugger in the box as a sub LB and helps address the lack of speed at LB.
Is the big draft need on defense now a disruptive DT? Does that guy exist in the draft?
Great news - STs were definitely the strength of last year's teamMike Reiss
@MikeReiss
2m
The Patriots have agreed to a 3-year, $6 million deal with special teams ace Justin Bethel, per league sources.
It's also notable that only 2 former Pats show up as good bigger money signings for other GMs in this analysis - one was Brady (and he wasn't resigning in NE) and the other was Ted Karras.Mike Sando did a piece for The Athletic where he looked at the 10 most expensive FA signings for NFL GMs over the last decade and made a ranking of the GMs based on hits/misses/mehs..
https://theathletic.com/2434379/2021/03/12/ranking-nfl-gms-by-their-most-expensive-free-agent-signings-bill-belichick-no-1/
Spoiler, Bill comes out #1, mostly because he doesn't make many big $ misses.
Absolutely. I'm happy to see BB continue to invest in ST players. After all these years, you just wonder why more GMs don't do this.Great news - STs were definitely the strength of last year's team
I wonder if there is a bit of knock on effect with rewarding ST stars in that it gives incentive to the younger lesser talents on a team to make their marks on ST? Matthew Slater being the poster child for this, coming out of college with very borderline level (at best) skills as a traditional offensive or defensive player but now having received multiple years of solid income and multiple Pro Bowls, he’s in the running for the HOF. Nate Ebner is another example.Absolutely. I'm happy to see BB continue to invest in ST players. After all these years, you just wonder why more GMs don't do this.
They've had plenty of room for both Slater and Bethel the last two years, not sure why would we need to read anything into this.It may also mean Slater is hanging it up. Lock up his successor. I have to think he told Coach Bill of his intentions prior to the start of free agency, but perhaps not..
Miguel seems to think that it was a fake report:I read on SOSH somewhere the Hightower agreed to a restructure, but I'm not seeing any details anywhere. Does anyone have the line on this?
I think they've evolved past the 4-3 or 3-4 to their 4-2-5 as their base. They are so multiple that the front 6 varies but without having the numbers in front of me I would guess they played more snaps in that alignment than anything else.The starting front 7 is likely to be wholly changed over from last year, or at least the entire LB lineup.
Any chance the additions of Judon, KVN, DHT, plus Godchaux and Anderson suggest a move to more 3-4 as a base?
Marqise Lee too. Not sure if it's been reported in another thread.Reiss: Beau Allen released
I think you can see more 3 man fronts because Judon and KVN(and Jennings hopefully) are capable of playing edge against the run while Wise and Anderson play near the end of the line on the ball.The starting front 7 is likely to be wholly changed over from last year, or at least the entire LB lineup.
Any chance the additions of Judon, KVN, DHT, plus Godchaux and Anderson suggest a move to more 3-4 as a base?
Why would Wino be traded? He is an ascending player on a rookie deal. I'd be shocked of if he was, despite the spats with the coaching staff (allegedly).I wonder what they're going to get in the (almost inevitable now) Winovich trade?
I think the angle is that he constantly fucks up run responsibilities and can be a pain in the ass.Why would Wino be traded? He is an ascending player on a rookie deal. I'd be shocked of if he was, despite the spats with the coaching staff (allegedly).
Probably, but the other side is.. if you think he's a situational pass rush guy only, you'd be wise to take a look around the league and see if someone thinks he's more than that. If he has value on that deal even as a pure sub rusher, another team may see him as having more value, and you get a player or pick you think gives you a bigger value.I think the angle is that he constantly fucks up run responsibilities and can be a pain in the ass.
If they use him predominantly as a sub rusher, he has value at his contract, so unless they’re flat out fed up with him (and I haven’t seen reporting that goes that far) I think he is here.
Three new DLineman -- Anderson, Godchaux, Adams, -- and three "new" (compared to last season) LBs -- DHT, KVN, Judon. That's six new players in the front 7. Wino, Uche, Jennings, Cowart, Hall, are now depth guys instead of starters.I think you can see more 3 man fronts because Judon and KVN(and Jennings hopefully) are capable of playing edge against the run while Wise and Anderson play near the end of the line on the ball.
Right, and further - who is coming off the field in passing situations to get Winovich in the game?Probably, but the other side is.. if you think he's a situational pass rush guy only, you'd be wise to take a look around the league and see if someone thinks he's more than that. If he has value on that deal even as a pure sub rusher, another team may see him as having more value, and you get a player or pick you think gives you a bigger value.
I don’t think that’s an issue. Other than DBs like DMac and Gilmore, pretty much every one else, especially in the front 6/7 are in a rotation. I think if Wino is only playing 20 snaps, all in clear passing downs, he could put up some big production in the pass rush.Right, and further - who is coming off the field in passing situations to get Winovich in the game?
Judon, KVN, Uche, Hightower...there are only so many edge/LB rush spots.
They definitely could use the next great CB. This guy is elite in basically every way.If this guy is there at 15 and the Pats don't trade one way or the other, I'd be thrilled if they took him
View: https://twitter.com/MathBomb/status/1374403040006991878
The mocks that I have looked at are so wildly all over the map by the time you get to 15.If this guy is there at 15 and the Pats don't trade one way or the other, I'd be thrilled if they took him
View: https://twitter.com/MathBomb/status/1374403040006991878
If they trade for Gilmore!!!I’m trying to think of reasons why he would get past Dallas at #10. Can’t think of many.
Reiss reporting the Pats and Lawrence Guy are finalizing a 4 year dealFree-agent DT Lawrence Guy and the Patriots are working on finalizing a four-year deal for Guy to remain in New England — pending a physical — per sources.
Love the Guy & White news! I'll be disappointed if they aren't a top 5 defense, barring a Gilmore trade.Reiss reporting the Pats and Lawrence Guy are finalizing a 4 year deal
Is he staying at Godchaux's house?Looks like the Pats have signed LaRoy Reynolds - seems like a core ST LB type player
View: https://www.instagram.com/p/CMz_N3MDi62/?igshid=1ak0xosy3jo68
Do we even want to do that? He turns 31 in September so not sure I'd be too excited about an extension. For point of comparison, Ty Law's last Pro Bowl season was his age 31 season. For Revis, it was his age 30 season. Both of those guys were physical corners like Gilmore who relied more on technique vs. athleticism so seem like decent comps.Add 2 years and $40M guaranteed and spread the hit?