Sox acquire Wade Miley for De La Rosa, Webster, and minor leaguer

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,234
Portland
I like it.  Teams like the Red Sox who are competing for playoff spots don't really have time to develop more than an arm at a time aside from maybe the bullpen.  There is no evidence that either of De La Rosa (both going into their age 26 seasons) are going to be more than #4s.  It's wonderful to talk about both of their potentials and Webster's step forward . . in September against expanded rosters, but they are both post prospect age.  They are much better off on teams that aren't going anywhere yet.  
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,998
Webster never struck me as a guy I'd want to have on the mound in a big game, even if he did manage to put it all together.  He looks like a pants-shitter.  For whatever that's worth.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,549
deep inside Guido territory
More from Cameron's article.
 
2015 Steamer projections
Wade Miley: 192 IP, +2.3 WAR
Rubby de la Rosa: 189 IP, +1.4 WAR
Allen Webster: 182 IP, +0.6 WAR
 
The Red Sox trade 10 years of team control for three years, but get a much more reliable mid-rotation starter in exchange. And if de la Rosa and Webser end up as relievers, then the extra years won’t matter much at all. While I recognize that I probably like pitchers in the mold of Wade Miley more than most, my early take — without knowing who the third prospect is, which could change things — is that this is a pretty nifty upgrade for the Red Sox.
 
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/instagraphs/red-sox-reportedly-acquire-wade-miley/
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,767
Obviously if RDLR or Webster figures it out, this trade could look bad. 
 
But I think this move improves the probability of having a cost controlled solid mid-rotation starter, which is something the Red Sox really needed.  Between Ranaudo, Workman, Barnes, Owens, and Rodriguez, there is still plenty of youth to fight it out for the back of the rotation and/or bullpen (or more trade bait).
 
IMO both Webster and RDLR were overrated around here, and think if they succeed at all, it's more likely in the bullpen. Arizona gets some upside there, but I like it for the Red Sox too. 
 

mloyko54

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2012
159
Mashpee, MA
As Tim Britton point out.. With RDLR and Webster gone it basically guarantees the Red Sox will acquire 3 SP this off-season. There is no true #5 Candidate now. 
 
 
1 - TBD
 
2- TBD
 
3- Buchholz
 
4- Miley
 
5 - Kelly 
 

canderson

Mr. Brightside
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
39,669
Harrisburg, Pa.
Don't think Webster ever makes it, but man I'm high on RDLR. If the third player is anyone worth a damn I'll be sour on this trade.

I wonder if they saw Lester's price and where that market is and they don't think they'll get Shields. That leaves Miley and whoever Cespedes fetches.
 

Merkle's Boner

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2011
3,838
Those Steamer projections for IP for RDLR and Webster seem to be wildly inflated. No way either of those guys sniffed 180 IP with the Sox next year. I look at this trade as trading maybe 120 IP combined for a 200 IP pitcher.

I also think there might be something to the theory that ground ball pitchers, with the massive expansion of infield shifts, is the new market inefficiency and the FO wants to load up on those guys.
 

ScubaSteveAvery

Master of the Senate
SoSH Member
Jul 29, 2007
8,329
Everywhere
Even if De la Rosa and/or Webster figure out, I still don't think this would be a horrible deal.  The Sox needed a reliable innings eater who they could plug in to be a 4/5 guy and they found him. Miley is significantly cheaper than anyone they could signed on the open market to fill this slot.  As we learned this year, gambling on youngsters to figure it out without viable backups is a recipe for disaster.  They still have a whole AAA rotation full of youngsters and don't have to roll he dice with De la Rosa and/or to see if they put it together. 
 

SydneySox

A dash of cool to add the heat
SoSH Member
Sep 19, 2005
15,605
The Eastern Suburbs
If we accept both RDLR and Webster were headed to the bullpen, this is a great trade for Boston.
 
I think the line on that acceptance will determine a lot of how the posting in here will fall.
 

pokey_reese

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 25, 2008
16,325
Boston, MA
I like Miley, but I admit that I loved RDLR after Pedro's endorsement and watching him pump gas for a few weeks when he had that hot stretch over the summer. Watching Rubby was one of the things I was excited about looking to 2015 ST, even if I know that this is probably the right move.

Unexciting, but makes the rotation more likely to be consistently good.
 

Tyrone Biggums

nfl meets tri-annually at a secret country mansion
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2006
6,424
Again if this ends up being one of these instances where Philadelphia told the Sox they wanted Cespedes and Miley in a Hamels deal then fine but the deal other than this really doesn't make sense. It doesn't make sense to fill a rotation full of #3 starters with the offense that Boston has constructed.
 

NJ_Sox_Fan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 2, 2006
10,917
NJ
Hate that they moved RDLR for Wade Miley.

I really hope this is the start to something bigger
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,234
Portland
Merkle's Boner said:
Those Steamer projections for IP for RDLR and Webster seem to be wildly inflated. No way either of those guys sniffed 180 IP with the Sox next year. I look at this trade as trading maybe 120 IP combined for a 200 IP pitcher.

I also think there might be something to the theory that ground ball pitchers, with the massive expansion of infield shifts, is the new market inefficiency and the FO wants to load up on those guys.
Ya, I had mentioned that earlier.  My only concern with this is not having a great glove at SS, but Sandoval certainly helps.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,256
Tyrone Biggums said:
Again if this ends up being one of these instances where Philadelphia told the Sox they wanted Cespedes and Miley in a Hamels deal then fine but the deal other than this really doesn't make sense. It doesn't make sense to fill a rotation full of #3 starters with the offense that Boston has constructed.
 
It does if they still have other things to do to fill the other rotation slots. Miley is a middle of the rotation innings-eater. Acquiring him doesn't preclude getting say, Shields and Porcello.
 

Rough Carrigan

reasons within Reason
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Pitchers usually have identifiable overall strategies.  I was always completely intrigued by the promise of Webster.  Comparisons to young Kevin Brown were more than a little intriguing.  But every time I saw him I could not figure out what the hell he was doing.  He didn't seem to just flood the zone with hard moving sinkers.  He didn't seem to go for the corners, or he couldn't  He didn't seem to have worthwhile breaking pitches.  He just . . failed.  Maybe they meant a 14 year old Kevin Brown.  I'm sorry to see him go just because of the promise.   Rubby's performance reminds me of the old Jim Leyland line uttered in Tim Wakefield's second season with the Pirates.  "The problem with Tim Wakefield," he said, " is that he's never mediocre".  That almost seems like a fair description of Rubby.  Excellent or shitty, a bipolar starter.  Good luck to both of them.  As long as the minor leaguer is a B or C level prospect I'm fine with this.
 

Merkle's Boner

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2011
3,838
Our system is so deep I need to get down towards 20 and lower before I see a guy I'd want to give up on as the throw in to this trade. Teddy Stankiewicz? Shaw? Asuaje?
 

86spike

Currently enjoying "Arli$$"
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2002
25,082
Procrasti Nation
Tyrone Biggums said:
Again if this ends up being one of these instances where Philadelphia told the Sox they wanted Cespedes and Miley in a Hamels deal then fine but the deal other than this really doesn't make sense. It doesn't make sense to fill a rotation full of #3 starters with the offense that Boston has constructed.
I disagree. I think they can afford to start the season with no true Ace and a pile of #2-4s precisely because the offense should be good enough to carry the team to wins.
 

mikeford

woolwich!
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2006
29,735
St John's, NL
86spike said:
I disagree. I think they can afford to start the season with no true Ace and a pile of #2-4s precisely because the offense should be good enough to carry the team to wins.
They'd have to acquire a #2 starter first for this to work.
 

LuckyBen

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 5, 2012
3,396
Merkle's Boner said:
Our system is so deep I need to get down towards 20 and lower before I see a guy I'd want to give up on as the throw in to this trade. Teddy Stankiewicz? Shaw? Asuaje?
Let them have Cody Kukuk.
 
Seriously though, the prospect better be way down the list.
 
Dec 10, 2012
6,943
Was really looking forward to seeing Rubby develop. Not confident Miley can make transition from NL West to AL West at anything better than a #4. I feel we traded 2 #5's with potential to be #3s (plus a mler) for a #4.
 
We're still looking for a #2 and a #1 and just lost 2 chips.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,557
this also leaves us with 2 open 40 man spots (we had one to begin with before the trade I believe)
 

k-factory

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2005
1,866
seattle, wa
SydneySox said:
If we accept both RDLR and Webster were headed to the bullpen, this is a great trade for Boston.
 
I think the line on that acceptance will determine a lot of how the posting in here will fall.
 
If we were a smaller market team maybe there would be more patience to see if a webster or de la rosa could pan out as starters. 180-200 ip from those guys is a real stretch. But there are far more talented arms knocking on the door in the minors that wouldn't allow that to happen. I'd rather see a solid #4 come in and the next wave compete for #5 and fill in in the pen.  
 

Stan Papi Was Framed

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 5, 2012
2,938
Tyrone Biggums said:
Again if this ends up being one of these instances where Philadelphia told the Sox they wanted Cespedes and Miley in a Hamels deal then fine but the deal other than this really doesn't make sense. It doesn't make sense to fill a rotation full of #3 starters with the offense that Boston has constructed.
what if they add Shields and McCarthy?  (edit: or, Shields and Porcello)
 
Dec 10, 2012
6,943
86spike said:
I disagree. I think they can afford to start the season with no true Ace and a pile of #2-4s precisely because the offense should be good enough to carry the team to wins.
We don't have a #2. Clay was that 4 years ago, not confident about now.
 

Merkle's Boner

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2011
3,838
LuckyBen said:
Let them have Cody Kukuk.
 
Seriously though, the prospect better be way down the list.
I guess I could see Bryce Brentz going due to the glut of OFers. Although I am sure he will become known as Brandon Moss 2.0 in no time.
 

curly2

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 8, 2003
4,920
86spike said:
I expect them to in the next days/weeks. Do you think they're done?
 
No but they also have two or three (depending on the quality of the third player) trade chips to get a good starter.
 

Steve22

New Member
Jul 28, 2011
132
Is everyone quite aware that the numbers being assigned to pitchers ITT are completely worthless out of context? 
 

mikeford

woolwich!
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2006
29,735
St John's, NL
86spike said:
I expect them to in the next days/weeks. Do you think they're done?
No, but I also haven't seen any rumblings around anyone who I'd term a #2 (or better) starter other than Hamels, who I don't believe RAJ will trade for anything we'd all consider reasonable. There is a reason that Phillies team hasn't been torn down already and its RAJ's overvaluation of his big pieces like Utley, Hamels and Lee.
 

LuckyBen

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 5, 2012
3,396
mikeford said:
They'd have to acquire a #2 starter first for this to work
 
I heard Jim Bowden saying the Yankees would possibly have 3 1s if they signed Scherzer (Tanaka and Pineda). Then there are the people saying Jake Arrieta is a number 2 behind behind Lester.  With all of the question marks surrounding those guys, I see no reason we can't look at Clay as a 2 right now.  Sure, he might suck, but so might a whole lot of other pitchers seen as a 1-3.
 
Hamels/Shields
Clay
Cespedes trade/or Miley with competition for 5 in spring training
Miley
Kelly
 

The Boomer

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2000
2,232
Charlottesville, Virginia
jarv said:
Wait, De La Rosa was the main piece of the Dodgers trade right?

You guys shed 249 trillions dollars of payroll in exchange for a World Series and Wade Miley. That's a pretty damn good deal.
 
You beat me to this point.  Both DLR and Webster came from the Dodgers with flotsam, jetsam, immense financial flexibility and one unexpected championship in the Punto trade.  DLR and Webster have velocity but are still learning to pitch.  Both might end up in a bullpen.  Under team control, Miley has the potential to benefit from this change of scenery after leaving the Arizona bandbox.  The minor leaguer going to the Diamondbacks might be the key to the fairness of this trade.  Miley certainly won't replace Lester on the Sox but he will replace his innings and lefty balance in the rotation.  I'm always looking for what might be the new Moneyball inefficiency in baseball (with OBP no longer the undervalued factor).  Perhaps, with Kelly and Miley as the last 2 major trade acquisitions for Ben, proven major league starters still in their primes but under team control for several seasons are too undervalued.  If DLR and Webster reach that point in the Diamondbacks launchpad, they will be much more valuable than they are at this moment.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,234
Portland
My guess is someone like Rijo who is double blocked or Ramos as the third guy.
 
And of course they're going to get another good pitcher.  They can't roll into the season with the current offensive surplus.
 

foulkehampshire

hillbilly suburbanite
SoSH Member
Feb 25, 2007
5,101
Wesport, MA
Merkle's Boner said:
I guess I could see Bryce Brentz going due to the glut of OFers. Although I am sure he will become known as Brandon Moss 2.0 in no time.
It literally took Moss several flameouts and a fortuitous stint in the PCL to figure it out. Wanna wait 6 years?
 

86spike

Currently enjoying "Arli$$"
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2002
25,082
Procrasti Nation
mikeford said:
No, but I also haven't seen any rumblings around anyone who I'd term a #2 (or better) starter other than Hamels, who I don't believe RAJ will trade for anything we'd all consider reasonable. There is a reason that Phillies team hasn't been torn down already and its RAJ's overvaluation of his big pieces like Utley, Hamels and Lee.
There has been talk of the Sox looking at guys like Cueto, Latos, Zimmerman, and Porcello.

I highly doubt Cherington sees Wade Miley as a Lester replacement.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
What.... The..... F@ck

Rdlr looked pretty Damn good and I had hopes he was a real arm, Webster is a decent bullpen arm at worst.

Rdlr is the best player in the trade for me. I need to go away and calm down and then try to talk myself into this. But this seems like a classic we fucked up so we are doing this move.

I just don't get the rush to get average starters. We have average starters. Rdlr (with upside) Owens, Kelly, all the kids. We need predictable plus pitchers.
 

GilaMonster

New Member
Nov 30, 2014
63
I don't really like it. 
 
You essentially got a .3 WAR upgrade, but I believe De La Rosa and Webster have higher upside. Wade Miley is Wade Miley. De La Rosa who sits in the upper 90′s an hits 100 with an elite changeup. Allen Webster struggles with command, but has #2 stuff with a nice Sinker,Slider, and Changeup.
At worse they were both very solid late inning relievers and possibly closers….they are also under control for more years. 
 
I don’t hate the trade. I just buy into RDLR and Webster more than most. They traded upside for security. It wouldn’t surprise me in RDLR is as good as Miley next year. I think this trade is simply a matt of preference. I prefer upside to security. Than again: I am not going to be spending $200M of my money.
 

LuckyBen

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 5, 2012
3,396
LondonSox said:
What.... The..... F@ck

Rdlr looked pretty Damn good and I had hopes he was a real arm, Webster is a decent bullpen arm at worst.

Rdlr is the best player in the trade for me. I need to go away and calm down and then try to talk myself into this. But this seems like a classic we fucked up so we are doing this move.

I just don't get the rush to get average starters. We have average starters. Rdlr (with upside) Owens, Kelly, all the kids. We need predictable plus pitchers.
 
Do you really want to watch Webster walk 4 batters to give up a lead in the 8th inning?