The 2023 Trade Deadline: Scenarios

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,986
Maine
Yes, with Duran’s emergence and Rafaela’s impending promotion to the majors, Verdugo is expendable, if not right now, then this winter.
I'm not inclined to argue strongly against trading Verdugo if there's a market and Bloom can get back good value, but there's no way that Rafaela's presence in any way makes Verdugo expendable. If they trade Dugie, they need to be getting an outfielder back or be prepared to sign or trade for one in conjunction with shipping him out.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,825
Yes, with Duran’s emergence and Rafaela’s impending promotion to the majors, Verdugo is expendable, if not right now, then this winter.
I would like to see Verdugo play RF, and Duran play LF/CF and Rafaela CF/SS for the foreseeable future. They can move (Duran/Rafaela/Mayer) to other positions; they'renot fixed to one single position). Verdugo is not expendable. Not yet at least.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
Would have to be a big improvement, because Verdugo's putting up a stellar defensive 2023 in RF (+11 DRS, +16 UZR/150)....he's been slumping recently but still has a 111+ wRC, so that could end up higher if/when he breaks out of it. He's on pace for almost a 4 WAR season. I doubt you're gonna get a better player in return unless it's a pure rental.
That's interesting. He's a 0 (average) by OAA. Wide gap! Not saying either is more right, but I've been under the impression that DRS is better for infield and OAA for outfield. +11 DRS seems quite good though.

This is starting to sound similar to my tirades about wanting to trade Benintendi back in 2018-19. Basically I just don't think it's that hard to find a low-ISO, 105 wRC+ corner outfielder with average to good defense. As a CF? Sure. And I'll certainly grant that Verdugo's average-to-plus defense is more valuable to us in right field than it was in left. But he's put up a 106 wRC+ over his age 25-27 seasons (1645 PAs). That's fine, but it's just kind of a Nick Markakis, David DeJesus, Denard Span-type profile and I don't think it's anything special or worth committing to long-term.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,858
I would like to see Verdugo play RF, and Duran play LF/CF and Rafaela CF/SS for the foreseeable future. They can move (Duran/Rafaela/Mayer) to other positions; they'renot fixed to one single position). Verdugo is not expendable. Not yet at least.
That puts Yoshida at DH with no real other option, unless you give the SS a day off and let Rafaela play there, and Yoshida moves to the OF.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,825
That puts Yoshida at DH with no real other option, unless you give the SS a day off and let Rafaela play there, and Yoshida moves to the OF.
I'm assuming Turner is no longer here when Rafaela is ready (whatever the position). Unless you're worried about Dalbec, and I don;t blame you there, ha!
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,356
Benintendi got 5/$75M and Reynolds got 8/$106M. You want to give Verdugo something like 6/$90? I'm a hard pass on that.
15m a year for a guy who we can reasonably project as a 3-4 win player going forward is perfectly fine unless they think his defense this year is a mirage.
 

Coachster

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2009
9,003
New Hampshire
But, more to your point, if he passed on that I'd absolutely consider dealing him, because you could quite easily (I think) slide Duran over to RF and not lose much value there and have Rafaela up to play CF, and thus "maximize" his defensive value. (Baseball savant gives Mookie a 72nd % arm, at least this season, which is admittedly all I'm looking up and a 66th% for Duran, so I assume his arm would be ok there - but if someone wants to tell me I'm way off, I'd believe them).

I understand why they won't do that now (trade him) but in a purely theoretical sense, if he wasn't open to that kind of deal I'd certainly have no objections. Though I'd try and give him that manner of deal first.
I know we all love Duran these days, and this is just me, but have you seen him actually throw? Trust me, he'll NEVER be able to play right field at Fenway. His arm strength is somewhat like Jacoby Ellsbury's. He'll get it there in a couple bounces.

Back to this thread, I'm against trading Verdugo. He's streaky, and right now he's at the bottom of his cycle, but he'll pull it together. He's done it before. Last year he was .219/.250/.302 for May and .337/.400/.502 for June. This is who he is.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,370
Verdugo’s line this year….274/348/432. Career, he’s at 284/342/431. Nice player to have around when he’s young and cheap, but I don’t think going long term at $15M or so for a corner OF with little speed or power is a great idea. He may be fine, but what’s the upside? We’ve got him through his age 28 year, let someone else pay for the years after that.
 

KillerBs

New Member
Nov 16, 2006
946
Verdugo has been playing a great RF this year and at his career norms offensively is a very valuable player for this team for the next few years. For 2024, Yoshida - Duran - Rafaela - Verdugo - Refsnyder complement each other near perfectly in the OF. Not seeing the RF of the future lurking out there. I agree we are not likely to want Verdugo playing everyday in 4 or 5 years, but equally I see no reason why we would be shopping him, least of all his hitting in the last few weeks.
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,462
That's interesting. He's a 0 (average) by OAA. Wide gap! Not saying either is more right, but I've been under the impression that DRS is better for infield and OAA for outfield. +11 DRS seems quite good though.

This is starting to sound similar to my tirades about wanting to trade Benintendi back in 2018-19. Basically I just don't think it's that hard to find a low-ISO, 105 wRC+ corner outfielder with average to good defense. As a CF? Sure. And I'll certainly grant that Verdugo's average-to-plus defense is more valuable to us in right field than it was in left. But he's put up a 106 wRC+ over his age 25-27 seasons (1645 PAs). That's fine, but it's just kind of a Nick Markakis, David DeJesus, Denard Span-type profile and I don't think it's anything special or worth committing to long-term.
I'm not opposed to trading him, but who would you suggest as a replacement? I don't see any obvious upgrades on the free-agent market - lateral moves, maybe, but different flavors of useful-yet-flawed players - and trading for a replacement might wind up as a net negative depending on the return and cost.
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
8,048
Boston, MA
Verdugo has been playing a great RF this year and at his career norms offensively is a very valuable player for this team for the next few years. For 2024, Yoshida - Duran - Rafaela - Verdugo - Refsnyder complement each other near perfectly in the OF. Not seeing the RF of the future lurking out there. I agree we are not likely to want Verdugo playing everyday in 4 or 5 years, but equally I see no reason why we would be shopping him, least of all his hitting in the last few weeks.
He's a free agent after 2024, so the choice is to be paying him 5 years from now or find a new right fielder in 2025. There's no way I'd trade him now since he's a very difficult to replace part of the outfield defense. But they could look into options in the offseason and bring him back if nothing good is available. Worst case is they offer him the QO and have to deal with figuring out who plays right in 18 months.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,539
That's interesting. He's a 0 (average) by OAA. Wide gap! Not saying either is more right, but I've been under the impression that DRS is better for infield and OAA for outfield. +11 DRS seems quite good though.

This is starting to sound similar to my tirades about wanting to trade Benintendi back in 2018-19. Basically I just don't think it's that hard to find a low-ISO, 105 wRC+ corner outfielder with average to good defense. As a CF? Sure. And I'll certainly grant that Verdugo's average-to-plus defense is more valuable to us in right field than it was in left. But he's put up a 106 wRC+ over his age 25-27 seasons (1645 PAs). That's fine, but it's just kind of a Nick Markakis, David DeJesus, Denard Span-type profile and I don't think it's anything special or worth committing to long-term.
I agree they don’t have to commit long term, but trading him at the deadline would be pretty likely to hurt the 2023 team unless they somehow got an even better player back which seems unlikely unless it’s a 3-way trade. Anyone trading for an above average MLB player in 2023 is probably in contention.

Verdugo might be an interesting trade piece in the offseason though.
 

Niastri

Member
SoSH Member
If Duvall turns back into the guy he was the first two weeks of the year, he, Yoshida and Duran make a very solid outfield, with Hernandez and Refsnyder as the depth.

Could Verdugo get two high minors pitching prospects that don't need to be on the 40 man for a while? I just don't think we should sell Verdugo unless we are selling for real.

I think I like Yoshida, Duran, Verdugo, Refsnyder and whomever we can get for Hernandez and Duvall better than trading Verdugo.

If we're not selling everybody, that is.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,825
Enrique as depth doesn’t work as Cora is infatuated with him and would play him too often. He needs to be traded.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,539
If Duvall turns back into the guy he was the first two weeks of the year, he, Yoshida and Duran make a very solid outfield, with Hernandez and Refsnyder as the depth.

Could Verdugo get two high minors pitching prospects that don't need to be on the 40 man for a while? I just don't think we should sell Verdugo unless we are selling for real.

I think I like Yoshida, Duran, Verdugo, Refsnyder and whomever we can get for Hernandez and Duvall better than trading Verdugo.

If we're not selling everybody, that is.
That’s a pretty iffy defensive outfield replacing Verdugo with Duvall. Of course, if Duvall is going to hit like peak Ted Williams, then we probably wouldn’t care but I doubt he returns to that. It was a ridiculous 8-game hot streak to start the season.

Barring an epic tank job in the next week, the most likely trade with Verdugo would be a 3-way where they get a solid major leaguer back…ala Manny/Jason Bay in 2008. But Verdugo isn’t halfway out of town like Manny was back then so I’d be shocked if he was dealt. Offseason is a different story perhaps.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,759
Oregon
Heyman (usual caveats) says the Pirates are listening on Keller and Bednar, both of whom could make sense for the Red Sox. Bednar, obviously, wouldn't close for Boston, but would really strengthen the pen.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,986
Maine
He's a free agent after 2024, so the choice is to be paying him 5 years from now or find a new right fielder in 2025. There's no way I'd trade him now since he's a very difficult to replace part of the outfield defense. But they could look into options in the offseason and bring him back if nothing good is available. Worst case is they offer him the QO and have to deal with figuring out who plays right in 18 months.
A QO probably won't work to keep him in 2025 (he'll decline and hit the market most likely), but what about a 3 year offer right now? Sign him through 2026 and he's still in line to hit the market entering his age 31 season. And by that point, projections suggest that both Roman Anthony and Miguel Bleis, not to mention some of the MI prospects who could move to the outfield (Romero? Meidroth? Jordan?), could be ready to take his place. Maybe none of those guys pan out, maybe some other prospect emerges, or maybe they find someone available in trade or free agency. That can be a 2026-2027 problem. In the meantime, RF is locked in but not so tightly they can't change tack if opportunity arises.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
I'm not opposed to trading him, but who would you suggest as a replacement? I don't see any obvious upgrades on the free-agent market - lateral moves, maybe, but different flavors of useful-yet-flawed players - and trading for a replacement might wind up as a net negative depending on the return and cost.
Well, we do still have Adam Duvall, who is maybe starting to pick it back up (.910 OPS over his last two weeks).

But just for fun, here's an internet trade that I'd be interested in.

MIL gets: Alex Verdugo, Christian Arroyo, Bryan Mata, Brandon Walter or Chris Murphy
BOS gets: RHSP Jacob Misiorowski, 2B/CF Tyler Black, INF Luis Urias

The playoff-bound Brewers get a RHP-mashing outfielder to do what they thought they'd get from Jesse Winker, Garrett Mitchell, or Blake Perkins. They get a RHB 2B to complement Bryce Turang (who can't hit lefties) and help spell the injured Brian Anderson. They get a young lefty hurler to help out their extremely right-handed pitching staff. Sox get one guy on the back end of the Top 100 (Misiorowski), a prospect with outstanding speed and plate discipline (Black), and a reclamation project in Urias. (If it's too big, maybe you remove Black from that deal and a couple of the Sox prospects.)

STL gets: Shane Drohan, Blaze Jordan, Angel Bastardo
BOS gets: Jack Flaherty, Dylan Carlson

The Cards get one nearly ready pitching prospect and another 2023 riser who'd need 40-man protection this winter. They also get local boy Blaze Jordan, who projects to be ready when Goldschmidt is done. Sox get a rental starting pitcher with excellent makeup who they may want to keep around if it's a good fit, and a former top prospect, switch-hitting, excellent defensive outfielder, who is 24 and under team control through 2027, and who the Cards seem really ready to discard. Carlson has had trouble hitting righties, but he also hits a lot of balls to deep left field for outs.

The Brewers really need an outfielder and the Cards have an extra, but they're disinclined to trade with one another.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,825
Heyman (usual caveats) says the Pirates are listening on Keller and Bednar, both of whom could make sense for the Red Sox. Bednar, obviously, wouldn't close for Boston, but would really strengthen the pen.
Is Bloom deft enough to send out Kenley, Enrique and Duvall (mutiple places obviously) and get Bednar in and then use the salary savings for affordable SP?
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,825
Well, we do still have Adam Duvall, who is maybe starting to pick it back up (.910 OPS over his last two weeks).

But just for fun, here's an internet trade that I'd be interested in.

MIL gets: Alex Verdugo, Christian Arroyo, Bryan Mata, Brandon Walter or Chris Murphy
BOS gets: RHSP Jacob Misiorowski, 2B/CF Tyler Black, INF Luis Urias

The playoff-bound Brewers get a RHP-mashing outfielder to do what they thought they'd get from Jesse Winker, Garrett Mitchell, or Blake Perkins. They get a RHB 2B to complement Bryce Turang (who can't hit lefties) and help spell the injured Brian Anderson. They get a young lefty hurler to help out their extremely right-handed pitching staff. Sox get one guy on the back end of the Top 100 (Misiorowski), a prospect with outstanding speed and plate discipline (Black), and a reclamation project in Urias. (If it's too big, maybe you remove Black from that deal and a couple of the Sox prospects.)

STL gets: Shane Drohan, Blaze Jordan, Angel Bastardo
BOS gets: Jack Flaherty, Dylan Carlson

The Cards get one nearly ready pitching prospect and another 2023 riser who'd need 40-man protection this winter. They also get local boy Blaze Jordan, who projects to be ready when Goldschmidt is done. Sox get a rental starting pitcher with excellent makeup who they may want to keep around if it's a good fit, and a former top prospect, switch-hitting, excellent defensive outfielder, who is 24 and under team control through 2027, and who the Cards seem really ready to discard. Carlson has had trouble hitting righties, but he also hits a lot of balls to deep left field for outs.

The Brewers really need an outfielder and the Cards have an extra, but they're disinclined to trade with one another.
Sign me up for the bottom option. I would love to buy low on Carlson and sell high on Blaze
 

derekson

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2010
6,264
He's a free agent after 2024, so the choice is to be paying him 5 years from now or find a new right fielder in 2025. There's no way I'd trade him now since he's a very difficult to replace part of the outfield defense. But they could look into options in the offseason and bring him back if nothing good is available. Worst case is they offer him the QO and have to deal with figuring out who plays right in 18 months.
I don't really see a good reason to trade him in the offseason. There aren't a lot of great corner OF options on the FA market. And if you keep him through 2024 you can offer him a QO if there's still a need for him in RF and no desire to sign him long term.
 

KillerBs

New Member
Nov 16, 2006
946
I was under the impression we could take on any one of the following group of potential 2023-24 free agent SP targets without having to shed salary to stay under the luxury tax: Lorenzen, Montgomery, Flaherty, Lynn.

Trying to wrap my head around what would be reasonable offer for this sort of clear rental. I am thinking Cards will get legit prospect for Montgomery but the others might be reasonably cheap in terms of the player(s) going back.
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,462
Well, we do still have Adam Duvall, who is maybe starting to pick it back up (.910 OPS over his last two weeks).

But just for fun, here's an internet trade that I'd be interested in.

MIL gets: Alex Verdugo, Christian Arroyo, Bryan Mata, Brandon Walter or Chris Murphy
BOS gets: RHSP Jacob Misiorowski, 2B/CF Tyler Black, INF Luis Urias

The playoff-bound Brewers get a RHP-mashing outfielder to do what they thought they'd get from Jesse Winker, Garrett Mitchell, or Blake Perkins. They get a RHB 2B to complement Bryce Turang (who can't hit lefties) and help spell the injured Brian Anderson. They get a young lefty hurler to help out their extremely right-handed pitching staff. Sox get one guy on the back end of the Top 100 (Misiorowski), a prospect with outstanding speed and plate discipline (Black), and a reclamation project in Urias. (If it's too big, maybe you remove Black from that deal and a couple of the Sox prospects.)

STL gets: Shane Drohan, Blaze Jordan, Angel Bastardo
BOS gets: Jack Flaherty, Dylan Carlson

The Cards get one nearly ready pitching prospect and another 2023 riser who'd need 40-man protection this winter. They also get local boy Blaze Jordan, who projects to be ready when Goldschmidt is done. Sox get a rental starting pitcher with excellent makeup who they may want to keep around if it's a good fit, and a former top prospect, switch-hitting, excellent defensive outfielder, who is 24 and under team control through 2027, and who the Cards seem really ready to discard. Carlson has had trouble hitting righties, but he also hits a lot of balls to deep left field for outs.

The Brewers really need an outfielder and the Cards have an extra, but they're disinclined to trade with one another.
But that STL trade has nothing to do with Verdugo, why not just make that one and be done with it?
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,539
I was under the impression we could take on any one of the following group of potential 2023-24 free agent SP targets without having to shed salary to stay under the luxury tax: Lorenzen, Montgomery, Flaherty, Lynn.

Trying to wrap my head around what would be reasonable offer for this sort of clear rental. I am thinking Cards will get legit prospect for Montgomery but the others might be reasonably cheap in terms of the player(s) going back.
It’ll be interesting to see what Montgomery fetches. He’s def the best pitcher in that group but he’s still a 2 month rental so I don’t think they’re getting anyone elite.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
But that STL trade has nothing to do with Verdugo, why not just make that one and be done with it?
The idea there would be for Carlson to step in as the right fielder. He’s been a solidly plus CF the last few years, and following the rule of thumb that Fenway’s RF is a second CF, he’d fit well.

In this scenario, Carlson would also give us another option against tough lefties, and another guy who can cover CF (which is no longer Verdugo).
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,239
Portland
From just playing around on trade simulator, Houck (4.5 years remaining) and Bleis is close to even for Keller who has two more years after this one and would also give them the QO option. I'd think about it since he's not a rental. I can't imagine how much more they'd have to pay with competition though.
 
Last edited:

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,539
Houck would be pretty attractive to STL as he’s from there.
Houck would have to fetch something super enticing because he’s the exact type of player that Bloom would want when peaking at that 2024-27 window. His stock is also a bit down after the ball to the face but it hopefully shouldn’t mean much longer term.
 

beautokyo

New Member
Jun 5, 2008
278
Tokyo, Japan
I know we all love Duran these days, and this is just me, but have you seen him actually throw? Trust me, he'll NEVER be able to play right field at Fenway. His arm strength is somewhat like Jacoby Ellsbury's. He'll get it there in a couple bounces.

Back to this thread, I'm against trading Verdugo. He's streaky, and right now he's at the bottom of his cycle, but he'll pull it together. He's done it before. Last year he was .219/.250/.302 for May and .337/.400/.502 for June. This is who he is.
Seems like when he's "on" he hustles down to first on every play.....but now......no hustle.....acts like he doesn't care....this is just my perception.
 

KillerBs

New Member
Nov 16, 2006
946
The team needs young, cost controlled pitching….so they are trading Houck to get it? Don’t see how that really helps.
Well if it could fetch Keller back, maybe. Keller seems erratic but his track record puts him a clear notch or two ahead of Tanner who I like alot. He is proven he can take the ball every fifth day and there is a decent chance he becomes a legit number 2. He is not a FA until 2026. Maybe Tanner and Yorke? But surely not dealing Bleis or Rafaela for Keller.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,184
15m a year for a guy who we can reasonably project as a 3-4 win player going forward is perfectly fine unless they think his defense this year is a mirage.
Dugo has been good this year, but has he... ever been a 3-4 win player? He's got 2.1 right now, according to fangraphs. 2.8, according to bref. If he continues to play as well as he has, he will break 3, but if he gets worse... watch out below. Last time bref had him at 3 wins was 2019. Last time fangraphs had him as worth 3 wins was, uh, never. 4 wins - also never. He was on-pace in the shortened season of 2020, but that season was shortened, and he has not been that good in a full season since.

We do have to at least acknowledge that peak offensive Verdugo might be what we saw in the first half, and that this slide might continue. For his career he's had a .673 OPS against left-handed pitching, so at the very best he's a player who ideally was platooned.

That’s a pretty iffy defensive outfield replacing Verdugo with Duvall. Of course, if Duvall is going to hit like peak Ted Williams, then we probably wouldn’t care but I doubt he returns to that. It was a ridiculous 8-game hot streak to start the season.

Barring an epic tank job in the next week, the most likely trade with Verdugo would be a 3-way where they get a solid major leaguer back…ala Manny/Jason Bay in 2008. But Verdugo isn’t halfway out of town like Manny was back then so I’d be shocked if he was dealt. Offseason is a different story perhaps.
This is also all true, but mostly because the OF defense is already iffy. Duvall would be fine in right-field and has played all three outfield positions in his career. He's also such and up-and-down player that I can't read if this is one of his above-average years or if he's going to crash in the second-half.

The one thing I definitely know is he barely has a platoon split, and Duran and Verdugo both do (with the caveat that Duran has been fine against LHP in extremely SSS). I'm not saying "trade Verdugo not Duvall", but when you think about how the former would get you better return that the latter, by virtue of the years of control you have at a young age. If they're looking to let Rafaela loose on the outfield and can get quality starting pitching back for Verdugo + prospects, then... I think they should at least consider it.

But probably they can't, and the risk that Duvall crashes and burns the rest of the season is too high for me to pull the trigger on something like that.

The team needs young, cost controlled pitching….so they are trading Houck to get it? Don’t see how that really helps.
Yeah, doesn't make sense. Return on Houck isn't going to be young cost-controlled starting pitching that we want anyways, because Houck has yet to throw 100 innings in a major-league season, which... well, if he had, then we wouldn't be looking for young cost-controlled starting pitching.
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,356
Dugo has been good this year, but has he... ever been a 3-4 win player? He's got 2.1 right now, according to fangraphs. 2.8, according to bref. If he continues to play as well as he has, he will break 3, but if he gets worse... watch out below. Last time bref had him at 3 wins was 2019. Last time fangraphs had him as worth 3 wins was, uh, never. 4 wins - also never. He was on-pace in the shortened season of 2020, but that season was shortened, and he has not been that good in a full season since.

We do have to at least acknowledge that peak offensive Verdugo might be what we saw in the first half, and that this slide might continue. For his career he's had a .673 OPS against left-handed pitching, so at the very best he's a player who ideally was platooned.
His offense this year is in line with his career norms, so it seems fair to except that his true talent is somewhere around the 108 he's putting up this year. When you combine that offense with his current defense that's a 3-4 win player. Hence, if they think this is his new true talent defense then he's likely to be a 3-4 win player for awhile. And yes, in 2019 and 2020 he was a 3-4 win player, really more like 4-5 (159 games, 4 fwar 5.1 bwar), then his war tanked in 21 and 22 largely because his defense was much worse.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,528
His offense this year is in line with his career norms, so it seems fair to except that his true talent is somewhere around the 108 he's putting up this year. When you combine that offense with his current defense that's a 3-4 win player. Hence, if they think this is his new true talent defense then he's likely to be a 3-4 win player for awhile. And yes, in 2019 and 2020 he was a 3-4 win player, really more like 4-5 (159 games, 4 fwar 5.1 bwar), then his war tanked in 21 and 22 largely because his defense was much worse.
He was injured most of ‘22 AND playing mostly in LF which I thought for some reason penalizes you.
I think he’s worth the Benintendi contract. He does bring extra stuff to the table and even with an occasional platoon (RFsnyder) he’s still a good value.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Verdugo is 100% worth the Benintendi deal, which is why I'm not sure he signs it. But 15 million a year for what he provides is very good value, he just hasn't made the leap into stardom that some were projecting based on how he started the season which might be negatively coloring the assessment of him as a player.
 

Mantush

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2014
445
Chad Jennings reports that Bloom said in a radio interview yesterday that he's looking for a lefty-hitting middle infielder

https://theathletic.com/live-blogs/mlb-trade-deadline-2023/Cxs2TSZ0o4pd/PVRxJtndLA8m/

That's quite specific, and suggests that maybe they don't view Valdez as a 2B anymore.

Anyway, there are 44 of those with more than 50 MLB PAs this year (and aren't Valdez). Those on non-contending teams include Nolan Gorman, Nick Maton, Nicky Lopez, Luis Guillorme, CJ Abrams, Zack McKinstry, Ji Hwan Bae, Luis Garcia, Michael Massey, Tony Kemp, Tommy Edman, Brendan Donovan, Luis Rengifo, Harold Castro, Tucupita Marcano, Ryan McMahon, Rodolfo Castro and Kolten Wong. But if we're excluding guys who can't handle the position, that group is considerably smaller.

I think one of the Tigers, Zack McKinstry or Nick Maton, would be solid fits here. Each seems like they can play an adequate 2B and is under control through 2027, and Detroit probably only has room for one with Justyn Henry-Malloy nearing promotion, Colt Keith ready soon, and Andy Ibañez having a sort of interesting year.

Each has interesting merits. Both seem to have great plate discipline, solid walk rates. McKinstry's a better contact hitter, athlete and defender. Maton has a terrible .164/.288/.292 line but with a .193 BABIP, and he's actually improved on his BB and K rates over last year, when he put up a 135 wRC+.

FWIW, BTV has McKinstry at $13.5M in surplus value, worth roughly Rafaela, and Maton at 0.6 BTV, worth roughly Chih-Jung Liu. That seems quite off on McKinstry, who the Tigers acquired last winter for a guy who ranks #51 in the Cubs system.
Nicky Lopez is a name I like here. He's an astoundingly bad hitter but he's an excellent infielder. He's perfect as a late inning defensive substitute and would solve a lot of the infield defense problems if he's in the lineup regularly. Bloom likes trading with the Royals, and the Royals could help us address needs on multiple fronts and we have the prospect depth to make it work.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,184
His offense this year is in line with his career norms, so it seems fair to except that his true talent is somewhere around the 108 he's putting up this year. When you combine that offense with his current defense that's a 3-4 win player. Hence, if they think this is his new true talent defense then he's likely to be a 3-4 win player for awhile. And yes, in 2019 and 2020 he was a 3-4 win player, really more like 4-5 (159 games, 4 fwar 5.1 bwar), then his war tanked in 21 and 22 largely because his defense was much worse.
Fair enough! I'm not advocating for trading him, but I just think it's premature to assume he's definitely going to be a 3-4 win player going forward. Defensively I think he was also probably getting punished for playing a lot of LF in Fenway last year, which defensive metrics tend to punish.

But also, calling the 2019-2020 3-4 win "seasons" when they were not full seasons at all for him seems generous. He only play 105 games in 2019 and 53 in 2020. In 55 games anybody can look good - JBJ had a 118 wrc+ in 55 games that year and look where he is now.

I'm in no rush to get rid of him, of course. He's affordable, he's been very good defensively this year, he hits LHP really well, and the Sox have several ready-made platoon players in the minors/bigs to work with him. I think the chances that he is a 3-4 win player are pretty good, actually. I just think that 3-4 win player is prone to swoons, can't hit left-handed pitching, and has had seasons where he was not in great shape, and so the 3-4 wins is not something I'd feel comfortable forecasting with any certainty.

BTW, where are you getting your WAR numbers? Neither baseball reference nor fangraphs have ever registered a season of more than 3 WAR for him. If you want to extrapolate from 2/3rds of a season and call that a 3-4 win season, I have to quibble, because you cannot assume he would have been worth more for the rest of the season - in fact, he could have played below replacement level the rest of the way and dropped his WAR.

I'm not really convinced people with that mentality actually watch the games.
They certainly don't post much when the team is playing well.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,184
Nicky Lopez is a name I like here. He's an astoundingly bad hitter but he's an excellent infielder. He's perfect as a late inning defensive substitute and would solve a lot of the infield defense problems if he's in the lineup regularly. Bloom likes trading with the Royals, and the Royals could help us address needs on multiple fronts and we have the prospect depth to make it work.
Haven't had a chance to watch him... Do you think the difference between he and Chang/Reyes is enough to justify trading for him?

I continue, by the way, to be devastated by the fact that Enmanuel Valdez didn't look competent at 2B in the bigs. The numbers he's putting up at Worcester are awfully good (282/388/602). He's only had 1 error down there in 200 innings or so, whereas he had six in about the same amount of time in the bigs. He'll never light the world on fire as a 2B defensively, but his bat could make the lineup awfully long. The holes right now - at SS, 2B, and C - could be solved by a combination of Story, a Valdez/Arroyo platoon, etc., but I wouldn't want that unless I was convinced the guy could field his position. He's injured right now, regardless.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,121
I'd like to chime in on 40 man issues.

That issue is not a Red Sox specific issue. Every organization is having 40 man issues due to expanded MLB rosters. They really need to expand the 40 to 42+. Anyway, it's one of the reasons that you need to be more aggressive in moving prospects you don't believe in before they hit the 40 man protection timeline.

Prospects that cannot immediately help the MLB roster, have some red flags, and require 40 man protection have almost no value in trades, even if there is some upside.

This is a very interesting trade deadline because the Red Sox are a good, not great team. From a position player standpoint they seem to be in a really strong position moving forward with very little needing to happen for the 2024 season. The bullpen is in a similar position. What they need is starting pitching, however, so does every other contender. So I don't see how you leverage the sale of a Paxton for major league ready starting pitching.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,986
Maine
Haven't had a chance to watch him... Do you think the difference between he and Chang/Reyes is enough to justify trading for him?
I had the same question.

I'd also add that doesn't the infield defense problem boil down to Kike? Chang is fine at SS or 2B. Same with Reyes. Arroyo is more than competent at 2B. And Story is returning imminently. I don't think defense up the middle is something that is a high priority at the deadline. If someone wants to throw out a name that would upgrade both offense and defense at 2B, I'm all ears but I really see no need for another no-hit, all-glove middle infielder at this point.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,754
Miami (oh, Miami!)
I had the same question.

I'd also add that doesn't the infield defense problem boil down to Kike? Chang is fine at SS or 2B. Same with Reyes. Arroyo is more than competent at 2B. And Story is returning imminently. I don't think defense up the middle is something that is a high priority at the deadline. If someone wants to throw out a name that would upgrade both offense and defense at 2B, I'm all ears but I really see no need for another no-hit, all-glove middle infielder at this point.
Agreed.

Plus, looking ahead, we have Rafaela (CF/SS) next year perhaps. Valdez is a potentially +bat and certainly a -defender. He'd be available now if he improved his defense, and perhaps he does so in 2024 - weirder things have happened. Then, in late 2024, we're looking at Yorke and Meyer potentially being ready.

And that's all really for one and a half positions since the plan is Story will be there as a SS or 2B. So we need his partner and a backup.

In terms of this year, we're most likely looking at any theoretical huge upgrade at 2B as a pure rental, as opposed to a huge upgrade at 2B as an ongoing concern. I mean, an ongoing 2B could happen in theory, rendering some of our prospects as trade-bait for other needs, but I'm not sure one's on the market, or that the prospect cost would be worth it. Since we're not quite yet in GFIN mode.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
Verdugo is 100% worth the Benintendi deal, which is why I'm not sure he signs it. But 15 million a year for what he provides is very good value, he just hasn't made the leap into stardom that some were projecting based on how he started the season which might be negatively coloring the assessment of him as a player.
To believe Verdugo is worth the Benintendi deal (and then some), you'd at least have to think that Benintendi is worth the Benintendi deal. I don't, of course. I get the sense that few around the league do. (BTV has him at around -$10M underwater.) He's been worth 1.0 fWAR this year, and he's somebody (given the White Sox reversal of fortunes) the team would already seem to regret signing.

Anyway, if you isolate their two age 26 and 27 seasons (not birthday to birthday, but the seasons themselves as of 7/1), the two characters are very comparable:

AB: 1059 PA, .289/.348/.421, 8.3 BB% | 16.4 K%, 40.9 GB%, 89.4 EV, 10.5 SoftContact%, .132 ISO, .335 wOBA, 113 wRC+ | -4 fielding run value in '21-22 per OAA
AV: 1041 PA, .278/.335/.415, 7.4 BB% | 13.5 K%, 45.9 GB%, 89.1 EV, 15.5 SoftContact%, .137 ISO, .327 wOBA, 106 wRC+ | -6 fielding run value in '22-23 per OAA (likely punished by Fenway's LF; he was -6 in '22 and 0 this year)

Verdugo still has a couple months to go of his age-27 season, but right now he looks like a slightly less valuable asset than Benintendi at the plate, with potentially more value in the field. Verdugo has a better arm, Benny is a better baserunner.

Also!
vs. LHP, age 26-27:
AB: .287/.343/.394 | .323 wOBA
AV: .251/.331/.338 | .301 wOBA

Not predicting he'll be traded this week. But count me as someone who would be pretty bummed if Bloom extended Verdugo at 6/$90 or something.
 
Last edited:

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,184
Agreed.

Plus, looking ahead, we have Rafaela (CF/SS) next year perhaps. Valdez is a potentially +bat and certainly a -defender. He'd be available now if he improved his defense, and perhaps he does so in 2024 - weirder things have happened. Then, in late 2024, we're looking at Yorke and Meyer potentially being ready.

And that's all really for one and a half positions since the plan is Story will be there as a SS or 2B. So we need his partner and a backup.

In terms of this year, we're most likely looking at any theoretical huge upgrade at 2B as a pure rental, as opposed to a huge upgrade at 2B as an ongoing concern. I mean, an ongoing 2B could happen in theory, rendering some of our prospects as trade-bait for other needs, but I'm not sure one's on the market, or that the prospect cost would be worth it. Since we're not quite yet in GFIN mode.
Rafaela and Valdez are probably the primo options right now. Rafaela for his defense, Valdez for his bat. As I noted upthread, the glut of errors Valdez made at 2B when he was promoted might have been jitters - he hasn't made that many at AAA. I'm not saying Valdez is a crazy good second baseman secretly, but maybe not as bad as he was when hecame up.

I think Yorke and Mayer both need more seasoning and 2024 might be ambitious. Yorke's young so there's still lots of improvement potential, but I'm really not willing to bet on him being a big-league second baseman until I see that K rate come down. 25% between A+ and AA the last couple of years will not fare well in the bigs, and since a hot start he's really faded in Portland (as has Meidroth. Both are around 120 wrc+, which is fine! But maybe indicates they need a full season at AA and then another at AAA before we rush them up). Mayer's a great prospect but he hasn't lit the world on fire this year - Meidroth's bat has outshone him so far, to be quite honest. Now Meidroth can't play SS, so the point is purely comparative, but you see what I'm getting at.

I think for now they're going to stick with Reyes and Chang at 2B for flexibility reasons, but I think the trade deadline might clear up some of this logjam I suspect they move on from Reyes and Kike, but we'll see. Interested see what the Sox can get for unjamming their logs.

Hmm, that sounds a little dirty. Sorry.
 

walt in maryland

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
223
Woodbine, MD
Chad Jennings reports that Bloom said in a radio interview yesterday that he's looking for a lefty-hitting middle infielder

https://theathletic.com/live-blogs/mlb-trade-deadline-2023/Cxs2TSZ0o4pd/PVRxJtndLA8m/

That's quite specific, and suggests that maybe they don't view Valdez as a 2B anymore.

Anyway, there are 44 of those with more than 50 MLB PAs this year (and aren't Valdez). Those on non-contending teams include Nolan Gorman, Nick Maton, Nicky Lopez, Luis Guillorme, CJ Abrams, Zack McKinstry, Ji Hwan Bae, Luis Garcia, Michael Massey, Tony Kemp, Tommy Edman, Brendan Donovan, Luis Rengifo, Harold Castro, Tucupita Marcano, Ryan McMahon, Rodolfo Castro and Kolten Wong. But if we're excluding guys who can't handle the position, that group is considerably smaller.

I think one of the Tigers, Zack McKinstry or Nick Maton, would be solid fits here. Each seems like they can play an adequate 2B and is under control through 2027, and Detroit probably only has room for one with Justyn Henry-Malloy nearing promotion, Colt Keith ready soon, and Andy Ibañez having a sort of interesting year.

Each has interesting merits. Both seem to have great plate discipline, solid walk rates. McKinstry's a better contact hitter, athlete and defender. Maton has a terrible .164/.288/.292 line but with a .193 BABIP, and he's actually improved on his BB and K rates over last year, when he put up a 135 wRC+.

FWIW, BTV has McKinstry at $13.5M in surplus value, worth roughly Rafaela, and Maton at 0.6 BTV, worth roughly Chih-Jung Liu. That seems quite off on McKinstry, who the Tigers acquired last winter for a guy who ranks #51 in the Cubs system.
I would love to see them get Edman, but he's currently on the IL rehabbing a wrist injury
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,462
I think Yorke and Mayer both need more seasoning and 2024 might be ambitious. Yorke's young so there's still lots of improvement potential, but I'm really not willing to bet on him being a big-league second baseman until I see that K rate come down. 25% between A+ and AA the last couple of years will not fare well in the bigs, and since a hot start he's really faded in Portland (as has Meidroth. Both are around 120 wrc+, which is fine! But maybe indicates they need a full season at AA and then another at AAA before we rush them up).
I've done the full 360 (I am using that phrase correctly!) on Yorke, at the beginning of the season I thought he was trade bait, then I wanted to keep him around, then fast track him, then back to keeping him in Portland and seeing what happens, and now I think they should trade him, let some other team deal with his K problems.
 

walt in maryland

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
223
Woodbine, MD
To believe Verdugo is worth the Benintendi deal (and then some), you'd at least have to think that Benintendi is worth the Benintendi deal. I don't, of course. I get the sense that few around the league do. (BTV has him at around -$10M underwater.) He's been worth 1.0 fWAR this year, and he's somebody (given the White Sox reversal of fortunes) the team would already seem to regret signing.

Anyway, if you isolate their two age 26 and 27 seasons (not birthday to birthday, but the seasons themselves as of 7/1), the two characters are very comparable:

AB: 1059 PA, .289/.348/.421, 8.3 BB% | 16.4 K%, 40.9 GB%, 89.4 EV, 10.5 SoftContact%, .132 ISO, .335 wOBA, 113 wRC+ | -4 fielding run value in '21-22 per OAA
AV: 1041 PA, .278/.335/.415, 7.4 BB% | 13.5 K%, 45.9 GB%, 89.1 EV, 15.5 SoftContact%, .137 ISO, .327 wOBA, 106 wRC+ | -6 fielding run value in '22-23 per OAA (likely punished by Fenway's LF; he was -6 in '22 and 0 this year)

Verdugo still has a couple months to go of his age-27 season, but right now he looks like a slightly less valuable asset than Benintendi at the plate, with potentially more value in the field. Verdugo has a better arm, Benny is a better baserunner.

Also!
vs. LHP, age 26-27:
AB: .287/.343/.394 | .323 wOBA
AV: .251/.331/.338 | .301 wOBA

Not predicting he'll be traded this week. But count me as someone who would be pretty bummed if Bloom extended Verdugo at 6/$90 or something.
There's a good argument to be made that trading Verdugo at the deadline makes more sense than trading Duvall. I'm a Verdugo fan, but let's be real about what he is: a nice 3-4 win corner OF who hits for average and plays great defense. Doesn't hit the ball particularly hard, and hits a lot of grounders. Not going to hit many homers or steal many bases. High floor, low ceiling. But he's still young and cheap, and has two years of control left.

Using the Benintendi situation as a comp (and to a lesser extent the Renfroe situation), I expect the Sox to trade Verdugo before he gets to free agency. He's reaching the point where he'll be able to command more $$$ than the Sox probably want to pay him.

Plus, with Yoshida and Duran securing the other OF spots, it's kind of an awkward mix. One too many lefties, and no one who can hit 25-30 HR. For the rest of this year, Duvall probably gives them more of what they need than Verdugo. They also have Refsnyder, and potentially Abreu or Rafaela.

Does anyone feel more ready to consider trading Verdugo yet? Since May 10th, a span of 239 PAs, he's put up a .700 OPS / 90 wRC+ and a .132 ISO (two home runs).

There's not a surplus of right fielders out there, but that could be a position we may look to improve.