I'm not sure the price (there seems to be some varying accounts, but call it somewhere between £25-30m) is that low given that he only has one year left on his contract. To take two other midfielders in that situation recently, Liverpool paid £25m for Thiago and Arsenal are being linked to Tielemans with a reported price around £25-30m as well. Unless there is a real bidding war between clubs, you just don't have a lot of leverage as the seller in that spot.At that price, I assume the sexual assault investigation are making him too big of a character risk for some teams. He's also been banned twice from driving due to multiple speed offenses. If he's innocent on the assault charges, this is a steal of a price.
So that explains that. ThanksHe only has one year left on his contract and is still under investigation for sexual assault, which assumedly has limited his market.
Really good player, albeit very similar profile to the players Spurs already have at CM.
if Brighton only sold before last seasoonThat fee - £25m - seems absurd. One would have thought Brighton could have got twice that amount.
Outstanding signing
Well , the transfer fee inflation (thank you Neymar) was bound to wear off post COVID.I may be way off with this, but it seems like world football was pretty bad at the spending money on player thing, only really figuring it out in the last 5 years or so. Teams were so silly splashing huge transfer fees when a more sustainable approach would've been avoiding transfer fees like the plague and paying players more wages. Of course young elite players at medium-sized clubs will usually earn their clubs big transfer fees, but I think 9-figure transfer fees are mostly a relic of the past.
I think its the players and agents that have figured things out, running down deals more frequently and increasing their share of the pie.I may be way off with this, but it seems like world football was pretty bad at the spending money on player thing, only really figuring it out in the last 5 years or so. Teams were so silly splashing huge transfer fees when a more sustainable approach would've been avoiding transfer fees like the plague and paying players more wages. Of course young elite players at medium-sized clubs will usually earn their clubs big transfer fees, but I think 9-figure transfer fees are mostly a relic of the past.
Oh for sure. For fun, what clubs do you think had the highest balance of transfer fees (i.e., income - expenditures) from 2016-2017 - 2022-2023?Well , the transfer fee inflation (thank you Neymar) was bound to wear off post COVID.
Clubs that sold players for exorbitant prices - Grealish , Coutinho ,Abraham for example - are the real winners here
Absolutely, and this is something I was trying to allude to in my previous comment but instead I awkwardly focused on the clubs. Players now understand the importance and value of "free agency" and the length of their deals.I think its the players and agents that have figured things out, running down deals more frequently and increasing their share of the pie.
I agree he could do well in that role and Spurs could use him, but he wants to play every minutand it’s too much money for Spurs.
Can't be. That's not even a profit over what Everton paid Watford.This number can't be right. But I mean, if you pay that and sell Bergwijn for about 2/3rds of that...that's not bad.
Update here, easing a little of the pressure:then we come back and go right into the festive season fixtures, t
They are both very, very young - as was Harvey Elliot a couple of years ago - with no experience in a senior European league.I see Liverpool has secured the transfer of Calvin Ramsay from Aberdeen for £4.5M. There are some add-ons, and apparently a 20% sell on clause. They also landed Fabio Carvalho from Fulham for a mere £5M. Is it me, or do those fees seem low compared to others in this current market?
No idea about Ramsay but Carvalho was out of contract this summer. When an English club signs a player on a "free" under a certain age who has been developed by another English club, the signing club actually has to pay a small fee determined by a tribunal. But clubs also have the option of just negotiating the fee between themselves and I think that's what Liverpool and Fulham did. He definitely would have cost significantly more if his Fulham contract was not up this summer.I see Liverpool has secured the transfer of Calvin Ramsay from Aberdeen for £4.5M. There are some add-ons, and apparently a 20% sell on clause. They also landed Fabio Carvalho from Fulham for a mere £5M. Is it me, or do those fees seem low compared to others in this current market?
This is definitely a transfer partially now, but also looking at the future as he just turned 22 about two weeks ago. I think rotating with Odegaard and Saka and hopefully developing into a more full time player over the next couple years as Saka did.Porto officially confirmed the transfer of Fabio Vieira to Arsenal for 35m euro plus 5m in bonuses.
Transfer came totally out of the blue and put every Arsenal journalist/insider in the mud. He was literally never mentioned before yesterday by anybody.
I'd never even heard of him before yesterday but he looks like a fun player based on youtube. My guess is that he rotates with Odegaard and Saka but in some matches he might play alongside Odegaard as the two 8s in a 4-3-3. That might be a bit lightweight but would have creativity and ball playing ability up the wazoo.
His teammate Vitinha looks really good too, a couple different PL clubs have been linked.
and - this was actually negotiated in the January window but they couldn’t get the paperwork done in timeNo idea about Ramsay but Carvalho was out of contract this summer. When an English club signs a player on a "free" under a certain age who has been developed by another English club, the signing club actually has to pay a small fee determined by a tribunal. But clubs also have the option of just negotiating the fee between themselves and I think that's what Liverpool and Fulham did. He definitely would have cost significantly more if his Fulham contract was not up this summer.
Yup, I agree with that. He hasn't played that much first team football so easing him in as a rotational player this year makes the most sense. He seems like an exciting addition though, just from his highlights videos at least. Very quick feet and the kind of left foot that invariably gets described as a "wand" by football commentators.This is definitely a transfer partially now, but also looking at the future as he just turned 22 about two weeks ago. I think rotating with Odegaard and Saka and hopefully developing into a more full time player over the next couple years as Saka did.
Rumor is that ManU are in Amsterdam now working on a £40m deal for Antony - which I’m not so sure makes sense for ManU, but seems a juicy news item because their manager is ETH.
Aren't the clean sheet numbers are pretty much the same?The clean sheets is the vital metric here
I agree with this overall.npxg+xa/90 the last two years
Raphinha: .46, .54
Richarlison: .37, .44
This despite the fact that Richarlison is really more of a true wide forward than an attacking midfielder/winger. Raphinha's passing/ball progression numbers are much better.
My guess is that if you look at wingers/attacking midfielders in a top 5 league who are 1) 25 or younger, 2) averaged .5 npxg+xa/90 over the last two seasons while 3) playing >4000 minutes, there aren't that many. That makes for a valuable player, although not superstar level. I think the price is on the high side; it would make more sense if Raphinha was 21 rather than 25. But the interest makes sense.
Well they mostly didn’t have Phillips who really struggled with injury. Agree with the sentiment though I don’t know who they’re attracting to Leeds under a new manager who barely survived the drop. It’s a really precariously position hopefully they have some targets in mind and these aren’t just early parachute paymentsSo, how does Leeds expect to replace Phillips and Raphinha? They were in the relegation battle with them, and can only get worse unless they are truly able to upgrade
Tyler Adams? RB are moving away from the old RB system so Adams isn’t as useful to them.So, how does Leeds expect to replace Phillips and Raphinha? They were in the relegation battle with them, and can only get worse unless they are truly able to upgrade