The Game ball Thread: Week 7 vs. Jets

Dollar

Member
SoSH Member
May 5, 2006
11,183
It starts with Amendola, then Vereen, and I'd put Hightower up there too.  Overall, just a solid team effort to come away on top, but there are a lot of things that need to be addressed going forward.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,609
Somewhere
Tom Brady; got the job done, looking good doing it.
Shane Vereen; double threat. Impressive showing against an excellent, amped up run defense.
Danny Amendola; a fine performance as kick returner and his touchdown was huge.
 
frowny face for 1) run defense and 2) special teams until the field goal block.
 

Mugsy's Jock

Eli apologist
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2000
15,128
UWS, NYC
I'll give myself a game ball for listening to the game on a shitty radio stream from 2-530am in Europe.

But to add a name, seems like Ryan Allen had a couple of really clutch punts downed inside the 20. The 10? And sounded like Don Jones was a plus on special teams too, though I'm kind of guessing.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,883
Amendola- His best game as a Patriot by far. He looked really good returning kicks and working special teams, and he ran a nasty route to haul in the gw score.
Brady- Every time he was given good protection, he stepped up with a clean and accurate throw. Great job throwing on the run to Amendola and if it wasn't for a couple costly drops, this game wouldn't have been as close.
Hightower- Actively riled up the defense in the second half and got their shit together. He needs to step up as a leader without Mayo, and tonight was a good sign.
The Joneses- Chandler is blossoming into an elite playmaker (his play on the Vick option was tremendous) Chris Jones added some good pressure from the interior and obviously got the blocked fg, and even that special teamer made two really solid tackles covering punts.
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,718
NOVA
Kliq said:
Amendola- His best game as a Patriot by far. He looked really good returning kicks and working special teams, and he ran a nasty route to haul in the gw score.
Brady- Every time he was given good protection, he stepped up with a clean and accurate throw. Great job throwing on the run to Amendola and if it wasn't for a couple costly drops, this game wouldn't have been as close.
Hightower- Actively riled up the defense in the second half and got their shit together. He needs to step up as a leader without Mayo, and tonight was a good sign.
The Joneses- Chandler is blossoming into an elite playmaker (his play on the Vick option was tremendous) Chris Jones added some good pressure from the interior and obviously got the blocked fg, and even that special teamer made two really solid tackles covering punts.
 
IDK. He almost single-handedly won game one last year vs. the Bills.
 

nothumb

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 27, 2006
7,065
yammer's favorite poster
Everybody on our team named Jones did something awesome. Any FAs named Jones we can target for the Meadowlands game?

Amendola was awesome. Huge game for him.
 
Jamie Collins did not seem that great tonight. Was never totally out of position but I kept watching replays and thinking "Mayo stops that play 3 yards short of where it actually ended." Maybe wishful thinking, I dunno. The whole front 7 really got beat up, but it's hard not to think TOP played a huge role by the second half.
 
Chung was fairly pukey as usual.
 

bigsid05

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
2,327
Amendola. The catch. The kick returns. At least he seems to have found a role of some kind.

Vereen. Great receiver and while not the runner that Ridley, still solid.

Tom. SO good since KC. Good numbers that still don't do justice to how good he has been.
 

Dollar

Member
SoSH Member
May 5, 2006
11,183
nothumb said:
Everybody on our team named Jones did something awesome. Any FAs named Jones we can target for the Meadowlands game?
 
 
Tebucky might be a little too old to produce at this point, but watch for his son to land on BB's draft radar as a junior WR out of Fordham.  
 
How great would it be to see Tom Brady throw TD passes to Tebucky Jones Jr. in 2015?
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,718
NOVA
Dollar said:
 
Tebucky might be a little too old to produce at this point, but watch for his son to land on BB's draft radar as a junior WR out of Fordham.  
 
How great would it be to see Tom Brady throw TD passes to Tebucky Jones in 2015?
 
Thanks. Now I feel old.
 

simplyeric

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 14, 2006
14,037
Richmond, VA
Edelman had a few big drops. Not to suggest that suddenly he'd become 'non grata' (especially considering a key late catch), but does this give a little breathing room for Amendola to integrate better with Tom on offense?
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,726
Well, Tebucky started reproducing young, if memory serves, so don't feel too old.
 
A tough game to hand out game balls -- every part of the Pats had its ups and downs, so for me this is based more on emotion than anything:
 
1: Amendola -- great catch, just 1 catch, but key...and so good to see that and his other contributions.
2: Brady -- not his greatest game, but damn good and just so good to see him in fine form. That record is amazing.
3: Vereen -- again, his limitations as a runner were apparent, but boy did he lay out for that overthrown ball from Brady. Both his and Amendola's TD catches were amazing.
 
The OL was generally good, I thought, though Marcus Cannon was terrible -- was he just in on a rotation or did Solder get nicked?
I thought Casey Walker was a relatively bright light on the DL. Wilfork seemed to have his lunch handed to him, though, which is a shame since he seemed to be returning to form. Oh, and as others have mentioned, Hightower was real good.
 
Even though could also criticize virtually every aspect of the Pats' game, too, a lot of it was on the refs. Not just really bad calls, but there was a cumulative effect. The Pats defense really wore down, but if the refs didn't extend seemingly every drive, TOP would have been much more even and the defense less tired. Of course, if there weren't so many near misses offensively, they would have extended their own drives. Still, I don't recall seeing so many bad calls. Giocomanni (sp?) seemed to be holding everytime I saw him on a replay, but never a call. Much less all the phantom calls on the Pats, and the missed review on that juggling catch at the end of the game.
 
Really a terrific victory. Great mental toughness.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Brady was really good tonight I thought. He missed a couple of throws, but thought he did a great job in the pocket and hit most throws that were there.

Amendola

The OL pass protection. Not sure they can run block but they keep Brady upright now.

Josh McDaniels until whatever the fuck the final drive was. Thought the offensive game plan was real good, throwing the ball was the way to go against this defense with this team and they were still able to keep the Jets pretty off balance

Chris Jones

Was truly a terrible effort on defense, but they are a mediocre run defense to start with and lost Mayo on a short week so they get a little slack. Hopefully there's another Siliga lying around to help turn it around. Think this is going to be more a middle of the pack defense than a very good one, better against the pass than in prior years but not enough pas rush to be very good. Browner has basically been officiated out of the league, which is unfortunate.

Refs sucked but weren't as much of a factor as giving up like six yards a run against a team with no passing game,.

Did Tyms see a snap tonight?
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Gonna vent here for two minutes about something: I hate how fucking conservative BB has become with in game decisions. Kicking on all the 4th and shorts (the FG tonight was more defensible than some other recent kicks as the team clearly had no confidence in running at the Jets, but going for it still clearly plus EV) running three times tonight when the first down seals the game. It bit them in the ass in the Carolina and Miami losses last year and it's going to get them this year at some point. BB never goes for it on that 4th and 2 against the Colts now and I fucking hate it.

On the other hand, he didn't go five wide on a 2 point conversion with Geno Smith while running at will sooooo.....yeah could be worse.

Also should credit the TO before the half, which many teams don't do.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Stitch01 said:
Gonna vent here for two minutes about something: I hate how fucking conservative BB has become with in game decisions. Kicking on all the 4th and shorts (the FG tonight was more defensible than some other recent kicks as the team clearly had no confidence in running at the Jets, but going for it still clearly plus EV) running three times tonight when the first down seals the game. It bit them in the ass in the Carolina and Miami losses last year and it's going to get them this year at some point. BB never goes for it on that 4th and 2 against the Colts now and I fucking hate it.

On the other hand, he didn't go five wide on a 2 point conversion with Geno Smith while running at will sooooo.....yeah could be worse.
Really tough to second guess this tonight. The 3 points was the margin of victory, and if the Jets had 30 more seconds they very likely would have won.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
I'm not basing it on the results of a single dice roll, it's been a pattern over years. They had a better chance of converting a first down than punting and holding. Running on first down is OK because completing a first down pass on first down doesn't completely end the game since the Jets had a time out and helps I'd you fail and running on third down after the second down atrocity was fine, but not throwing on second down was really, really bad and burnt win equity. They played all game like they couldn't run against the Jets defense then gave up and put the game in the hands of a defense that struggled to get stops all night. Its different if they could have run the clock down to 30 seconds or something, but 1:10 is an eternity when a FG beats you. The Jets ran two pretty terrible plays to start the drive and still made it to FG range.

I'm sure the advanced stats will show the FG was bad too, and they're probably better off going for it, but given they didn't even attempt to run the ball on this front seven it's fairly marginal so whatever. They kick so often on fourth and short though, it's been a disappointing regression.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,434
Philadelphia
I think they were hoping to catch the Jets off guard a bit by running outside on 2nd and then planning to throw on third and medium. Once it's 3rd and 14 or whatever, running seems like the best option. I didn't like how it all panned out but I don't think we have enough info to crucify BB for being overly conservative there.

I agree about kicking on 4th and short though.
 

Beomoose

is insoxicated
SoSH Member
May 28, 2006
21,478
Exiled
Dollar said:
 
Tebucky might be a little too old to produce at this point, but watch for his son to land on BB's draft radar as a junior WR out of Fordham.  
 
How great would it be to see Tom Brady throw TD passes to Tebucky Jones Jr. in 2015?
Tebucky Jones' kid is headed into the draft? Do it, Bill, more Tebucky.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Watching the replay, some quick thoughts.
--Wilfork got crushed by 66 on a regular basis 1 on 1. Casey Walker probably played best up front and wasn't that good.
--Jamie Collins looks horrible as a run defender.
--tackling sucked.
-- what the fuck was with the three man rush eight in the zone defense on the first couple drives with Jones and Collins dropping into zones. Uh, that's great guys, everyone is covered downfield but Geno Smith just has to run around three fat guys for an automatic seven yards. Would be cool if Tavon Wilson didn't just play for the tackle three yards beyond the sticks too.
--not sure what the plan was with the pass rush, usually they play contain on guys like smith, tonight they seemed to play contain without setting edges or having the linebackers come up to force when Smith broke the pocket.
--Pick up whoever the Denver running back is in fantasy two weeks from now because he'll run for 200 yards out of the spread formation like Moreno did last year if Fox wants to take what's there.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Boy that was a hideously officiated game. That LaFell pick gets called illegal contact on the DB like four times a game this year, refs obviously have "watch LaFell picking" in their pregame notes so need to burn that play or run it with one of the other receivers for a big.
 

jercra

No longer respects DeChambeau
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
3,152
Arvada, Co
Are people being a little too harsh on D?  Mayo, the captain, signal caller and best tackler was lost for the season 3 days ago.  How much of an impact does that have on the run D?  There's similar question with the run game but that may have just been game planning more than no trust in Gray.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
I'm sure it had an effect, but not sure it would cause Wilfork and company to get blown off the ball down after down. It's also the third time in seven games they've been terrible against the run.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Stitch01 said:
I'm not basing it on the results of a single dice roll, it's been a pattern over years. They had a better chance of converting a first down than punting and holding. Running on first down is OK because completing a first down pass on first down doesn't completely end the game since the Jets had a time out and helps I'd you fail and running on third down after the second down atrocity was fine, but not throwing on second down was really, really bad and burnt win equity. They played all game like they couldn't run against the Jets defense then gave up and put the game in the hands of a defense that struggled to get stops all night. Its different if they could have run the clock down to 30 seconds or something, but 1:10 is an eternity when a FG beats you. The Jets ran two pretty terrible plays to start the drive and still made it to FG range.

I'm sure the advanced stats will show the FG was bad too, and they're probably better off going for it, but given they didn't even attempt to run the ball on this front seven it's fairly marginal so whatever. They kick so often on fourth and short though, it's been a disappointing regression.
Do you have statistics on the run / passing on second down in the final series? As far as I know, no one tracks end-of-game scenarios to this level of detail.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,124
Brady.

38 dropbacks, 1 sack, 0 INTs.

You can do a lot of things wrong and still win when you don't turn the ball over.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,247
Stitch01 said:
I'm not basing it on the results of a single dice roll, it's been a pattern over years. They had a better chance of converting a first down than punting and holding. Running on first down is OK because completing a first down pass on first down doesn't completely end the game since the Jets had a time out and helps I'd you fail and running on third down after the second down atrocity was fine, but not throwing on second down was really, really bad and burnt win equity. They played all game like they couldn't run against the Jets defense then gave up and put the game in the hands of a defense that struggled to get stops all night. Its different if they could have run the clock down to 30 seconds or something, but 1:10 is an eternity when a FG beats you. The Jets ran two pretty terrible plays to start the drive and still made it to FG range.

I'm sure the advanced stats will show the FG was bad too, and they're probably better off going for it, but given they didn't even attempt to run the ball on this front seven it's fairly marginal so whatever. They kick so often on fourth and short though, it's been a disappointing regression.
I'm not sure that was the case during the end of the game.  The clock was a big factor.  Running on first down forced the Jets to use their final timeout.  By running on 2nd down, they made sure that was the final play prior to the 2 minute warning, which allowed them to kill the clock after the 3rd down play.  The chances of a Jets win after being pinned at the 12 with just over a minute left and no timeouts were not good (10.3%, to be exact).  The D should have held up better on that final drive; they left way too much room for the Jets receivers given that they were only rushing 3.  
 
I'm also not too down on the FG in the 3rd.  Points are valuable in a game like this.  The FG gave them the lead, and there were plenty of potential possessions to add to the score.  At some point, you do have to rely on the defense to some extent.  It was a very different scenario than the infamous Indy game.  
 
The defense, in particular the run defense, was horrible  The refs didn't help by calling defensive holding whenever a Jets receiver tripped on their own two feet, but still, the D needed to make stops they didn't make.  Having said that, the impact of Mayo's loss combined with an abbreviated practice week cannot be understated.  There was really no time to make adjustments.  
 
The game was set up to be a difficult challenge.  The injuries; a desperate opponent and a desperate coach both trying to save their seasons; an opponent with a good defense and a better ground game than what they've shown previously; the Thursday game.  And the Jets haven't exactly had the easiest schedule; it was much like the Patriots upcoming slate of games (Detroit, GB, Chargers, Broncos).  They probably are better than their record indicates.  Of course, I have zero sympathy for any team that has Michael Vick on its roster. 
 
Bottom line is that this game was a critical win against a divisional opponent.  The Pats are 5-2 entering the iron of their schedule.  And they effectively have 2 byes during that 6 game stretch before closing out against their division opponents.  Sometimes the result is more important than how you get there.  
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
I'd say the Jets were much better than 9-1 to get into field goal range when they got the ball back given how the defense had played all night.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,522
deep inside Guido territory
FOXBOROUGH, Mass. -- Brace yourselves for another officiating controversy involving a field goal at the end of a Jets-Patriots game, America. Because what the heck is this?
Thursday night, Jets kicker Nick Folk tried a 58-yard field goal on the game's final play. The try was obviously a longshot (duh): Folk had never made a kick attempt longer than 56 yards, and this one was blocked by Patriots defensive end Chris Jones. The Patriots won, 27-25, and the Jets got to slink back to Florham Park to figure out what to do, their season in ashes now that they're 1-6 with six straight losses.
Now, the Jets did plenty wrong and deserved to lose. Their season is a trash heap because they stink. But this isn't a good look for the NFL's officiating crew.
Check out what happened just before the ball was snapped. Patriots linebacker Dont'a Hightower approached the line of scrimmage and attempted to stand just over Jets long snapper Tanner Purdum. According to the rule book, this should have been a five-yard penalty. But instead, an official stepped in, grabbed Hightower by his right arm, and presumably told him to move over, which Hightower quickly did. But why?
An NFL spokesman did not immediately return an email message seeking comment, but that might have something to do with the fact that it's now past 3 a.m.
You can watch the video here; I'd embed it, but the NFL would rather not do anything to make life easy for its fans.
 
http://www.nj.com/jets/index.ssf/2014/10/why_did_official_help_patriots_avoid_penalty_before_jets_game-ending_field_goal_got_blocked.html
 

richgedman'sghost

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2006
1,895
ct
RedOctober3829 said:
I noticed this right before the play but did not think anything of it. However, the first thing I looked for after the kick was blocked was a flag. I almost assumed there had to be a flag based both on how bad the officiating was in this game, and also what happened after the missed field goal in the game at the Meadowlands last year with the bs call. 
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Of course they never snap the ball when Hightower is on the line of scrimmage and he's still moving around, so there's no penalty to call, but still lol Jets.
 

Bellhorn

Lumiere
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2006
2,328
Brighton, MA
Stitch01 said:
Gonna vent here for two minutes about something: I hate how fucking conservative BB has become with in game decisions. Kicking on all the 4th and shorts (the FG tonight was more defensible than some other recent kicks as the team clearly had no confidence in running at the Jets, but going for it still clearly plus EV) running three times tonight when the first down seals the game. It bit them in the ass in the Carolina and Miami losses last year and it's going to get them this year at some point. BB never goes for it on that 4th and 2 against the Colts now and I fucking hate it.
 
And don't forget the Seattle game in 2012, which may have been the worst of all - they went run-and-punt with 3 minutes left despite having amassed over 450 yards of offense, and still having the crappy pre-Talib secondary. 
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,254
306, row 14
loshjott said:
Why the heck should that be a penalty anyway?  I'll never understand the NFL rule book.
Player safety. The long snapper is considered indefensible since he's busy snapping the football. They don't 4 guys crashing down on the center before he has a chance to block.
 

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
FWIW, the Patriots have played 4 games in 17 days, coming off a game where they lost three hugely important players to injury, with very little time to adjust.  They played against a team that was playing for their season, and who, other than that one blown coverage on the Pats' first drive, played incredibly well.
 
And the Pats still won.
 
Game ball to the team for just an incredible effort.  Now they get a mini-bye to heal and rest up before da Bears come to town.
 
And by the way, the Patriots are going to absolutely destroy Chicago.  Mark it down.
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,462
Overland Park, KS
I look at this game and think everything went right for the Jets and they still lost. It's clear the Jets were terrified to pass last night. NE has a good secondary, Geno is a turnover machine and instead of making one pass in traffic, he ran all night long. If you are afraid to throw the ball in the 2014 NFL, you will lose most games.
 
I think the secondary was very good, the offensive line outside of Devey was good. Obviously, Amendola and Vereen were great. Brady was very good as usual. One thing I love about the Brady and BB era is they have always secured the ball. No TO was key. It appears they are going to ease Gray in. I wish they gave him the ball more but he hasn't seen game action in 5 weeks, so I can understand the decision.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Bellhorn said:
 
And don't forget the Seattle game in 2012, which may have been the worst of all - they went run-and-punt with 3 minutes left despite having amassed over 450 yards of offense, and still having the crappy pre-Talib secondary. 
They in fact did throw on 3rd down on that last drive against the Seahawks.
 
The Baltimore game that year was game where they drew criticism for going pass-happy on a clock-killing drive and didn't kill much time. We could probably go back and forth with anecdotes all day. I don't think one is right or one is wrong. Both are appropriate in different circumstances. I think it would have been dumb to be content to kick the ball away if Manning, Brees, Rodgers, Luck, etc. was on the other sideline needing just a FG to win, but I think it was the percentage play against a poor Jets passing attack.
 
lexrageorge said:
I'm not sure that was the case during the end of the game.  The clock was a big factor.  Running on first down forced the Jets to use their final timeout.  By running on 2nd down, they made sure that was the final play prior to the 2 minute warning, which allowed them to kill the clock after the 3rd down play.  The chances of a Jets win after being pinned at the 12 with just over a minute left and no timeouts were not good (10.3%, to be exact).  The D should have held up better on that final drive; they left way too much room for the Jets receivers given that they were only rushing 3.  
 
Where do you get the 10.3% figure?
 
Stitch01 said:
I'd say the Jets were much better than 9-1 to get into field goal range when they got the ball back given how the defense had played all night.
The pass defense wasn't that bad. The Jets averaged 5.5 yards per pass attempt, which is low. The run D was pitiful but didn't factor into that situation, obviously.
 

Silverdude2167

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 9, 2006
4,725
Amstredam
ivanvamp said:
FWIW, the Patriots have played 4 games in 17 days, coming off a game where they lost three hugely important players to injury, with very little time to adjust.  They played against a team that was playing for their season, and who, other than that one blown coverage on the Pats' first drive, played incredibly well.
This.
 
They won a Thursday night game after losing their defensive captain and one of the main cogs of their run defense. This article by ((Football by Football) http://www.footballbyfootball.com/lockerroom/preparing-for-thursday-nfl-games), I think could explain alot of the run defense issues. Vince had a bad game, but I would not be surprised to learn that his body could not perform well on 3 days rest.
 
Also the Charges beat the Raiders by 3 last week, division games are rarely easy.
 

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
Silverdude2167 said:
This.
 
They won a Thursday night game after losing their defensive captain and one of the main cogs of their run defense. This article by ((Football by Football) http://www.footballbyfootball.com/lockerroom/preparing-for-thursday-nfl-games), I think could explain alot of the run defense issues. Vince had a bad game, but I would not be surprised to learn that his body could not perform well on 3 days rest.
 
Also the Charges beat the Raiders by 3 last week, division games are rarely easy.
 
And the Jets played Denver pretty tough as well.  
 
It's not an easy league.