The Game Ball Thread: Wk 6 at Colts

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,604
Somewhere
In a rare occurrence, an all-D game ball post:
 
Chandler Jones
Jamie Collins
Malcolm Butler
 
Down:
 
Bradley Fletcher
 

Byrdbrain

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
8,588
Special Teams were huge all night, the only negative was one bad punt.
Amendola was also very good, they were barely paying attention to him all night but he took advantage. 
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,719
have to give one to Brady, too, as good as the D was.
 
down: Edelman's finger.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,044
AZ
Hard to overcome a pick 6 against a good team in their own building. The defensive effort in the second half was outstanding. Tough to pick one guy but I say Jones.

The end of game management has been kind of shaky this year -- this game and the Buffalo game stand out. Usually a strength so it's weird. Have to tighten that up before it costs them.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,536
FYI
@MikeGiardi: Slater huddled with docs and trainers outside the locker room.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,604
Somewhere
DennyDoyle'sBoil said:
Hard to overcome a pick 6 against a good team in their own building. The defensive effort in the second half was outstanding. Tough to pick one guy but I say Jones.

The end of game management has been kind of shaky this year -- this game and the Buffalo game stand out. Usually a strength so it's weird. Have to tighten that up before it costs them.
 
-- I've mentioned this before, but the Patriots (under Belichick) have pretty much played that way with a two-score lead since forever. It's not too fun to watch, but war of attrition is probably the soundest strategy. At the very least, it forces the underdog to make exceedingly improbable plays to win.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,227
Here
Chandler Jones and Easley were fantastic, and Collins was all over the place again. Flemming did a nice job and Brady was his normal good self.

Those last 3 drives were a great combo of mental and physical errors, though. The Delay of Game was about as bad as you will ever see from Brady.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Devizier said:
 
-- I've mentioned this before, but the Patriots (under Belichick) have pretty much played that way with a two-score lead since forever. It's not too fun to watch, but war of attrition is probably the soundest strategy. At the very least, it forces the underdog to make exceedingly improbable plays to win.
I think he means more stuff like not running the clock down on both punts. They could have run 30 seconds. Playcalling seemed fine execution was dogshit on offense.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,604
Somewhere
Stitch01 said:
I think he means more stuff like not running the clock down on both punts. They could have run 30 seconds. Playcalling seemed fine execution was dogshit on offense.
 
That, I agree with. No idea what happened there. Failure to burn time -- when that was the offense's essential job -- was inexplicable, as was the DOG.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Doesn't get a game ball, but Gronk caught his 60th TD and is already 4th all time among TES. He's insane and will be the no doubt best tight end ever with good health
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,725
That was a really disappointing effort from the O and the coaching staff. BB is gonna have a field day this week. Also, injuries suck.
 

teddykgb

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
11,116
Chelmsford, MA
Game ball to the ref who ruled the Patriots recovered the onside kick. I can't imagine what it would be like on here if that had been against the Pats.

I thought Ninkovich was pretty good when he came on. Drew several of those holding calls that stalled their offense out. Collins seemed to be a big difference maker in shutting down all the underneath stuff in the 2nd half
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,044
AZ
Stitch01 said:
I think he means more stuff like not running the clock down on both punts. They could have run 30 seconds. Playcalling seemed fine execution was dogshit on offense.
Yeah, and as mentioned, the delay of game. Play calling was ok, though on the drive with 7 or 8 minutes left, I thought play action would have worked. The busted sneak was tough, but it usually works so hard to grumble about it.
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,889
Washington, DC
GeorgeCostanza said:
Can't wait to hear an explanation for whatever the hell that play was supposed to be from Indy. I'm still absolutely gobsmacked.
About the only thing I can think of is that Indy wanted a formation so unusual that the Pats would call timeout, and never meant to snap the ball.
 

Mugsy's Jock

Eli apologist
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2000
15,126
UWS, NYC
Glad I get to say this first this week: DeGuglielmo.

Already down Solder (not to mention Wendell and Stork), he loses Cannon and still has his guys so well prepared they don't miss a beat. I don't remember the DL sacking Brady, the running game was excellent until the Pats completely abandoned the pass, and no holding calls?

Remarkable. Great coaching.

Also special teams coaching gets credit for having the Pats punt defense so well disciplined not to fall over laughing on the punt formation nonsense.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,509
deep inside Guido territory
Jones
Collins
Blount

Offense hasn't looked crisp since before the bye. They seem to be very happy not getting Gronk involved in the passing game early. There needs to be more targets for him earlier. Get him in favorable match ups and use him more.
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,713
NOVA
How many NFL coaches call a timeout when the Colts shifted into that crazy punt formation? So, game ball to BB.
 

wiffleballhero

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 28, 2009
4,605
In the simulacrum
Collins seemed like he was involved in many, many key moments and when the Colts moved the ball it seemed like it was when they somehow figured out how to neutralize him. So Collins, for me.
 

GeorgeCostanza

tiger king
SoSH Member
May 16, 2009
7,286
Go f*ck yourself
singaporesoxfan said:
About the only thing I can think of is that Indy wanted a formation so unusual that the Pats would call timeout, and never meant to snap the ball.
His actual explanation was almost as bizarre as the at itself. Was trying to catch the pats with too many men on the field??
 

mikeford

woolwich!
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2006
29,711
St John's, NL
Big ups to Vollmer. Swapped sides and aside from one hands to the face penalty, never heard his name called again. Which for an OL is generally a very good thing.
 
Fleming was also good at RT for the most part.
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,889
Washington, DC
riboflav said:
How many NFL coaches call a timeout when the Colts shifted into that crazy punt formation? So, game ball to BB.
The Colts though had one person besides the "center" on the line of scrimmage. I'm guessing a lot of NFL coaches would have seen that.

Maybe the Colts were trying to draw the defense offsides by getting someone to double over in laughter past the line of scrimmage. The ROFL strategy.
 

MarcSullivaFan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2005
3,412
Hoo-hoo-hoo hoosier land.
Colts players are saying that the point was to catch the Pats with 12 on the field or force them to call a timeout. The fact that BB left the pressure on them to figure out wtf to do was just brilliant. Every other coach in the NFL calls a timeout there.

McAfee said (and I'm paraphrasing) that it was the biggest fuck up in the history of fake punts.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,508
Not here
MarcSullivaFan said:
Colts players are saying that the point was to catch the Pats with 12 on the field or force them to call a timeout. The fact that BB left the pressure on them to figure out wtf to do was just brilliant. Every other coach in the NFL calls a timeout there.

McAfee said (and I'm paraphrasing) that it was the biggest fuck up in the history of fake punts.
 
I'm pretty sure it was the worst trick play in the history of sport.
 
Apr 7, 2006
2,576
This is what happens when other teams try to get "deceptive" like BB does. The thing is, Belichick practices everything, all this talk of situational football we are constantly hearing about - that's why the punt team didn't panic. They reacted, communicated and got it done. Meanwhile,the other teams attempting this junk "trick" stuff...I mean, god...there are no words.

Except maybe these: In. Their. Heads.

Game Balls: TB12, Googe, Jamie Collins for the block. If not for Defakegate, his special teams play would be a bigger talking point.
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,713
NOVA
Mugsy's Walk-Off Bunt said:
This is what happens when other teams try to get "deceptive" like BB does. The thing is, Belichick practices everything, all this talk of situational football we are constantly hearing about - that's why the punt team didn't panic. They reacted, communicated and got it done. Meanwhile,the other teams attempting this junk "trick" stuff...I mean, god...there are no words.

Except maybe these: In. Their. Heads.

Game Balls: TB12, Googe, Jamie Collins for the block. If not for Defakegate, his special teams play would be a bigger talking point.
 
A linebacker made that play. A linebacker!! LMAO
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,318
MarcSullivaFan said:
Colts players are saying that the point was to catch the Pats with 12 on the field or force them to call a timeout. The fact that BB left the pressure on them to figure out wtf to do was just brilliant. Every other coach in the NFL calls a timeout there.

McAfee said (and I'm paraphrasing) that it was the biggest fuck up in the history of fake punts.
Yeah, I mean BB has a history of panicking and calling time outs in big spots. I love how our players reacted in that spot too, looked to each other and figured out to crowd the center to prevent the sneak.
 

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
14,313
The Buffalo game was definitely inexplicable, but I feel like this is a hallmark of Pats teams in general - when they're up late, they're content to let the other team grabs yards, and even points, as long as they feel like there's not a way to lose. They don't care if they win by 1 or 21. 
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
A gut-it-out underrated win that will be sort of lost in the wake of 50-point win predictions. Tough injuries, physical plays, and they still manage to win comfortably on the road.

Up:

- Jamie Collins -- His coming out party on the national stage, capped by the XP block that put him into Kam Chancellor freak territory.

- Secondary: Malcolm Butler, Devin McCourty (he played corner for much of the 2nd half, right?), Pat Chung (played the deep safety role really well when asked). At one point late in the 4th Zo said that the Colts had run 24 plays in the 2nd half and had 39 total yards. That's in large part a credit to these guys, and even Logan Ryan, who gave up plays but made sure none of them were big plays.

- Googs, Sebastian Vollmer: honestly, Sea Bass may be an upgrade at LT. Which is insane.

LOL: Punt unit on the "fake": I give them massive credit for adjusting and blowing it up, but... LOL what was that?

Obligatory: Tom Brady: more mobile in the pocket in his late 30s than most guys are in their 20s. That game sealing TD to Blount would have been a coverage sack a few years ago.

Moral: Slater. Heal up soon, big guy.

HM: Allen. After a bad punt, he was lights out in the 2nd half.

Down:

- Mayo -- Maybe harsh, but he looked like he was getting pushed around on some run plays.

- Freeny: Seemed to really struggle in coverage, which is admittedly tough for a slow LB.

- Onsides unit: interested to see what Chuck has to say. Seemed disorganized on the 1st, and even on the 2nd I didn't like their assignments -- Gronk's amazing hands and size bailed them out, I thought.

I almost added McDaniels here, because I felt that the team sort of shut it down in the 4th quarter and stopped executing, but with a 3rd stringer at RT, 2 rookies on the line, and the #1 WR playing with a badly injured finger, I think he probably figured the smart play on the road was to go conservative and emerge with a win.
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,837
Needham, MA
Bergs said:
That was a really disappointing effort from the O and the coaching staff. BB is gonna have a field day this week. Also, injuries suck.
They scored 34 points on the road with zero turnovers forced by the D and only one time with great field position. Man, how our perspective of what constitutes a great offensive performance has been warped.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,817
Melrose, MA
GeorgeCostanza said:
Can't wait to hear an explanation for whatever the hell that play was supposed to be from Indy. I'm still absolutely gobsmacked.
Jake McQuaide, the Rams' long snapper, tweeted out an explanation:
 
https://twitter.com/JakeMcQuaide/status/655943577059643392
 
https://twitter.com/JakeMcQuaide/status/655944108494692352
 
https://twitter.com/JakeMcQuaide/status/655944108494692352
 
https://twitter.com/JakeMcQuaide/status/655944707978174464
 
So the idea is to snap the ball with >11 defensive players on the field, in which case, first down for the Colts. If the defense doesn't subsitute, the ball should never be snapped - its either a timeout or a delay of game.
 
Either the Colts "QB" and "center" on that play never got the memo or, they mistook the Pats' defensive shifting for actual substitutions.  
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
Ralphwiggum said:
They scored 34 points on the road with zero turnovers forced by the D and only one time with great field position. Man, how our perspective of what constitutes a great offensive performance has been warped.
I agree with this. Especially given the injuries, to score 34 on the road in this game was incredibly impressive.
 

Preacher

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 9, 2006
6,478
Pyeongtaek, South Korea
Eddie Jurak said:
 
So the idea is to snap the ball with >11 defensive players on the field, in which case, first down for the Colts. If the defense doesn't subsitute, the ball should never be snapped - its either a timeout or a delay of game.
 
Either the Colts "QB" and "center" on that play never got the memo or, they mistook the Pats' defensive shifting for actual substitutions.  
But that doesn't make a ton of sense because if the offensive team makes a substitution (offense comes on for punt team) the refs won't let the center snap the ball until the defense is allowed to substitute. Sure, you still might catch someone slow to substitute but you can't just hurry out and snap without giving the other side an opportunity to sub. And I know I've seen the Pats try this but it never seems to work since the ref just stands over the ball.

Edit: I guess what I was trying to say was what the Colts did made no sense even with that explanation.
 

Byrdbrain

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
8,588
Eddie Jurak said:
Jake McQuaide, the Rams' long snapper, tweeted out an explanation:
 
https://twitter.com/JakeMcQuaide/status/655943577059643392
 
https://twitter.com/JakeMcQuaide/status/655944108494692352
 
https://twitter.com/JakeMcQuaide/status/655944108494692352
 
https://twitter.com/JakeMcQuaide/status/655944707978174464
 
So the idea is to snap the ball with >11 defensive players on the field, in which case, first down for the Colts. If the defense doesn't subsitute, the ball should never be snapped - its either a timeout or a delay of game.
 
Either the Colts "QB" and "center" on that play never got the memo or, they mistook the Pats' defensive shifting for actual substitutions.  
That sort of makes some sense but to think that a BB coached team would fall for something like that means you haven't been paying attention. I mean the Pats use that type of substitution more than anyone, to think they wouldn't know what to do and how to act is dumb.
Then to snap the ball on top of it just adds another layer of stupid
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,817
Melrose, MA
Preacher said:
But that doesn't make a ton of sense because if the offensive team makes a substitution (offense comes on for punt team) the refs won't let the center snap the ball until the defense is allowed to substitute. Sure, you still might catch someone slow to substitute but you can't just hurry out and snap without giving the other side an opportunity to sub. And I know I've seen the Pats try this but it never seems to work since the ref just stands over the ball.

Edit: I guess what I was trying to say was what the Colts did made no sense even with that explanation.
The "offense" made no substitution. The punt team stayed on the field the whole time. The idea behind the play is that BB was supposed to see the Dolts punt team running for the sideline and yell "Defense, go!" In which case the Colts, who have made no substitution, can snap the ball for a free first down.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
SeoulSoxFan said:
BB says Indy ran a fake punt vs. Titans and were aware that they may run another one.
 
They've run surprise onside kicks before but the Pats weren't prepared for the one last night. After that they were prepared the rest of the game (would have been cool if Gronk had taken that last one all the way back although he might have gotten in trouble for not immediately downing it)