The Michael McCorkle "Mac" Jones Thread

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
49,158
Great question! Yes, actually. Year over year ~80% of QBs are within 2-3% of their previous season normally, more than half of QBs stay within 1% of previous year. However, with younger QBs we often do see improvements, and if we don't they typically wash out of the league. This seems to stabilize for the most part once players have been in the league a few years.

Justin Fields (so far) has made the most significant positive strides this year by this measure. Mac Jones is actually better by this measure than he was a year ago as well, but unfortunately has just shifted his struggles elsewhere (with turnovers and other bad decisions instead of sacks).
Thank you. Its very subtle so no worries if you haven't sensed that this forum is a touch down on Mac Jones. While your response almost certainly won't change any minds it gives us some upside to dream on while watching balls sail over Kendrick Bourne or seeing them land behind a check down target all while Jones is only trying to stay upright for a hair over 2.3 seconds (the last mile to 2.4 being the hardest).
 

TravisMight

Member
Oct 11, 2023
10
Thank you. Its very subtle so no worries if you haven't sensed that this forum is a touch down on Mac Jones. While your response almost certainly won't change any minds it gives us some upside to dream on while watching balls sail over Kendrick Bourne or seeing them land behind a check down target all while Jones is only trying to stay upright for a hair over 2.3 seconds (the last mile to 2.4 being the hardest).
Haha yeah, I think Patriots fans have good reason to be down not only on Mac, but the team as a whole at this point, unfortunately for you all. So many glaring issues. Mac has made a bunch of bad decisions this year, and doesn't seem to be the long-term answer, but it definitely seems like he has no help around him that's for sure!

Can't imagine getting rid of the ball under 2.5 seconds just about every time and still facing the 8th most pass rush pressures in the league. Tough year for the Pats all around.
 

Spelunker

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
12,211
Thank you. Its very subtle so no worries if you haven't sensed that this forum is a touch down on Mac Jones. While your response almost certainly won't change any minds it gives us some upside to dream on while watching balls sail over Kendrick Bourne or seeing them land behind a check down target all while Jones is only trying to stay upright for a hair over 2.3 seconds (the last mile to 2.4 being the hardest).
If Mac's touch downs weren't so rare we'd all feel a lot better about him.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
49,158
If Mac's touch downs weren't so rare we'd all feel a lot better about him.
Good point. We are actually a touch down on his ability to generate touchdowns.

Maybe BB is ahead of his time in trying to find the next great edge - QBs who are trained to get the ball out in two seconds or less...
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,702
Somewhere
This cracks me up because (a) Harrison Senior didn't love football at all (I had friends close to the program when he was at Syracuse), and (b) he has/had pretty lousy character (see: car wash shooting).
Always thought Harrison was kind of a Stringer Bell type.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,235
Missoula, MT
Harrison Senior strikes me as the type who would take notes of criminal conspiracies.

@TravisMight care to share a little background on your background in education, professional work, who your team is?
 

TravisMight

Member
Oct 11, 2023
10
Harrison Senior strikes me as the type who would take notes of criminal conspiracies.

@TravisMight care to share a little background on your background in education, professional work, who your team is?
My NFL team is Tennessee, so I by extension would likely be diagnosed as a low grade masochist.

My educational background? I graduated from Purdue with a management degree and a tech minor no one's ever heard of because I started in aero/astronautical engineering and had to use those classes as tech electives to graduate in four years. Then I got my MBA with a focus in business analytics.

Professionally? I've spent six years in the music industry, five in ministry, and I guess eight in total now working in sports (writing, video, audio, predictive model building, several things). My full-time gig now is Lead College Football Analyst & Trader for Mojo (a sports stock market, sports book, and fantasy company) where I mainly build predictive modeling, pricing, and projections for CFB & the NFL while managing the market as a part of the trading team.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,235
Missoula, MT


Seriously, thanks for sharing and answering questions on your work. If you hadn't' noticed, there are quite a few analytics, draft gurus, and highly educated people who go to their day jobs only to watch film, dissect our teams, and post here instead of working.

So, you are welcome for the time waster.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,856
San Francisco
To this question, this particular model wasn't a logistic regression build. It was MLR that was cross-checked via logarithmic to see which best fit the distribution. Tbh it's not really a finished product either. This model was a curiosity-based byproduct of something else I was building for CFB/NFL Prospect analysis. I may continue to attempt to improve it using other methods, but that day is not today. :p

To your previous question, if it were just testing for team sack prediction then QB teammates would all test the same, and they don't. Why they don't can be attributed to a few things, one being they often have vastly different pressure percentages and blocking success in front of them even when they're on the same team. In recent years it has been proven that QBs actually own a significant portion of their pressure and can have a significant effect on the blocking grades in front of them due to style of play. When you adjust for those differences you begin to see how well QBs both deal with pressure and even perhaps bring it more upon themselves.

So no, in this case it isn't like your shortstop example. Is it perfect, and solving for every bit of sack attribution of the individual QB? Nah. But it does at least paint a significant portion of that picture given what we know. I'm sure either I, or someone else, will improve upon this measure in the future. And I know personally that multiple NFL teams build their own kind of metrics like this to help with personnel decision-making (and they probably do it better than me).
Mixed effects is linear so not sure what you mean by referring to logistic regression?

I don't agree with your conclusion about attributing to the QB. As you say, the reasons for QB's not testing the same on the same team could be due to factors not related to the QB, so simply saying they get different scores on the same team doesn't really suggest anything about whether this is a QB or a team level statistic. Slice up a single QB's games in a single season and see if its closer.

I think context factors can be adding a lot of noise to this data. In particular, QBs are more likely to take sacks on third down since throwing the cost/benefit of throwing the ball away is totally different than on early downs. Combine this with the fact that the number of third and longs faced by each team varies quite a bit, AND that the passing ratio on early downs also varies significantly among teams and you have yourself a pretty big confounder unrelated to the QB.

Another confounder is how often the QB is blitzed and more generally which position the pressure is coming from. A quick little excel using pro football reference shows the sack:pressure rate varies substantially between DL's and LB's. For DL's its 25% ish and for LB's its 33%. The rate at which QBs are blitzed again varies quite a bit among the QBs, and is not something they are directly controlling.

Addendum: Here you can see all of Jalen Hurts 2023 sacks taken. There were 48, 4 of those were on Minshew. So 44 sacks, by my count 24 of them came from DBs or LBs. That is a much higher percentage than the overall league distribution of sacks, and you can clearly see a lot of those are on blitzes, where Hurts was blitzed nearly twice as often as other QBs, source https://www.fantasypros.com/nfl/advanced-stats-qb.php?year=2022&view=pergame . This should affect a player's sack / pressure rate - it's harder to sneak by LBs and DBs if they are in your face, plus things get a bit more bimodal where if a blitz is picked up its generally easier to get a clean completion before pressure, or else the pressure is more likely to lead to a sack. And this is going to confound the model output.
 
Last edited:

dirtynine

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 17, 2002
8,468
Philly
I believe local sports radio hosts Toucher & Rich were discussing OP’s study on air yesterday with Dave Richard from CBS Sports. (starts at the 27:00 mark here) They were skeptical. I wouldn’t call them analytics-friendly (they’re smart, but entertainers before analysts), but some of the questions they had about pulling all the situational stuff out to isolate QB responsibility is germane, I’d think. Is it really possible to control for down/distance/score/playcall etc? All of those could change QB behavior, and even incentivize certain styles of play in some situations but not others.
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,474
Overland Park, KS
They can find every metric under the sun. He doesn't pass the eye test. I always think of that playoff game against Buffalo when he had Agholor open for the touchdown on the first drive and floated the ball in there and Micah Hyde had a month to intercept it. You have to either be a supercomputer or an unbelievable athlete to play QB in the NFL and he is neither. Have the Pats screwed him, no doubt but he just isn't good enough.
 

k-factory

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2005
1,890
seattle, wa
If Jimmy is hurt can we get a 5th round pick for Mac from the Raiders and just play Zappe/Grier/Cunningham the rest of the way?
6th?
Reclamation project has got to have crossed Josh’s mind…
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,585
If Jimmy is hurt can we get a 5th round pick for Mac from the Raiders and just play Zappe/Grier/Cunningham the rest of the way?
6th?
Reclamation project has got to have crossed Josh’s mind…
Yes, in a heartbeat. We've had enough. And if he shows anything maybe it buys Josh another year in LV.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,344
Does Mac really have any trade value? I honestly can’t imagine more than some kind of 6th or a 7th kind of pick swap, which BB would then use to trade up for another punter who can’t punt
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,674
02130
Does Mac really have any trade value? I honestly can’t imagine more than some kind of 6th or a 7th kind of pick swap, which BB would then use to trade up for another punter who can’t punt
Yeah I don't see it. If you are contending and have an injury or something that might make sense last year but with his struggles this year he's a huge gamble to be competent and learn your offense. If you are rebuilding and want to take a chance on him for the future you would probably just wait until the offseason unless you can get him for a very low pick.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,263
Does Mac really have any trade value? I honestly can’t imagine more than some kind of 6th or a 7th kind of pick swap, which BB would then use to trade up for another punter who can’t punt
Probably some yes. Josh Dobbs and a 7th got a 5th, Trey Lance brought a 4th. Mac Jones looks terrible right now, but he has way more NFL success than either.
I would guess the comp is something like Sam Darnold? Who brought a 2nd, 4th and 6th.
 

Bernie Carbohydrate

writes the Semi-Fin
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2001
4,080
South Carolina via Dorchestah
Probably some yes. Josh Dobbs and a 7th got a 5th, Trey Lance brought a 4th. Mac Jones looks terrible right now, but he has way more NFL success than either.
I would guess the comp is something like Sam Darnold? Who brought a 2nd, 4th and 6th.
If BB could get a 2nd, 4th and 6th for Mac he should do it yesterday.

All we need is a team with an equally atrocious QB situation but with enough exposure to University of Alabama football on Saturdays that they recall when Mac was a functional QB.

Carolina? New Orleans?
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,320
If BB could get a 2nd, 4th and 6th for Mac he should do it yesterday.

All we need is a team with an equally atrocious QB situation but with enough exposure to University of Alabama football on Saturdays that they recall when Mac was a functional QB.

Carolina? New Orleans?
Carolina just drafted a QB #1, also from Alabama. I can't see that happening. Saints are 3-3 and Carr isn't great, but he has to be pretty much what they expected and they're .5 game out of first place in that division. They ain't gonna give Mac a whirl.

The Raiders though...
 
Oct 12, 2023
752
I don’t see any point in trading Mac and more to the point I don’t see BB going into the off-season (assuming he’s still running the show) with Zappe, Grier and Cunningham as the only QB on the roster

They need someone to be an opening day starter and unless they really want to waste money on Cousins, or want a highly drafted rookie to get thrown into the fire, Jones seems like he fits BB’s philosophy of “fill a hole so you’re not desperate in the draft/free agency”

If they draft a QB, the chances of having a good OL or good WR diminish. Free agency is poor for both position groups. If they don’t draft a QB, chances are no veteran other than Cousins (for whom there’s likely to be a bidding war) will be better than Mac or at least better enough to warrant the money or draft capital required to bring in via FA/trade

if they sign Cousins, a Jones trade for whatever you can get - if anything - makes sense. Otherwise, he’s probably here next year as a bridge to the next guy or dumped in camp if a rookie is clearly a better option.

And sadly, I think there’s still a world where BB runs it back with Mac with 2021-esque additions on offense.

Mac is bad but the non-Cousins, Maye or Caleb Williams alternatives are all terrible veterans or prospects who are not immediate “sure fire opening day starter” pedigree.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,674
02130
I mean, Darnold had a lot of tools that people saw upside in. Mac was supposed to be more polished but with a lower ceiling. So you have to feel like you're a good team that needs a QB AND you have to think you can fix what he's doing wrong right now. Other than the Raiders if Jimmy is out for a while, I'm not sure who that team is.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,137
New York City
Carolina just drafted a QB #1, also from Alabama. I can't see that happening. Saints are 3-3 and Carr isn't great, but he has to be pretty much what they expected and they're .5 game out of first place in that division. They ain't gonna give Mac a whirl.

The Raiders though...
The Raiders wouldn't touch Mac with a 50 foot pole. Aiden or Hoyer are fine, compared to Mac.

Why would anyone give up anything for Mac Jones?
 

jcd0805

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 3, 2007
4,043
Florida
The Raiders wouldn't touch Mac with a 50 foot pole. Aiden or Hoyer are fine, compared to Mac.

Why would anyone give up anything for Mac Jones?
I don't see it either. Whatever success he had was basically in his first year and he's gone downhill since, I see nothing that screams he just needs a change of scenery to be even decent. He stinks, there's no fixing that somewhere else.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,320
The Raiders wouldn't touch Mac with a 50 foot pole. Aiden or Hoyer are fine, compared to Mac.

Why would anyone give up anything for Mac Jones?
You're most likely right of course. I just know some coaches always think that *they* can fix what ails people and Josh had some success with Mac. It's all very unlikely, just list it as more likely than those other teams that were listed.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,137
New York City
I don't see it either. Whatever success he had was basically in his first year and he's gone downhill since, I see nothing that screams he just needs a change of scenery to be even decent. He stinks, there's no fixing that somewhere else.
I don't understand what world some people are living in.

Carson Wentz was traded for a pick a few years because he was a one time MVP candidate. Mac Jones made the pro bowl one season because 40 QBs pulled out. Since then, he is one of the worst QBs in the NFL. He's got the same number of Pick 6s in his career as Aaron Rodgers.

The team is 3-10 in their last 13 regular season games with Mac Jones.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,137
New York City
You're most likely right of course. I just know some coaches always think that *they* can fix what ails people and Josh had some success with Mac. It's all very unlikely, just list it as more likely than those other teams that were listed.
You can try to fix a guy with great speed and athleticism and a solid arm. It usually fails but people think they can do it.

Mac is slow and has a noodle arm. And he throws truly awful INTs.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,971
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I don't understand what world some people are living in.

Carson Wentz was traded for a pick a few years because he was a one time MVP candidate. Mac Jones made the pro bowl one season because 40 QBs pulled out. Since then, he is one of the worst QBs in the NFL. He's got the same number of Pick 6s in his career as Aaron Rodgers.

The team is 3-10 in their last 13 regular season games with Mac Jones.
To be fair, those three wins were against the murderer's row of Colt McCoy, Teddy Bridgewater/Skylar Thompson and Zach Wilson.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,393
306, row 14
I don't understand what world some people are living in.

Carson Wentz was traded for a pick a few years because he was a one time MVP candidate. Mac Jones made the pro bowl one season because 40 QBs pulled out. Since then, he is one of the worst QBs in the NFL. He's got the same number of Pick 6s in his career as Aaron Rodgers.

The team is 3-10 in their last 13 regular season games with Mac Jones.
I don't think a Mac trade will happen, but Sam Darnold is the counter point. His 3 years with the Jets were worse than what Mac has put together in New England and there was still a team out there that was still willing to trade significant draft capital for him, I think it was a 2nd 4th and 6th. NFL teams are dumb and most are starving for QB's. He's still young, has the first round draft pick pedigree, and on a rookie contract. Someone will talk themselves into thinking they can work with him and fix him. It almost always happens with young quaterbacks.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,137
New York City
I don't think a Mac trade will happen, but Sam Darnold is the counter point. His 3 years with the Jets were worse than what Mac has put together in New England and there was still a team out there that was still willing to trade significant draft capital for him, I think it was a 2nd 4th and 6th. NFL teams are dumb and most are starving for QB's. He's still young, has the first round draft pick pedigree, and on a rookie contract. Someone will talk themselves into thinking they can work with him and fix him. It almost always happens with young quaterbacks.
Sam Darnold has raw skills.

Mac has no skills, unless we include cock punches.

And to be honest, those days of trading a lot of picks for journeyman QBs are over, too. Dallas traded a 4th round pick for Lance, the #3 QB selected in the same draft as Mac Jones. Mac might get a 5th rounder. Might.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,971
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I don't think a Mac trade will happen, but Sam Darnold is the counter point. His 3 years with the Jets were worse than what Mac has put together in New England and there was still a team out there that was still willing to trade significant draft capital for him, I think it was a 2nd 4th and 6th. NFL teams are dumb and most are starving for QB's. He's still young, has the first round draft pick pedigree, and on a rookie contract. Someone will talk themselves into thinking they can work with him and fix him. It almost always happens with young quaterbacks.
Much easier to sell Sam Darnold as a toolsy guy let down by the Jets' incompetence than to spin the potential of squeezing more juice out of "high floor, low ceiling" Mac Jones than Bill Belichick.

Not to mention Darnold was two years younger than Mac is now by the time he was traded.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,405
I wonder if teams look at a guy like Darnold and figure maybe they can wash the Jets stink off and salvage something, but think with the Pats Mac has probably maxed out his talent.

Edit - wow rodderick get outta my brain!
 

NDame616

will bailey
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
2,385
Zo (yes I know) said he thought the Pats could get a 2nd for Mac.

I nearly threw Alexa out my 3rd floor window
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,474
Overland Park, KS
Who knows what Mac is worth? Someone gave up a second rounder for the corpse of Mohamed Sanu and a third rounder for the corpse of DeVante Parker. There is a sucker born every moment.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,204
Mac Jones value in the trade market will occur if/when a competitive team loses their starter to injury (or the starter and their backup) and they don't have a remotely decent backup.

Teams like Cleveland don't matter, and will roll with PJ Walker because they aren't making any noise anyway. Same with a team like the Giants, or the Jets right now or even the teams with young QB's like Houston and Carolina.

But if a team like Baltimore loses Lamar, and then Huntley gets injured, they'd all of a sudden be in the market. Maybe Pickett goes down and Pittsburgh is done with the Mason Rudolph experience, or Joe Burrow gets hurt and Jake Browning sucks. Is CJ Beathard the answer in Jacksonville if TLaw goes down? Shoot, you've got Blaine Gabbert behind Mahomes and Hurts is being backed up by Mariota. Could Mac in those environments with those coaches do more than those backups? I don't honestly know, but I know if a team that's in contention is staring at 4-5 weeks with some of these backups, a lot of them will throw whatever shit they have to against the wall to tread water until their starter is back. I don't think that's a 2nd rounder, but I could see a 3rd and a 5th.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,320
Teams like Cleveland don't matter, and will roll with PJ Walker because they aren't making any noise anyway.
Does Cleveland know they aren't making any noise? They're 3-2, just beat the Niners, and have one of the best defenses in the league. People outside may not believe in them, but if they think they can win that division, who knows?
 

Time to Mo Vaughn

RIP Dernell
SoSH Member
Mar 24, 2008
7,306
I wonder if teams look at a guy like Darnold and figure maybe they can wash the Jets stink off and salvage something, but think with the Pats Mac has probably maxed out his talent.

Edit - wow rodderick get outta my brain!
When you've got additional examples like Geno Smith lighting up the league, it at least seems plausible.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,137
New York City
Teams like Cleveland don't matter, and will roll with PJ Walker because they aren't making any noise anyway. Same with a team like the Giants, or the Jets right now or even the teams with young QB's like Houston and Carolina.
This is crazy for so many reasons, but the main one is why would you go for a Mac Jones when PJ Walker can be just as ineffective but it costs you nothing? At least PJ can move in the pocket, actually. So he's better than Mac.

The other crazy reason is that the Browns have playoff aspirations. Their defense is all time great right now. And their 2nd half schedule is much easier than the first half, too. I do not think they are going nowhere. They aren't the Giants.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,204
This is crazy for so many reasons, but the main one is why would you go for a Mac Jones when PJ Walker can be just as ineffective but it costs you nothing? At least PJ can move in the pocket, actually. So he's better than Mac.

The other crazy reason is that the Browns have playoff aspirations. Their defense is all time great right now. And their 2nd half schedule is much easier than the first half, too. I do not think they are going nowhere. They aren't the Giants.
I don't understand the question. I specifically said the Browns wouldn't be interested in a guy like Mac. I completely disagree that they are a contender, but others may feel differently.

What about the teams that I pointed out that I thought could create a market for Mac if their QB's went down?

If you think Mac would be completely ineffective in an offense like Philly, or Seattle or LA Rams, that's fine, but I don't think NFL GM's who are looking into their 2nd or 3rd quarterback would necessarily believe the same thing. There were 69 different quarterbacks that started in the NFL last year. Things around the league change on a weekly basis. Teams that don't need a quarterback all of a sudden may need one to carry them through a 4-5 week period without better options. All I'm saying is that's where Mac could have some trade value. I don't think he has any right now. I don't think this is a really controversial position at all.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,204
Does Cleveland know they aren't making any noise? They're 3-2, just beat the Niners, and have one of the best defenses in the league. People outside may not believe in them, but if they think they can win that division, who knows?
I guess they could win the division, but their 2 losses were already within the division (to the Steelers and a shitbeating from the Ravens) and one of their wins was in a week 1 to a Bengals team that had Joe Burrow playing on one leg.

Again though, fortunes change fast in the NFL and who knows, maybe Cleveland can make some noise on the strength of their defense, or maybe PJ Walker goes down and Watson continues to not want to play, then what do they do? If CMC and Deebo don't get hurt yesterday, or if their rookie kicker made the kick, the Browns would be 2-3 and in last place in their division. I'm just not bullish on them yet.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,960
Oregon
Orlovsky might be the last man standing

@danorlovsky7
You can’t find 5 plays on the Patriots offensive tape that allow the QB to play successfully.