The Michael McCorkle "Mac" Jones Thread

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,019
Saskatoon Canada
Yup. Similar to 2020 when many(myself included) were wanting him to start Stidham, and he kept rolling Cam out there. Coaches always have much more, and usually better, information about their players than fans and media do. Combine that with a sort of inherent conservatism that seems to come with the job, and they are reluctant to just throw things against the wall. They are more wired to keep grinding away and try and improve with the players they’ve already decided are their best options. I don’t think Zap or Cunningham start this year unless injuries necessitate it. And I don’t think either of them would meaningfully change the trajectory of this season.
I am not saying this applies to Bill, but coaches are also wrong. Sports history is full of coaching changes where a a guy who was on ther bench is played by the new coach and is better than the guys he sat behind.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,158
AZ

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,013
Unreal America
BB did allude to changing things up on his presser but I took that to mean they’d roll back the complexity of the offense a bit.
Which makes zero sense to me. The problem has been that our O is too complicated? How!? And for whom?!

Are the blocking schemes too complex for an OL that is heavy on vets? Are the route trees too complex for a WR and TE crew that is almost all vets?

Are we dumbing down the O for Mac? The guy who's missing badly on his first reads half the time?

Seems like simplifying the O means drawing plays in the dirt at this point.
 

shawnrbu

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
39,897
The Land of Fist Pumps
I expect them to go back to the type of offense they installed in December 2018. A grind it out, run based offense. I would expect to see a lot more Pharaoh Brown, less Gesicki and a fullback added to the roster this week.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,299
Imaginationland
I expect them to go back to the type of offense they installed in December 2018. A grind it out, run based offense. I would expect to see a lot more Pharaoh Brown, less Gesicki and a fullback added to the roster this week.
That probably works better when you've got Tom Brady and Rob Gronkowski on the field.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I expect them to go back to the type of offense they installed in December 2018. A grind it out, run based offense. I would expect to see a lot more Pharaoh Brown, less Gesicki and a fullback added to the roster this week.
That grind it out run based on offense threw their way to a 35-7 lead against the Chargers and then threw their win to beat the Chiefs in a dogfight when every drive was do or die. Also threw their way into 10 4th quarter points in the Super Bowl when both offenses were bogged down. I agree they should take a run first approach, but that offense passed the ball extremely well to deliver them a title.
 

Garshaparra

New Member
Feb 27, 2008
543
McCarver's Mushy Mouth
I expect them to go back to the type of offense they installed in December 2018. A grind it out, run based offense. I would expect to see a lot more Pharaoh Brown, less Gesicki and a fullback added to the roster this week.
This is generally a good idea for the next game anyhow. The Raiders' run D is fairly bad (134 YPG, ranked 26th overall), and while the Pats' run game had horrible numbers vs. NO, they had three solid 8-yard runs on early downs that looked like great starts to drives:

1st & 10 at NE 6 - (10:10 - 1st) R.Stevenson right guard to NE 14 for 8 yards (A.Taylor; D.Davis).
2nd & 2 at NE 14 - (9:37 - 1st) M.Jones pass incomplete deep right to K.Bourne.
3rd & 2 at NE 14 - (9:32 - 1st) (Shotgun) M.Jones pass incomplete deep left to H.Henry.

1st & 10 at NE 25 - (10:39 - 2nd) E.Elliott left tackle to NE 33 for 8 yards (M.Lattimore).
2nd & 2 at NE 33 - (10:08 - 2nd) (Shotgun) E.Elliott right tackle to NE 35 for 2 yards (M.Lattimore, K.Saunders).
<snip>

1st & 10 at NE 25 - (14:50 - 3rd) M.Jones pass short left to J.Smith-Schuster to NE 26 for 1 yard (A.Taylor). <--- this play knocks JJSS out of the game
2nd & 9 at NE 26 - (14:23 - 3rd) R.Stevenson left guard to NE 34 for 8 yards (P.Werner).
3rd & 1 at NE 34 - (14:00 - 3rd) M.Jones FUMBLES (Aborted) at NE 29, RECOVERED by NO-C.Jordan at NE 29.

...but then, not so much.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,013
Unreal America
I expect them to go back to the type of offense they installed in December 2018. A grind it out, run based offense. I would expect to see a lot more Pharaoh Brown, less Gesicki and a fullback added to the roster this week.
I don't doubt that they may try that, but I feel pretty confident in saying that it won't work. With no threat to pass then teams would load the box and overwhelm our shaky OL. We don't have receivers or a QB who can make a D pay for overcommitting to stop the run.

I'd certainly like to see us run more (ideally more with Rham, and less with Zeke). But if we get out of balance I suspect bad, bad things will occur.
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,303
from the wilds of western ma
I am not saying this applies to Bill, but coaches are also wrong. Sports history is full of coaching changes where a a guy who was on ther bench is played by the new coach and is better than the guys he sat behind.
Oh, for sure. Didn’t mean to imply coaches are infallible in their decisions. Just that a lot them tend to approach them the way I described, based on their daily information and evaluations in practice.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
This isn't just on Mac obviously, but I got a little curious over how bad this offense has been and they have the 2nd worst dropback EPA/Play in the league since at least 2012 (the site I use doesn't go further). They probably won't end the season this poorly, but right now this passing offense as a whole is just in another stratosphere of shit.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,030
Earlier in the year I thought there were some real bad WR plays....
Last two weeks Mac is missing guys who are open. The playcalling is pretty good, the WRs are winning a good amount... the line still stinks, but Mac is a complete disaster because he's being given nice easy throws and he just either doesn't see them or won't take them.
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,170
Westwood MA
If you want to back even further a guy named Jim Plunkett looked equally lost here. Two teams and several years later he was a 2-time SB champ.
Mac needs a new team, a decent OL and a reset. And so do the Pats.
If the Patriots trade Mac Jones and get the same haul for draft picks in return that they got for Plunkett, I'm all for it.
 

daburgaman

New Member
Apr 3, 2007
298
Dan Orlovsky
@danorlovsky7



“The Patriots all 22 tape is horrific

Impossible to play QB”

Haven’t seen any all 22 yet but he has to be referring to the oline play. Not trying to take blame off of Mac but I don’t know many qbs who could succeed with this offense right now.
 

Jinhocho

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2001
10,290
Durham, NC
Earlier in the year I thought there were some real bad WR plays....
Last two weeks Mac is missing guys who are open. The playcalling is pretty good, the WRs are winning a good amount... the line still stinks, but Mac is a complete disaster because he's being given nice easy throws and he just either doesn't see them or won't take them.
I've read some stuff that he's basically looking for his first read and then bailing if it's not there.
 

JokersWildJIMED

Blinded by Borges
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2004
2,754
Not sure why we’re quoting Orlovsky as he has been one of the biggest Mac defenders from the beginning…he essentially claims Mac is as good as Purdy and is simply not credible
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,030
Orlovsky's claim to fame has been riding for Wentz as an elite QB right up until he was out of the league. His takes on QBs are worthless on other stuff he can be fine but not QBs
 

k-factory

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2005
1,866
seattle, wa
Armchair psych for a second: There is a window of time when you can showcase leadership, overcome obstacles and prove you’re worthy of being a leader. And when you do that your team gets behind you and will elevate their own performance because it’s worthwhile.
Sure these guys are all professionals and are all compensated well but they are also human and that dynamic does come into play.
The line sucks but they have had decent performances just not consistent ones. But Mac keeps failing to elevate the team even when the protection is good. That saps motivation.
Maybe it’s a chicken and an egg problem but BB has often preached ‘mental toughness’ and that really starts with the QB to lead by example.
When that’s not there the overall effort level will wane.
 

Jettisoned

Member
SoSH Member
May 6, 2008
1,059
Orlovsky's claim to fame has been riding for Wentz as an elite QB right up until he was out of the league. His takes on QBs are worthless on other stuff he can be fine but not QBs
His claim to fame is running out of bounds at the back of the endzone completely unpressured, giving up a safety for free. Maybe he's just looking out for his colleagues in the terrible quarterbacks guild.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,256
Dan Orlovsky
@danorlovsky7



“The Patriots all 22 tape is horrific

Impossible to play QB”

Haven’t seen any all 22 yet but he has to be referring to the oline play. Not trying to take blame off of Mac but I don’t know many qbs who could succeed with this offense right now.

I saw him comment (at least I think it was him) on this pic

 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I saw him comment (at least I think it was him) on this pic

I wanted to get @SMU_Sox's take on this play in particular, because to me the way Trent Brown sets and just tries to widen the pass rusher only to look back at Mac and then desperately stick his arm out could indicate he expected Mac to be anchored much shallower in the pocket and was trying to guide the DE towards depth and then was surprised to see Mac 11 yards deep. Am I reading too much into this? Is it possible either Mac or the tackles fucked up the expected depth of the drop there?
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,545
San Francisco
I wanted to get @SMU_Sox's take on this play in particular, because to me the way Trent Brown sets and just tries to widen the pass rusher only to look back at Mac and then desperately stick his arm out could indicate he expected Mac to be anchored much shallower in the pocket and was trying to guide the DE towards depth and then was surprised to see Mac 11 yards deep. Am I reading too much into this? Is it possible either Mac or the tackles fucked up the expected depth of the drop there?
I thought the same, I also know nothing about football.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,106
I wanted to get @SMU_Sox's take on this play in particular, because to me the way Trent Brown sets and just tries to widen the pass rusher only to look back at Mac and then desperately stick his arm out could indicate he expected Mac to be anchored much shallower in the pocket and was trying to guide the DE towards depth and then was surprised to see Mac 11 yards deep. Am I reading too much into this? Is it possible either Mac or the tackles fucked up the expected depth of the drop there?
The only thing I can think of when I see that still shot is "Man, that better be a fucking screen."

Then I remember we have zero guys who are fast enough or have enough vision to make a screen work, so it wouldn't matter anyway. And Mac might throw it to the other team trying to do something stupid off his back foot.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,610
around the way
The only thing I can think of when I see that still shot is "Man, that better be a fucking screen."

Then I remember we have zero guys who are fast enough or have enough vision to make a screen work, so it wouldn't matter anyway. And Mac might throw it to the other team trying to do something stupid off his back foot.
One of the saddest parts of this whole season debacle is that the Mac Sucks contingent is in full-on denial about how bad the OL also is. Like why are these two things somehow mutually exclusive. Even the announcers were calling out that it was pointless for most of the day to step up in the pocket after the tackles were beaten because his guards were usually occupying the space where one would step up due to being bullrushed themselves.

I'm 100% fine with Bill walking away from Mac this offseason and drafting someone or signing a JAG, but we'll be in the same position next year if he disregards the tackle position in the draft and FA period and picks up a center and a guard in the draft and rolls with garbage on the OL once again.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,856
Football is the ultimate team sport. A bad OL is going to make life much harder for a QB. Bad receivers run poor routes and drop good passes even if there's time. A bad QB makes the OL look worse and doesn't give the WRs a chance to make plays. It all fits together. Conversely, a good OL helps a QB a ton, and great receivers make plays, giving the QB confidence. Meanwhile, a great QB makes the right reads and can move in the pocket and make the OL better, and helps hit receivers in stride so they get more YAC.

It feels right now like all phases of the offense are breaking down and it's all piling up on itself and making everything seem even worse (if that's even possible).
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
One of the saddest parts of this whole season debacle is that the Mac Sucks contingent is in full-on denial about how bad the OL also is. Like why are these two things somehow mutually exclusive. Even the announcers were calling out that it was pointless for most of the day to step up in the pocket after the tackles were beaten because his guards were usually occupying the space where one would step up due to being bullrushed themselves.

I'm 100% fine with Bill walking away from Mac this offseason and drafting someone or signing a JAG, but we'll be in the same position next year if he disregards the tackle position in the draft and FA period and picks up a center and a guard in the draft and rolls with garbage on the OL once again.
I'm seeing a whole lot more people in denial about how bad Mac has been than people who think he's the only part of the offense that sucks. The vast majority of people unhappy with his play readily recognize the OL is the worst in football by two of the three metrics we have available and the receivers suck. Honestly, I'm not being hyperbolic when I say I haven't seen "the OL is fine" as a sentiment echoed anywhere, not since, say, Week 3. But the "Mac is fine, no one could do any better in this offense" contingent is still going strong online.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,545
San Francisco
One of the saddest parts of this whole season debacle is that the Mac Sucks contingent is in full-on denial about how bad the OL also is. Like why are these two things somehow mutually exclusive. Even the announcers were calling out that it was pointless for most of the day to step up in the pocket after the tackles were beaten because his guards were usually occupying the space where one would step up due to being bullrushed themselves.

I'm 100% fine with Bill walking away from Mac this offseason and drafting someone or signing a JAG, but we'll be in the same position next year if he disregards the tackle position in the draft and FA period and picks up a center and a guard in the draft and rolls with garbage on the OL once again.
really? nearly everyone I've read on this board agrees they are probably the worst line in the NFL. but also, Mac stinks.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,158
AZ
really? nearly everyone I've read on this board agrees they are probably the worst line in the NFL. but also, Mac stinks.
Yeah, who are the people in denial about our OL?

I guess the argument is that we can’t really know how bad Mac is because of our OL. Which again is not exactly an under-represented discussion on SOSH. This has been a discussion here for a year or more. It has basically been the discussion (with some pass catcher discussion thrown in).

I was on team “I’m just not sure about Mac” until very recently. Now I am sure. The chicken and egg or “fault” question is not one that interests me. Is he shitty because the line sucks, and in perfect conditions he would flourish? Many seem to think they know one way or the other. I am comfortable saying that I don’t know. It doesn’t matter. That ship has sailed. He is broken. If he has a Ryan Brasier resurgence with a good line, good for him. It needs to happen somewhere else. For his sake and the Patriots’ sake.
 

Arroyoyo

New Member
Dec 13, 2021
836
really? nearly everyone I've read on this board agrees they are probably the worst line in the NFL. but also, Mac stinks.
Yeah, this.

The OL sucks.

Mac sucks.

If we missed a post from someone saying the OL is fine, please share it.

The closest I’ve seen is “Mac doesn’t help the OL by not stepping up into the pocket” and “Mac doesn’t have good pocket awareness.”

It’s almost like because both suck (Mac and the OL), when put on a field together, they make each other suck more.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,610
around the way
really? nearly everyone I've read on this board agrees they are probably the worst line in the NFL. but also, Mac stinks.
Both you and roddick like 5 posts ago looked at an impossible passing situation photo and concluded--and I'm paraphrasing--"that must be Mac's fault".

Tom Brady Resurrected Cyborg couldn't have done shit on Sunday with that offense. That doesn't imply that Mac doesn't suck. But "that must be Mac's fault" implies that you didn't notice what a joke that the OL was all damn day.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,096
New York City
Both you and roddick like 5 posts ago looked at an impossible passing situation photo and concluded--and I'm paraphrasing--"that must be Mac's fault".

Tom Brady Resurrected Cyborg couldn't have done shit on Sunday with that offense. That doesn't imply that Mac doesn't suck. But "that must be Mac's fault" implies that you didn't notice what a joke that the OL was all damn day.
Interestingly enough, Daniel Jones is going through the same thing this year. Not that Jones is Justin Herbert, but he has had a touch of success in the NFL. He has less than one second to throw every play. And he's truly awful this year because of it.

But when you're getting hit by THREE guys every play, you will suck.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,302
Both you and roddick like 5 posts ago looked at an impossible passing situation photo and concluded--and I'm paraphrasing--"that must be Mac's fault".

Tom Brady Resurrected Cyborg couldn't have done shit on Sunday with that offense. That doesn't imply that Mac doesn't suck. But "that must be Mac's fault" implies that you didn't notice what a joke that the OL was all damn day.
Actually, they didn’t. In fact, rodderick openly wondered whether it was Mac OR the OT screwing up the depth of the drop. He left it as an open-ended question.

Your paraphrasing is simply an incorrect representation of what he wrote and what slammins also was wondering.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,856
I mean, the problem with the offense is that, right now, they might have to replace literally every single starter on it.
Yep, this feels like it. Even Rhamondre - who was supposed to be the best player on the offense - has looked very MEH. No explosion, no smashing through defenders, no....nothing.

Through 5 games: 68 att, 188 rush yards, 2.8 y/a, with a long of just 12 yards. 12 receptions for 87 yards. Just one total TD. He has no burst, and doesn't power through guys either. He just looks slow and lame. Much of that is the OL - he can't even get a head of steam going. Last year he had 2.9 yards before contact, and this year it's just 1.8. But his yards after contact this year is godawful.

2021: 2.7 yards after contact per attempt
2022: 2.1 yards after contact per attempt
2023: 1.0 yards after contact per attempt

According to pro-football-reference, he's broken a grand total of *THREE* tackles this season. In 2021 he averaged 8.3 rush attempts per broken tackle, and that was 8.8 last year. This year? 22.7 rush attempts per broken tackle.

So again, it's a team sport, right? The OL is getting him buried every time he touches the ball, but he's also not doing anything to help either. He's getting hit and going down instead of shrugging off contact.

It's totally depressing because they aren't doing ANYTHING right on offense. At all. The entire thing is broken.

EDIT: By the way, Elliott hasn't been any better in this regard. He's also averaging 1.0 yards after contact per attempt, and has ZERO broken tackles. So neither guy is "helping" the OL out by being difficult to bring down. That combined with poor OL play means NO rushing game whatsoever. And that makes passing harder. Of course, not passing well makes it harder to run the ball. So again, it's a vicious cycle. If only they could start by doing ONE thing very well, it would really help.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,545
San Francisco
Both you and roddick like 5 posts ago looked at an impossible passing situation photo and concluded--and I'm paraphrasing--"that must be Mac's fault".

Tom Brady Resurrected Cyborg couldn't have done shit on Sunday with that offense. That doesn't imply that Mac doesn't suck. But "that must be Mac's fault" implies that you didn't notice what a joke that the OL was all damn day.
You are not very good at paraphrasing then.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,158
AZ
Both you and roddick like 5 posts ago looked at an impossible passing situation photo and concluded--and I'm paraphrasing--"that must be Mac's fault".

Tom Brady Resurrected Cyborg couldn't have done shit on Sunday with that offense. That doesn't imply that Mac doesn't suck. But "that must be Mac's fault" implies that you didn't notice what a joke that the OL was all damn day.
Not sure that’s a fair leap to what they were implying, but either way, the question “is it Mac or is it the offense around him” has dominated BBTL for a year now. It has dominated most threads and even game threads. People disagree, but I don’t think people trying to bolster Mac sucks arguments by pretending the OL is good has really been a thing anyone would take seriously here. Unfortunately, team Mac sucks have plenty to work with to make their arguments right now without needing hyperbole.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,610
around the way
Interestingly enough, Daniel Jones is going through the same thing this year. Not that Jones is Justin Herbert, but he has had a touch of success in the NFL. He has less than one second to throw every play. And he's truly awful this year because of it.

But when you're getting hit by THREE guys every play, you will suck.
Yep. Daniel Jones is another example. And somehow Russell Wilson and Goff can play again, and let's talk about Baker Mayfield.

Actually, they didn’t. In fact, rodderick openly wondered whether it was Mac OR the OT screwing up the depth of the drop. He left it as an open-ended question.

Your paraphrasing is simply an incorrect representation of what he wrote and what slammins also was wondering.
You're right. I went too far. They said that it could be Mac's fault, not that it must be. Which is still really weird to me. Finding plays where Mac sucked in that game isn't that hard. Pointing to one of like a dozen Trent Brown turnstile performances and looking for the possibility that it was somehow the QBs fault is denial.

edit: if nobody else thinks that's weird, I'll shut up about it.