Vince Wilfork: new 3 year deal for $22.5m to stay with Patriots

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
That Bob Kraft surfaced on this only underscores the seriousness of the situation. He is an ideal owner; I love him. But he is not above pressuring players, or above getting out front publicly so if it goes south, he can say he tried.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,277
Newton
dcmissle said:
That Bob Kraft surfaced on this only underscores the seriousness of the situation. He is an ideal owner; I love him. But he is not above pressuring players, or above getting out front publicly so if it goes south, he can say he tried.
Exactly. Didn't we hear the same song and dance from Kraft last year about Welker? How is this any different?
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
He's mentioning Vince as an all time favorite Patriot. I don't recall Weller getting that compliment from Kraft. I think it's an honest statement from Kraft with little spin.

Plus Welker was a free agent
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,683
deep inside Guido territory
ORLANDO - We have some light to shed on the Vince Wilfork situation.

Prior to Wilfork requesting his release, the Patriots asked the veteran defensive tackle to restructure his 2014 contract so that his salary would be based on playing time. The thresholds Wilfork would have to attain to realize all of the $7.5M salary he is currently due to be paid are not known but, in the offer Wilfork rejected, he could still realize the $7.5M without playing every game.

Wilfork blew out his Achilles in the fourth game of the 2013 season. It's likely he'll start training camp on the physically unable to perform (PUP) list and - given the length of time necessary to recover from an Achilles - his availability for the start of the season is also in question. Wilfork was paid $6.5M in 2013.

The restructure also included an extension. The length and value of that is not known nor whether the 2014 component of the offer is contingent on Wilfork agreeing to future years.

In other words, we have some light to shed but it's a flashlight and not full illumination.

Wilfork asked for his release and hasn't been heard from since. I was told Sunday Wilfork cleaned out his locker at Gillette Stadium by a source and confirmed it with a second source Monday.

Patriots owner Robert Kraft said on Monday he's holding out hope the two sides can come to a resolution.
 
http://www.csnne.com/blog/patriots-talk/wilfork-rejected-patriots-restructured-extension-offer
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,877
Here
So it looks like they may have been trying to get Vince his money, but spread the cap hit with clauses not LTBE, since he missed most of last year? If Vince could have gotten, say, 5-7.5 million and gotten a decent extension, I think he'd be crazy to turn that down, especially after the Raji contract. Maybe Vince is expecting to miss a good chunk of the start of the season and feels he's earned the right to be paid through that injury time.
 

Otis Foster

rex ryan's podiatrist
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
1,713
dcmissle said:
That Bob Kraft surfaced on this only underscores the seriousness of the situation. He is an ideal owner; I love him. But he is not above pressuring players, or above getting out front publicly so if it goes south, he can say he tried.
 
...which from a fan's perspective is exactly what he should be doing. Now the onus has shifted a bit, with an inference - however slight - that Vince is digging his heels in.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,683
deep inside Guido territory
New article with Vince quote from Curran.  It actually sounds promising.
 
 
ORLANDO -- Bill Belichick urged a reporter on Tuesday to “verify” with Vince Wilfork that the defensive tackle actually asked for his release.
 
During the annual Coaches Breakfast, Belichick was asked on two different occasions about Wilfork.
 
The first time through, Belichick was asked about contentiousness with Wilfork.
 
“Uh, I don’t really know what, you know, the nature of your question — maybe that’s something you’d have to talk about Vince about,” Belichick answered.
 
Asked if Wilfork indeed asked for his release, Belichick replied, “I’m not going to talk about anything with any of our specific players. I’m not going to get into that.”
 
Later, Belichick was asked again.
 
“If you have any questions about Vince, you should ask Vince, or (questions about) any other players, you should talk to those players,” he answered.
 
Where will the team go now that Wilfork requested his release?
 
“You need to talk to him about any of those statements. I think you should verify first,” Belichick warned.
 
I contacted Wilfork who replied, “I will respond to all media for FIRST TIME after my fate is determined!!!!”
 
Wilfork’s release request was reported by Ian Rapoport of NFL Network
 
His report came two days after the 2014 league year began and Wilfork’s $11.6 million cap hit went into effect. It also came on the heels of the Patriots acquiring Darrelle Revis.
 
The team hoped Wilfork would agree to restructure his deal to save 2014 cap room.
 
As we reported Monday night, Wilfork was given an offer that would allow him to realize his $7.6 million salary in 2014 if he was able to hit playing time thresholds.
 
Between Belichick cautioning reporters to “verify”, Wilfork stating his pending comments will be his “FIRST” remarks and owner Robert Kraft saying Monday he “surely hopes” that Wilfork will remain with the team, there seems to be a cooling off in progress since Wilfork cleaned out his locker and took down his nameplate.
 
What’s emerged in the past 18 hours is that, while the situation with Wilfork isn’t ideal, it is salvageable.
 
http://www.csnne.com/blog/patriots-talk/brightening-skies-stormy-wilfork-front
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,683
deep inside Guido territory
New England Patriots owner Bob Kraft said Monday that he's still not giving up hope of retaining nose tackle Vince Wilfork, who had asked for his release two weeks ago.
Now Kraft is taking action, re-recruiting his defensive leader.
Sources close to the situation have told NFL Media Insider Ian Rapoport that the Patriots have taken steps to win Wilfork back.
Although nothing has been worked out on the contract front, Kraft is reaching out to Wilfork in an effort to smooth over any bad blood that has developed between the two sides.
It remains to be seen if Kraft can win Wilfork back after the latter cleaned out his locker two weeks ago.
On the bright side, the two have maintained a great relationship. Wilfork has long been one of Kraft's personal favorites.
Wilfork is scheduled to make $7.5 million in 2014, with a salary cap charge of $11.6 million. For a 32-year-old coming off Achilles surgery, those numbers represent no small hurdle to clear.
 
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000336656/article/vince-wilfork-could-still-return-to-new-england-patriots?campaign=Twitter_atl

 
Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 9s
There are 2 parts of Wilfork situation: Making him feel wanted & working out contract situation. Progress on the first, not as much on 2nd
 
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
65,017
RedOctober3829 said:
New article with Vince quote from Curran.  It actually sounds promising.
 
http://www.csnne.com/blog/patriots-talk/brightening-skies-stormy-wilfork-front
 
Y'know, I bet players like seeing that. There are so many coaches that try to go no comment, but when pressed say something about a player. The players pretty clearly like to speak--or not speak--for themselves. I imagine Belichick's hard-line refusal to speak of the players in that way and to let his players control things in the media more helps his standing with them.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Thank you to Vince for making clear he hasn't said JACK or SHIT to a reporter. 
 
Which, if you've been following along, means the NFL Network employs the guy who overheard the guy who said to the other guy that he saw Ferris throw up at 31 Flavors last night.
 
M

MentalDisabldLst

Guest
 

Reverend said:
Y'know, I bet players like seeing that. There are so many coaches that try to go no comment, but when pressed say something about a player. The players pretty clearly like to speak--or not speak--for themselves. I imagine Belichick's hard-line refusal to speak of the players in that way and to let his players control things in the media more helps his standing with them.
 
Or the players don't care one way or the other, and BB is just giving up one opportunity for him to exert leverage over these situations by determining the narrative.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,033
Mansfield MA
MentalDisabldLst said:
 
 
Or the players don't care one way or the other, and BB is just giving up one opportunity for him to exert leverage over these situations by determining the narrative.
Who cares about determining the narrative, though? Is there one example of a coach talking about an issue like this and having that provide any benefit whatsoever?

The Patriots' actions speak louder than any words, anyway. The fact that they haven't cut Wilfork means that they haven't given up hope of him being on the roster in 2014, whether at his current numbers or in a restructure. That they've managed to add pieces without touching Wilfork (by far the biggest potential source of cap savings) tells me that they still value him and will go to lengths to try to keep him.
 

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
Super Nomario said:
Who cares about determining the narrative, though? Is there one example of a coach talking about an issue like this and having that provide any benefit whatsoever?

The Patriots' actions speak louder than any words, anyway. The fact that they haven't cut Wilfork means that they haven't given up hope of him being on the roster in 2014, whether at his current numbers or in a restructure. That they've managed to add pieces without touching Wilfork (by far the biggest potential source of cap savings) tells me that they still value him and will go to lengths to try to keep him.
And this is not surprising.  The run defense suffered while Vince was out despite the valiant efforts of some of his replacements, effective nose tackles are hard to find and Vince is apparently a team leader. 
 
Whether and when Vince can come back, and how he'll perform when he does return, are all unknowns, but the Patriots would be crazy not to do what they are doing: exploring ways to make this work for both sides.
 
I know that Vince isn't the first "large" human to succeed at nose tackle.  Vince's immediate predecessor, Ted Washington, wasn't exactly svelte.  But Vince's ability to play at his level at that weight always amazed me, and I was always worried that he'd pop his achilles or suffer some other horrible injury.  That's a long way of saying that I have my doubts about his comeback, though at the same time Vince has defied logic in my mind since the get go, so who the hell knows?
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Is cleaning out your locker an acceptable substitute? That story stands unrebutted.

If there were nothing to this, Kraft wouldn't be saying anything of note because there would be nothing to discuss.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
dcmissle said:
Is cleaning out your locker an acceptable substitute? That story stands unrebutted.

If there were nothing to this, Kraft wouldn't be saying anything of note because there would be nothing to discuss.
 
Of course there is SOMETHING to this - he's carrying a huge cap hit in the last year of his contract and coming off an injury. There was a non-zero chance that his contract was going to be discussed this offseason. 
 
Many have argued this season about the different 'culture' of a football locker room. One of, if not the most important, symbols in the locker room is the locker. I would not be surprised at all that Vince loudly cleaning out his locker was witnessed by team employees, sales weasels and beat reporters. It is an undeniable part of the culture and a ritual that "says something". It is a long way from "Vince ranted as he cleaned out his locker" (at the end of the season, mind you) to "Vince asked for his release". Rapsheet is not a reliable source. Vince tell us so. Hell, "no comment" from Vince to Curran on that question confirms Rapshit's "exclusive". And Vince specifically refutes it. 
 
Vince makes ~10% of the salary cap, has been here for a decade and has a noted off-field relationship with Kraft. It would surprise me if Kraft were silent. He gets involved in special circumstances like these. 
 
M

MentalDisabldLst

Guest
Super Nomario said:
Who cares about determining the narrative, though? Is there one example of a coach talking about an issue like this and having that provide any benefit whatsoever?
 
How could someone possibly prove such a thing one way or another?  We'll never know in a counterfactual world what would have happened contractually if Coach X hadn't said Y about Player Z.
 
But the analogy I'll use is politics: take President Obama.  He is going to get killed by the same people whether he says something or declines to say anything about nearly any particular issue.  Faced with such hobsons' choices, there are some issues where he doesn't consider it worth his time to say anything, but many on which he does, regardless.  His audience is frequently not the one he is nominally addressing - perhaps it's signalling to other allies or interest groups (other FAs in the league or players on his team, in the Patriots analogy), perhaps it's to try and paint the opposition into a corner in order to create PR leverage (as Kraft may be doing here by going out of his way to seem reasonable), but there are plenty of reasons to frame a narrative.
 
My point is that Belichick may decline to speak about players' contract situations out of a sense of dignity or privacy, or because he realizes he's bad at anything involving PR, but it's not like that's an obvious decision that everyone should make - there are rational people who choose otherwise in lots of other situations.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
dcmissle said:
Is cleaning out your locker an acceptable substitute? That story stands unrebutted.

If there were nothing to this, Kraft wouldn't be saying anything of note because there would be nothing to discuss.
I agree with this.  We can't say for certain exactly what happened, but it seems really likely that Wilfork told the team he wanted out at some point in recent weeks.  It seems emotions are a little bit cooler and the two sides are now trying to work something out.
Going into the locker room in the middle of March and ripping off your name plate and cleaning out the locker doesnt seem like normal course business.
 
Vince didnt really refute the story, he refuted being the source while saying things are up in the air. 
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,235
Missoula, MT
soxfan121 said:
Thank you to Vince for making clear he hasn't said JACK or SHIT to a reporter. 
 
Which, if you've been following along, means the NFL Network employs the guy who overheard the guy who said to the other guy that he saw Ferris throw up at 31 Flavors last night.
 
 
Thank you, Simone.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,683
deep inside Guido territory
First, owner Robert Kraft shared his thoughts Monday that he hopes Wilfork remains a Patriot and that he believes Wilfork feels the same way. That cautious optimism indicated that perhaps there was forward momentum between the sides.

But almost immediately after Kraft said those words, a report surfaced that Wilfork was so angry, he had "ripped" his nameplate off and cleaned out his locker. In some media circles, that blunted what Kraft said and created a picture of acrimony between the sides.

Except ...

"That happened a long time ago," a source said.

That timing is key when it comes to Wilfork and the context surrounding his present situation.

Surely, he was angry two weeks ago when he requested his release and did indeed clean out his locker, as first reported by the Boston Herald. Doing so represented a symbolic showing of his discontent.

But that doesn't account for what could have happened over the last two weeks or so. Things have changed, the sides are talking.

That probably explains why Bill Belichick seemed to go out of his way Tuesday morning to dismiss the idea of a contentious situation with Wilfork. It might have been at one point, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's that way now.

There have been some steps forward, but more are needed to push it over the goal-line. As we learned last year with Wes Welker, just because things might be looking up doesn't mean an agreement is forthcoming. It can fizzle out quickly.

But one thing is clear: The Patriots and Wilfork are in a better place than they were two weeks ago.
 
Reiss
http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4760732/timing-the-key-with-wilfork-pats?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,118
A Scud Away from Hell
And boom. There it is:
 
@AdamSchefter Patriots and DT Vince Wilfork restructured his contract. It's a new 3-year, $22.5M deal, per source. Wilfork stays a Patriot.
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,118
A Scud Away from Hell
And there's Rapshit juuuuuuuuuust a step late as always:
 
@RapSheet Source: #Patriots and Vince Wilfork are closing in on a basic agreement on a contract extension that will keep him in New England.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Interested to see the structure before opining on this.
 
Good news is, playing time expenses for this year are going to be heavily NLTBE weighted so cap hit might shrink materially
 
Dec 10, 2012
6,943
That's a lot more $ that I would like, but we need him this fall/winter. Hope it doesn't sting in 2016. What's the cap hit for 2015 and 2016?
 

Steve Dillard

wishes drew noticed him instead of sweet & sour
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2003
5,994
So this year's $7.5 salary times 3
 
Allows him never to get a pay cut, but brings his AAV to the $7.5 rather than $11
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,877
Here
Stitch01 said:
Interested to see the structure before opining on this.
 
Good news is, playing time expenses for this year are going to be heavily NLTBE weighted so cap hit might shrink materially
 
If it's just the 7.5 million spread out over this year's and next year's cap, then meh I can deal with it.
 
I think I still would have rather cut him at this point.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,683
deep inside Guido territory
phragle said:
Woah, I hate this so far.
How can you hate it?  It opens up cap space for this year Obviously need to see cap hits for the next 2 seasons, but for this year I think it's the best of both worlds.  You gain cap space and get the player back.
 
$3 million guaranteed??? Hell yea.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
SeoulSoxFan said:
So possibly no more than $8m in cap hit? Does that release about $4m in cap money this year?
They're still hit with the bonus, but if that $8MM is in PT incentives most will be NLTBE incentives which will roll to '15 if he hits them.
 
Structure details really matter on this one IMO
 
EDIT: so $3MM guaranteed over 3 years should free up at least $2MM + whatever PT incentives are NLTBE
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,877
Here
RedOctober3829 said:
How can you hate it?  It opens up cap space for this year Obviously need to see cap hits for the next 2 seasons, but for this year I think it's the best of both worlds.  You gain cap space and get the player back.
 
$3 million guaranteed??? Hell yea.
 
Anything you gain in room this year, you lose next year. The tab is already starting to build, though they do have some money to work with.
 
Dec 10, 2012
6,943
So, the demise of the Wilfork family financial acumen has been greatly exaggerated.
 
 
Do we draft Nix, mentor for one year, and cut him after a year?
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,235
Missoula, MT
Really great news. I wanted Jared Allen too but 4 of the 5 things on my wish list came true this offseason.
 
Very nice.
 

Klostrophobic

New Member
Apr 12, 2006
578
Part Sun Known
At 3 mil guaranteed I'm on board I guess. I would expect him to be a league average DT at this point though.
 
Is this going to be an issue again next year or the year after, though?
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,877
Here
Klostrophobic said:
At 3 mil guaranteed I'm on board I guess. I would expect him to be a league average DT at this point though.
 
Is this going to be an issue again next year or the year after, though?
 
With 3 million guaranteed, I can't see how this will be an issue next year. It's very likely a one year deal, with little to no cap implications beyond the NLTBE carryover.
 

Phragle

wild card bitches
SoSH Member
Jan 1, 2009
13,154
Carmine's closet
RedOctober3829 said:
How can you hate it?  It opens up cap space for this year Obviously need to see cap hits for the next 2 seasons, but for this year I think it's the best of both worlds.  You gain cap space and get the player back.
 
$3 million guaranteed??? Hell yea.
Because he wasn't the player he used to be since 2011. I felt cutting him would have been a good option. Obviously the official numbers could change my opinion drastically, but 22 is a lot and there isn't much left in the FA market to spend the savings on.