That Bob Kraft surfaced on this only underscores the seriousness of the situation. He is an ideal owner; I love him. But he is not above pressuring players, or above getting out front publicly so if it goes south, he can say he tried.
Exactly. Didn't we hear the same song and dance from Kraft last year about Welker? How is this any different?dcmissle said:That Bob Kraft surfaced on this only underscores the seriousness of the situation. He is an ideal owner; I love him. But he is not above pressuring players, or above getting out front publicly so if it goes south, he can say he tried.
http://www.csnne.com/blog/patriots-talk/wilfork-rejected-patriots-restructured-extension-offerORLANDO - We have some light to shed on the Vince Wilfork situation.
Prior to Wilfork requesting his release, the Patriots asked the veteran defensive tackle to restructure his 2014 contract so that his salary would be based on playing time. The thresholds Wilfork would have to attain to realize all of the $7.5M salary he is currently due to be paid are not known but, in the offer Wilfork rejected, he could still realize the $7.5M without playing every game.
Wilfork blew out his Achilles in the fourth game of the 2013 season. It's likely he'll start training camp on the physically unable to perform (PUP) list and - given the length of time necessary to recover from an Achilles - his availability for the start of the season is also in question. Wilfork was paid $6.5M in 2013.
The restructure also included an extension. The length and value of that is not known nor whether the 2014 component of the offer is contingent on Wilfork agreeing to future years.
In other words, we have some light to shed but it's a flashlight and not full illumination.
Wilfork asked for his release and hasn't been heard from since. I was told Sunday Wilfork cleaned out his locker at Gillette Stadium by a source and confirmed it with a second source Monday.
Patriots owner Robert Kraft said on Monday he's holding out hope the two sides can come to a resolution.
dcmissle said:That Bob Kraft surfaced on this only underscores the seriousness of the situation. He is an ideal owner; I love him. But he is not above pressuring players, or above getting out front publicly so if it goes south, he can say he tried.
http://www.csnne.com/blog/patriots-talk/brightening-skies-stormy-wilfork-front
ORLANDO -- Bill Belichick urged a reporter on Tuesday to “verify” with Vince Wilfork that the defensive tackle actually asked for his release.
During the annual Coaches Breakfast, Belichick was asked on two different occasions about Wilfork.
The first time through, Belichick was asked about contentiousness with Wilfork.
“Uh, I don’t really know what, you know, the nature of your question — maybe that’s something you’d have to talk about Vince about,” Belichick answered.
Asked if Wilfork indeed asked for his release, Belichick replied, “I’m not going to talk about anything with any of our specific players. I’m not going to get into that.”
Later, Belichick was asked again.
“If you have any questions about Vince, you should ask Vince, or (questions about) any other players, you should talk to those players,” he answered.
Where will the team go now that Wilfork requested his release?
“You need to talk to him about any of those statements. I think you should verify first,” Belichick warned.
I contacted Wilfork who replied, “I will respond to all media for FIRST TIME after my fate is determined!!!!”
Wilfork’s release request was reported by Ian Rapoport of NFL Network.
His report came two days after the 2014 league year began and Wilfork’s $11.6 million cap hit went into effect. It also came on the heels of the Patriots acquiring Darrelle Revis.
The team hoped Wilfork would agree to restructure his deal to save 2014 cap room.
As we reported Monday night, Wilfork was given an offer that would allow him to realize his $7.6 million salary in 2014 if he was able to hit playing time thresholds.
Between Belichick cautioning reporters to “verify”, Wilfork stating his pending comments will be his “FIRST” remarks and owner Robert Kraft saying Monday he “surely hopes” that Wilfork will remain with the team, there seems to be a cooling off in progress since Wilfork cleaned out his locker and took down his nameplate.
What’s emerged in the past 18 hours is that, while the situation with Wilfork isn’t ideal, it is salvageable.
Ian Rapoport @RapSheet 19m
If you're curious about slight optimism emerging from #Patriots about Vince Wilfork, Robert Kraft and Vince have spoken. He's re-recruiting
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000336656/article/vince-wilfork-could-still-return-to-new-england-patriots?campaign=Twitter_atlNew England Patriots owner Bob Kraft said Monday that he's still not giving up hope of retaining nose tackle Vince Wilfork, who had asked for his release two weeks ago.
Now Kraft is taking action, re-recruiting his defensive leader.
Sources close to the situation have told NFL Media Insider Ian Rapoport that the Patriots have taken steps to win Wilfork back.
Although nothing has been worked out on the contract front, Kraft is reaching out to Wilfork in an effort to smooth over any bad blood that has developed between the two sides.
It remains to be seen if Kraft can win Wilfork back after the latter cleaned out his locker two weeks ago.
On the bright side, the two have maintained a great relationship. Wilfork has long been one of Kraft's personal favorites.
Wilfork is scheduled to make $7.5 million in 2014, with a salary cap charge of $11.6 million. For a 32-year-old coming off Achilles surgery, those numbers represent no small hurdle to clear.
Ian Rapoport @RapSheet 9s
There are 2 parts of Wilfork situation: Making him feel wanted & working out contract situation. Progress on the first, not as much on 2nd
RedOctober3829 said:New article with Vince quote from Curran. It actually sounds promising.
http://www.csnne.com/blog/patriots-talk/brightening-skies-stormy-wilfork-front
Reverend said:Y'know, I bet players like seeing that. There are so many coaches that try to go no comment, but when pressed say something about a player. The players pretty clearly like to speak--or not speak--for themselves. I imagine Belichick's hard-line refusal to speak of the players in that way and to let his players control things in the media more helps his standing with them.
Who cares about determining the narrative, though? Is there one example of a coach talking about an issue like this and having that provide any benefit whatsoever?MentalDisabldLst said:
Or the players don't care one way or the other, and BB is just giving up one opportunity for him to exert leverage over these situations by determining the narrative.
And this is not surprising. The run defense suffered while Vince was out despite the valiant efforts of some of his replacements, effective nose tackles are hard to find and Vince is apparently a team leader.Super Nomario said:Who cares about determining the narrative, though? Is there one example of a coach talking about an issue like this and having that provide any benefit whatsoever?
The Patriots' actions speak louder than any words, anyway. The fact that they haven't cut Wilfork means that they haven't given up hope of him being on the roster in 2014, whether at his current numbers or in a restructure. That they've managed to add pieces without touching Wilfork (by far the biggest potential source of cap savings) tells me that they still value him and will go to lengths to try to keep him.
bankshot1 said:Has there actually been an interview with Wilfork where he says he wants out?
dcmissle said:Is cleaning out your locker an acceptable substitute? That story stands unrebutted.
If there were nothing to this, Kraft wouldn't be saying anything of note because there would be nothing to discuss.
Super Nomario said:Who cares about determining the narrative, though? Is there one example of a coach talking about an issue like this and having that provide any benefit whatsoever?
I agree with this. We can't say for certain exactly what happened, but it seems really likely that Wilfork told the team he wanted out at some point in recent weeks. It seems emotions are a little bit cooler and the two sides are now trying to work something out.dcmissle said:Is cleaning out your locker an acceptable substitute? That story stands unrebutted.
If there were nothing to this, Kraft wouldn't be saying anything of note because there would be nothing to discuss.
soxfan121 said:Thank you to Vince for making clear he hasn't said JACK or SHIT to a reporter.
Which, if you've been following along, means the NFL Network employs the guy who overheard the guy who said to the other guy that he saw Ferris throw up at 31 Flavors last night.
ReissFirst, owner Robert Kraft shared his thoughts Monday that he hopes Wilfork remains a Patriot and that he believes Wilfork feels the same way. That cautious optimism indicated that perhaps there was forward momentum between the sides.
But almost immediately after Kraft said those words, a report surfaced that Wilfork was so angry, he had "ripped" his nameplate off and cleaned out his locker. In some media circles, that blunted what Kraft said and created a picture of acrimony between the sides.
Except ...
"That happened a long time ago," a source said.
That timing is key when it comes to Wilfork and the context surrounding his present situation.
Surely, he was angry two weeks ago when he requested his release and did indeed clean out his locker, as first reported by the Boston Herald. Doing so represented a symbolic showing of his discontent.
But that doesn't account for what could have happened over the last two weeks or so. Things have changed, the sides are talking.
That probably explains why Bill Belichick seemed to go out of his way Tuesday morning to dismiss the idea of a contentious situation with Wilfork. It might have been at one point, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's that way now.
There have been some steps forward, but more are needed to push it over the goal-line. As we learned last year with Wes Welker, just because things might be looking up doesn't mean an agreement is forthcoming. It can fizzle out quickly.
But one thing is clear: The Patriots and Wilfork are in a better place than they were two weeks ago.
Ian Rapoport @RapSheet 59s
Wilfork’s new deal is through 2016 and earns him the right to make $8M in 2014.
Stitch01 said:Interested to see the structure before opining on this.
Good news is, playing time expenses for this year are going to be heavily NLTBE weighted so cap hit might shrink materially
Karen Guregian @kguregian 49s
Source: Pats and Wilfork close to one yr deal with ability to earn $8 mil. with $3 mil. guaranteed plus option aver. $7.5 mil. on 3-yr deal
How can you hate it? It opens up cap space for this year Obviously need to see cap hits for the next 2 seasons, but for this year I think it's the best of both worlds. You gain cap space and get the player back.phragle said:Woah, I hate this so far.
They're still hit with the bonus, but if that $8MM is in PT incentives most will be NLTBE incentives which will roll to '15 if he hits them.SeoulSoxFan said:So possibly no more than $8m in cap hit? Does that release about $4m in cap money this year?
RedOctober3829 said:How can you hate it? It opens up cap space for this year Obviously need to see cap hits for the next 2 seasons, but for this year I think it's the best of both worlds. You gain cap space and get the player back.
$3 million guaranteed??? Hell yea.
Miguel@PatsCap.Com @patscap 5s
I hope that what happened with Revis reminds people to wait for the official numbers before looking to see what Wilfork's 2014 cap number is
They're counting on the Hernandez money coming off the books and the increase in the cap. I think they'll be fine.Ed Hillel said:
Anything you gain in room this year, you lose next year. The tab is already starting to build, though they do have some money to work with.
Klostrophobic said:At 3 mil guaranteed I'm on board I guess. I would expect him to be a league average DT at this point though.
Is this going to be an issue again next year or the year after, though?
Because he wasn't the player he used to be since 2011. I felt cutting him would have been a good option. Obviously the official numbers could change my opinion drastically, but 22 is a lot and there isn't much left in the FA market to spend the savings on.RedOctober3829 said:How can you hate it? It opens up cap space for this year Obviously need to see cap hits for the next 2 seasons, but for this year I think it's the best of both worlds. You gain cap space and get the player back.
$3 million guaranteed??? Hell yea.