Pats need to blitz the shit out of Flacco and play man to man. Make Flacco make mistakes with the football.
Stitch01 said:Pats in with a win or a Miami loss or a Bengal loss if I'm thinking of this correctly.
The problem is, I don't think they have a great matchup on Smith or Jones or Pitta. If the protection holds up, they could get some long TDs that way (as we've seen with the Pats blitzing the last two games).RedOctober3829 said:Pats need to blitz the shit out of Flacco and play man to man. Make Flacco make mistakes with the football.
Yes, meant this week scenarios.Bongorific said:It matters which game Cincy wins. If the lose this week and beat Ravens, Pats are in and Ravens are out. If they win this week and lose to Ravens, and Pats lose both, Pats lose WC to Cincy because if h2h tie breaker.
Super Nomario said:The problem is, I don't think they have a great matchup on Smith or Jones or Pitta. If the protection holds up, they could get some long TDs that way (as we've seen with the Pats blitzing the last two games).
This Baltimore team scares me. The D is really good, they're tough at home, and they've given the Pats trouble historically. Their offense is week, but consistent (between 14 and 30 points every game) and I don't think the Pats match up great against it.
jsinger121 said:
I think I would use Talib on Pitta as he is Flacco's security blanket.
dynomite said:
I tentatively agree, but I worry about what this means on the outside: Arrington/Dennard/Ryan stumbling and flailing as they desperately try to keep pace with Jacoby Jones and/or Torrey Smith racing down the sideline.
EDIT: It's hard, but I might make Arrington the Pitta shadow. Talib would be better to be sure (he's bigger, stronger, and a better overall CB), but Arrington is such a liability on downfield routes that I don't think you can risk it, especially against two of the fastest WRs in football. Arrington's the best tackler in the secondary and does pretty well in coverage routes over the middle.
Overall, I'd probably try to have an LB/DE chip Pitta at the line and then have Arrington pick him up.
ivanvamp said:
Talib's game isn't downfield speed. He can really blanket the bigger receivers, and I think he'd absolutely shut Pitta down. He would have handled Boldin last year, but I think Jones/Smith would give him problems. You risk the big play on the outside, though, with Ryan, Dennard, and Arrington, but still, it might be the way to go.
ivanvamp said:
Talib's game isn't downfield speed. He can really blanket the bigger receivers, and I think he'd absolutely shut Pitta down. He would have handled Boldin last year, but I think Jones/Smith would give him problems. You risk the big play on the outside, though, with Ryan, Dennard, and Arrington, but still, it might be the way to go.
BigSoxFan said:I think this has to be a big Vereen game for the Pats to win as I don't really see many big plays coming on offense. The Ravens' front 7 is going to cause all sorts of problems for our battered OL. Just like in every recent Ravens game, I don't expect Brady to have very much time to throw the ball. With Gronk out, we really need either Dobson or Thompkins back in the lineup to give Brady bigger targets in the passing game.
dcmissle said:
I imagine Vereen is the one guy Pees will attempt to take away because they don't fear the others. They'll happily take their chances tying up and beating up Amendola and Edelman on marches down the field, as that's what they have done successfully before.
It may be high risk against this crew, but I'd unleash Ridley. What do they have to lose? If the Pats can't bring some balance, Brady is likely to be running for his life for much of the afternoon.
On defense, I take away the long ball. Force the Ravens to march it down the field. They have had their share of red zone problems too.
Any recipe for a win has to include controlling the Ravens' excellent special teams.
I think they need to use more bunch formations and utilize motion to get free releases for the WRs whenever possible against these physical CBs. The more physical they are, the more they are vulnerable to the double move as well. This game screams for Aaron Dobson to work the outside of the field so hopefully he's healthy. I haven't seen a practice report from today, but he did practice last Friday. The formula for the Ravens against the Patriots in the past has been to muddle the middle of the field, so Brady will have to try to work the outside with some back-shoulders and such.Pumpsie said:The Ravens defensive backs scare me. They punished the more athletic Lion receivers all game long. If I were Edelman or Amendola, I'd take out extra insurance. This is going to be a very tough game, no doubt about it.
Good call, Lloyd had a big game against the Ravens last year IIRCRedOctober3829 said:I think they need to use more bunch formations and utilize motion to get free releases for the WRs whenever possible against these physical CBs. The more physical they are, the more they are vulnerable to the double move as well. This game screams for Aaron Dobson to work the outside of the field so hopefully he's healthy. I haven't seen a practice report from today, but he did practice last Friday. The formula for the Ravens against the Patriots in the past has been to muddle the middle of the field, so Brady will have to try to work the outside with some back-shoulders and such.
On defense, they need to be able to defend the screen pass(both inline and traditional) better. Obviously, the 4th and 5 pass was not defended good enough but they've given up way too many middle screen plays for big yardage(Denver game for example). The Ravens like to involve Rice in the screen game as we've seen in the past.
9 catches for 108 yards week 3, 7 catches for 70 in the playoffs. Welker had even bigger games - 8 for 142 and 8 for 117 and a TD.Stitch01 said:Good call, Lloyd had a big game against the Ravens last year IIRC
Super Nomario said:9 catches for 108 yards week 3, 7 catches for 70 in the playoffs. Welker had even bigger games - 8 for 142 and 8 for 117 and a TD.
This amazes me if true(which I assume it is), I could see it in obvious passing downs but it is inexcusable in other situations.mascho said:Baltimore's guards telegraph run/pass with their stance. Hand in the dirt: run. Two point stance: pass. They don't change it up for play action, draws, or screens.
Byrdbrain said:This amazes me if true(which I assume it is), I could see it in obvious passing downs but it is inexcusable in other situations.
I also don't see a major advantage for guards even doing that, I understand tackles especially with edge speed rushers but not guards.
I believe there was also a run on Baltimore's game-winning FG drive on which the guards had their hands on their knees. Otherwise, seems pretty accurate.mascho said:
Baltimore ran one play in the second half where it didn't match up, a play-action bubble screen. On every other offensive snap in the second half, run/pass could be predicted from their stances.
ivanvamp said:Over/Under on Patriots' pass interference, defensive holding, or illegal contact penalties as Flacco chucks it deep, play after play?
I'll offer 3.5 as the over/under, with at least one of them being a Mike Francesca UGE one.
Jeff Howe @jeffphowe 6m
Nate Solder (concussion) misses practice for the second straight Wednesday. Boyce, who was a little gimpy after Sunday's game, also out.
Stitch01 said:Wonder if Mankins or Svitek will go at left tackle.
I think this is really cool. It combines his love of coaching, football, and lacrosse into an endeavor he can carry on after his coaching days are over.Jeff Howe @jeffphowe 3m
Bill Belichick has announced the launch of the Bill Belichick Foundation to assist in coaching, mentorship in football and lacrosse.
dynomite said:
Svitek at LT, defending Tom Brady's blind side. Against the Ravens. In Baltimore.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVmeeYwEiQw&noredirect=1[/youtube]
Svitek started 11 games at LT for Atlanta in 2011 (the last time he was healthy). Obviously it's not ideal, but he's a pretty reasonable backup option.Reverend said:
So much for the WR-heavy spread formations being the team's best hope to score idea floated last week.
I mean, this is a pro team going into a game without a real left tackle? People go ape shit on the main board fighting about whether or not a catcher or a third baseman can play first base, the difference being that if Middlebrooks plays there and misses a catch, Lester doesn't get pile-driven into the dugout.
Meh, still would rather play now than during that stretch when Gronk was still out, Vereen was out, Amendola was banged up/out, and the Dobson/Thompkins hadnt hit their stride.dcmissle said:Temps are expected to be around 60, so maybe it won't hurt so much. The only worse timing for this game would be next week if making the playoffs were on the line. They were much better gotten earlier in the season.
Since there was no MRI on his knee, I wouldn't think it would be very serious. The brace is probably for precautionary reasons, but if he was truly healthy he wouldn't need the brace.Albert Breer @AlbertBreer 3m
RT @jamisonhensley Joe Flacco walks into practice wearing brace on left leg. #ravens
Seriously - I can guarantee that sometime in the near future, the league will need to adjust their passing rules because offenses are figuring out that they can exploit these rules to the detriment of the on-field product. When you have offenses starting to be built around exploiting pass-interference rules, they probably need to change a bit.dynomite said:
I think you're underestimating Talib here. He's simply a good CB: earlier this season he shut down Julio Jones and AJ Green.
If last night is any indication, the Ravens seem to rely in part on the pass interference offense and Flacco's rainbow throws. I'd worry about asking Kyle Arrington to cover 3-4 of those.