Okay, maybe LAC.Good defense and Rivers is a decent QB with some good weapons.You really don't think so?
Yeah, he never even made a half-step forward during the entire play.What, they ruled his forward progress was stopped?? That's simply ludicrous. Dude was crushed, what are they talking about?
Then that should be challenge-able no?He didn't rule forward progress, he ruled the runner was down before the fumble. That's why he was pointing at the ground.
I'm guessing Triplette realized he effed up and decided this was the way to "fix" it.Then that should be challenge-able no?
No. He said forward progress which is why it couldn’t be challenged.He didn't rule forward progress, he ruled the runner was down before the fumble. That's why he was pointing at the ground.
I understand what he said, that's just not what he indicated on the field. Pointing at the ground is an established NFL signal. Making it up as he goes.No. He said forward progress which is why it couldn’t be challenged.
No chalenge, however. And why would the men upstairs (or NY or whatever) not call for a review?Also, that's a fumble
They couldn't challenge, there were less than 2 minutes left.No chalenge, however. And why would the men upstairs (or NY or whatever) not call for a review?
Yes, but then the NFL said that explanation was right. And that’s why they couldn’t review.I understand what he said, that's just not what he indicated on the field. Pointing at the ground is an established NFL signal. Making it up as he goes.
Well...sort of. there are 16 crews, 10 get playoff berths (Super Bowl crew also works divisional round). Wild Card would be the worst 4 of the 10, so these officials graded out somewhere between the 38th and 62nd percentile.And these are the All-star refs.
Yes, because that's what he told them. They can't decide otherwise in NYC.Yes, but then the NFL said that explanation was right. And that’s why they couldn’t review.
Right, NY had to review it because under 2 min. Make-up no fumble call perhapsNo chalenge, however. And why would the men upstairs (or NY or whatever) not call for a review?
No Riverron said that GA was correct in saying it couldn't be reviewed, because Triplette indicated forward progress. He didn't opine on the correctness of the ruling itself.Yes, but then the NFL said that explanation was right. And that’s why they couldn’t review.
Not so sure that was obvious.And then they choose to review that obvious catch? Ok...