Poll: What do you WANT to see happen with BB?

What's your preference?


  • Total voters
    413

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,716
I want BB to stay and guide the Pats to another Super Bowl championship, as he gets the all-time wins record as a coach.
I'll put money down this does not ever happen win another Super Bowl title in New England. He will be hard pressed to even make the playoffs with this shitty roster he has constructed. The sooner the Patriots move on from him the better because it isn't going to getter better with him only worse.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,816
I'll put money down this does not ever happen win another Super Bowl title in New England. He will be hard pressed to even make the playoffs with this shitty roster he has constructed. The sooner the Patriots move on from him the better because it isn't going to getter better with him only worse.
Oh for SURE that's the safe bet - that he won't win a SB here.

But then again, no matter which coach you bring in to replace him, the safe bet is that he won't win a SB here either.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,952
BB has a tremendous job of resigning good players for good prices and letting over-priced guys go over the years. Why is that never part of the equation measuring Bill the GM?

Edit: I will admit he hasn't signed / drafted too much talent worth retaining in the last few years. Th e one regret we may have had a t first is letting Chandler Jones go but that worked itself out
THis is a good point, I thought of it during the "he let the offense decline by letting... X go", Solder, turned to dust after he left, all the guys who left then he got back for cheap... JCJ, Collins (twice), Trent Brown, Van Noy, but also a bunch of others. Bill has generally been very good at knowing which of his guys are not worth paying market for, which is key since a lot of teams that have good years hamstring themselves by bringing everyone back
 

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,716
Oh for SURE that's the safe bet - that he won't win a SB here.

But then again, no matter which coach you bring in to replace him, the safe bet is that he won't win a SB here either.
Except you don't know that. I'd rather take my chances on someone new than with someone the game has pretty much passed by. The roster is in horrendous shape under BB. That cannot be denied and anyone that wants to run it back is an absolute fool. We have seen 4 years of this team rotting into the ground. Its beyond embarrassing.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,816
Except you don't know that. I'd rather take my chances on someone new than with someone the game has pretty much passed by. The roster is in horrendous shape under BB. That cannot be denied and anyone that wants to run it back is an absolute fool. We have seen 4 years of this team rotting into the ground. Its beyond embarrassing.
I didn't say we "know" anything. But it's always the safe bet that any particular coach will NOT win a Super Bowl with your team than that they WILL.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,816
Just the AFC teams (I just don't feel like doing it for the whole NFL but it's going to be basically the same).

Mia: 56 seasons in SB era, 13 HC, 2 SB titles, 1 SB-winning HC
Buf: 56 seasons in SB era, 18 HC, 0 SB titles, 0 SB-winning HC
NYJ: 56 seasons in SB era, 18 HC, 1 SB title, 1 SB-winning HC
NE: 56 seasons in SB era, 14 HC, 6 SB titles, 1 SB-winning HC
Bal: 26 seasons in SB era, 3 HC, 2 SB titles, 2 SB-winning HC
Pit: 56 seasons in SB era, 4 HC, 6 SB titles, 3 SB-winning HC
Cin: 54 seasons in SB era, 10 HC, 0 SB titles, 0 SB-winning HC
Cle: 52 seasons in SB era, 21 HC, 0 SB titles, 0 SB-winning HC
Jax: 27 seasons in SB era, 9 HC, 0 SB titles, 0 SB-winning HC
Hou: 20 seasons in SB era, 8 HC, 0 SB titles, 0 SB-winning HC
Ind: 56 seasons in SB era, 21 HC, 2 SB titles, 2 SB-winning HC
Ten: 56 seasons in SB era, 15 HC, 0 SB titles, 0 SB-winning HC
KC: 56 seasons in SB era, 13 HC, 3 SB titles, 2 SB-winning HC
LAC: 56 seasons in SB era, 16 HC, 0 SB titles, 0 SB-winning HC
Den: 56 seasons in SB era, 18 HC, 3 SB titles, 2 SB-winning HC
LV: 56 seasons in SB era, 19 HC, 3 SB titles, 2 SB-winning HC

So these 16 franchises have played a total of 795 seasons in the SB era, have had 220 HC, have won 28 SB titles, and there have been 14 SB-winning HC.

14 out of 220 HC in the history of the AFC in the SB era have won Super Bowls. That's 6.4%. That means that 95.4% of all HC in the AFC during the SB era did not or have not won a Super Bowl, over the course of 795 combined seasons.

So yeah, while I don't KNOW that the next non-BB coach the Pats hire won't win a SB, it's a pretty good bet that he won't.
 
Except you don't know that. I'd rather take my chances on someone new than with someone the game has pretty much passed by. The roster is in horrendous shape under BB. That cannot be denied and anyone that wants to run it back is an absolute fool. We have seen 4 years of this team rotting into the ground. Its beyond embarrassing.
This kind of thing is all too common on this site right now, and for a forum that prides itself on being higher quality than most it is, to coin a phrase, beyond embarrassing.

@BaseballJones doesn't know that bringing in a new coach won't lead to a new era of dominance. But it's (very) unlikely. Likewise you don't know that keeping Bill on won't either. Though that's (very) unlikely too. Thinking that the guy who has won it six times before is more likely to win it than a non-specified replacement doesn't make someone an absolute fool. It's an entirely reasonable viewpoint, and one held by the majority of people who've voted in the poll it seems.

The past three seasons have been, and this has been stated time and time again, about average. One playoff season. Approximately .500 record. That's the epitome of normal expectations. Coming off the back of perhaps the best 5 season run in history, that's actually a fine achievement. This season has not been so good. The team has clearly played poorly and has had accordingly poor results. We're all frustrated by this and want better. But come on people, let's try to remain at least-slightly level-headed.

If you look at what bad teams who remain bad for sustained periods do - churning through coaches, trading up for specific players, focusing on results rather than process, giving big long-term contracts based on past performance rather than future expectations....it blows my mind how many of the more vocal contributors here are constantly advocating doing exactly that kind of stuff.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,326
They are 27-32 post Brady. That’s a .458 winning percentage. I don’t know if that’s “about average”.
20-23 if you remove the covid year, .465. If they finish with 4 wins, that would be .433 post Brady. Not a lot of GM or coaches survive a four year stretch like that, do they? Isn’t not like things are looking real bright for next year.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,135
Losing to WAS after they trade their two best defensive players at home is the final nail for me. Clean house fire everyone and start fresh.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,816
BJ

Start your letter with

Dear Santa

And maybe he'll deliver your XMAS wish list

And remember to put out the milk and cookies.
LOL in my house we left out Ritz crackers and a glass of scotch.

“It’s cold outside and Santa needs to be warmed up,” we were told.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,816
They are 27-32 post Brady. That’s a .458 winning percentage. I don’t know if that’s “about average”.
20-23 if you remove the covid year, .465. If they finish with 4 wins, that would be .433 post Brady. Not a lot of GM or coaches survive a four year stretch like that, do they? Isn’t not like things are looking real bright for next year.
Definitely not a lot of coaches survive that.

But then again, not a lot of coaches have BB’s overall track record.

In other words, this is a totally unique situation.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,970
Unreal America
Definitely not a lot of coaches survive that.

But then again, not a lot of coaches have BB’s overall track record.

In other words, this is a totally unique situation.
What’s funny is that Bill would never give this much rope to any player of his. 4 years of mediocre-to-bad performance? Is there any example in his 22 years here where he hung on to anyone more than maybe 1 year past their ability to contribute at a meaningful level?

Forget Brady, he jettisoned guys like Viniateri the moment he didn’t think he was worth the salary.

It’s just striking that Bill gets the benefit of his past success that he never gave to any of his players.
 

Jettisoned

Member
SoSH Member
May 6, 2008
1,059
If Tony Dungy, Mike McCarthy or Sean Payton had QBs that were even close to as good as Brady, they'd have won just as many Super Bowls as Belichick has.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,816
What’s funny is that Bill would never give this much rope to any player of his. 4 years of mediocre-to-bad performance? Is there any example in his 22 years here where he hung on to anyone more than maybe 1 year past their ability to contribute at a meaningful level?

Forget Brady, he jettisoned guys like Viniateri the moment he didn’t think he was worth the salary.

It’s just striking that Bill gets the benefit of his past success that he never gave to any of his players.
There's a salary cap with players, not so with coaches. Apples and oranges.
 

Pablo's TB Lover

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 10, 2017
6,017
There's a salary cap with players, not so with coaches. Apples and oranges.
It's apples and oranges, but not in the direction you are thinking. So the salary cap motivates the team to cut players quicker and put dead money on the cap, but hold on to coaches when it only costs the owners real money and not towards the cap to buy them out and hire a new coach?
 

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,685
It's apples and oranges, but not in the direction you are thinking. So the salary cap motivates the team to cut players quicker and put dead money on the cap, but hold on to coaches when it only costs the owners real money and not towards the cap to buy them out and hire a new coach?
Vinatieri, the example used in the original post, was a free agent. The Pats didn’t use the franchise tag on him. There was no dead money on the cap for the Patriots when he signed with the Colts.
 

Pablo's TB Lover

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 10, 2017
6,017
Vinatieri, the example used in the original post, was a free agent. The Pats didn’t use the franchise tag on him. There was no dead money on the cap for the Patriots when he signed with the Colts.
I missed that interjection, thanks. My point holds for FA signings like Adalius Thomas, where the Patriots brass probably wanted to get rid of him well before they did but had to factor in the cap hit.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,970
Unreal America
There's a salary cap with players, not so with coaches. Apples and oranges.
I was going to include a reference to this in my post, because I knew it’d be the first thing someone countered with.

Of course the cap makes it an imperfect comparison. But cutting/keeping a player is not always driven by some massive cap hit. Often over the years a replacement was essentially an even swap for the guy being tossed aside.

In those situations it was strictly a case of Bill being ruthlessly focused on a player’s current, and projected future, level of contribution. The past meant nothing.

And that was good. It’s part of why we won.
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,837
Needham, MA
I am ready to move on from Bill. I hope he retires after this year, although I doubt he will.

At the start of the year and even into October I was hesitant. There are not a lot of guys in the world who can coach an NFL team at a championship level, and finding the next one will be hard. But much like the discussion about the QB and the fact that the new guy might be worse, at this point I think you have to take that chance. Like I said in the Mac thread, if you are a poorly performing organization but you are afraid to make a change because it might get worse that is chickenshit leadership that pretty much guarantees you'll never get better.

This is year 4 post Brady and the roster on offense is pathetic. Defensively they might have a few nice pieces, but other than Gonzalez maybe they do not have a difference maker on either side of the ball. The whole thing needs an overhaul, and I don't think Bill is the guy to do it at this point.

Cannot believe that is where I am right now, but that's where I am. This year's Patriots are embarrassingly bad, and there is little light at the end of the tunnel. Front offices and coaching staffs do not and should not survive seasons like this, especially since they were expected to at least contend for a playoff spot and instead they are in the running for a top 5 or even top 3 pick.
 

Bowhemian

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2015
5,798
Bow, NH
If Tony Dungy, Mike McCarthy or Sean Payton had QBs that were even close to as good as Brady, they'd have won just as many Super Bowls as Belichick has.
Say what? Is this satire? I mean:
Tony Dungy had Peyton Manning
Mike McCarthy had Aaron Rodgers
Sean Payton had Drew Brees
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,816
It's apples and oranges, but not in the direction you are thinking. So the salary cap motivates the team to cut players quicker and put dead money on the cap, but hold on to coaches when it only costs the owners real money and not towards the cap to buy them out and hire a new coach?
Apparently, yes. At least in some cases.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,816
I was going to include a reference to this in my post, because I knew it’d be the first thing someone countered with.

Of course the cap makes it an imperfect comparison. But cutting/keeping a player is not always driven by some massive cap hit. Often over the years a replacement was essentially an even swap for the guy being tossed aside.

In those situations it was strictly a case of Bill being ruthlessly focused on a player’s current, and projected future, level of contribution. The past meant nothing.

And that was good. It’s part of why we won.
Well I don't know if Bill is going to fire himself. Maybe Kraft will, but then again, Kraft's philosophy may not be the same as Bill's. We shall see.
 

Jettisoned

Member
SoSH Member
May 6, 2008
1,059
This is getting utterly ridiculous. Walsh “only” won 3 SBs with Montana.
I mean look, would Sean McVay, Andy Reid or Kyle Shanahan miss the playoffs because of some injuries or bad QB play? How about John Harbaugh?

We all need to think about just how good a coach and GM Belichick actually is.
 

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,685
I’m still fully on board with Belichick as both GM and HC. Was tempted to start a new thread on that topic alone, but decided to post here.

Current roster:


Honestly, I think that this year is out of range and I am happy for every loss as it improves our draft odds. That being said, I think this is still a good core group.

I feel that, when healthy, this defense can be one of the top defenses in the league. The problems on the defensive side this year are mostly a reflection of injuries (Judon and Gonzalez).

With a rookie kicker and a rookie punter, I think our special teams also have lots of room for growth.

Top level defense, rising special teams, empty offense, but lots of money to spend and a top ten draft pick (or better). I feel like this team can be very competitive next year.

Coaching:

I think Belichick is still a great coach and would even suggest that his problems with the roster are mainly a reflection of how good a coach he actually is.

Taking the corpse of Cam Newton to a 7-9 record in 2020 (COVID year) and ending up with the 15th pick (Mac).
Taking a rookie Mac Jones to 10-7 and a playoff appearance and ending up with the 21st pick (trading back and ending up with Cole Strange)
Going 8-9 in 2022 ending up with the 14th pick (trading back and ending up with Gonzalez - which was a coup).

I don't want to pivot to his track record as a GM just yet, just want to point out that with a couple more losses in those years, his draft opportunities would have gone way up. My point is that this team has been stagnant for the past three years and a lot of that is because Belichick as a coach got this team to over-perform expectations.

General Manager (Drafting):

I don't know how you can look at last year's draft and be disappointed or feel like Belichick can't draft. Gonzalez, White, Douglas with the potential for more rookies to continue to develop. I was watching the World Poker Tour the other day with Richard Seymour. I want to see what Belichick does with a top pick in the draft. I feel like we've gone over 20 years of drafts where we were stuck with the scraps and left-overs. I want to give Belichick the chance to use a top draft pick.

General Manager (free agent spending):


Obviously, this has been the biggest failure of the recent seasons. Ju-Ju is the current poster child, but it's obviously been a problem. To me, this is solvable and this is where the team needs to spend money to support Belichick. I don't think that we replace Belichich as GM. I think we bring in an understudy to manage and support free agent signings.

OL > QB > WR/TE in that order.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,774
I mean look, would Sean McVay, Andy Reid or Kyle Shanahan miss the playoffs because of some injuries or bad QB play? How about John Harbaugh?

We all need to think about just how good a coach and GM Belichick actually is.
If only there were a thread. Or better yet, multiple ones where we could ask such questions.
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,837
Needham, MA
Re: the defense and injuries, keep in mind Judon will be 32 before the start of next season. If you believe the timeline for the Pats to be contenders again is at least 2-3 years down the road, it is exceedingly unlikely Judon will be an impact player on the defense anymore by then.
 

heavyde050

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2006
11,257
San Francisco
I voted for BB to return as HC and GM as I think he has earned a shot to rebuild this thing. I would also love to see him beat Shula's record while coaching the Pats.
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,298
from the wilds of western ma
I’ve come to care less and less about Shulas record, and really hope it’s not any kind of factor, in any of the principals thinking, about how to proceed after this season. He’s already a first ballot hall of famer, and has left Shula in the dust on any thinking persons historical ranking of coaches. A cold, clear eyed, honest assessment of where he and the organization are should be the only criteria in determining his future. Certainly on the part of the Krafts. And while it’s probably unrealistic to expect it, I hope on Bills part as well.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,677
Hingham, MA
I’ve come to care less and less about Shulas record, and really hope it’s not any kind of factor, in any of the principals thinking, about how to proceed after this season. He’s already a first ballot hall of famer, and has left Shula in the dust on any thinking persons historical ranking of coaches. A cold, clear eyed, honest assessment of where he and the organization are should be the only criteria in determining his future. Certainly on the part of the Krafts. And while it’s probably unrealistic to expect it, I hope on Bills part as well.
I feel the same, and I'd even go as far to say that I think him passing Shula will be diminished (as in, potentially hurt his legacy) if it comes threw a slew of sub-.500 seasons.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,239
I’ve come to care less and less about Shulas record, and really hope it’s not any kind of factor, in any of the principals thinking, about how to proceed after this season. H
I can't imagine Kraft thinks fans will be showing up in droves to see BB get there coaching a mediocre team.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
If breaking Shula's record is important to Bill--and we fans likely never know if it really is--then I want him to do it as a Patriot. If he does it slowly, whatever, no one knows or cares what Shula's record was in his last few years.
Beyond that, I'm fine seeing what he can do with high picks/young team if that seems invigorating to him. I guess I'll pretty much ride with him until he's ready to stop the ride.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,816
I feel the same, and I'd even go as far to say that I think him passing Shula will be diminished (as in, potentially hurt his legacy) if it comes threw a slew of sub-.500 seasons.
I don't think it will. Shula had a couple of losing seasons, though to be fair, his record is actually pretty remarkable. Dude was a phenomenal HC. But at the end of the day, I care less about BB's win total and where it ranks than I do that my team - the New England Patriots - is good.
 

Jinhocho

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2001
10,290
Durham, NC
Maybe it is because I no longer live in New England, but I am just baffled by the fire BB stuff in general and the fire him this week stuff in particular.

This has been a terrible franchise throughout its history and people are lining up to get rid of the guy who has been in charge during its most sustained run of success and the most sustained run of success in NFL history. It literally makes no sense to me.

As a fifty year old and someone whose primary fandom in all Boston sports is for the Pats, I just do not really understand the short leash people are giving BB and the pure glee and fury some folks have divded into the whole process.

This has truly been the only disaster year post Brady. Even with Newton they were in contention for a playoff spot. I distinctly remember the consensus being it might have been the finest coaching job of his career to squeeze so many wins out of that team. People wanted the Pats to tank this year, but what does tanking look like? Giving your 3rd year struggling QB every chance in the world to stay out there and either sink or swim? Playing hard but also keep tons of flexibility in spending for next year? Not making any major in season moves outside of a late round pick for JC Jackson? Playing a number of young players this year and last to see what we have and give them a chance to grow?
.
So many of you were like I would trade a decade at the bottom of the NFL for another SB or a SB in the past and one 2-7 start to the season and people act like they are owed everything.

I am firmly in ride or die with BB until he hangs it up.
 

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,716
Maybe it is because I no longer live in New England, but I am just baffled by the fire BB stuff in general and the fire him this week stuff in particular.

This has been a terrible franchise throughout its history and people are lining up to get rid of the guy who has been in charge during its most sustained run of success and the most sustained run of success in NFL history. It literally makes no sense to me.

As a fifty year old and someone whose primary fandom in all Boston sports is for the Pats, I just do not really understand the short leash people are giving BB and the pure glee and fury some folks have divded into the whole process.

This has truly been the only disaster year post Brady. Even with Newton they were in contention for a playoff spot. I distinctly remember the consensus being it might have been the finest coaching job of his career to squeeze so many wins out of that team. People wanted the Pats to tank this year, but what does tanking look like? Giving your 3rd year struggling QB every chance in the world to stay out there and either sink or swim? Playing hard but also keep tons of flexibility in spending for next year? Not making any major in season moves outside of a late round pick for JC Jackson? Playing a number of young players this year and last to see what we have and give them a chance to grow?
.
So many of you were like I would trade a decade at the bottom of the NFL for another SB or a SB in the past and one 2-7 start to the season and people act like they are owed everything.

I am firmly in ride or die with BB until he hangs it up.
I live 15 minutes from the stadium and have had tickets for years. They have been going downhill for 4 years. Look at the roster. Very little impact talent on the roster. Awful coaching every week with the same mistakes over and over again with multiple penalties to boot. They are a train wreck. BB should get the Tom Landry treatment after this year. His drafting has been historically bad in the past 5 plus years forcing them to overspend money on crappy free agents. This is all on Bill. The buck stops with him.
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
20,692
Row 14
I would try to do Bill Belichick as President of Football Operations, Mayo as coach and a GM brought in if I was Kraft. Pretty sure Mayo is Kraft's guy. Let Bill say no and give him his out.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,638
02130
This has truly been the only disaster year post Brady. Even with Newton they were in contention for a playoff spot. I distinctly remember the consensus being it might have been the finest coaching job of his career to squeeze so many wins out of that team. People wanted the Pats to tank this year, but what does tanking look like? Giving your 3rd year struggling QB every chance in the world to stay out there and either sink or swim? Playing hard but also keep tons of flexibility in spending for next year? Not making any major in season moves outside of a late round pick for JC Jackson? Playing a number of young players this year and last to see what we have and give them a chance to grow?
.
So many of you were like I would trade a decade at the bottom of the NFL for another SB or a SB in the past and one 2-7 start to the season and people act like they are owed everything.

I am firmly in ride or die with BB until he hangs it up.
They were more like a 5-6 win team last year that had a very easy schedule. I think this year they are about the same with a tougher schedule and more injuries. It's a bad team.

It's good that you mentioned Newton -- Tanking actually means you rip the team up, take a multi-year approach and don't do something like transform your offense for Cam Newton in the hopes of getting trounced in the first round of the playoffs.

To me the last four years have shown that BB is the wrong guy for a rebuilding franchise because he seems to think he can always squeeze extra wins out of castoff guys. He earned the last 4 years by being such a great coach, but he doesn't get another shot to rebuild on the fly.
 

Jinhocho

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2001
10,290
Durham, NC
I live 15 minutes from the stadium and have had tickets for years. They have been going downhill for 4 years. Look at the roster. Very little impact talent on the roster. Awful coaching every week with the same mistakes over and over again with multiple penalties to boot. They are a train wreck. BB should get the Tom Landry treatment after this year. His drafting has been historically bad in the past 5 plus years forcing them to overspend money on crappy free agents. This is all on Bill. The buck stops with him.
I think you miss that they basically did the impossible for almost 20 years, took it to the limit for the last SB, and then turned the roster over the last few years.

Take a look at the Rams. Do you think McVey deserves to be fired?

2017 11-5
2018 13-3
2019 9-7
2020 10-6
2021 12-5
2022 5-12
2023 3-6
63-44

How about Mike Vrabel
2017 9-7
2018 9-7
2019 9-7
2020 11-5
2021 12-5
2022 7-10
2023 3-5
60-46

BB
2017 13-3
2018 11-5
2019 12-4
2020 7-9
2021 10-7
2022 8-9
2023 2-7
63 - 44

Outside of the Pats, what team has not had downtimes even with great coaches?
 

Jinhocho

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2001
10,290
Durham, NC
I live 15 minutes from the stadium and have had tickets for years. They have been going downhill for 4 years. Look at the roster. Very little impact talent on the roster. Awful coaching every week with the same mistakes over and over again with multiple penalties to boot. They are a train wreck. BB should get the Tom Landry treatment after this year. His drafting has been historically bad in the past 5 plus years forcing them to overspend money on crappy free agents. This is all on Bill. The buck stops with him.
Yes it is very clear that 1) they tried to rebuild on the fly rather than bottoming out and 2) that they thought Jones would get them back to the playoffs. 2 definitely didnt work, but the first one looks like it has moved from unlikely to highly doubtful. The bottoming out process is almost never a year.

I could see this team with an upgrade at QB, WR, and some health next year winning 11 games with the cap money they have incoming.

Ijust cannot fathom how you toss out BB after one terrible season marred by injuries.
 

Fenway_NS

New Member
Nov 10, 2006
13
Maybe it is because I no longer live in New England, but I am just baffled by the fire BB stuff in general and the fire him this week stuff in particular.

This has been a terrible franchise throughout its history and people are lining up to get rid of the guy who has been in charge during its most sustained run of success and the most sustained run of success in NFL history. It literally makes no sense to me.

As a fifty year old and someone whose primary fandom in all Boston sports is for the Pats, I just do not really understand the short leash people are giving BB and the pure glee and fury some folks have divded into the whole process.

This has truly been the only disaster year post Brady. Even with Newton they were in contention for a playoff spot. I distinctly remember the consensus being it might have been the finest coaching job of his career to squeeze so many wins out of that team. People wanted the Pats to tank this year, but what does tanking look like? Giving your 3rd year struggling QB every chance in the world to stay out there and either sink or swim? Playing hard but also keep tons of flexibility in spending for next year? Not making any major in season moves outside of a late round pick for JC Jackson? Playing a number of young players this year and last to see what we have and give them a chance to grow?
.
So many of you were like I would trade a decade at the bottom of the NFL for another SB or a SB in the past and one 2-7 start to the season and people act like they are owed everything.

I am firmly in ride or die with BB until he hangs it up.
Thanks for putting this in to words as I’ve been trying to think of a way to articulate my thoughts and failing.

I don’t want to direct this at anyone in particular, but the quickness with which the pitchforks have come out makes me wonder about if some of the fans have just as much disdain for BB as some in the media do. He’s always been a prickly SOB, but he’s our SOB. It feels like some of the fandom have it out for BB beyond this season/rebuild.