Your 2015 Boston Red Sox

Status
Not open for further replies.

sean1562

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 17, 2011
3,668
Johnny Cueto was possibly the second best pitcher in the game last year and the Reds were a 4th place team. Why would they trade Cueto, their best player, for an OF they will only have for a year, a year that they will probably not contend in? I would think any package targeting Cueto is gonna have to have a top 50 prospect and some less premium guys. the 2015 Reds are not going to improve from 4th place next year if they trade Johnny Cueto for Cespedes so why would they? 
 
Edit: I can't imagine a trade for Cueto is centered around anybody less than Owens or Rodriguez with a Rijo type throw in. Webster and Cespedes for Cueto straight up is a lopsided trade in Boston's favor. 
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,271
nattysez said:
 
Please do not try to justify Cherington's trades for relievers.
 
"Melancon's incredible."  He has never pitched like anything more than hot garbage when in the AL.  Jed Lowrie spent the past two years playing 130+ games for a playoff team.  This was a bad trade. 
 
"We don't know what Bailey'd be if he weren't hurt."  That's because he's always hurt, which is why Beane traded him, and which is why it was a mistake to trade for him.  
 
And you conveniently leave out Hanrahan, which was another dumpster fire of a deal. 
Since the trade, Lowrie had one good year (2013), one extremely mediocre year (2014), and one year he failed to reach 100 games yet again.  Let's not fall victim to Cafardo-itis and ignore the actual stats. 
 
Bailey:  I've yet to see an accurate model that predicts future Tommy John surgeries.  
 
Melancon:  Just goes to prove that even the best models cannot always player performance with 100% certainty, either before or after a player's tenure.   Also, keep in mind that during his one year in Boston he had neither a MLB quality manager nor pitching coach.  Happened to coincide with Lester's worst season as well. 
 

67WasBest

Concierge
SoSH Member
Mar 17, 2004
2,442
Music City USA
sean1562 said:
Johnny Cueto was possibly the second best pitcher in the game last year and the Reds were a 4th place team. Why would they trade Cueto, their best player, for an OF they will only have for a year, a year that they will probably not contend in? I would think any package targeting Cueto is gonna have to have a top 50 prospect and some less premium guys. the 2015 Reds are not going to improve from 4th place next year if they trade Johnny Cueto for Cespedes so why would they? 
 
Edit: I can't imagine a trade for Cueto is centered around anybody less than Owens or Rodriguez with a Rijo type throw in. Webster and Cespedes for Cueto straight up is a lopsided trade in Boston's favor. 
I think you answered your own question.  With Cueto they were still a 4th place team.  Just like the Sox at the trade deadline, they are going after offense this offseason.  Unfortunately, they're locked in to a their roater with long term, and unmovable deals with Votto (1B), Phillips (2B) and Bruce (RF); SS, CF and C have Cozart, Hamilton and Mesoraco in place, and Fraser at 3B was their best hitter in 2014,  LF is the only position they have open.   You noted that Cespedes has only one year while failing to acknowledge Cueto also has only one year remaining on his deal.
 
It's been published by Cincinnati and national reporters the Reds will likely have to move one of Cueto or Latos to gain the offense they seek.  They prefer Latos, but most pundits indicate it will likely require Cueto to gain what they seek.  Cespedes just gained half a year of Lester along with half a year of Gomes; so I'm not quite seeing why he couldn't net a similar pitcher, when 6 years of a controlled pitcher are added to that same value.  It may be an overpay, imo.
 

sean1562

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 17, 2011
3,668
If they lose Johnny Cueto they will only be worse, he was far and away their best pitcher. Cueto was like a 6 WAR player last year and can be offered a QO, Cespedes at best was worth 3 WAR and cannot be. There is literally no way they trade us Johnny Cueto for Cespedes. I would be amazed if they think they are in a position to compete next year and dont package Cueto for the best prospect package they can get. The Reds will probably be the last place team in the Central next year, it makes no sense for them to be trading Cy Young caliber players for OF on one year deals. Cueto will be a hot commodity and they are sure to get a lot more for him then Cespedes. 
 
Edit: In a division with the Pirates, Cardinals, Brewers, and possibly resurgent Cubs, I dont see the Reds trading away their elite SP talent for players that can only contribute next season. And honestly, if they think they can compete next season, keeping Cueto makes a lot more sense than trading for Cespedes and Allen Webster, who I really dont think has tons of trade value at this point. 
 

OptimusPapi

Jiminy Cricket
Mar 6, 2014
295
Cespedes could be a part of a deal but you are looking at including Owens and I am not sure what else. Checchini has no value to the Reds unless they think he is a left fielder. Maybe one of the Webster/Barnes/Ranando/de la Rosa group and either Marrero or Coyle?
 

pdub

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 2, 2007
517
Agreed, that Cueto-Cespedes deal has no chance of happening. It makes no sense to trade a top-10 pitcher for a solid hitter. What would they get out of Cespedes that they could not get out of Cueto? They will just stay in 4th place OR go down even further. Because their budget is tied up into offense, they'll want to pursue affordable pitching. That means our farm. Cueto is getting trade for high-impact pitching prospects OR salary-controlled major league pitchers.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
The Reds were 3rd in baseball by starters ERA and 2nd to last in team wRC+. They don't really need SP, they need better hitters. I'm not suggesting Cespedes-Cueto is going to happen, but it comes closer to filling a need than pitching does. 
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Rudy Pemberton said:
But if the Reds are interested in contending- they need Cueto. Trading Cueto for Cespedes doesn't make sense. And, if Cueto is made available, they could get a lot more than Yoenis, IMO.

The Sox need a SP, 3B, or closer. Any teams have excess there and need power? Has to be a team hoping to contend or else Cespedes doesn't make sense.

Doubt the Sox would move him within the division, but Toronto could be a fit if they lose Cabrera. Dickey or Buehrle for Cespedes?

The ChiSox have a pretty solid contingent of Cuban players....and sure they'd love to move John Danks.

LAA, for CJ Wilson? Mets could use offense; I'm sure they'd love to part with Colon, but maybe the Sox could get Niese?
 
Why would the Red Sox move Cespedes for fringe 3/4 starters? They need help at the top of the rotation, if they want a guy like Buehrle/Dickey/Colon/Niese, they could just grab someone like Masterson and hold on to Cespedes. If they intend to involve him in a bigger deal alongside prospects for a bonafide 1/2 starter or a solution at 3rd, that would make more sense.
 

maxotaur

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
429
Pittsburgh PA
OptimusPapi said:
Cespedes could be a part of a deal but you are looking at including Owens and I am not sure what else. Checchini has no value to the Reds unless they think he is a left fielder. Maybe one of the Webster/Barnes/Ranando/de la Rosa group and either Marrero or Coyle?
If the scouting reports are accurate (Owens' ceiling being a #3) I would be very happy to trade him and Cespedes to get a 25/26 year old ace.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
nattysez said:
 
"Melancon's incredible."  He has never pitched like anything more than hot garbage when in the AL.  Jed Lowrie spent the past two years playing 130+ games for a playoff team.  This was a bad trade. 
IIRC the thought of Jed Lowrie playing 1000 innings at shortstop sent shivers up our collective spines. It's nice that he wasn't injured after he left, but I've never regretted his departure.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Cespedes to Seattle makes more sense. Their OF is terrible, their pitching is more or less set up and down the roster. Cespedes' personality would play here (I'm in the 206) like it did in Oakland. But it's not clear to me what we'd want in return. Almost nobody on their major league roster is an upgrade, except for untouchables like Felix and Paxton. Walker is probably untouchable too. There are risk/reward guys like Hultzen. Smoak could be had easily, and he's, um, less terrible from the left side. Really, though, I don't see a matchup on our side. Maybe a three-way deal with a team looking for pitching prospects?
 
[edit] Adding, I would bet Jack Z is in now-mode, having "won" his gamble on Cano with the team being relevant (in year 1 of 10). After years of sitting on prospects, I think they're in a different mode now. Particularly with Oakland looking vulnerable.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Rudy Pemberton said:
Because they have too many OF's, and pretty clearly have to move some of them. He has no value to them after this year. I agree that trading him for a depth starter isn't ideal, but I suspect these are the kinds of deals they could make. No team is giving up a top starter for a one year rental.
 
Sure, that's why I said it would make more sense to involve him in a bigger deal. Obviously Cespedes alone isn't bringing back the kind of pitcher this team needs at the top of the rotation. Though if having him in a deal precludes us from having to trade one of Eduardo Rodriguez/Blake Swihart/Rafael Devers/Henry Owens, that would be preferrable to me.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
sean1562 said:
If they lose Johnny Cueto they will only be worse, he was far and away their best pitcher. Cueto was like a 6 WAR player last year and can be offered a QO, Cespedes at best was worth 3 WAR and cannot be. There is literally no way they trade us Johnny Cueto for Cespedes. I would be amazed if they think they are in a position to compete next year and dont package Cueto for the best prospect package they can get. The Reds will probably be the last place team in the Central next year, it makes no sense for them to be trading Cy Young caliber players for OF on one year deals. Cueto will be a hot commodity and they are sure to get a lot more for him then Cespedes. 
 
Edit: In a division with the Pirates, Cardinals, Brewers, and possibly resurgent Cubs, I dont see the Reds trading away their elite SP talent for players that can only contribute next season. And honestly, if they think they can compete next season, keeping Cueto makes a lot more sense than trading for Cespedes and Allen Webster, who I really dont think has tons of trade value at this point. 
Not debating the specifics of a deal around Cespedes for a Reds pitcher, but you're not evaluating the Reds through Red Sox colored glasses. Anybody who thinks there's a chance Craig will rebound, has to acknowledge that Votto is likely to bounce back nicely. Anybody who thinks JBJ will someday hit in the major leagues has to acknowledge that Hamilton will likely take a step forward with the bat. Phillips is their Pedroia; they'll be projecting a lot more and higher quality ABs from him next year. And they have a bunch of young pitching that can step in and fill a rotation slot--I don't see any indication that Tony Cingrani won't be ready to go in spring training--with their current pitchers moving up one slot in the pecking order.
 

Puffy

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 14, 2006
1,268
Town
chrisfont9 said:
Cespedes to Seattle makes more sense. Their OF is terrible, their pitching is more or less set up and down the roster. Cespedes' personality would play here (I'm in the 206) like it did in Oakland. But it's not clear to me what we'd want in return. Almost nobody on their major league roster is an upgrade, except for untouchables like Felix and Paxton. Walker is probably untouchable too. There are risk/reward guys like Hultzen. Smoak could be had easily, and he's, um, less terrible from the left side. Really, though, I don't see a matchup on our side. Maybe a three-way deal with a team looking for pitching prospects?
 
[edit] Adding, I would bet Jack Z is in now-mode, having "won" his gamble on Cano with the team being relevant (in year 1 of 10). After years of sitting on prospects, I think they're in a different mode now. Particularly with Oakland looking vulnerable.
 
Kyle Seager would be an upgrade and matches up well with our lineup, although I'd have to think he's pretty untouchable. Certainly Cespedes wouldn't be enough.
 

Drek717

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
2,542
pdub said:
Agreed, that Cueto-Cespedes deal has no chance of happening. It makes no sense to trade a top-10 pitcher for a solid hitter. What would they get out of Cespedes that they could not get out of Cueto? They will just stay in 4th place OR go down even further. Because their budget is tied up into offense, they'll want to pursue affordable pitching. That means our farm. Cueto is getting trade for high-impact pitching prospects OR salary-controlled major league pitchers.
It isn't prospects OR Cespedes though.
 
I think the Reds could actually be a real good fit.  For starters they're career norm seasons from Votto, Bruce, and Phillips away from being a far better offensive team.  Cespedes would be a dream fit in a lineup with those three, do quite well in Cincy's power friendly park, and would be a huge upgrade over Ludwick.  They've also shown a willingness to make one year deals for OF help, like when they traded Trevor Bauer, Didi Gregorius, and others for Shin-Soo Choo prior to 2013.  They need to move one of Cueto or Latos now if they want a real chance to sign the other too.
 
The FA and trade markets also look to be pretty stocked on solid pitchers.  Obviously anyone as good as Cueto or Latos will demand a nice price, but it isn't exactly a seller's market either.  I could see Cespedes, one of Webster/Workman/Escobar/Ranaudo/Barnes, Marrero/Coyle, and a low minors lottery ticket not named Devers or Margot getting it done for Latos.  Cueto probably requires swapping the pitcher with either Owens or Rodriguez, but maybe not.  
 
A package could definitely be assembled if that is the route the Sox want to take, though it would be a bit of a gut check to trade for either of these guys and give them the huge multi-year extension needed to make the deal worthwhile prior to ever seeing them pitch in the AL East regularly.
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Plympton91 said:
Phillips is their Pedroia; they'll be projecting a lot more and higher quality ABs from him next year.
 
Aside from being two somewhat momentous (especially for a 2B) years older, that is. Projecting more and higher quality at bats from a second baseman who'll turn 34 before the All-Star break and whose offense has declined for three years running seems an awful lot like whistling in the dark.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,466
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Drek717 said:
It isn't prospects OR Cespedes though.
 
I think the Reds could actually be a real good fit.  For starters they're career norm seasons from Votto, Bruce, and Phillips away from being a far better offensive team.  Cespedes would be a dream fit in a lineup with those three, do quite well in Cincy's power friendly park, and would be a huge upgrade over Ludwick.  They've also shown a willingness to make one year deals for OF help, like when they traded Trevor Bauer, Didi Gregorius, and others for Shin-Soo Choo prior to 2013.  They need to move one of Cueto or Latos now if they want a real chance to sign the other too.
 
The FA and trade markets also look to be pretty stocked on solid pitchers.  Obviously anyone as good as Cueto or Latos will demand a nice price, but it isn't exactly a seller's market either.  I could see Cespedes, one of Webster/Workman/Escobar/Ranaudo/Barnes, Marrero/Coyle, and a low minors lottery ticket not named Devers or Margot getting it done for Latos.  Cueto probably requires swapping the pitcher with either Owens or Rodriguez, but maybe not.  
 
A package could definitely be assembled if that is the route the Sox want to take, though it would be a bit of a gut check to trade for either of these guys and give them the huge multi-year extension needed to make the deal worthwhile prior to ever seeing them pitch in the AL East regularly.
 
I'm pretty sure an acceptable package could be worked out for Cueto (or Latos) - but do the Sox do the deal without a negotiating window? They're not trading the likes of Owens for just one year of anybody.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Papelbon's Poutine said:
 
There was at best a 50/50 split on that trade. Christ, there were people (mostly in an EV led brigade) bemoaning the loss of Weiland, let alone Lowrie. That trade did not come close to getting a rubber stamp approval around here. 
Sure, of course. I was merely saying that this trade can't be discussed without at least acknowledging the unmitigated disaster Lowrie was in the field. There was a rationale for shipping him out in addition to the injuries.
 

sean1562

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 17, 2011
3,668
Drek717 said:
It isn't prospects OR Cespedes though.
 
I think the Reds could actually be a real good fit.  For starters they're career norm seasons from Votto, Bruce, and Phillips away from being a far better offensive team.  Cespedes would be a dream fit in a lineup with those three, do quite well in Cincy's power friendly park, and would be a huge upgrade over Ludwick.  They've also shown a willingness to make one year deals for OF help, like when they traded Trevor Bauer, Didi Gregorius, and others for Shin-Soo Choo prior to 2013.  They need to move one of Cueto or Latos now if they want a real chance to sign the other too.
 
The FA and trade markets also look to be pretty stocked on solid pitchers.  Obviously anyone as good as Cueto or Latos will demand a nice price, but it isn't exactly a seller's market either.  I could see Cespedes, one of Webster/Workman/Escobar/Ranaudo/Barnes, Marrero/Coyle, and a low minors lottery ticket not named Devers or Margot getting it done for Latos.  Cueto probably requires swapping the pitcher with either Owens or Rodriguez, but maybe not.  
 
A package could definitely be assembled if that is the route the Sox want to take, though it would be a bit of a gut check to trade for either of these guys and give them the huge multi-year extension needed to make the deal worthwhile prior to ever seeing them pitch in the AL East regularly.
 
Cueto is a Cy Young caliber guy. If they really think they are taking a step forward and are ready to compete next season, I dont see them trading any of their strating pitchers. Cingrani stepping forward and Bailey getting healthy, plus all the rebounds from all the players you just mentioned make them a better team than losing one of Cueto or Latos(but especially Cueto, I think people are underrating just how good he is) and adding a player like Cespedes(again with no QO potential). A deal of Cespedes, Ranuado, and Coyle is a horrible one for either Latos or Cueto. The pick they get from the QO would be more valuable than Coyle, maybe even Ranuado. That looks like a trade that happens in a vacuum with no other suitors. If the Reds put Cueto on the market, there will be loads of suitors. And why rush? Why do they need to move one now for the chance to sign one of the others? If they keep them and their team sucks, they have two really hot trade commodities at the trade deadline. 
 

jscola85

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
1,305
Cueto seems far more likely to go in a midseason deal than in the offseason.  If the Reds fall out of contention, they could dangle him or Latos to contenders and get a king's ransom.
 

Mike F

Mayor of Fort Myers
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,068
Otis Foster said:

 
"Mother, you're not supposed to leave the home without your attendant."
"Screw you Junior. I've cut you out of the will "
 

Drek717

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
2,542
sean1562 said:
 
Cueto is a Cy Young caliber guy. If they really think they are taking a step forward and are ready to compete next season, I dont see them trading any of their strating pitchers. Cingrani stepping forward and Bailey getting healthy, plus all the rebounds from all the players you just mentioned make them a better team than losing one of Cueto or Latos(but especially Cueto, I think people are underrating just how good he is) and adding a player like Cespedes(again with no QO potential). A deal of Cespedes, Ranuado, and Coyle is a horrible one for either Latos or Cueto. The pick they get from the QO would be more valuable than Coyle, maybe even Ranuado. That looks like a trade that happens in a vacuum with no other suitors. If the Reds put Cueto on the market, there will be loads of suitors. And why rush? Why do they need to move one now for the chance to sign one of the others? If they keep them and their team sucks, they have two really hot trade commodities at the trade deadline. 
1. Coyle is a solid prospect, better than what you're likely to get with a QO pick and far closer to ML ready.
2. the pitcher would largely hinge on the one they liked the most.  I doubt that would be Ranaudo, but it would be their choice.
3. the Reds have made similar moves in the past looking for a one year push.  The Central isn't a powerhouse division, they could lose one of Latos/Cueto and if Cingrani steps up still have a top 10 pitching rotation in the NL but then potentially coupled with a top 10 offense.  They could compete next year quite easily if they're healthy and guys play to their career norms.
4. Also, Cespedes, a pitcher, Coyle, and a low level minor leaguer would be for Latos.  Cueto, as I said, most likely costs you one of Owens or Rodriguez unless some crazy things happen this off-season.
 
Personally I'd expect them to try moving Latos this winter, try to work out an extension with Cueto, and if that isn't possible dangle him in a deadline deal mid-season should they fall out of contention.  Latos would get a good return in his own right, the kind of return that can simultaneously shore up their offense while adding some mL depth, Cueto is the one they'd prefer to keep long term, and is also the one most likely to demand a high ransom for only 3-4 months of work as he's a huge difference maker on a playoff bound team, especially one that could find itself in a wild card playoff.
 
I really don't see why you're assuming the Reds are going to just roll over and quit this year either.  It took huge drops from career norms for Bruce, Votto, Phillips, and several injuries to create their 2014 season.  I doubt they expect similar bad luck across the board.  The division also lacks a clear powerhouse team, Milwaukee was in the pole position for a good chunk of last season for example.  The Reds could be in the playoffs with just a few breaks going their way and they've got a team that would likely make some real noise in the playoffs (good starting pitching, a couple shutdown relievers, good hitters who can hit good pitching).  They'll be looking to build a competitive team for 2015, not start planning for 5 years from now.
 

sean1562

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 17, 2011
3,668
If Cingrani steps up is a huge question mark. The guy had an FIP of 5.37 last year. I would hink if they think they can contend they would see a top three of Cueto, Latos and Bailey as a much more attractive than one that replaces Latos with Cingrani. AS we learned this year, sometimes it takes prospects some time to figure things out, if at all. But you are right, Votto returning to form for next year will be huge for them. I dont see Phillips getting much better. And if half of the young talent that the Cards has emerges next season they will be much better than the reds. The same could be said for the Pirates, Polanco could become an All Star OF and Cole could emerge as a front line starter. Alvarez at 1B and Harrison fulltime at 3B makes that offense pretty stellar. When does Tallion get back? The Reds just dont seem nearly as well positioned as any of the other teams, and I dont think they see a trade eliminating one of their top starters for Cespedes as one that will bring them that much closer to an NL Central title. 
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
sean1562 said:
 
Cueto is a Cy Young caliber guy. If they really think they are taking a step forward and are ready to compete next season, I dont see them trading any of their strating pitchers. Cingrani stepping forward and Bailey getting healthy, plus all the rebounds from all the players you just mentioned make them a better team than losing one of Cueto or Latos(but especially Cueto, I think people are underrating just how good he is) and adding a player like Cespedes(again with no QO potential). A deal of Cespedes, Ranuado, and Coyle is a horrible one for either Latos or Cueto. The pick they get from the QO would be more valuable than Coyle, maybe even Ranuado. That looks like a trade that happens in a vacuum with no other suitors. If the Reds put Cueto on the market, there will be loads of suitors. And why rush? Why do they need to move one now for the chance to sign one of the others? If they keep them and their team sucks, they have two really hot trade commodities at the trade deadline. 
Just to pile on a bit, Ranaudo is EXACTLY what you would hope to get with a sandwich pick. A potential top 10 selection who fell in the draft due to signability and lingering injury concerns. The Red Sox gave him a multi-million dollar bonus that was way above the current slot money for that spot. And, with him having reached AAA and achieved some modicum of trade value, he's already outperformed probably all but a quarter of the sandwich picks of the past 10 years.
 

Drek717

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
2,542
sean1562 said:
If Cingrani steps up is a huge question mark. The guy had an FIP of 5.37 last year. I would hink if they think they can contend they would see a top three of Cueto, Latos and Bailey as a much more attractive than one that replaces Latos with Cingrani. AS we learned this year, sometimes it takes prospects some time to figure things out, if at all. But you are right, Votto returning to form for next year will be huge for them. I dont see Phillips getting much better. And if half of the young talent that the Cards has emerges next season they will be much better than the reds. The same could be said for the Pirates, Polanco could become an All Star OF and Cole could emerge as a front line starter. Alvarez at 1B and Harrison fulltime at 3B makes that offense pretty stellar. When does Tallion get back? The Reds just dont seem nearly as well positioned as any of the other teams, and I dont think they see a trade eliminating one of their top starters for Cespedes as one that will bring them that much closer to an NL Central title. 
All depends on how you want to spin the narrative I'd say.
 
Votto is the best hitter in the division on a normal year.  Bruce is every bit as good as any other team's #2 when he has a normal year.  Mesoraco just had his breakout year, if he reaches 85-90% of his 2014 season next year surrounded by a rebounded Votto and Bruce they're the best lineup in the Central and it isn't even close.  Frazier is solid.  Some bounce back to career norms from Phillips (or just no further decline) and any improvement by Hamilton and they'd be one of the best lineups in all of baseball.  Adding someone like Cespedes as the #5 bat would be a huge step towards ensuring a complete offensive turnaround from 2014.
 
Meanwhile even if they trade one of Cueto/Latos they'll still have a highly competitive front four with the remainder of Cueto/Latos, Mike Leake, Alfredo Simon, and Homer Bailey.  All mid-3's or better ERAs.  Latos threw the fewest innings in 2014 and I'd imagine he's the one they're most open to trading of the two front line guys.  Cingrani is obviously the guy they want to be the 5th starter in this group, but if the Sox send one of the Webster/Ranaudo/Workman/Escobar/Barnes group in the deal that would provide the much needed insurance they'd want to move one of their best two.
 
Add that they have Aroldis Chapman for two more seasons before he's a free agent and I don't see the Reds as a team willing to fold 'em and hope they rebuild faster than the Cubs who have spent the last 5 years rebuilding.
 
Meanwhile the Cards still aren't getting expected production from Tavares.  Pischotty and Grichuk are comparable prospects to JBJ and just as likely to flop.  Matt Holiday is declining.  Yadi Molina's heavy workload seems to be dragging on his health.  Peralta is as likely to go into the tank next year as he is to have another solid season.  Same for Jon Jay who played over his head all season.  Wainright is clearly starting to lose the battle against father time.  Wacha has dealt with injuries all season and will likely carry some of that baggage into the off-season.  Miller still hasn't figured it out.  Rosenthal fell apart late this year, significantly weakening their bullpen.  Lackey is a solid #2 but not better than that, he isn't anchoring the staff and he already has shown the ol' bitchy horse face we're all familiar with in the playoffs when he flipped out at Grichuk for misplaying a fly ball against SF. Lynn's FIP and xFIP were the same last year as his career norms, his ERA dropped a run because he was lucky (K rate dropped, BABIP dropped, HR rate dropped, LOB% shot up, all the calling cards of a guy due for regression).
 
Again, you can spin it any way you want.  The Reds have a good team overall, they're missing a few pieces here and there.  For them it would make a ton of sense to parlay one year of a front line starter into immediate offensive help, more young cost controlled pitching depth, and additional farm hands to backfill with should they miss in the short term.  But they aren't likely to just pack it in and concede 2015 as long as they have the majority of the 2014 rotation still in-house, Votto, Bruce, Mesaraco, etc..  Most teams feel like they're close any given year, the Reds have a ton of very legitimate reasons to feel that way for 2015.
 
 

Plympton91 said:
Just to pile on a bit, Ranaudo is EXACTLY what you would hope to get with a sandwich pick. A potential top 10 selection who fell in the draft due to signability and lingering injury concerns. The Red Sox gave him a multi-million dollar bonus that was way above the current slot money for that spot. And, with him having reached AAA and achieved some modicum of trade value, he's already outperformed probably all but a quarter of the sandwich picks of the past 10 years.
He also has the skills to potentially make an excellent reliever.  His curve is an ML quality out pitch and his fastball is already in the mid-90's.  If a change in roles kicks his fastball up to the upper 90's and he can show some level of control at that velo he'd be in the upper 5-10% of all sandwich picks.
 
I don't think any team is likely to come calling for Ranaudo in particular unless they see something most everyone else is missing, but Escobar would fit the needs of any team wanting a cheap LHP to compete as a 5th/6th SP/long man type.  Webster is a desirable target for any team who can afford to roll the dice for a full season on a #5 with #2/#3 potential if he puts it together.  Barnes is basically Ranaudo with more hope that he sticks in the rotation and therefore more value as a result.  They're all guys most any team can find a spot on their 25 man roster for.  Hell, we'd all be real excited to see one or two of them as part of the Sox' pitching staff for 2015 if it wasn't for already having De La Rosa, Kelly, etc..  The Sox simply have too many for us to appreciate what we have.
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,980
 
This is where I probably differ from a lot of posters here. It's a bit off topic, but I have no problem swapping Owens a lesser prospect (a Sean Coyle type) and a lottery ticket for Latos. It would remind me slightly of the Beckett trade, only with pieces on both sides not being quite as high quality. Latos is still young enough that he could very well be a front of the rotation starter going forward, but there is a significant amount of risk that he's more of a 2 or a middle of the rotation guy. I'd swap Owens and Coyle for a very good number 3 or a number 2 any day. If a lotto ticket like Mercedes is necessary, so be it.
 
You are correct that Cueto is going to cost more, and he should. That cost is where I get a little uncomfortable, though, because it's probably something around Owens, Devers or Margot, and two pieces like Coyle. Perhaps Coyle and one of Ranaudo/Webster/Barnes? Regardless, that's a lot to give up and it's the Devers/Margot portion of the cost that has me hesitating. Anyway, back to the outfield discussion. This is probably best continued in the 2015 Red Sox thread, if there's any interest in following up.
Moving some pitching discussion out of the OF thread back where it belongs:
 
I agree with you that I'd have no problem swapping Owens + lesser prospect + lottery ticket for someone like Latos.  I think where we differ is how we rate Margot/Devers.  Personally, I'd give the proposed package of Owens, Margot, Coyle, Barnes without hesitation for Cueto.  We have plenty of toolsy, athletic outfielders right now and Margot is just so far from being ready I guess I don't value him as highly you do.  
 
If Cincinatti wants Cespedes or Victorino instead of Coyle? That's fine too.  If Cueto can be had without giving up Swihart, Betts or Bogaerts I think you have to go for it so long as the FO believes an extension is feasible.
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
Both Devers and Margot are far in that neither has played above A ball, but Margot really isn't much further from the majors than Betts was when he started 2013. The difference is 34 games and 157 plate appearances. I'm guessing he starts in Salem, but would be surprised if he isn't in Portland by the time June rolls around if he continues to mash. It might even be sooner. He's about as valuable as Devers because he's closer, though Devers has a higher ceiling at the plate by a significant margin.
 
That said, if they are really confident in Castillo being worth the 7 year investment, there's a pretty good argument for cashing in on Margot while his value is as high as it is. In the minor league forum I have Devers in a tier above Margot, so if asked to draw the line, I probably put it between the two of them.
 

Buzzkill Pauley

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 30, 2006
10,569
Snodgrass'Muff said:
That said, if they are really confident in Castillo being worth the 7 year investment, there's a pretty good argument for cashing in on Margot while his value is as high as it is. In the minor league forum I have Devers in a tier above Margot, so if asked to draw the line, I probably put it between the two of them.
 
The other thing that the Sox need to consider when trading prospects is the relative numbers of various skill-sets within the organization. 
 
Devers' age, LH power, and strike-zone control combines into a potentially tremendous offensive asset which doesn't appear to have a cognate elsewhere in the organization.  Margot had a great year and is now getting justified prospect hype, but the Sox have other CF options who are likely to still be under club control if/when he is MLB-ready.  Devers, if everything should break exactly right, is pretty much the Sox' only possible cost-controlled replacement for David Ortiz. 
 
Of course, that's unlikely...but it likely makes trading Margot easier than trading Devers.
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,459
One of SoSH's own suggests the Red Sox made a trade with the Reds - not for Cueto/Latos, but rather Joey Votto. I'm not sure Laurila's proposed deal gets it done, but I'm wondering what others think of that idea. The Reds would save some money, while the Red Sox would get a high-OBP offensive star (when healthy) to help them transition into a post-Ortiz/post-Napoli world. Presumably, they would send an outfielder over in the deal, but I don't think the cost in terms of players would be terribly high due to the money involved. It doesn't seem like that awful of an idea to me.
 

lxt

New Member
Sep 12, 2012
525
Massachusetts
How about a change in the way the rotation and pen are handled. I’m suggesting going with 6 starters and 7 in the pen. A rotation that allows Lester to pitch every 5th game while the rest of the group pitches on a 6 game rotation. Lester gets 32 starts but they rest of the rotation gets 25 – 26 starts. The pen has a couple of long arms in it to cover weak starts but the other 5 are all short guys. Maybe with two closer types to handle an odd-even split and to ensure guys like Uehara don’t get burned out.
 
The Sox need to look at getting a "shut down" pen that is three innings deep and can be there almost every night and a quality front-liner like Lester with a solid bunch of respectable starter is essential to being competitive (Bumgarner and company and to some extent Shields and the KC gang). They have the position players, well almost, now they need to focus on the arms and allowing the offense/defense to have a chance. Lester with guys like Kelly & Buchholz (if he can ever stay healthy) and the young arms (RDLR, Workman, Webster, Ranaudo, Wright, Wilson, Barnes, Ownes & Johnson) may have what is needed. The pen is what needs to be upgraded with two to three arms not just Miller.
 
Try getting Chapman from the Reds and if possible – sign guys like Miller, Sergio Romo, Street, Soriano, Neshak or Morales (LH)
 
Something like: (Assuming just Lester & Miller are brought back & Uehara resigned)
Lester
Kelly
Buchholz
RDLR
Webster
Ranaudo
 
Uehara
Miller
Tawaza
Workmen
Layne
Wright
Wilson
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
lxt, not sure how many of these bullpen arms you're looking to sign, but if you're talking 3 or so I would rather spend the money on another top of the rotation guy to go along with (in your scenario) Lester. You're advocating giving 50-54 starts between your #5 and #6 starters. You better be damn sure you've got a rotation strong enough to do that when you're calling on Buchholz and Kelly to be you're #2 and #3. To me you're spreading more starts amongst mediocrity and the untested and if that's the case your bullpen may well be heavily taxed. Right now I see Kelly and Buchholz better suited to be #3 and #4 guys at best. IMO 6 man rotations are something you go with on a limited basis at times to give guys a break or experiment with out of necessity.
 

mfried

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 23, 2005
1,680
lxt said:
How about a change in the way the rotation and pen are handled. I’m suggesting going with 6 starters and 7 in the pen. A rotation that allows Lester to pitch every 5th game while the rest of the group pitches on a 6 game rotation. Lester gets 32 starts but they rest of the rotation gets 25 – 26 starts. The pen has a couple of long arms in it to cover weak starts but the other 5 are all short guys. Maybe with two closer types to handle an odd-even split and to ensure guys like Uehara don’t get burned out.
 
The Sox need to look at getting a "shut down" pen that is three innings deep and can be there almost every night and a quality front-liner like Lester with a solid bunch of respectable starter is essential to being competitive (Bumgarner and company and to some extent Shields and the KC gang). They have the position players, well almost, now they need to focus on the arms and allowing the offense/defense to have a chance. Lester with guys like Kelly & Buchholz (if he can ever stay healthy) and the young arms (RDLR, Workman, Webster, Ranaudo, Wright, Wilson, Barnes, Ownes & Johnson) may have what is needed. The pen is what needs to be upgraded with two to three arms not just Miller.
 
Try getting Chapman from the Reds and if possible – sign guys like Miller, Sergio Romo, Street, Soriano, Neshak or Morales (LH)
 
Something like: (Assuming just Lester & Miller are brought back & Uehara resigned)
Lester
Kelly
Buchholz
RDLR
Webster
Ranaudo
 
Uehara
Miller
Tawaza
Workmen
Layne
Wright
Wilson
Is a Workmen multiple of Workman?  Seriously, I doubt Ranaudo will ever be no. 5 on a championship rotation.
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
lxt, you are advocating for a three man bench. How do you propose to make that work? If we are going to throw radical changes to roster construction around, an eleven man pitching staff makes more sense than thirteen given the outfield crunch and there's almost no chance of that. Like your idea of acquiring three front line starters, this makes no sense. Thinking outside the box is all well as good, but try grounding suggestions in something resembling reality.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Danny_Darwin said:
One of SoSH's own suggests the Red Sox made a trade with the Reds - not for Cueto/Latos, but rather Joey Votto. I'm not sure Laurila's proposed deal gets it done, but I'm wondering what others think of that idea. The Reds would save some money, while the Red Sox would get a high-OBP offensive star (when healthy) to help them transition into a post-Ortiz/post-Napoli world. Presumably, they would send an outfielder over in the deal, but I don't think the cost in terms of players would be terribly high due to the money involved. It doesn't seem like that awful of an idea to me.
Joey Votto is my favorite non-Sox player in baseball. That being said, the Red Sox should stay far, far away. The only way that deal proposed works is if the Sox take on nearly the entire Votto contract and that is a horrible idea. He's owed nearly $200 million through 2023, and he's already 31. I have a very hard time picturing the back of that deal working out well, and I'm uninterested in seeing it play out in a Red Sox uni. 
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,514
Anyone suggesting the Sox (or any team) go to a 6 man rotation is playing some weird fantasy baseball with themselves.  It's just not happening.  You're taking starts away from your best 3 and giving more to your bottom 3.  Even a good argument showing rest= better pitchers, it's just not happening.  Not.
 

lxt

New Member
Sep 12, 2012
525
Massachusetts
Snodgrass'Muff said:
lxt, you are advocating for a three man bench. How do you propose to make that work? If we are going to throw radical changes to roster construction around, an eleven man pitching staff makes more sense than thirteen given the outfield crunch and there's almost no chance of that. Like your idea of acquiring three front line starters, this makes no sense. Thinking outside the box is all well as good, but try grounding suggestions in something resembling reality.
The bench would be Holt & Swihart, unless a 1B/C backup can be found with either Nava or Craig because they can play LF, some 1B and possibly RF in a pinch. Betts can also be used as a fill-in at 2B. Keep JBJ, Swihart/Butler, Weeks and Cecchini in the minors (AAA) to cover OF, C, 2B/SS & 3B respectively. 
 
I'd rather the three front-line starters but I almost lost my figures suggesting that one.
 
Just trying to liven up the discussion with an alternative that does not require a great deal of disruption to the existing roster other than trying to unload some OF'ers.
 
I have to agree with Hillbilly in that Votto would be a nice addition except for his contract.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,796
Also, the idea of putting together a great bullpen is a nice one, but relievers are so inconsistent that it seems risky to build a roster that has this strategy as it's core principle. The Red Sox had a great bullpen in the 2013 playoffs, but it wasn't the one they envisioned in April, as Hanrahan, Bailey, Miller were all hurt and Thornton sucked. Moreover over the past decade or so Red Sox fans have seen historically great relievers just fall off a cliff, including Foulke in 2005, Gagne in 2007, Bard in 2011 and Uehara in 2014. (And, to a lesser degree, Papelbon in 2010). Investing huge money in three relief pitchers at the expense of other positions and banking on them all being effective and healthy after 162 games seems like a likely way to blow huge money.
 

keninten

New Member
Nov 24, 2005
588
Tennessee
With a 3 man bench would you have to put guys on the DL even if the have a nagging injury that would keep them out only a couple days?
 

lxt

New Member
Sep 12, 2012
525
Massachusetts
geoduck no quahog said:
Can we all just admit it's a stupid idea and move on?
 
edit: Sorry, I have literally no more to say on the topic.
At this point and with so many disliking the thought I am in 100% agreement.
 

lxt

New Member
Sep 12, 2012
525
Massachusetts
snowmanny said:
Also, the idea of putting together a great bullpen is a nice one, but relievers are so inconsistent that it seems risky to build a roster that has this strategy as it's core principle. The Red Sox had a great bullpen in the 2013 playoffs, but it wasn't the one they envisioned in April, as Hanrahan, Bailey, Miller were all hurt and Thornton sucked. Moreover over the past decade or so Red Sox fans have seen historically great relievers just fall off a cliff, including Foulke in 2005, Gagne in 2007, Bard in 2011 and Uehara in 2014. (And, to a lesser degree, Papelbon in 2010). Investing huge money in three relief pitchers at the expense of other positions and banking on them all being effective and healthy after 162 games seems like a likely way to blow huge money.
I did not say sacrifice other areas nor did I suggest this to be the core principle. Bullpen arms can be an inexpensive way to rebuild a pitching staff with short term commitments. Buying two, three or four pen arms gives you multiple options if one or two fail rather than dumping a boatload of money into a single closer who can easily have an injury or be adversely affected by a change in leagues. The idea was to bring on arms that would quickly strengthen the pen while going after a single (Lester) front-line arm and adding a quality 3B (Headley) to the team without making any significant changes to the roster other than potentially trading away the excise OF players.
 
There was more insanity in the suggestion, however; you've done a nice job of pointing out how depending on a pen to be a core principal in your organizational strategy can backfire. 
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Here's the list of relievers that are going to be available this offseason:
 
RHP
Jason Grilli (38)
LaTroy Hawkins (42) – $2.25MM club option with a $250K buyout
Casey Janssen (33)
David Robertson (30)
Francisco Rodriguez (33)
Sergio Romo (32)
Rafael Soriano (35) – $14MM vesting/club option
Huston Street (31) – $7MM club option
Koji Uehara (40)

Mike Adams (36) – $6MM club option
Matt Albers (32)
Burke Badenhop (32)
Andrew Bailey (31)
Matt Belisle (34)
Heath Bell (37)
Jared Burton (34)
Joba Chamberlain (29)
Jesse Crain (34)
Kyle Farnsworth (39)
Jason Frasor (38)
Kyuji Fujikawa (34) – $5.5MM club/vesting option with a $500K buyout
Luke Gregerson (31)
Matt Guerrier (36)
Luke Hochevar (31)
Jim Johnson (32)
Matt Lindstrom (35)
Jeff Manship (30)
Nick Masset (33)
Daisuke Matsuzaka (34)
Dustin McGowan (32) – $4MM club option with a $500K buyout
Jason Motte (33)
Pat Neshek (34)
Darren O’Day (32) – $4.25MM club option with a $400K buyout
Juan Carlos Oviedo (33)
Joel Peralta (39) – $2.5MM club option
Chris Perez (29)
J.J. Putz (38)
Sergio Santos (31) – $6MM club option with a $750K buyout
Joakim Soria (30) – $7MM club option with a $500K buyout
Kevin Slowey (31)
Tim Stauffer (32)
Jose Veras (34)
Jamey Wright (40)
 
LHP

Joe Beimel (38)
Craig Breslow (34) – $4MM club option with a $100K buyout
Sean Burnett (32) – $4.5MM club/vesting option with a $500K buyout
Phil Coke (32)
Neal Cotts (35)
Scott Downs (39)
Zach Duke (32)
Tom Gorzelanny (32)
Andrew Miller (30)
Franklin Morales (29)
Josh Outman (30)
Joe Thatcher (33)
 
I think Layne has done well enough that he should be the primary LHP going into the season, unless Miller is resigned. 
 
Out of the RHP, I'd like to see them sign Gregerson and Hochevar, but I'm not sure when the latter will be able to pitch again. 
 
Note that the list isn't final, as options haven't been exercised yet. Hudson Street, for example, is very likely to have his club option picked up. 
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
If they really wanted to be radical with their bullpen they would... wait for it... they'd get rid of the designated closer and have an actual relief ace this time but it will never happen.

I'd love a 5 man bench but re: 13 pitchers, if you have a Brock Holt that can play any position, A C/1b and a team with 2 players in the OF capable of playing CF, you'd just carry an all glove SS with good speed or w/e. I wouldn't suggest it. It really limits your ability to carry a decent bat on the bench or have a platoon. You'd basically need 2 Brock Holt's and one would have to be a good SS considering Xander is meh. Deven Merrero could be that guy I guess but will he hit?

I'll let the idea die since I think it poses a lot of problems, but with a versatile roster and players with options it could be done.

Anyway, a 5 man bench seems like a plus in this new run scoring enviroment where pitchers theoritically go deeper in games and the MRs are of far better quality possibly due to specialization. Maybe the Sox could go with a specialized bench instead. A 5 man bench allows you to have Nava/Craig/Vic/Holt/Catcher, but even then you'd want to find a better backup SS with the glove which I think will be a need on this team. One of the Nava/Vic/Craig group needs to go unless Cespedes does.

This all assumes Holt isn't our 3b and Betts is our RF/CF. Plus with speed playing even more a part in todays game, carrying a guy who just comes in to steal bases late and can play passable D who can't hit a lick have more value over a 7th bullpen guy. Think JBJ's bat and D with great/elite baserunning. Although his D is elite, so maybe not a good example. Or with power at a premium, you can carry a Bryce Brentz type if you didn't already have the glut.

That 5th bench spot adds so much more room for customization than a mopup pitcher. Even if you have 7 above average MRs it seems a waste of resources and that there would be a trickle down effect in value (the law of diminishing return) but front offices are smarter than I. Maybe 7 man bullpens keep players healthier longer. Or maybe the 5th bench player suffers from that same flaw but it gives you more choices.
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,980
Quite a few decent buy low options in the reliever market.  I don't care if the Royals win the World Series - signing two or three of Robertson, Koji, Miller, Crain to 3 year deals is just a waste of money.
 
Focus on guys like Johnson, Lindstrom, Hochevar, Perez, Veras, Janssen, Motte and Albers to complement what we already have and see if they can get their shit together.
 

ALiveH

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
1,104
koji will be expensive but i doubt he gets 3 years going into his age 40 season.  it's not like he's been super-durable his whole career.
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,459
Maybe this is worth a new thread as it speaks to a larger philosophical discussion, but I was wondering about when the team makes the decision on the long-term roles of Ranaudo and Barnes - I'm assuming Workman is going back to the pen full-time and Rubby (and maybe Webster) will get some more rope in the rotation, but the other two seem in play for relief roles. Obviously some of this will depend on how many bodies they acquire for the rotation - my guess is they aim for one from the Lester-Hamels-Scherzer-Shields tier and one from the McCarthy-Santana tier, but who knows - and Cherington will probably grab a reliever or two regardless, and one of them will probably get traded, but still: should whoever's left be competing for an SP or RP spot with the 2015 BRS?
 
Also, before you ask: I'm not talking about Owens for this as I believe the team thinks he needs more time in AAA (I also think he's the most likely prospect to be in a different system by next April, but that's not really germane to the discussion).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.