This offense demands accuracy. A lot of these slants and crossing routes are designed for YAC. When Tannehill isn't leading them or hitting them accurately, it defeats the purpose. He gets it in the general area of the receiver, but he's missing the accuracy required for him to take that next step.Clears Cleaver said:If Tannehill cannot thrive in this offense then he cannot be a good NFL QB. and so far after two games I'd say he cannot thrive. He has cost them at least 30 points with inaccurate passes so far after two games
30 points?Clears Cleaver said:If Tannehill cannot thrive in this offense then he cannot be a good NFL QB. and so far after two games I'd say he cannot thrive. He has cost them at least 30 points with inaccurate passes so far after two games
Not that he needs me to defend him, but I assumed CC didn't mean that literally. Tannehill has been frustrating to the point that, if I'm not mistaken, there's been a few times where he had more than one miss on the same drive that could have or should have resulted in scores. I'd have to go back and look at the games to confirm, but I'd say there have been at least 3 drives that should have ended in a touchdown if not for one or more errant Tannehill tosses. So I think you could say he's left at least 18 points out there, but quite possibly 4 or 5 throws altogether that could have ended up as TDs. Hence the 30-point reference.CaptainLaddie said:30 points?
30 points???
Just to be clear, if they had 30 more points, they'd have 73. That's 15 more points than the Saints, the highest scoring team in the league.
That's a dumb statement.
Tony C said:I was flipping in and out on this game and, yeah, where was that guy last week for the Pats? Really poor accuracy.
If we want to cut him a little slack, if we are giving the Dolphins those "30 points left on the field" then we should also be comparing them not other teams actual point totals but other teams totals if we account for "points left on the field". I mean the Chiefs were inside the 5 twice today and did not get any points. That is 14 point right there.CaptainLaddie said:He said, "at least 30 points". Even if you don't mean it literally (and cut it in half), he's basically saying the Dolphins have the best offense in the NFL so far, which clearly (based on the offensive personnel the Dolphins have) simply isn't true.
Ain't that the truth.CaptainLaddie said:He said, "at least 30 points". Even if you don't mean it literally (and cut it in half), he's basically saying the Dolphins have the best offense in the NFL so far, which clearly (based on the offensive personnel the Dolphins have) simply isn't true.
I disagree. Last week his receivers dropped more passes which had a big impact on his completion percentage. Today he was off all game long. And a lot of it wasn't related to pressure, which is what makes it so troubling.DrewDawg said:
He was more accurate this week than last week.
He's out 4-8 weeks, he landed on the arm and immediately writhed around.Deathofthebambino said:Did anyone see the Moreno injury? All I saw was a little blurb on ESPN that referred to it as "gruesome," but reading here, it seems you guys have some hope he's back soon.
He actually had his arm stretched out and right aaa he was landing, a linebacker came in a hit him right in the elbow. Definitely hyperextended it, and lucky he didn't end up with a dislocation that would require surgery.Stitch01 said:He's out 4-8 weeks, he landed on the arm and immediately writhed around.
I think EJ Manuel is going to turn out to be a solid QB. Injuries might derail him, but he had some great moments last year. I see his upside as Kaepernick with better decision making and accuracy. (As a Pats fan I have been impressed with Tannehill and scared he becomes a star too so make of that what you will.)rymflaherty said:That was all kinds of disappointing.
I'm not shocked Buffalo beat them, but I am surprised that they let EJ Manuel look like a Pro-Bowl QB, and that they failed in really all 3 phases of the game.
Buffalo has had their number for a while, so I'm not ready to bail and forget all the positives from week 1. They have 2 winnable games coming up, so they can right things quick, and we'll see where they stand then.
I just hope the injury situation doesn't become too much to overcome.
Silverdude2167 said:Never as good as you look on your best day, never as bad as you look on your worst. So where is the middle ground?
Yay, Daniel Thomas is back.Clears Cleaver said:Daniel Thomas resigned. Interesting how long a look Damian Williams got in the second half. They must be down on miller.
This team needs to beat KC. GB is a toss up. 3-1 would be fine. 2-2 and it's a tough road to make playoffs
Clears Cleaver said:Pats had to play in brutal heat and dolphins dominated them. Dolphins had to go to buffalo on day they honored Wilson, Jim Kelly and new owner who promised to keep them. Plus, bills strengths are Miami weaknesses. Still, you hope that Tannehill wouldn't suck. And he sucked.
Division is wide open.
Daniel Thomas resigned. Interesting how long a look Damian Williams got in the second half. They must be down on miller.
This team needs to beat KC. GB is a toss up. 3-1 would be fine. 2-2 and it's a tough road to make playoffs[/quote
Miller had an ankle injury and the game was out of reach for most of the second half. Think Williams time was mostly due to not risking re-injury for Miller
Clears Cleaver said:Pats had to play in brutal heat and dolphins dominated them. Dolphins had to go to buffalo on day they honored Wilson, Jim Kelly and new owner who promised to keep them. Plus, bills strengths are Miami weaknesses. Still, you hope that Tannehill wouldn't suck. And he sucked.
Division is wide open.
CaptainLaddie said:
No it's not.
Seriously, it's not.
You guys are the most bi-polar fans in the world. In the first quarter of the Minnesota game, someone called DMC's int "season saving."Shelterdog said:
Be a dear and let them have September. They are a week away from the biggest win the franchise has had in a decade.
If only we had more information than team records to project the rest of the season.sodenj5 said:You guys are the most bi-polar fans in the world. In the first quarter of the Minnesota game, someone called DMC's int "season saving."
Now that NE knocks off an AP-less Minnesota with Matt Cassel fluttering the ball all over your secondary, all of your problems are fixed, and NE is back in the Super Bowl.
Enjoy your win. You're still 1-1, just like 3 other teams in the division.
Shelterdog said:
Be a dear and let them have September. They are a week away from the biggest win the franchise has had in a decade.
...and still in sole possession of last place (going by divisional records).sodenj5 said:You guys are the most bi-polar fans in the world. In the first quarter of the Minnesota game, someone called DMC's int "season saving."
Now that NE knocks off an AP-less Minnesota with Matt Cassel fluttering the ball all over your secondary, all of your problems are fixed, and NE is back in the Super Bowl.
Enjoy your win. You're still 1-1, just like 3 other teams in the division.
And how does that math work? Are you speaking of Brady's first two games or what you would project out for the entire season?Clears Cleaver said:The division is wide open. Even though there is only one slightly above average QB playing in it.
Not so fast. Whatever. They and Pouncey will all available after the bye, one way or the other. Oakland and KC are "beatable" without them.Clears Cleaver said:Dion Jordan and reshad should return this week given the change in the new drug policy. They will be eligible immediately.
I'm starting to become convinced that Tanny's all up in his own head right now. Dude still throws well when he doesn't have time to think. 7-8/44yds on Sunday when under pressure. Granted he's just dumping it off, but combined with his well-documented strength of throwing on the run and arm strength that belies his inability to lead receivers after they create separation on deep routes, and I'm going with it's psychological. Time for Lazor to work some mental magic on the kid.pdaj said:Ryan Tannehill is playing very, very average right now, with accuracy being a major issue at the moment. But not playing well and not being good enough are two entirely different things. Considering the new offense and offensive line work-in-progress, I'm not going to consider the latter option until we're past the half-way point. Aside from the deep ball, accuracy hasn't been an issue the past two seasons -- in fact, it's been a strength -- so I'm fairly positive he'll work through his current funk.
After a team's first 4 games, 2-2 is a success. 3-1 would be great, but I'll take 2-2. During the first quarter of the season, teams are still working out the kinks. It's the next 4 games (after the BYE) that will provide us with the clearest picture of this team's potential.
Reminder that we want to challenge assumptions on a post no matter who you are rooting for, but should refrain from attacking the poster him/herself.RIrooter09 said:Why are you feeding CC? His work in the UConn threads prove he's nothing but a front running, reactionary troll.
CaptainLaddie said:He said, "at least 30 points". Even if you don't mean it literally (and cut it in half), he's basically saying the Dolphins have the best offense in the NFL so far, which clearly (based on the offensive personnel the Dolphins have) simply isn't true.
RIrooter09 said:Why are you feeding CC? His work in the UConn threads prove he's nothing but a front running, reactionary troll.
Stitch01 said:I'll bet the Pats vs. the field at even money for pretty much any amount and donate winnings to the Jimmy Fund. Seems like a pretty good bet for a wide open division.
Clears Cleaver said:
Well, OK then. Why would anyone make that bet when they can make significantly more in Vegas? Why don't you make the Pats bet in Vegas and I'll make my bet in vegas (betting all three teams) and then donate winnings to Jimmy Fund? or something like that? not that I ever really bet on sports.
The division is wide open IMO because the Pats are soft along the lines and the other three teams in the division are solid along the lines. They are just bad matchups for the Pats. Plus, Brady just isn't playing as well as he was. he and BB are the only difference between these teams. In fact, I bet most pundits would prefer the Bills or Miami's talent 2-53 over NE. BB is > MArrone, Philbin and Rex. Brady > Manuel, Tannehill and Geno (three of the five worst QBs in the league perhaps). I haven't analyzed the schedules or anything, but presumably the PAts is tougher?
CaptainLaddie said:Just because you think they left 19 points on the field doesn't mean they did.
And nice of you to acknowledge that you're a troll.
Well since discussion boards are predicated on the exchange of honestly held views there absolutely is a problem with trolling.Clears Cleaver said:
oh boy. just because you have an opinion doesn't mean its true!
there's nothing wrong with trolling, especially if it makes you feel good. especially in a form that is filled with other team's fans. especially Duke, BC and Patriots fans.
Honestly? I didnt think anyone who truly thinks this division is completely wide open or thinks the Dolphins or Bills have more talent than the Pats after quarterback would be the kind of person who thought about odds or anything in a logical manner.Clears Cleaver said:
Well, OK then. Why would anyone make that bet when they can make significantly more in Vegas? Why don't you make the Pats bet in Vegas and I'll make my bet in vegas (betting all three teams) and then donate winnings to Jimmy Fund? or something like that? not that I ever really bet on sports.
The division is wide open IMO because the Pats are soft along the lines and the other three teams in the division are solid along the lines. They are just bad matchups for the Pats. Plus, Brady just isn't playing as well as he was. he and BB are the only difference between these teams. In fact, I bet most pundits would prefer the Bills or Miami's talent 2-53 over NE. BB is > MArrone, Philbin and Rex. Brady > Manuel, Tannehill and Geno (three of the five worst QBs in the league perhaps). I haven't analyzed the schedules or anything, but presumably the PAts is tougher?
Not on this board. Same warning goes to you as well regarding trolling.Clears Cleaver said:there's nothing wrong with trolling, especially if it makes you feel good. especially in a form that is filled with other team's fans. especially Duke, BC and Patriots fans.
Clears Cleaver said:
oh boy. just because you have an opinion doesn't mean its true!
there's nothing wrong with trolling, especially if it makes you feel good. especially in a form that is filled with other team's fans. especially Duke, BC and Patriots fans.
CaptainLaddie said:
You want wide open? Look at the AFC South. Or NFC North. Or even the NFC West.