2015 Patriots 53-man Roster & Practice Squad Watch

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Rico Guapo said:
 
I wonder if this means the Jake Bequette experiment at TE is going well.
 
No, it probably means Derby is injured.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,223
Here
I'm waiting to see if the Giants or Panthers pounce here. Revenge, baby.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
https://twitter.com/PhilAPerry/status/629118843785453568
 
Bill Belichick had the entire defense run a lap late in practice. Coaches too. Matt Patricia ran his with his headset on.
 
https://twitter.com/JamesPalmerTV/status/629117052343713792
 
Jimmy Garoppolo took almost all QB reps in team drills 2night. Asked him if he knows workload B4 practice"No never. It's always a surprise."
 
Jabaal Sheard feeling right at home.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,223
Here
There were 24,000 fans at practice last night. We talkin' 'bout practice...
 

Valek123

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
985
Upper Valley
One of the more exciting elements to yesterday's practice notes was that Jerod Mayo is flying around.  This LB core could be really nasty if all stay healthy through the year and can allow some pretty crazy depth.  I think we forget with how good the other linebackers were last year how incredibly good Mayo has been.  Here's hoping he has an injury free season and shows what he's capable of once again.
 

bakahump

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2001
7,567
Maine
But in "todays base" IE the Nickel we only need 2 LBs and Mayo is a bad fit for that duty.  HT and Collins (esp) are much better matchups.   HT because of his size (With 1 less run defender you need a bigger guy to "eat space" and hold up against any runs out of the nickel)  and Collins because he is a missile who can run with pretty much any TE in the league.
 
Mayo is good sideline to sideline.....but Pass coverage is not his forte.
 
I get your point though....you can never have too many good players....and Mayo is a good player.
 

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
bakahump said:
But in "todays base" IE the Nickel we only need 2 LBs and Mayo is a bad fit for that duty.  HT and Collins (esp) are much better matchups.   HT because of his size (With 1 less run defender you need a bigger guy to "eat space" and hold up against any runs out of the nickel)  and Collins because he is a missile who can run with pretty much any TE in the league.
 
Mayo is good sideline to sideline.....but Pass coverage is not his forte.
 
I get your point though....you can never have too many good players....and Mayo is a good player.
 
I was petrified last year when Mayo went down and they were left basically with Collins and Hightower only.  I figured one of them surely would get hurt.  I was absolutely amazed to see them survive till the end.  And, as we know, Hightower was playing with a significant injury.
 
It'll be nice to have quality depth.
 

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,684
Assuming all three linebackers are healthy, how do they get used in a 'linebacker by committee' sense? 
 

( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)

T&A
SoSH Member
Feb 9, 2010
5,302
Providence, RI
bakahump said:
But in "todays base" IE the Nickel we only need 2 LBs and Mayo is a bad fit for that duty.  HT and Collins (esp) are much better matchups.   HT because of his size (With 1 less run defender you need a bigger guy to "eat space" and hold up against any runs out of the nickel)  and Collins because he is a missile who can run with pretty much any TE in the league.
 
Mayo is good sideline to sideline.....but Pass coverage is not his forte.
 
I get your point though....you can never have too many good players....and Mayo is a good player.
 
We should be past talking the Patriots playing out of any base defense by now.  We all know that week to week they are going to play something different to play to their strengths vs. the offense's weaknesses.  At the end of the year, they very well may end up with a nickel Defense having the greatest % of snaps played, but there could also very well be entire games or long stretches of multiple games where they play with three LBers on the field.  I am going to guess that at the end of the year, assuming good health for all three, that Mayo, Hightower and Collins all end up playing a fairly similar % of defensive snaps.  
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Even in they are playing mostly in two LB sets it will be nice to be able to rotate three competent players through so they arent gassed by games end. Hopefully same thing works on the defensive line too, Nink and Chandler Jones have played stupid amounts of snaps over the last two years (a little better last year, but still, better pass rush come games end if these guys arent dog tired)
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,719
Stupid question: if they are rotating do both Dante H and J Mayo wear helmets with the green dot/communication equipment and it's only turned on for whomever is the designated playcaller for that play? Or...how does that work?
 
The rules make it sound pretty hard to transition, per the following:
 
» Two defensive players from each team will be identified and will be authorized to have receivers in their helmets, one as the primary and the other as the backup.
» The primary player will have one "live" helmet on the field and a second "live" helmet stored in a secured trunk or container as a backup in case of a malfunction.
» The backup player will wear his regular helmet on the field and will have a "live" helmet stored in the secured trunk or container in the event of an injury to the primary player.
» At no time will two defensive players from the same team be permitted to wear "live" helmets, either on the sideline or on the field, after pregame warm-ups or during the game.
 
 
That's from 2008, so maybe that has been refined a bit so not so difficult to rotate out a guy with the green dot? 
 
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d809f61c6/article/nfl-installs-new-coachtodefense-communications-system
 

h8mfy

New Member
Jul 15, 2005
337
Orange County, CA
soxfan121 said:
https://twitter.com/PhilAPerry/status/629118843785453568
 
Bill Belichick had the entire defense run a lap late in practice. Coaches too. Matt Patricia ran his with his headset on.
 
https://twitter.com/JamesPalmerTV/status/629117052343713792
 
Jimmy Garoppolo took almost all QB reps in team drills 2night. Asked him if he knows workload B4 practice"No never. It's always a surprise."
 
Jabaal Sheard feeling right at home.
The Onion is all over it:
 
http://www.theonion.com/article/patriots-tired-jimmy-garoppolo-beginning-every-hud-51022
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,385
soxfan121 said:
Jimmy Garoppolo took almost all QB reps in team drills 2night. Asked him if he knows workload B4 practice"No never. It's always a surprise.
My cousin is a season ticket holder and said Jimmy looked pretty rough. Anyone else there to see how he threw?
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
HomeRunBaker said:
My cousin is a season ticket holder and said Jimmy looked pretty rough. Anyone else there to see how he threw?
 
Zolak says he's "completely different" than Brady - ball comes at a different angle, a little more zip, not as fluid. Plus, no first team receivers. SZ didn't seem worried about it, though.
 

crystalline

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 12, 2009
5,771
JP
soxfan121 said:
 
Zolak says he's "completely different" than Brady - ball comes at a different angle, a little more zip, not as fluid. Plus, no first team receivers. SZ didn't seem worried about it, though.
A little /more/ zip? I have only seen Jimmy G a few times but comparing him and Brady on the slant or quick out has been the opposite. Brady fires those in with heat and Garoppolo leaves more arc on them.

Do other people agree?
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
So obviously this is injury related. Flynn wasn't going to play on Thursday night. He may or may not be back depending on what happens with Brady.
 
That being said, what is the plan for Thursday night? Brady has to be in NY on Wednesday, but that doesn't mean he can't play on Thursday night. Historically Brady hasn't played in the first preseason game, but that could potentially be a little different this year if some/all of his suspension sticks.
 
What do others think - should we expect to see Jimmy wire-to-wire on Thursday night? If so, who is the backup QB? Would they just have Edelman hand the ball off the rest of the game if Jimmy got hurt? Or have Brady do that? Does anyone think Brady will play at all this week?
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
tims4wins said:
So obviously this is injury related. Flynn wasn't going to play on Thursday night. He may or may not be back depending on what happens with Brady.
 
That being said, what is the plan for Thursday night? Brady has to be in NY on Wednesday, but that doesn't mean he can't play on Thursday night. Historically Brady hasn't played in the first preseason game, but that could potentially be a little different this year if some/all of his suspension sticks.
 
What do others think - should we expect to see Jimmy wire-to-wire on Thursday night? If so, who is the backup QB? Would they just have Edelman hand the ball off the rest of the game if Jimmy got hurt? Or have Brady do that? Does anyone think Brady will play at all this week?
 
We need to wait for the details on the transaction to be sure it is injury related, as he'll most likely get some kind of settlement on his way out. Reiss or Miguel will eventually reveal it, as it has (very minor) cap implications. 
 
I do expect JG wire-to-wire unless Garrett Gilbert* is walking through that door. No one else would know the playbook, unless the Highlander has been cut since I last checked**.
 
* Still on Detroit's roster.
** Still with Miami.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
Well he was on the active/NFI list with a hamstring injury, and hasn't really practiced, so he is definitely injured. You are right that he will likely receive a small settlement.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
crystalline said:
A little /more/ zip? I have only seen Jimmy G a few times but comparing him and Brady on the slant or quick out has been the opposite. Brady fires those in with heat and Garoppolo leaves more arc on them.
 
Ah, I am guilty of being imprecise with the terminology. JG's ball has more zip, as in he has less touch. Brady delivers a low ball (or wherever the best location to keep a defender away from making a play) whereas JG's delivers a ball that's more on a line, quickly. 
 
I should have said touch and explained it better. Brady's delivery is almost always tailored to the customer; JG's less polished, more rushed and less deft. 
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
tims4wins said:
Well he was on the active/NFI list with a hamstring injury, and hasn't really practiced, so he is definitely injured. You are right that he will likely receive a small settlement.
 
True, but it might have been that he was showing nothing in the film room. If he hooks on with another club before the end of camp, he was "injured". Far more likely, you are correct and his inability to get over the hammy is the reason.
 
ETA: I'm most interested in whether he was "waived-injured" or just flat out "waived". It's a small, stupid detail. Sorry for being overly precise.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
soxfan121 said:
 
True, but it might have been that he was showing nothing in the film room. If he hooks on with another club before the end of camp, he was "injured". Far more likely, you are correct and his inability to get over the hammy is the reason.
 
ETA: I'm most interested in whether he was "waived-injured" or just flat out "waived". It's a small, stupid detail. Sorry for being overly precise.
 
Eh, what else would us diehards obsess over if not for these types of minutiae?
 

crystalline

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 12, 2009
5,771
JP
soxfan121 said:
 
Ah, I am guilty of being imprecise with the terminology. JG's ball has more zip, as in he has less touch. Brady delivers a low ball (or wherever the best location to keep a defender away from making a play) whereas JG's delivers a ball that's more on a line, quickly. 
 
I should have said touch and explained it better. Brady's delivery is almost always tailored to the customer; JG's less polished, more rushed and less deft. 
Yeah. Count me worried about Jimmy G. I don't think he's the answer. We will see.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
crystalline said:
Yeah. Count me worried about Jimmy G. I don't think he's the answer. We will see.
 
If this is based on numbers and practice reports, I think Jeff Howe's numbers (and the corresponding number of drops and/or blown-up plays by the defense) need to be considered. 
 
Brady's clocking in around 80% in the preseason; JG at 63% (last I checked). Is tht 17% because the (near) 17 years of practice Brady owns over him? I think it's a big part. "Tailored" is a pretty good term here - Brady knows exactly how to cut and sew: JG is still measuring and checking the manual. 
 
ETA: And anyone would look bad in comparison to the GOAT. If you want some laughs, check the Buffalo practice reports for the numbers of Cassel, Manuel & Taylor. WOOF.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,924
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
soxfan121 said:
 
If this is based on numbers and practice reports, I think Jeff Howe's numbers (and the corresponding number of drops and/or blown-up plays by the defense) need to be considered. 
 
Brady's clocking in around 80% in the preseason; JG at 63% (last I checked). Is tht 17% because the (near) 17 years of practice Brady owns over him? I think it's a big part. "Tailored" is a pretty good term here - Brady knows exactly how to cut and sew: JG is still measuring and checking the manual. 
 
ETA: And anyone would look bad in comparison to the GOAT. If you want some laughs, check the Buffalo practice reports for the numbers of Cassel, Manuel & Taylor. WOOF.
I'll trust the opinion of the PFW guys on this, as they tend to be very even keeled in analyzing practice performance, even if they're team employees.

None of them have been very impressed with Garoppolo so far, saying he's holding the ball too long and being very indecisive in general. They don't seem worried about it, as he hasn't been downright bad by any means and it's normal for quarterbacks to go through growing pains, especially with his best receiving options being out, but they are a bit puzzled with some of the praise he received, especially early in camp.

I haven't been to a single practice, so I have no clue how accurate that assessment is, but I don't know if completion percentage is the best stat to judge quarterbacks by in practice.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,504
deep inside Guido territory
He looked absolutely terrible(worse than how he's looked this year) in practice last training camp yet came out in the games and shined.  I wonder if he simply hasn't learned yet to bring his A-game every day in practice yet.  He better start doing so however.  
 

crystalline

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 12, 2009
5,771
JP
No I haven't seen any practices this year, and I hadn't seen the numbers (which, being football numbers, I wouldn't weight strongly anyway.)

What I've seen in the past is that Jimmy G's arm strength isn't as good as Brady's. If he's looking indecisive too, then well, woof. The arm strength difference was a surprise to me when I saw them last year. It may just be a positive reflection on Brady that at 38 he still has a cannon which he uses to his advantage on those quick routes.

On the other hand Brady looked very raw too when he started out.


Edit: I didn't think Jimmy looked good in the preseason games last year either. He looked inaccurate.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
soxfan121 said:
 
We need to wait for the details on the transaction to be sure it is injury related, as he'll most likely get some kind of settlement on his way out. Reiss or Miguel will eventually reveal it, as it has (very minor) cap implications. 
 
soxfan121 said:
ETA: I'm most interested in whether he was "waived-injured" or just flat out "waived". It's a small, stupid detail. Sorry for being overly precise.
Flynn wasn't hurt practicing with the Pats, so I don't think he is entitled to any kind of injury settlement. Plus if he has an injury settlement, the Pats can't re-sign him for 6 weeks, which kind of defeats the point of Matt Flynn. Waived/injured means he's going on IR; I don't think that will happen, and they could just leave him on the NFI anyway.
 
rodderick said:
I'll trust the opinion of the PFW guys on this, as they tend to be very even keeled in analyzing practice performance, even if they're team employees.

None of them have been very impressed with Garoppolo so far, saying he's holding the ball too long and being very indecisive in general. They don't seem worried about it, as he hasn't been downright bad by any means and it's normal for quarterbacks to go through growing pains, especially with his best receiving options being out, but they are a bit puzzled with some of the praise he received, especially early in camp.

I haven't been to a single practice, so I have no clue how accurate that assessment is, but I don't know if completion percentage is the best stat to judge quarterbacks by in practice.
I was at practice on Saturday and I saw indecisiveness and hesitation, too, but it should be noted that the WR group is really banged up and all the DBs are practicing. It's one thing to hold the ball because you don't know what's going on; it's another to be holding the ball because you're waiting for Jonathan Krause to get off Bradley Fletcher's press or Chris Harper to shake Malcolm Butler. But in general I think this is the part of Garoppolo's game that needs the most work - he's really quick and accurate when he's in a rhythm and can just rock and fire out of the shotgun, but start throwing good initial coverage at him combined with muddy pockets and you don't really know what you're going to get.
 
As for arm strength, Brady hums it in there with more velocity but he generally uses his whole body; I wouldn't be surprised if Garoppolo has better pure arm strength. Jimmy showed a tighter spiral on the deep balls. That stuff's all pretty overrated compared to general accuracy and a nuanced understanding of what the offense and defense are doing, of course.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
amarshal2 said:
 
 
Please elaborate for the unenlightened.  Thanks.  
Some of us were speculating last year that Googe likes big OL, hence starting guys like Marcus Cannon (6'5" 335) and Jordan Devey (6'6" 320). 2014 draftees Jon Halapio (6'4" 320) and Cameron Fleming (6'6" 325) also fit that mold, as do Groy and Tre' Jackson (6'4" 330). But as Josh notes, Shaq Mason (6'1" 300) is on the small side, and Ryan Wendell (6'2" 300) started 15 games last year, and Josh Kline (6'3" 295) was one of the key backups, so who the hell knows.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,504
deep inside Guido territory
Super Nomario said:
Some of us were speculating last year that Googe likes big OL, hence starting guys like Marcus Cannon (6'5" 335) and Jordan Devey (6'6" 320). 2014 draftees Jon Halapio (6'4" 320) and Cameron Fleming (6'6" 325) also fit that mold, as do Groy and Tre' Jackson (6'4" 330). But as Josh notes, Shaq Mason (6'1" 300) is on the small side, and Ryan Wendell (6'2" 300) started 15 games last year, and Josh Kline (6'3" 295) was one of the key backups, so who the hell knows.
The Patriots under Scar liked to bring in smaller, versatile, and athletic OL.  Look at guys like Dan Connolly, Stephen Neal, and Dan Koppen as examples of interior linemen who weren't very big.  It make some sense that they'd draft guys like Mason still because Scar does a lot of predraft scouting for Belichick.  
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,105
A Scud Away from Hell
Plus, Shaq Mason is pretty much unproven as a pass blocker. Georgia Tech utilizes virtually zero shotgun plays, runs options, and is as old school as you can get. 
 
Besides the measurements, it has always been a huge question whether Mason can fill out one of the guard spots in year 1. 
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
SeoulSoxFan said:
Plus, Shaq Mason is pretty much unproven as a pass blocker. Georgia Tech utilizes virtually zero shotgun plays, runs options, and is as old school as you can get. 
 
Besides the measurements, it has always been a huge question whether Mason can fill out one of the guard spots in year 1. 
 
The Mason pick was always a little strange going as high as he did--his size makes more sense at center but why bother drafting another center with Stork having just finished a year?  I assume they thought he was just potentially really special despite his size--maybe they saw a young Brian Waters type (waters was 6'2" 280 at the combine) who could be your FB/6th OL/blocking TE/lineman on kick returns as a rookie and then grow into a starting spot as a second year. 
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
Chris White? He was a core ST player last year, was he not? Even got penalized in the Ravens game IIRC. Bodes well for the other LBs like James Morris.
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,105
A Scud Away from Hell
tims4wins said:
Chris White? He was a core ST player last year, was he not? Even got penalized in the Ravens game IIRC. Bodes well for the other LBs like James Morris.
He was on PUP. Rhymes with tub.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Shelterdog said:
 
The Mason pick was always a little strange going as high as he did--his size makes more sense at center but why bother drafting another center with Stork having just finished a year?  I assume they thought he was just potentially really special despite his size--maybe they saw a young Brian Waters type (waters was 6'2" 280 at the combine) who could be your FB/6th OL/blocking TE/lineman on kick returns as a rookie and then grow into a starting spot as a second year. 
Yeah, and the fourth round is actually pretty high for an interior lineman, especially one that wasn't invited to the Combine. I suspect you're right and they really liked him.
 
tims4wins said:
Chris White? He was a core ST player last year, was he not? Even got penalized in the Ravens game IIRC. Bodes well for the other LBs like James Morris.
Fourth on the team in ST snaps, just behind Tavon Wilson, Slater, and Bolden and just ahead of Ebner. Good for the other LBs, but also for guys like Wilson and Ebner who figure to contribute more on fourth down than on defense. Josh Boyce is another guy who could benefit - he's having a good camp, has returned kicks in the past, and in practice Saturday he got some work at gunner on the punt team. Special teams contributions might give him an edge over Dobson, Tyms, and Gibson for that fourth WR role.